Skip to main content

Immune infiltration landscape and immune-marker molecular typing of pulmonary fibrosis with pulmonary hypertension

Abstract

Background

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PH) secondary to pulmonary fibrosis (PF) is one of the most common complications in PF patients, it causes severe disease and usually have a poor prognosis. Whether the combination of PH and PF is a unique disease phenotype is unclear. We aimed to screen the key modules associated with PH–PF immune infiltration based on WGCNA and identify the hub genes for molecular typing.

Method

Using the gene expression profile GSE24988 of PF patients with or without PH from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, we evaluated immune cell infiltration using Cibersortx and immune cell gene signature files. Different immune cell types were screened using the Wilcoxon test; differentially expressed genes were screened using samr. The molecular pathways implicated in these differential responses were identified using Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes functional enrichment analyses. A weighted co-expression network of the differential genes was constructed, relevant co-expression modules were identified, and relationships between modules and differential immune cell infiltration were calculated. The modules most relevant to this disease were identified using weighted correlation network analysis. From these, we constructed a co-expression network; using the STRING database, we integrated the values into the human protein–protein interaction network before constructing a co-expression interaction subnet, screening genes associated with immunity and unsupervised molecular typing, and analyzing the immune cell infiltration and expression of key genes in each disease type.

Results

Of the 22 immune cell types from the PF GEO data, 20 different immune cell types were identified. There were 1622 differentially expressed genes (295 upregulated and 1327 downregulated). The resulting weighted co-expression network identified six co-expression modules. These were screened to identify the modules most relevant to the disease phenotype (the green module). By calculating the correlations between modules and the differentially infiltrated immune cells, extracting the green module co-expression network (46 genes), extracting 25 key genes using gene significance and module-membership thresholds, and combining these with the 10 key genes in the human protein–protein interaction network, we identified five immune cell-related marker genes that might be applied as biomarkers. Using these marker genes, we evaluated these disease samples using unsupervised clustering molecular typing.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrated that all PF combined with PH samples belonged to four categories. Studies on the five key genes are required to validate their diagnostic and prognostic value.

Peer Review reports

Background

Pulmonary fibrosis (PF) is a progressive type of interstitial lung disease that causes fibrotic destruction of the lung parenchyma caused by repeated damage to the alveolar epithelium or endothelium [1]. This damage causes fibroblasts to excessively secrete extracellular matrix components such as collagen and fibronectin, which in turn lead to lung scarring (fibrosis) [2, 3]. The occurrence of PF leads to reduced lung function and respiratory failure, and—as the disease develops—the respiratory function of the patient continues to deteriorate [3,4,5]. However, the exact cause of PF remains unknown.

Currently, the treatments for PF include lung transplantation or the use of anti-fibrosis drugs (pirfenidone and nintedanib), immunosuppressive agents (prednisone), and chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide) [6]. During treatment, obesity [7], diabetes [8], gastroesophageal reflux [9], pulmonary hypertension [10], obstructive sleep apnea [11], coronary artery disease [12], and emphysema [13] can lead to changes in clinical symptoms and of the condition of the patient. Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PH) secondary to PF (associated pulmonary hypertension, APH) is one of the most common complications in PF patients and is characterized by severe pulmonary vascular remodeling and capillary density reduction, leading to a continuous increase in pulmonary pressure [14, 15]. Patients with various forms of end-stage PF require lung transplantation, and the presence of PH increases the risk of these surgeries in these patients. Recently, researchers have increasingly recognized that PH is a major contributor to PF morbidity and mortality [16, 17]. Therefore, a better understanding of the key genes in APH is likely to support better molecular typing of this disease and improve our understanding of its clinical significance.

Weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA) is a systematic biological method that can be used to identify highly correlated gene modules to identify candidate biomarkers or therapeutic targets [18, 19]. Using WGCNA, Qi et al. [20] found nine long non-coding RNAs (UCA1, PVT1, etc.) which may be related to the progression of non-small-cell lung cancer using WGCNA analysis, providing new possible molecular targets for the diagnosis and treatment of this disease. Wang et al. [21] identified four key genes associated with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) (COL14A1, TSHZ2, IL1R2, and SLCO4A1). In addition, the application of WGCNA in lung cancer and IPF studies also suggests that it is feasible to combine the data in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and use WGCNA to identify key genes related to specific conditions in an effort to produce a genetic signature of the disease.

