Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of intra-operative bronchoscope intervention characteristics between group Acute and Non-acute

From: Lung isolation—a personalized and clinically adapted approach to control bronchoscopy-associated acute massive airway hemorrhage

Group

Group Acute (n = 29)

Group Non-acute (n = 194)

P value

Hemorrhage location

  

0.872

Location I, n (%)

4(13.8)

27(13.9)

 

Location II, n (%)

23(79.3)

158(81.4)

 

Location III, n (%)

2(6.9)

9(4.6)

 

Cause of Hemorrhage

  

0.621

Tumor excision, n (%)

19(65.5)

127(65.5)

 

Biopsy, n (%)

7(24.1)

57(29.4)

 

Stent extraction and implantation, n (%)

2(6.9)

8(4.1)

 

Dilation and tearing, n (%)

1(3.4)

2(1.0)

 

Conventional hemostasis method, n (%)

26(89.7) *

194(100)

0.002

Lung isolation approach

   

Endotracheal tube isolation, n (%)

8(21.6) *

3(1.5)

0.000

Endoscopic balloon isolation, n (%)

4(23.5) *

3(1.5)

0.006

Intravenous infusion of hemostatic, n (%)

25(86.2) *

73(37.6)

0.000

Blood loss volume, ml

1198.28 ± 913.93*

216.18 ± 162.16

0.000

Duration of therapy, mins

93.90 ± 53.07 *

67.80 ± 28.09

0.000

  1. Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation or as numbers and percentages. * was statistically significant compared with Group Non-acute
  2. Location I: hemorrhage lesions were located in the main airway; Location II: hemorrhage lesions were located in the left/right mainstem bronchus; Location III: hemorrhage lesions were located both in the main airway and mainstem bronchus
  3. Group Acute: bronchoscope-related acute massive airway hemorrhage group; Group Non-acute: bronchoscope-related non-acute massive airway hemorrhage group