Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Graphic analysis of flow-volume curves: a pilot study

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 1Email author and
BMC Pulmonary MedicineBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:18

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-016-0182-8

©  Lee et al. 2016

  • Received: 31 July 2015
  • Accepted: 15 January 2016
  • Published:

The Erratum to this article has been published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine 2016 16:115

Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Conventional spirometric parameters have shown poor correlation with symptoms and health status of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). While it is well-known that the pattern of the expiratory flow-volume curve (EFVC) represents ventilatory dysfunction, little attempts have been made to derive quantitative parameters by analyzing the curve. In this study, we aimed to derive useful parameters from EFVC via graphic analysis and tried to validate them in patients with COPD.

Methods

Using Graphical Analysis 3.4 Vernier Software, we derived from the EFVC such parameters as area of obstruction (Ao), area of triangle (AT), area of rectangle (AR) and ratio of volume at 75 and 25 % peak expiratory flow (PEF) (0.25/0.75 V). For validation, we reviewed clinical and spirometric data of 61 COPD patients from Seoul National University Airway Registry (SNUAR) and Korean obstructive Lung Disease (KOLD) cohorts.

Results

Of all parameters, only RV/TLC significantly correlated with scores from St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) (r = 0.447, p = 0.037). Six-minute walking distance (6MWD) highly correlated with Ao/AR (r = −0.618, p = 0.005) and Ao/PEF (r = −0.581, p = 0.009) whereas neither FEV1 nor FEV1/FVC had significant correlation with 6MWD.

Conclusions

Ao/AR and Ao/PEF are promising parameters which correlate well with the exercising capacity of COPD patients.

Keywords

  • Pulmonary disease, Chronic obstructive
  • Maximal expiratory flow-volume curves
  • Spirometry

Background

Chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD) is defined as having airflow limitation, measured as forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) divided by forced vital capacity (FVC). These conventional spirometric parameters, such as FEV1 or FVC, are currently accepted standards in grading the severity of airflow limitation; when FEV1/FVC is less than 0.70, diagnosis of COPD is made.

However, these parameters cannot exactly determine the health status of patients with COPD. For example, FEV1 shows weak association with physical activity and subjective symptom scores such as St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) [1–3]; little correlation between FEV1 and hospital readmission in such patients is also reported [4]. Therefore, dyspnea scores and objectively measured exercise capacity should also be considered and taken into account.

Exercise capacity, which can be simply measured by 6-min walking distance (6MWD), is reflective of activities of daily living and functional status of patients with COPD but shows poor correlation with FEV1 or FEV1/FVC [5, 6].

While it is well-known that the concave shape of expiratory flow-volume curve (EFVC) is suggestive of the presence of underlying small airway obstruction, few attempts have been made to quantify the concave area and correlate it with clinical indices in patients with COPD [7–9]. In this study, we sought to derive new useful graphic parameters from a commonly used spirometric curve and performed correlation analysis with symptom severity and exercise capacity. We initially hypothesized that the concave area under the flow-volume curve might reflect symptom severity and health status in patients with COPD.

Methods

Study subjects and general methods

The following study was approved by the institutional review board of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (B-1108/134-004 and B-0508-023-009). Informed written consent for participation in the study was obtained from all participants.

For validation of new graphic parameters, we analyzed the clinical and baseline pre-bronchodilator best spirometric data of 61 COPD patients from the Seoul National University Airway Registry (SNUAR) and the Korean Obstructive Lung Disease (KOLD) cohort [10]. 40 patients from SNUAR and 21 patients from KOLD cohort were included in the analysis. The SNUAR cohort included stable COPD patients who were prospectively recruited from the outpatient pulmonary clinic of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. The diagnosis of COPD was made according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2003 criteria. The KOLD cohort consisted of patients with stable COPD, who were prospectively recruited from the pulmonary clinics of 11 hospitals in Korea from June 2005 to September 2009.

Spirometry was performed using a Vmax 22 instrument (Sensor-Medics; Yorba Linda, CA, USA). Lung volumes were measured by body plethysmography (V6200; SensorMedics). Diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco) was measured by the single-breath method using a Vmax229D (Sensor-Medics). All pulmonary function tests were performed as recommended by the American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society.