This study aimed to screen the key modules associated with APH immune infiltration and identify the hub genes for use in molecular typing. We identified the differential immune cell types associated with PF with or without APH using a single dataset downloaded from the GEO database and used these data to identify the differentially expressed genes, enriched biological pathways, and key regulator nodes for APH. We hope that our data will provide a reference for further research focusing on the classification and treatment of APH.

Methods

GEO data download and preprocessing

We obtained the gene expression dataset describing APH (GSE24988, published on October 28, 2010) from the GEO database. This database, last updated on the 26th of July 2018, contains data from 116 samples. These data were obtained from fresh frozen lung samples collected from the recipient organs of 116 patients with PF undergoing lung transplantation. The transcriptional profiles of these samples were obtained using an Affymetrix microarray and these 116 samples included 17 samples with severe PH (mean pulmonary arterial pressure, mPAP > 40 mmHg), 22 samples without PH (mPAP < 20 mmHg), 45 samples with intermediate PH (mPAP 21–39 mmHg), and 32 control samples.

Immune cell infiltration analysis

The R function and 22 immune cell gene feature files provided by Cibersortx (http://cibersortx.stanford.edu) were used to calculate the degree of immune cell infiltration in the GSE24988 samples, and the percentage of immune cells in each sample was displayed using a stacked histogram. Next, we created a ratio matrix of these immune cells (noPH–PF: PH–PF) to identify the differences in their proportions in different sample types using the Wilcoxon test (p < 0.05).

Identification of differentially expressed genes

Differences in gene expression between PH and non-PH samples in the GSE24988 dataset were evaluated using the samr R package, and differentially expressed genes were selected using a p value of < 0.05, and 1.2 as the fold-change (FC) threshold [22, 23].

Functional enrichment analysis

Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses are widely used for high-throughput gene analysis. The Metascape database provides a comprehensive set of functional annotation tools to understand the biological significance of many genes. In this study, the Metascape database was used to perform GO biological process and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses of the differentially expressed genes identified in the GSE24988 dataset.

Construction of a co-expression network

The WGCNA package in R was used to construct a weighted co-expression network for differentially expressed genes in the GSE24988 dataset. The coefficient of variation for each gene was calculated using WGCNA analysis, and a weighted gene co-expression network was constructed. Finally, we selected an appropriate module size to identify the co-expression modules.

Identification of the key modules

We calculated the correlation between gene–immune cell significance and the degree of connectivity within each module and then screened out the module most relevant to the immune cell phenotype based on the gene significance (GS) and module-membership (MM) thresholds.

Screening of the hub genes associated with differences in immune cell infiltration

The STRING database can be used to predict protein–protein interactions (PPIs), which can then be used to retrieve protein–gene interactions verified by experiments or predicted based on the literature. We extracted and identified the genes in the key modules, constructed a PPI network using the STRING database, and then extracted the hub genes from this network. Once this was completed, we identified the key module hub genes (according to MM and GS) and selected the threshold of gene significance (geneTraitSignificance) as needed. Here, we used the official website’s default value of 0.2; MM was set to 0.8, and the key module was obtained after screening the gene. Finally, the key genes in each module and the key hub genes from the PPI were combined to produce a panel of key marker genes associated with immune cell infiltration in APH.

Results

To obtain the clinical sample data for APH, we downloaded the APH hypertension chip data within GSE24988 from the GEO database. This dataset contains results from 116 samples. We first matched the probe data from the chip with the gene data and excluded any data that did not have a corresponding gene name or which were duplicates. We then averaged the remaining gene expression values to obtain the final sample values and named them 22noPH–PF and 94PH–PF. The R function and 22 immune cell gene signature files provided by Cibersortx were used to calculate the degree of immune cell infiltration in each sample. The stacked histogram shows the proportion of immune cells in each sample (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Stacked histogram of 22 types of immune cell infiltration corresponding to the dataset

To study the proportion of the same type of immune cells in different samples, we used the ratio matrix (noPH–PF: PH–PF) and evaluated the differences in the abovementioned immune cells in each sample using the Wilcoxon test (p < 0.05). The results showed that in addition to memory B cells and resting NK cells, the remaining immune cells were significantly different between the noPH–PF and PH–PF groups (Fig. 2). This suggests there is a certain degree of immune overlap between the noPH–PF and PH–PF patients.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Immune cell difference analysis box plot

