Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies

From: Incidence of noninvasive ventilation failure and mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and proportion meta-analysis

Author

Year

Country

Design

COVID-19

Male

(%)

Immunosuppression

(%)

Age

PaO2/FiO2

Definition of NIV failure

Patients with ARDS

NIV interface

NIV mode

NIV failure

ICU mortality

Hospital mortality

Rocker

1999

Canada

Observational

No

30%

NA

47 ± 23

102 ± 57

Intubation or death

10

Oronasal

BiPAP

5

3

3

Antonelli

2000

Italy

RCT

No

65%

100%

45 ± 19

129 ± 30

Intubation

8

Oronasal

BiPAP

3

3

NA

Hilbert

2000

France

Observational

No

55%

100%

45 ± 16

128 ± 32

Intubation

64

Oronasal

CPAP

48

44

NA

Delclaux

2000

France

RCT

No

61%

NA

56 (19–85)#

140 (59–228)#

Intubation

40

Oronasal

CPAP

15

9

12

Antonelli

2001

Italy

Observational

No

64%

10%

Success: 58 (16–96)$

Failure: 60 (13–86)$

Success: 119 ± 35

Failure: 120 ± 40

Intubation

86

Oronasal

BiPAP

44

26

NA

Confalonieri

2002

Italy

Observational

No

NA

100%

37 ± 9

122 ± 44

Intubation

24

Oronasal

BiPAP

8

6

NA

Ferrer

2003

Spain

RCT

No

55%

18%

61 ± 17

102 ± 21

Intubation

7

Oronasal

BiPAP

6

5

NA

Zhi

2003

China

Observational

No

42%

NA

40 ± 3

Success: 144 ± 15

Failure: 111 ± 8

Intubation or death

12

Oronasal or nasal

BiPAP

4

NA

4

Xu

2003

China

Observational

No

57%

NA

59 ± 12

Pul*: 147 ± 28

Extrapul*: 163 ± 46

Intubation

23

Oronasal

BiPAP

6

NA

NA

Rai

2004

India

Observational

No

64%

NA

68 (29–82)$

NA

Intubation

4

Oronasal

BiPAP

2

NA

NA

Li

2005

China

Observational

No

72%

NA

Pul*: 38 ± 12

Extrapul*: 34 ± 15

Pul*: 138 ± 29

Extrapul*: 141 ± 33

Intubation

18

Oronasal

BiPAP

8

NA

6

Gu

2005

China

Observational

No

69%

NA

43 (29–84)$

PaO2 51 ± 5

Intubation

29

Oronasal or nasal

BiPAP

4

NA

4

Rana

2006

USA

Observational

No

61%

43%

Success: 60 (46–84)

Failure: 64 (55–73)

Success: 147 (118–209)

Failure: 112 (70–157)

Intubation

54

Oronasal

BiPAP or CPAP

38

NA

26

Antonelli

2007

Italy

Observational

No

63%

15%

Success: 53 (35–64)

Failure: 60 (51–68)

Success: 116 ± 38

Failure: 105 ± 33

Intubation

147

Oronasal or helmet

BiPAP

68

41

53

Adda

2008

France

Observational

No

68%

100%

Success: 59 (47–66)

Failure: 57 (47–67)

PaO2 success: 44 (38–51)

PaO2 failure: 54 (41–59)