Graphic analysis methods

For graphic analysis of the EFVC, we used Graphical Analysis 3.4 Vernier Software program. Using the program, we first integrated the area under the curve. Figure 1 shows an example of pre-bronchodilator best EFVC and integration of the area under the curve using the software.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

An example of maximal expiratory flow-volume curve and integration of the area under the curve

Figure 2 shows the lighted area below the imaginary diagonal line and above the EFVC; we defined this area as Au, which reflects concavity of the curve. Our new graphic parameter, Area of obstruction (Ao) and area of triangle (At) were calculated as follows.
$$ \mathrm{A}\mathrm{o}=\mathrm{A}\mathrm{u}/\mathrm{A}\mathrm{t} $$
$$ \mathrm{A}\mathrm{t}=\mathrm{PEFR}\times \left(\mathrm{F}\mathrm{V}\mathrm{C}\hbox{--} \mathrm{X}\mathrm{p}\right)/2 $$
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Graphic explanation of new parameters. Au was defined as the lighted area below the imaginary diagonal line and above the expiratory flow-volume curve. Area of obstruction (Ao) and area of triangle (At) were calculated as follows. Xp denotes the expirated lung volume at PEFR. The ratio of lung volumes at 75 and 25 % of PEFR (0.25/0.75 V) were also measured. Area of rectangle (AR), not shown here, was defined as follows. Ao = Au/At; At = PEFR × (FVC–Xp)/2; AR = (actual PEFR/predicted PEFR) × (actual FVC/predicted FVC) × 100 %

As Ao approaches to 1, the concavity of EFVC becomes more severe. As Ao gets closer to 0, the EFVC becomes less concave. Xp denotes the lung volume at PEFR.

Because the baseline pulmonary function depends on the patients’ heights and other factors, we needed to define Ao in ratio rather than raw values. In order to calibrate and adjust for such individual differences, we divided Au by At. Using a raw value such as Au may result in wrong direction and inappropriate interpretation of result (see Additional file 1: Table S1).

Another parameter, area of rectangle (AR) were defined as follows; we used the reference equation derived from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examinations Survey IV to calculate predicted FVC in Korean COPD patients [11, 12].
$$ \mathrm{A}\mathrm{R}=\left(\mathrm{actual}\kern0.5em \mathrm{PEFR}/\mathrm{predicted}\kern0.5em \mathrm{PEFR}\right)\times \left(\mathrm{actual}\kern0.5em \mathrm{F}\mathrm{V}\mathrm{C}/\mathrm{predicted}\kern0.5em \mathrm{F}\mathrm{V}\mathrm{C}\right)\times 100\% $$

The ratio of lung volumes at 75 and 25 % of PEFR (0.25/0.75 V) were also calculated.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the statistics software, PASW Statistics for Windows, Version 18.0, Chicago: SPSS Inc. The association between clinical and spirometric parameters was determined by using Pearson correlation analysis.

Results

The demographic, clinical, and conventional spirometric characteristics are shown in Table 1. Data are presented as mean ± SD. The patients were mostly men (96.7 %) with mean age of 71 years old, 44 pack-years of smoking history and mean body mass index (BMI) of 23.4 kg/m2. Mean FEV1 was 65 % and FEV1/FVC 0.48.
Table 1

Clinical characteristics and conventional spirometric values of patients

 

Mean (SD or %)

N

Age

71 (8)

61

Male

59 (96.7)

 

BMI (kg/m2)

23.40 (3.40)

56

Smoking (pack-years)

44 (19)

59

FEV1/FVC

0.48 (0.12)

60

FEV1 (%)

65 (18)

60

DLco (%)

73 (20)

59

RV/TLC (%)

0.42 (0.11)

57

RV (%)

113 (43)

58

IC (L)

1.98 (0.56)

56

SGRQ (raw score)

1112 (571)

38

6MWD (m)

425 (126)

31

CAT

12.7 (7.7)

41

Abbreviations: BMI body mass index, FEV 1 forced expiratory volume in one second, FVC forced vital capacity, DLco diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, RV residual volume, TLC total lung capacity, IC inspiratory capacity, SGRQ St. George’s respiratory questionnaire, 6MWD six-minute walking distance, CAT the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test

Among 61 subjects, the pre-bronchodilator EFVC data for three subjects were missing, so they were excluded in the correlation analysis. Table 2 displays the correlation result between clinical and known spirometric parameters after adjusting for age, BMI and smoking. Of all conventional parameters, only residual volume (RV) divided by total lung capacity (TLC) significantly correlated with SGRQ (r = 0.447, p = 0.037). Inspiratory capacity (IC), as percent predicted, showed positive correlation with 6MWD.
Table 2