Screening for differences in noPH–PF and PH–PF gene expression profiles

To identify the differentially expressed genes associated with APH and PF, we used samr in R to screen for the differential genes and select those with a corrected p value of < 0.05 and FC of 1.2. This analysis identified 1622 differentially expressed genes, of which 295 were upregulated and 1327 were downregulated (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Differential gene expression analysis. A Differential gene volcano map. B Heat map of differential gene expression

GO and KEGG analysis of these differentially expressed genes

To analyze the functional enrichment associated with these differentially expressed genes, 1622 differential genes were imported into the Metascape database and subjected to both GO biological process and KEGG analysis. Of these genes, 98.3% were enriched in signaling pathways. This result suggests that the differences between these groups are likely to be closely associated with cell-to-cell signaling and activation. The majority of the differentially expressed genes were associated with pathways such as MAPK kinase regulation and positive regulation of cell death (Fig. 4, pathway information is indicated by ID).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Enrichment analysis of differentially expressed GO and KEGG pathways. A Bubble chart of GO term enrichment of differentially expressed genes. B Enriched bubble chart of the KEGG pathway

Construction of the co-expression network

To classify and analyze the impact of the differential gene expression profiles in these tissues, we constructed a weighted co-expression network in R using the WGCNA software package. The results are shown in Fig. 5A, B (power = 5), which revealed that six modules could be identified within this data (Fig. 5C). The module size ranged from 27 to 969 genes, and the statistics underlying the number of genes in each module are summarized in Table 1.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Co-expression network construction. A, B Analysis of network topology for various soft-thresholding powers in scale independence and mean connectivity. Therefore, when the soft threshold power was set to 5, the co-expression network fits a scale-free distribution. C Gene dendrogram and module colors

Table 1 Summary of genes in each module after weighted correlation network analysis

Identification of the key modules associated with immune infiltration

To explore the correlation between the six modules and immune cell infiltration, immune cells with significant differences in abundance between the two sets of samples were selected and used to draw a module–immune cell correlation heat map (Fig. 6). We then analyzed the correlation between the different modules and immune cell invasion. These values were then used to estimate the relationship between gene–immune cell saliency and connectivity within each module, and this parameter was then used to identify the module with the most significant impact on immune cell infiltration. Using all these data, we were able to identify the green module as being most likely to influence immune cell infiltration (Fig. 7).

Fig. 6
figure 6

A heat map of the correlation between the module and the differential immune cells

Fig. 7
figure 7

Relationship between gene–immune cell saliency and connectivity within the module

Identification of the hub genes associated with immune cell infiltration

To further identify genes specifically associated with immune cell infiltration in the green module, we extracted the genes from the green module (46 genes in total) and constructed a protein–protein interaction (PPI) network using STRING. The results of this analysis revealed that there were 10 nodes in the network (not counting solitary points; Fig. 8A). We then extracted the key genes from each node in the PPI network and considered them hub genes. We also identified the critical genes in the key module using MM and GS scores. These evaluations identified 25 hub genes (GS_MM_hub; Fig. 8B). Finally, we investigated the intersection of the hub genes (GS_MM_hub) identified from the key module and key PPI nodes to produce a single set of critical genes (5) associated with immune cell infiltration in APH. These genes included ATP11A, ITM2C, OCLN, SLCO4C1, and MEGF9 (Fig. 8C).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Screening of hub genes related to immune cell infiltration. A The protein–protein interaction network constructed using the genes from the green module in the STRING database. The greater the redness of the point, the larger the size, indicating that the node has more genes. B Identification of the key genes of the green module. The hub gene is indicated by the red box. C Intersection of hub genes identified from the green module and key nodes in PPI network to produce a single set of 5 critical genes associated with immune cell infiltration in APH

Unsupervised clustering facilitated molecular typing of diseases based on hub gene expression

To further determine whether the obtained hub genes could be used for the molecular classification of these diseases, we mapped the five key hub genes obtained from the GSE24988 data using unsupervised clustering. We first classified all PF-PH samples using the k-means unsupervised clustering method and then used the inflection point of the sum of the squared error to select the optimal k value. As shown in Fig. 9A, the decline slows down after k = 4; therefore, we selected k = 4 as the threshold. We then used the Rtsne R module to reduce the dimensionality of the gene expression data, and our results showed that all PF_PH samples could be clearly divided into four categories (Fig. 9B). By combining the expression of key genes co-expressed in all disease samples (Fig. 9C), we found that no classification difference could be seen from the expression of a single gene, but a combination of all five critical genes yielded a highly consistent stratification (Fig. 9B).