Intubation

32

Oronasal

BiPAP

31

NA

NA

Yoshida

2008

Japan

Observational

No

72%

NA

Success: 68 ± 12

Failure: 70 ± 10

Success: 122 ± 43

Failure: 125 ± 51

Intubation

47

Oronasal

BiPAP or CPAP

14

9

13

Domenighetti

2008

Switzerland

Observational

No

42%

NA

66 ± 8

104 ± 42

Intubation

12

Oronasal

BiPAP

4

5

NA

Agarwal

2009

India

Observational

No

43%

43%

42 ± 24

131 ± 46

Intubation

21

Oronasal

BiPAP

12

7

NA

Ding

2009

China

Observational

No

74%

42%

49 ± 17

123 ± 32

Intubation, death or withdrawal of therapy

31

Oronasal

BiPAP or CPAP

8

NA

NA

Zan

2009

China

Observational

No

68%

NA

58 (32–79)$

151 ± 19

Intubation

22

Oronasal

BiPAP

10

NA

9

Wang

2009

China

Observational

No

53%

NA

28 ± 2

229 ± 5

Intubation

21

Oronasal

BiPAP

6

NA

2

Gu

2010

China

Observational

No

65%

NA

38 (28–64)$

PaO2 55 ± 4

Intubation or tracheotomy

40

Oronasal or nasal

BiPAP

9

0

0

Uçgun

2010

Turkey

Observational

No

90%

NA

45 ± 20

NA

Intubation

10

Oronasal

BiPAP

6

3

NA

Gristina

2011

Italy

Observational

No

59%

100%

60 ± 16

NA

NA

89

Oronasal or helmet

BiPAP

53

52

56

Bhadade

2011

India

Observational

No

74%

NA

NA

NA

Intubation

17

Oronasal

NA

11

NA

NA

Bai

2011

China

Observational

No

61%

12%

46 (34–60)

244 (211–290)

Intubation or death

24

NA

NA

11

9

NA

Kirakli

2011

Turkey

Observational

No

44%

NA

39 (24–52)

Survivor: 150 (98–232)

Nonsurvivor: 67 (60–100)

Intubation

10

NA

NA

7

NA

6

Kikuchi

2011a

Japan

Observational

No

70%

NA

69 ± 17

PaO2 79 ± 27

Intubation

17

Oronasal or nasal

BiPAP or CPAP

4

NA

NA

Kikuchi

2011b

Japan

Observational

No

51%

NA

58 ± 23

PaO2 81 ± 43

Intubation

18

Oronasal or nasal

BiPAP or CPAP

6

NA

NA

Carrillo

2012a

Spain

Observational

No

59%

NA

62 ± 18

127 ± 34

Intubation or death

35

Oronasal or nasal

BiPAP

25

NA

13

Carrillo

2012b

Spain

Observational

No

77%

NA

72 ± 11

136 ± 37

Intubation or death

15

Oronasal or nasal

BiPAP

9

NA

7

Sharma

2012

India

Observational

No

52%

NA

48 ± 18

125 ± 78

Intubation

12

Oronasal

BiPAP

9

NA

NA

Zhan

2012

China

RCT

No

76%

24%

44 ± 14

225 ± 17

Intubation

21

Oronasal

BiPAP

1

1

1

Jin

2012

China

Observational

No

37%

NA

Yushu earthquake:

33 ± 20

Wenchuan earthquake:

52 ± 19

NA

Intubation

19

Oronasal

BiPAP

6

NA

NA

Zhi

2012

China

RCT

No

73%

NA

48 ± 17

139 ± 49

Intubation

15

Oronasal

BiPAP or CPAP

5

1

NA

Türkoğlu

2013

Turkey

Observational

No

69%

100%

45 (28–57)

104 (74–165)

Intubation

46

Oronasal

BiPAP

36

34

35

Wang

2013

China

Observational

No

54%

NA

Success: 70 (59–82)

Failure: 60 (47–75)