Correlation analysis of traditional spirometric parameters and selected variables

 

FEV1

FEV1/FVC

RV/TLC

PEF

IC

r a

P-value

r a

P-value

r a

P-value

r a

P-value

r a

P-value

RV/TLC

−0.881 *

<0.001

−0.702 *

<0.001

–

–

−0.765 *

<0.001

−0.148

0.512

SGRQ

−0.355

0.105

−0.140

0.534

0.447 *

0.037

−0.306

0.202

−0.073

0.747

6MWD

0.201

0.371

0.042

0.853

−0.257

0.249

0.441

0.058

0.611 *

0.003

CAT

−0.226

0.313

−0.026

0.909

0.277

0.213

−0.233

0.337

−0.046

0.838

Abbreviations: FEV 1 forced expiratory volume in one second, FVC forced vital capacity, RV residual volume, TLC total lung capacity, IC inspiratory capacity, PEF peak expiratory flow, SGRQ St. George’s respiratory questionnaire, 6MWD 6-min walking distance, CAT the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test

a r: Pearson’s correlation coefficient, adjusted for age, BMI and smoking

*P-value < 0.05

The results for new parameters derived from EFVC are given in Table 3. The new graphic parameters significantly correlated with RV/TLC were Ao, Ao/FVC, Ao/AR, and Ao/PEF.
Table 3

Correlation between new graphic parameters and selected variables

 

Ao

AR

Ao/FVC

Ao/AR

Ao/PEF

PEF/(Xp-FVC)

0.25/ 0.75 V

r a

P

r a

P

r a

P

r a

P

r a

P

r a

P

r a

P

RV/TLC

0.674*

0.001

−0.824*

<0.001

0.806*

<0.001

0.718*

0.001

0.780*

<0.001

−0.585*

0.004

−0.286

0.197

SGRQ

0.171

0.447

−0.432

0.065

0.422

0.072

0.388

0.101

0.408

0.083

−0.057

0.802

0.108

0.631

6MWD

−0.013

0.956

0.488*

0.034

−0.398

0.092

−0.618*

0.005

−0.581*

0.009

0.336

0.126

−0.097

0.667

CAT

0.161

0.475

−0.342

0.152

0.382

0.106

0.331

0.167

0.308

0.200

−0.035

0.876

−0.007

0.976

Abbreviations: Ao area of concavity, AR area of rectangle, FVC forced vital capacity, PEF peak expiratory flow, Xp the lung volume at peak expiratory flow, 0.25/0.75 V ratio of volume at 75 and 25 % peak expiratory flow, RV residual volume, TLC total lung capacity, SGRQ St. George’s respiratory questionnaire, 6MWD 6-min walking distance, CAT the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test

a r: Pearson’s correlation coefficient, adjusted for age, BMI and smoking

*P-value < 0.05

Among clinico-physiological parameters, 6MWD highly correlated with Ao/AR (r = −0.618, p = 0.005) and Ao/PEF (r = −0.581, p = 0.009). Neither FEV1 nor FEV1/FVC had significant correlation with 6MWD.

Discussion

We set out to determine whether new parameters could further reflect the clinical status of patients with COPD. In this study, we demonstrated that Ao/AR and Ao/PEF significantly negatively correlated with 6MWD. 6MWD is a simple, objective test of measuring functional capacity targeted at people with at least moderately severe impairment and can be used as a follow-up tool to show response after intervention. In addition, the new parameters, Ao/AR and Ao/PEF, highly correlated with RV/TLC, which is a measure of hyperinflation. On the other hand, conventional parameters, such as FEV1 or FEV1/FVC, did not show correlation with 6MWD in our study.

Most of previous studies sought to derive parameters reflecting concavity of the EFVC, but did not further investigate the correlation with clinical and functional indices. Mead et al. first developed the slop ratio as an index of the curvature of maximal EFVC, but it was regarded impractical to use [13]. Afterwards, studies conducted in asthma patients revealed that the concave shape of the curve became less bowed after the steroid treatment [14]; the relationship between the severity of wheezing and the concavity of EFVC was also suggested [15, 16]. In order to quantify the concavity, Vermaak et al. attempted to measure the area under the curve (Aex) as an imaginary triangle with FVC as the base, PEF the perpendicular axis, and straight descending portion of maximal EFVC as the hypotenuse, that seemed to be the most sensitive index to assess the degree of bronchodilation in patients with COPD [17, 18].