Fig. 9
figure 9

A The threshold is based on the sum of the squared error. B TSNE diagram shows the clustering of PF-PH samples. C The expression of five key genes in PF-PH samples

Analysis of different types of immune infiltration

To compare the differences in immune infiltration among the four types identified in the hub gene screening we again used the R function and 22 immune cell gene signature files provided by the Cibersortx website to calculate the differences in the degrees of immune cell infiltration among these four groups. The results of this analysis revealed that each of these four groups corresponded to a specific subset of immune cells with different characteristics, which suggests that these four groups can be used to facilitate molecular classification of these samples (Fig. 10).

Fig. 10
figure 10

Analysis of different types of immune infiltration

Differences in the expression of hub genes of different types

To explore the expression differences among the hub genes of different types, we calculated the expressions of each of the five hub genes in each of the four different groups and used box plots to show the differences for each gene in each group. We then used ANOVA to calculate the differences in the expression levels of these five genes among the four different types. The results showed that the expression of these genes was significantly distinct for each type (Fig. 11), suggesting that these five genes may be applicable as biomarkers for each of these four subgroups.

Fig. 11
figure 11

Differences in the expression of hub genes in different types

Discussion

PF is a progressive and epidemic disease that primarily manifests as coughing, progressive exertional dyspnea, and restricted movement. Studies have shown that the incidence and prevalence of PF are increasing every year [24]. Many interstitial lung diseases cause diffuse pulmonary fibrosis, indicating that there are many different causes of PF. Therefore, the treatment of PF cannot be generalized. In addition, it is important to identify and accurately treat other diseases associated with PF. Of these, PH is among the most common PF comorbidities and is more likely to cause severe breathing difficulties and poor prognosis [13, 15, 25]. However, there is still a lack of accurate biomarkers for the diagnosis and treatment of PF combined with PH.

Our study used bioinformatics methods to analyze and screen several differentially expressed genes between patients with PF and PH and with PF alone from a dataset based on their general gene expression profile. Furthermore, a weighted co-expression network was constructed using WGCNA and used to identify six critical gene modules for APH. Further evaluation allowed us to identify a single critical module determining immune cell infiltration in these samples, from which we were able to identify a panel of five critical genes that may act as biomarkers for APH. This panel consisted of ATP11A, ITM2C, OCLN, SLCO4C1, and MEGF9. When we combined their gene expression profiles we were able to clearly identify four different categories of PH–PF and noPH–PF samples, allowing for clear stratification and potentially simplifying intervention.

The ATPase phospholipid transporting 11A (ATP11A) gene encodes a membrane ATPase, ABCA1, which acts as a transmembrane protein with a transport function [26]. Studies have shown that mutations in another transporter gene, ABCA3, can affect the function of surfactant proteins; this leads to a lack of surfactant in newborns and is therefore closely associated with desquamative interstitial pneumonia in children [27]. Quantitative transcriptomic analysis using RNA-seq showed that ATP11A is expressed in multiple tissues and is significantly enriched in the lungs [28]. Tasha et al. conducted a genome-wide association analysis of 1616 pulmonary fibrosis cases and 4683 control cases, and identified seven new susceptibility loci for pulmonary fibrosis, including FAM13A, DSP, OBFC1, ATP11A, DPP9, and chromosome regions 7q22 and 15q14–15 [29]. This supports our observation that ATP11A is a key gene in differential immune cell infiltration in patients with APH or PH alone, suggesting that ATP11A may act as a susceptibility gene for pulmonary fibrosis and an indicator of pulmonary hypertension.

The integral membrane protein 2C (ITM2C) gene, also known as BRI3, is a member of the BRI gene family. Mutations in the BRI2 gene have been linked to the development of familial dementia in the United Kingdom (a stop-codon mutation in the BRI gene) and in Denmark (a decamer duplication in the 3′ region of the BRI gene produces an amyloid peptide associated with dementia) [30, 31]. These familial dementias are primarily associated with changes in amyloid precursor protein (APP) processing speed and the production of Aβ42 resulting from APP and presenilin mutations [32]. Shuji Matsuda et al. identified BRI3 as an interaction partner for APP. Researchers have found that overexpression of BRI3 reduces the cleavage of APP by α- and β-secretase and increases the levels of sAPPβ, Aβ40, and Aβ42. These results indicate that BRI3 may promote the onset of Alzheimer’s disease by regulating APP processing [33]. Subsequent studies have found that BRI2 and BRI3 could be substrates for ubiquitin ligase nuclear receptor binding protein 1, which would ubiquitinate these proteins and schedule them for degradation. This means that this protein may also be a potential therapeutic target for Alzheimer’s disease [34]. To date, most studies on BRI3 have focused on its role in Alzheimer's disease; our study is the first to link BRI3 to the molecular typing of pulmonary fibrosis with pulmonary hypertension, which may provide a new avenue for BRI3 functional research.

