Skip to main content

Table 3 Associations between inpatient hospitalization risk and nintedanib adherence trajectory

From: Association between nintedanib adherence trajectory and healthcare use among idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients

Outcome name

High adherence

Moderate adherence

High-then-poor adherence

Delayed-poor adherence

Early-poor adherence

Time to first all-cause inpatient hospital event

     

 Unadjusted hazard ratio (95% CI)

ref

1.11 (0.80, 1.53)

1.53 (1.13, 2.07)

1.52 (1.16, 2.00)

1.42 (1.10, 1.83)

  P-value

 

0.54

0.006

0.003

0.007

 Adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI)

ref

1.12 (0.80, 1.56)

1.54 (1.12, 2.11)

1.46 (1.09, 1.94)

1.34 (1.03, 1.75)

  P-value

 

0.51

0.008

0.01

0.03

Time to first IPF-related inpatient hospital event

     

 Unadjusted hazard ratio (95% CI)

ref

1.07 (0.67, 1.70)

1.85 (1.26, 2.73)

1.31 (0.88, 1.94)

1.16 (0.81, 1.67)

  P-value

 

0.78

0.002

0.18

0.42

 Adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI)

ref

1.12 (0.70, 1.78)

1.84 (1.24, 2.72)

1.26 (0.84, 1.91)

1.08 (0.75, 1.57)

  P-value

 

0.64

0.002

0.27

0.67

Sample size, n (%)

781 (43.4)

202 (11.2)

190 (10.6)

255 (14.2)

370 (20.6)

  1. Notes:
  2. 1. Results derived from models estimated with unadjusted and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. Covariates in the adjusted model specifications included baseline measures of: age, sex, non-Hispanic White race and ethnicity, index year, Census region, SDI score, Gagne comorbidity count, gastroesophageal reflux disease, hypoxia, pulmonary hypertension, sleep apnea, CT scan, lung biopsy, oxygen receipt, index nintedanib prescriber was a pulmonologist, any all-cause ED event, any all-cause inpatient event, total prescription drug spending, and total medical spending
  3. 2. CI: confidence interval