Success: 192 ± 50

Failure: 170 ± 51

Intubation

24

Oronasal or nasal

NA

20

NA

NA

Thille

2013

France

Observational

No

66%

44%

Success: 58 ± 17

Failure: 63 ± 14

Success: 211 ± 86

Failure: 163 ± 92

Intubation

82

Oronasal

BiPAP

50

24

NA

Zhang

2014a

China

Observational

No

41%

NA

49 ± 10

127 ± 22

NIV intolerance or requirement of intubation or death

17

Oronasal

BiPAP

10

NA

NA

Zhang

2014b

China

Observational

No

53%

NA

48 ± 9

125 ± 24

17

Oronasal

BiPAP

7

NA

NA

Zhang

2014c

China

Observational

No

41%

NA

53 ± 9

132 ± 22

17

Oronasal

BiPAP

4

NA

NA

Verma

2014

India

Observational

No

52%

NA

NA

NA

Intubation

6

Oronasal

BiPAP

6

4

NA

Yu

2014

China

Observational

No

97%

NA

61 ± 7

126 ± 32

Intubation

64

Oronasal

NA

32

NA

2

Tsushima

2014

Japan

Observational

No

77%

NA

Survivor: 71 ± 14

Nonsurvivor: 81 ± 5

Survivor: 143 ± 62

Nonsurvivor: 122 ± 84

Intubation

47

Oronasal

BiPAP

17

NA

12

Sehgal

2015

India

Observational

No

34%

NA

27 (23–36)

180 (166–232)

Intubation

41

Oronasal

BiPAP

23

NA

19

Frat

2015

France

Observational

No

71%

36%

61 (49–68)

192 (158–251)

Intubation

23

Oronasal

BiPAP

8

NA

NA

Chawla

2016

India

Observational

No

62%

NA

49 ± 15

192 ± 51

Intubation

96

Oronasal

BiPAP

42

29

NA

Korkmaz

2016

Turkey

Observational

No

54%

71%

63 ± 16

145 ± 50

Intubation

28

Oronasal

BiPAP

17

NA

NA

Patel

2016a

USA

RCT

No

54%

36%

61 (56–71)

144 (90–223)

Intubation

39

Oronasal

BiPAP

24

NA

19

Patel

2016b

USA

RCT

No

55%

34%

58 (50–68)

118 (93–170)

Intubation

44

Helmet

BiPAP

8

NA

12

Meeder

2016

Netherlands

Observational

No

53%

11%

Success: 73 (28–87)$

Failure: 72 (41–88)$

Success: 296 (211–369)

Failure: 207 (146–296)

Intubation

11

NA

NA

5

NA

NA

Ye

2016

China

Observational

No

60%

NA

54 ± 19

130 ± 46

Intubation

43

Oronasal

BiPAP

17

NA

22

Zhao

2016

China

Observational

No

60%

NA

47 ± 13

NA

Intubation

127

Oronasal or nasal

BiPAP

24

NA

9

Zeng

2016

China

Observational

No

57%

NA

Success: 58 ± 17

Failure: 65 ± 19

Success: 156 ± 12

Failure: 104 ± 10

Intubation

103

Oronasal

BiPAP

34

22

NA

Bellani

2017

Italy

Observational

No

60%

22%

Success: 67 (52–78)

Failure: 63 (53–74)

Success: 171 ± 65

Failure: 145 ± 60

Intubation

349

NA

BiPAP or CPAP

131

79

94

Duan

2017a

China

Observational

No

70%

NA

Success: 65 ± 17

Failure: 66 ± 17

Success: 179 ± 83

Failure: 137 ± 65

Intubation

85

Oronasal

BiPAP or CPAP

61

NA

NA

Duan

2017b

China

Observational

No

62%

NA

Success: 65 ± 17

Failure: 67 ± 17

Success: 165 ± 63

Failure: 146 ± 68

Intubation

45

Oronasal

BiPAP or CPAP

27

NA

NA

Liu

2017

China

Observational

No

71%

100%

Success: 42 ± 10

Failure: 44 ± 11

Success: 114 ± 33

Failure: 111 ± 45

Intubation, death, or withdrawal of therapy

17

NA

BiPAP

8

NA

NA

Neuschwander

2017

France

Observational

No

64%

100%

57 (46–67)