Occludin (OCLN) was one of the first tight junction proteins to be discovered and is necessary for maintaining the structure and function of tight junctions. Wang et al. found that OCLN is highly expressed in multiple lung cancer tissue samples, and its knockdown can inhibit the proliferation of lung cancer cells and induce an increase in cell apoptosis, proving that OCLN is a potential therapeutic target for lung cancer [35]. Zou et al. found that the expression of OCLN in lung cells near the fibroblast foci of patients with pulmonary fibrosis was upregulated. The authors speculated that the increased expression of OCLN may indicate a tightening of the epithelial barrier, which may be an adaptive mechanism in response to pulmonary fibrosis [36]. These findings indicate the important role of OCLN in lung diseases, and whether tight junctions are changed is also an important sign of the onset or progression of lung diseases. Our research showed that OCLN plays an important role in APH. This not only indicates that OCLN can be used as a possible molecular classification standard for APH, but also suggests that tight junction changes may also be a new diagnostic criterion for this disease.

The solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 4C1 (SLCO4C1) gene is a member of the organic anion transporter family and is primarily expressed in the kidneys, lungs, liver, and other tissues. In addition to its function in chronic kidney disease, SLCO4C1 has also been found to be involved in the occurrence of various tumors [37]. Rafael et al. found that SLCO4C1 acts as a tumor suppressor gene for primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and promoter methylation or somatic mutations in this gene may induce or augment the occurrence and development of head and neck cancer [38]. The Cancer Genome Atlas data showed that upregulation of SLCO4C1 is closely related to the clinical stage and survival time of endometrial cancer. Researchers have found that SLCO4C1 regulates the proliferation, apoptosis, migration, and other characteristics of endometrial cancer cells by regulating the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway [39]. By analyzing data from the GEO database, Li et al. found that methylation of the three sites within the SLCO4C1 promoter is related to the proliferation and differentiation of prostate cancer cells, which may be a potential molecular marker and provide a reference for the prognosis of prostate cancer patients [40]. Therefore, although SLCO4C1 is specifically expressed in the kidney, it can also perform important functions in multiple tissue diseases. Our study found that SLCO4C1 could be a potential molecular marker for the classification of APH, and it may also be a potential therapeutic target for APH.

Multiple EGF-like domains 9 (MEGF9) are transmembrane proteins with multiple EGF-like repeats. As multiple proteins containing EGF-like repeats are believed to be involved in the development of the nervous system, it is unsurprising that some researchers have observed the expression of MEGF9 in the peripheral nervous system [41]. Some of these results suggest that MEGF9 is highly expressed in the sensory ganglia and related peripheral nerves [42]. Other studies have shown that MEGF9 may be a guiding molecule in the process of neurodevelopment and maturation of the nervous system. In previous studies, researchers found that MEGF9 expression was increased in the tumor tissues of patients with multiple breast tumors, but its expression was not detected in normal breast tissues. In addition, studies have revealed that MEGF9 may be regulated by miR-125b, which provides a new potential molecular target for the treatment of breast cancer [43]. Our study is the first to describe MEGF9 expression in APH and provides a novel direction for further research on MEGF9.

Conclusions

Both ATP11A and OCLN were identified as critical factors in APH, which is consistent with the available data on both these genes. This further supports the accuracy of our WGCNA-based approach and suggests that our newly identified key genes—including ITM2C, SLCO4C1, and MEGF9—may facilitate the molecular classification and diagnosis of APH. In addition to the five key genes, our study also identified multiple pathways associated with APH, providing new ideas for follow-up studies designed to evaluate the mechanism of APH and identify potential treatment options.

Availability of data and materials

Data analyzed in this manuscript are publicly available from the Gene Expression Omnibus (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/), accession number GSE24988.