More recently, Nozoe et al. studied spontaneous expiratory (SEFV) curve of 34 stable COPD patients at resting state and found that the area under the curve divided by the surrounding rectangular area, the rectangular area ratio (RAR), is indicative of concavity of SEFV curve; FEV1 was the most powerful predictor of concavity of the curve [19]. Ma et al. also used the same parameter, RAR, in analysis of SEFV curve during exercise [20]. While RAR is an excellent novel parameter to measure concavity of the EFVC, these studies did not provide the data showing the relationship of RAR with symptom severity and exercise capacity. Another interesting pilot study by Williams et al. investigated tidal flow-time and flow-volume centroids of spirograms, which showed shorter time to reach PEF and more left-shifted centroid pattern in patients with COPD [21]. Assessing SEFV curve as in this recent study seems promising and is more applicable to elderly patients with comorbidities who cannot perform the maximal EFVC. Nevertheless, utilization of SEFV curve is not widely accepted yet in practice as much as the maximal EFVC. Future studies are warranted in examining SEFV curve to check the relationship between new parameters and functional indices.

The authors acknowledge that the present study has several limitations. First, the size of study sample was too small to fully validate our new parameters. Second, we analyzed the pre-bronchodilator best expiratory curves rather than the post-bronchodilator curves, which could have affected the curvature. Third, most patients were in moderate to severe stage of COPD, GOLD II-III, and we did not include the patients with mild COPD (FEV1 ≥ 80 %).

Conclusion

In this study, we found that Ao/AR and Ao/PEF are potentially useful parameters which correlate well with exercising capacity in patients with COPD. Yet, further studies are warranted to validate the new parameters in a sample of sufficient size and also in SEFV curves.

Notes

Abbreviations

COPD: 

chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

SNUAR: 

Seoul National University Airway Registry

KOLD: 

Korean Obstructive Lung Disease

EFVC: 

expiratory flow-volume curve

Au: 

area under the curve

Ao: 

area of concavity

AT: 

area of triangle

AR: 

area of rectangle

PEF: 

peak expiratory flow

FEV1 : 

forced expiratory volume in one second

FVC: 

forced vital capacity

RV: 

residual volume

TLC: 

total lung capacity

Aex: 

the area under the curve

6MWD: 

6-min walking distance

SGRQ: 

St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire

BMI: 

body mass index

DLco: 

diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide

GOLD: 

Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. J. Patric Barron for revising the manuscript style.

The also authors thank the members of the Korean Obstructive Lung Disease (KOLD) Cohort Study Group: Prof. Tai Sun Park, Prof. Joon Beom Seo, Prof. Moo Song Lee, Prof. Jin Won Huh, Prof. Seung Won Ra, Prof. Jae Seung Lee, Prof. Sei Won Lee, Prof. Eun Jin Chae, Prof. Nam Kug Kim (Univ. of Ulsan), Prof. Deog Kyeom Kim, Prof. Sang-Min Lee, Prof. Tae-Hyung Kim, Prof. Sang-Heon Kim (Hanyang Univ.), Prof. Young Sam Kim (Yonsei Univ.), Prof. Woo Jin Kim (Kangwon National Univ.), Prof. Hye Kyeong Park, Prof. Sung-Soon Lee (Inje Univ.), Prof. Ji-Hyun Lee, Eun Kyung Kim (Bundang CHA Hospital), Prof. Jin Hwa Lee (Ewha Womans Univ.), Prof. Sang Yeub Lee (Korea Univ.), Prof. Seong Yong Lim (Sungkyunkwan Univ.), Prof. Tae Rim Shin, Yong Il Hwang (Hallym Univ.), Prof. Seung Soo Sheen (Ajou Univ.), Prof. Prof. Kwang Ha Yoo (Konkuk Univ.), Prof. Chin Kook Rhee (Catholic Univ.), and Prof. Young Kyung Lee (Kyung Hee Univ.).

