Skip to main content

Table 5 Acute exacerbation and annual FEV1 change according to the blood eosinophil count

From: Clinical outcomes of long-term inhaled combination therapies in patients with bronchiectasis and airflow obstruction

 

Moderate-to-severe exacerbation

Annual FEV1 change, mL/yr

 

adjusted HRa

(95% CI)

P-value

Adjusted β-coefficientb

(95% CI)

P-value

Blood eosinophil count, ≥ 300/uL

    

ICS/LABA (compared with LABA/LAMA)

0.196 (0.045–0.861)

0.031

-137.06 (-428.66–154.53)

0.361

ICS/LABA/LAMA (compared with LABA/LAMA)

0.137 (0.034–0.553)

0.005

246.45 (-63.80–556.70)

0.128

Blood eosinophil count, 200–299/uL

    

ICS/LABA (compared with LABA/LAMA)

0.944 (0.175–5.101)

0.947

-42.72 (-398.09–312.65)

0.817

ICS/LABA/LAMA (compared with LABA/LAMA)

0.655 (0.098–4.388)

0.663

191.80 (-39.03–422.64)

0.123

Blood eosinophil count, < 200/uL

    

ICS/LABA (compared with LABA/LAMA)

1.918 (0.465–7.908)

0.368

-197.18 (-307.04–-87.32)

< 0.001

ICS/LABA/LAMA (compared with LABA/LAMA)

1.467 (0.462–4.658)

0.515

9.63 (-115.23–134.49)

0.880

  1. Note: Data were analyzed with mixed linear regression and are presented as linear regression coefficient and standard error
  2. a Adjusted hazard ratio was estimated using covariables including age, current smoker, mMRC grade, baseline FEV1, and number of exacerbations in previous year.
  3. b Adjusted β-coefficient was estimated using covariables including age, sex, BMI, current smoker, mMRC grade, baseline FEV1, and previous history of moderate or severe exacerbation.