Skip to main content
  • Retraction Note
  • Open access
  • Published:

Retraction Note: Bronchial blocker versus double-lumen endobronchial tube in minimally invasive cardiac surgery

The Original Article was published on 09 November 2019

Retraction Note: BMC Pulm Med 19, 207 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-019-0956-x

The Editor has retracted this article [1] because the authors have been unable to provide documents confirming that ethics approval was obtained in advance of the study. Additionally, discrepancies in study design and recruitment dates were noted between the trial registry [2] and the article.

Authors Chuncheng Zhang, Jing Yue, Mingyue Li, Wei Jiang, Yu Pan, Zhimin Song, Cailian Shi, Weixuan Fan and Zhenxiang Pan all agree to this retraction.

Reference

  1. Zhang C, Yue J, Li M, et al. Bronchial blocker versus double-lumen endobronchial tube in minimally invasive cardiac surgery. BMC Pulm Med. 2019;19:207. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-019-0956-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Chinese Clinical Trial Register [Internet]. Chengdu (Sichuan): Ministry of Health (China). 2007 Jun 27 - Identifier ChiCTR1900024250, Bronchial blocker versus double-lumen endobronchial tube in minimally invasive cardiac surgery; 2019 July 02 [cited 2020 October 19]; [1 page]. Available from: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=38904

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhenxiang Pan .

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang , ., Yue , ., Li , . et al. Retraction Note: Bronchial blocker versus double-lumen endobronchial tube in minimally invasive cardiac surgery. BMC Pulm Med 20, 322 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-020-01365-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-020-01365-7