Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Reliability of the respiratory rate and oxygenation index for successful high-flow nasal cannula support in coronavirus disease pneumonia: a retrospective cohort study

Original Submission
28 Feb 2023 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
4 May 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
12 May 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
31 May 2023 Author responded Author comments - Ryosuke Hirabayashi
Resubmission - Version 5
31 May 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 5
2 Jun 2023 Author responded Author comments - Ryosuke Hirabayashi
Resubmission - Version 6
2 Jun 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 6
13 Jun 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
28 Jun 2023 Author responded Author comments - Ryosuke Hirabayashi
Resubmission - Version 7
28 Jun 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 7
12 Jul 2023 Author responded Author comments - Ryosuke Hirabayashi
Resubmission - Version 8
12 Jul 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 8
18 Jul 2023 Author responded Author comments - Ryosuke Hirabayashi
Resubmission - Version 9
18 Jul 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 9
20 Jul 2023 Author responded Author comments - Ryosuke Hirabayashi
Resubmission - Version 10
20 Jul 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 10
4 Aug 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 11
Submitted Manuscript version 11
Publishing
6 Aug 2023 Editorially accepted
10 Aug 2023 Article published 10.1186/s12890-023-02598-y

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page