NA

Intubation

387

Oronasal or nasal

NA

276

171

213

Liu

2017

Canada

Observational

No

60%

100%

56 ± 14

PaO2 73 ± 38

Intubation or change to palliative care

41

Oronasal

BiPAP or CPAP

28

NA

NA

Kumar

2018

India

Observational

No

49%

NA

40 ± 3

197 ± 74

Intubation

35

Oronasal

NA

15

7

NA

Hong

2018

China

Observational

No

74%

NA

77 ± 7

141 ± 60

Intubation

64

Oronasal

BiPAP

46

NA

33

Briones-Claudett

2018

Ecuador

Observational

No

65%

NA

68 ± 22

PaO2 77 ± 11

Intubation

38

Oronasal

BiPAP

13

11

NA

Wang

2018

China

Observational

No

68%

NA

68 ± 12

Success: 198 ± 74

Failure: 168 ± 63

Intubation

56

Oronasal

BiPAP or CPAP

20

NA

14

He

2019

China

RCT

No

67%

9%

53 ± 18

232 ± 35

Intubation

102

Oronasal

BiPAP

9

7

7

Bajaj

2019

India

Observational

No

46%

NA

53 ± 17

143 ± 94

Intubation

27

Oronasal

BiPAP

11

7

NA

Paternoster

2020

Italy

Observational

No

36%

NA

62 ± 10

108 ± 21

Intubation

11

Helmet

CPAP

3

NA

2

Satou

2020

Japan

Observational

No

75%

NA

68 ± 19

Success: 137 ± 69

Failure: 126 ± 67

Intubation or death

68

Oronasal

BiPAP or CPAP

16

NA

13

Liengswangwong

2020

Thailand

Observational

No

49%

NA

Success: 75 ± 13

Failure: 73 ± 14

PaO2 success: 122 ± 38

PaO2 Failure: 125 ± 60

Intubation

5

NA

NA

5

NA

NA

Ding

2020

China

Observational

No

65%

NA

Success: 47 ± 9

Failure: 54 ± 11

Success: 125 ± 41

Failure: 119 ± 19

Intubation

20

Oronasal

BiPAP or CPAP

9

1

1

Menzella

2020

Italy

Observational

Yes

71%

NA

67 ± 11

120 ± 42

Intubation

79

Oronasal

BiPAP

41

NA

30

Carrillo

2020

Spain

Observational

No

52%

NA

67 ± 17

141 ± 36

Intubation or death

262

Oronasal

BiPAP

184

NA

NA

Pagano

2020

Italy

Observational

Yes

72%

NA

Success: 70 ± 11

Failure: 68 ± 14

Success: 143 ± 91

Failure: 167 ± 72

Intubation

18

NA

CPAP

8

NA

11

Shen

2020

China

Observational

No

44%

100%

Success: 39 (27–55)

Failure: 41 (30–54)

Success: 146 (114–204)

Failure: 153 (103–228)

Intubation

70

Oronasal

BiPAP

44

39

NA

Duca

2020a

Italy

Observational

Yes

86%

NA

70 (62–79)

131 (97–190)

Intubation or death

71

Helmet

CPAP

65

NA

54

Duca

2020b

Italy

Observational

Yes

71%

NA

75 (59–80)

87 (53–120)

Intubation or death

7

Helmet

BiPAP

4

NA

4

Tonelli

2020

Italy

Observational

No

67%

NA

71 (66–81)

125 (101–170)

Intubation or death

15

Oronasal

BiPAP

7

NA

NA

Liu

2020

China

Observational

No

53%

40%

58 ± 12

65 ± 19

Intubation

15

Oronasal

BiPAP

10

NA

NA

Wang

2020

China

Observational

Yes

69%

NA

64 ± 7

268 ± 6

Intubation

32

NA

BiPAP

6

NA

8

Simioli

2021

Italy

Observational

Yes

86%

NA

64 ± 23

95 ± 57

Intubation

29

Oronasal or helmet

BiPAP or CPAP

3

3

NA

Drescher

2021

USA

Observational

No

51%

13%

Success: 65 (49–71)

Failure: 67 (57–75)

Success: 198 (149–298)

Failure: 187 (106–235)

Intubation

18

Oronasal

BiPAP

15

NA

NA

Koga

2021

Japan

Observational

No

68%

NA

78 (69–84)