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 166, Gumi-ro, Bundang-gu, 463-707 Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
(2)
Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and Clinical Research Center for Chronic Obstructive Airway Diseases, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

References

  1. Jones PW. Health status and the spiral of decline. COPD. 2009;6(1):59–63. doi:10.1080/15412550802587943.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Pitta F, Troosters T, Spruit MA, Probst VS, Decramer M, Gosselink R. Characteristics of physical activities in daily life in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171(9):972–7. doi:10.1164/rccm.200407-855OC.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Watz H, Pitta F, Rochester CL, Garcia-Aymerich J, ZuWallack R, Troosters T, et al. An official European Respiratory Society statement on physical activity in COPD. Eur Respir J. 2014;44(6):1521–37. doi:10.1183/09031936.00046814.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Osman IM, Godden DJ, Friend JA, Legge JS, Douglas JG. Quality of life and hospital re-admission in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax. 1997;52(1):67–71.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Wijkstra PJ, Van Altena R, Kraan J, Otten V, Postma DS, Koeter GH. Quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease improves after rehabilitation at home. Eur Respir J. 1994;7(2):269–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Solway S, Brooks D, Lacasse Y, Thomas S. A qualitative systematic overview of the measurement properties of functional walk tests used in the cardiorespiratory domain. Chest. 2001;119(1):256–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Sovijarvi AR. Flow-volume response to inhaled methacholine in asthmatics; comparison of area under the curve (AFV) with conventional parameters. Eur J Respir Dis Suppl. 1986;143:18–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Seppala OP. Reproducibility of methacholine induced bronchoconstriction in healthy subjects: the use of area under the expiratory flow-volume curve to express results. Respir Med. 1990;84(5):387–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lapp NL, Hyatt RE. Some factors affecting the relationship of maximal expiratory flow to lung volume in health and disease. Dis Chest. 1967;51(5):475–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Park TS, Lee JS, Seo JB, Hong Y, Yoo JW, Kang BJ, et al. Study design and outcomes of Korean Obstructive Lung Disease (KOLD) cohort study. Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases. 2014;76(4):169–74. doi:10.4046/trd.2014.76.4.169.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Eom SY, Kim H. Reference values for the pulmonary function of Korean adults using the data of Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey IV (2007–2009). J Korean Med Sci. 2013;28(3):424–30. doi:10.3346/jkms.2013.28.3.424.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Yoo KH, Kim YS, Sheen SS, Park JH, Hwang YI, Kim SH, et al. Prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Korea: the fourth Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2008. Respirology (Carlton, Vic). 2011;16(4):659–65. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1843.2011.01951.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Mead J. Analysis of the configuration of maximum expiratory flow-volume curves. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1978;44(2):156–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kraan J, van der Mark TW, Koeter GH. Changes in maximum expiratory flow-volume curve configuration after treatment with inhaled corticosteroids. Thorax. 1989;44(12):1015–21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Kapp MC, Schachter EN, Beck GJ, Maunder LR, Witek Jr TJ. The shape of the maximum expiratory flow volume curve. Chest. 1988;94(4):799–806.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Schachter EN, Kapp MC, Maunder LR, Beck G, Witek TJ. Smoking and cotton dust effects in cotton textile workers: an analysis of the shape of the maximum expiratory flow volume curve. Environ Health Perspect. 1986;66:145–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Vermaak JC, Bunn AE, de Kock MA. A new lung function index: the area under the maximum expiratory flow-volume curve. Respiration. 1979;37(2):61–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Struthers AD, Addis GJ. Respiratory function measurements in clinical pharmacological studies including an assessment of the area under the MEFV curve as a new parameter in chronic bronchitic patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1988;34(3):277–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Nozoe M, Mase K, Murakami S, Okada M, Ogino T, Matsushita K, et al. Relationship between spontaneous expiratory flow-volume curve pattern and air-flow obstruction in elderly COPD patients. Respir Care. 2013;58(10):1643–8. doi:10.4187/respcare.02296.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ma S, Hecht A, Varga J, Rambod M, Morford S, Goto S, et al. Breath-by-breath quantification of progressive airflow limitation during exercise in COPD: a new method. Respir Med. 2010;104(3):389–96. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2009.10.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Williams EM, Powell T, Eriksen M, Neill P, Colasanti R. A pilot study quantifying the shape of tidal breathing waveforms using centroids in health and COPD. J Clin Monit Comput. 2014;28(1):67–74. doi:10.1007/s10877-013-9497-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Lee et al. 2016

Advertisement

BMC Pulmonary Medicine

ISSN: 1471-2466

Contact us