141 (97–186)

Intubation, death or crossover to HFNC

10

Oronasal

BiPAP or CPAP

7

NA

NA

Carpagnano

2021

Italy

Observational

Yes

73%

NA

Survivor: 64 ± 14

Nonsurvivor: 75 ± 13

Survivor: 226 ± 76

Nonsurvivor: 137 ± 54

Death

61

NA

BiPAP or CPAP

25

25

NA

Menzella

2021

Italy

Observational

Yes

71%

NA

67 ± 11

120 ± 42

Intubation or death

79

Oronasal

BiPAP

41

20

NA

Briones

2021

Ecuador

Observational

No

66%

NA

71 ± 19

192 ± 40

Intubation

5

Oronasal

BiPAP

2

NA

1

Zhao

2021

China

Observational

Yes

75%

NA

68 (62–76)

NA

Meet the criteria of intubation

24

Oronasal

NA

16

NA

14

Zhu

2021

China

Observational

No

62%

NA

Success: 57 ± 13

Failure: 63 ± 15

Success: 145 ± 23

Failure: 122 ± 20

Intubation or death

180

NA

NA

27

NA

NA

Ramirez

2022

Italy

Observational

Yes

80%

5%

61 (53–71)

98 (74–137)

Intubation or death

90

Oronasal

CPAP

35

NA

17

Lazzeri

2022

Italy

Observational

Yes

75%

NA

Success: 60 ± 13

Failure: 70 ± 13

Success: 123 (110–145)

Failure: 82 (66–103)

Intubation

75

Oronasal

BiPAP

31

NA

23

Sun

2022

China

Observational

No

64%

NA

Success: 66 (59–76)

Failure: 65 (57–77)

Success: 236 ± 53

Failure: 194 ± 78

Meet the criteria of intubation

131

Oronasal

BiPAP or CPAP

64

NA

NA

Chiumello

2022

Italy

Observational

Yes

77%

NA

58 (52–64)

264 (204–301)

NA

104

Oronasal or helmet

BiPAP or CPAP

20

NA

13

Duan

2022a

China

Observational

No

69%

8%

Success: 63 ± 16

Failure: 64 ± 16

Success: 178 ± 74

Failure: 153 ± 60

Need for intubation

311

Oronasal or nasal

BiPAP or CPAP

153

NA

NA

Duan

2022b

China

Observational

No

67%

19%

Success: 61 ± 17

Failure: 61 ± 16

Success: 147 ± 104

Failure: 137 ± 85

Need for intubation

143

Oronasal or nasal

BiPAP or CPAP

86

NA

NA

Jurjević

2022

Croatia

Observational

Yes

57%

NA

66 ± 11

137 ± 57

Intubation

58

Oronasal

BiPAP or CPAP

15

NA

NA

Chacko

2022

India

Observational

Yes

84%

NA

53 ± 12

161 ± 80

Intubation or death

209

Oronasal

BiPAP

91

NA

NA

Isaac

2022

India

Observational

Yes

83%

NA

54 ± 12

NA

Intubation or death

168

Oronasal

BiPAP or CPAP

39

28

NA

Tetaj

2022

Italy

Observational

Yes

65%

NA

60 (48–73)

NA

Intubation or death

224

Oronasal or helmet

BiPAP or CPAP

64

NA

43

Yaroshetskiy

2022

Russia

Observational

Yes

56%

NA

72 (62–80)

Success: 131 (92–230)

Failure: 90 (70–120)

Meet the criteria of intubation

80

Oronasal

BiPAP

57

NA

57

  1. NA = not available, NIV = noninvasive ventilation, BiPAP = bi-level positive airway pressure, CPAP = continuous positive airway pressure, RCT = randomized control trial
  2. #Data are reported as medians and 5th to 95th percentiles
  3. $Data are reported as medians and ranges
  4. *Pul; pulmonary; Extrapul: extrapulmonary