Abbreviations

PH:

Pulmonary hypertension

PF:

Pulmonary fibrosis

WGCNA:

Weighted correlation network analysis

IPF:

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

GEO:

Gene Expression Omnibus

FC:

Fold-change

GO:

Gene Ontology

KEGG:

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

PPI:

Protein–protein interaction

APP:

Amyloid precursor protein

APH:

Associated pulmonary hypertension

mPAP:

Mean pulmonary arterial pressure

References

  1. Cottin V, Wollin L, Fischer A, Quaresma M, Stowasser S, Harari S. Fibrosing interstitial lung diseases: knowns and unknowns. Eur Respir Rev. 2019;28(151):180100.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Verrecchia F, Mauviel A. Transforming growth factor-beta and fibrosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(22):3056–62.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Wynn TA, Ramalingam TR. Mechanisms of fibrosis: therapeutic translation for fibrotic disease. Nat Med. 2012;18(7):1028–40.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Nalysnyk L, Cid-Ruzafa J, Rotella P, Esser D. Incidence and prevalence of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: review of the literature. Eur Respir Rev. 2012;21(126):355–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Raghu G, Weycker D, Edelsberg J, Bradforf WZ, Oster G. Incidence and prevalence of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174(7):810–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Juarez MM, Chan AL, Norris AG, Morrissey BM. Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis—a review of current and novel pharmacotherapies. J Thorac Dis. 2015;7(3):499–519.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Alakhras M, Decker PA, Nadrous HF, Collazo-Clavell M, Ryu JH. Body mass index and mortality in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest. 2007;131(5):1448–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gribbin J, Hubbard R, Smith C. Role of diabetes mellitus and gastro-oesophageal reflux in the aetiology of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir Med. 2009;103(6):927–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee JS, Collard HR, Raghu G, Sweet MP, Hays SP, Campos GM, et al. Does chronic microaspiration cause idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis? Am J Med. 2010;123(4):304–11.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Nadrous HF, Pellikka PA, Krowka MJ, Swanson KL, Chaowalit N, Cecker PA, et al. Pulmonary hypertension in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest. 2005;128(4):2393–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lancaster LH, Mason WR, Parnell JA, Rice TW, Loyd JE, Milstone AP, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea is common in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest. 2009;136(3):772–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Nathan SD, Basavaraj A, Reichner C, Shlobin OA, Ahmad S, Kiernan J, et al. Prevalence and impact of coronary artery disease in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir Med. 2010;104(7):1035–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cottin V, Pavec JL, Prevot G, Mal H, Humbert M, Simonneau G, et al. Pulmonary hypertension in patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema syndrome. Eur Respir J. 2009;35(1):105–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Raghu G, Amatto VC, Behr J, Stowasser S. Comorbidities in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients: a systematic literature review. Eur Respir J. 2015;46(4):1113–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lettieri CJ, Nathan SD, Barnett SD, Ahmad S, Shorr AF. Prevalence and outcomes of pulmonary arterial hypertension in advanced idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest. 2006;129(3):746–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hamada K, Nagai S, Tanaka S, Handa T, Shigematsu M, Nagao T, et al. Significance of pulmonary arterial pressure and diffusion capacity of the lung as prognosticator in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest. 2007;131(3):650–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fell CD, Martinez FJ. The impact of pulmonary arterial hypertension on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest. 2007;131(3):641–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rung J, Brazma A. Reuse of public genome-wide gene expression data. Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14(2):89–99.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Langfelder P, Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:559.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Qi G, Kong W, Mou X, Wang S. A new method for excavating feature lncRNA in lung adenocarcinoma based on pathway crosstalk analysis. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120(6):9034–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang Z, Zhu J, Chen F, Ma L. Weighted gene coexpression network analysis identifies key genes and pathways associated with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Med Sci Monit. 2019;25:4285–304.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Huang A, Zhang M, Li T, Qin X. Serum proteomic analysis by tandem mass tags (TMT) based quantitative proteomics in gastric cancer patients. Clin Lab. 2018;64(5):855–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rodriguez-Mateos A, Istas G, Boschek L, Feliciano RP, Mills CE, Boby C, et al. Circulating anthocyanin metabolites mediate vascular benefits of blueberries: insights from randomized controlled trials, metabolomics, and nutrigenomics. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019;74(7):967–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Olson AL, Swigris JJ, Lezotte DC, Norris JM, Wilson CG, Brown KK. Mortality from pulmonary fibrosis increased in the United States from 1992 to 2003. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;176:277–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mejía M, Carrillo G, Rojas-Serrano J, Estrada A, Suarez T, Alonso D, et al. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema: decreased survival associated with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension. Chest. 2009;136(1):10–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang B, Groffen J, Heisterkamp N. Resistance to farnesyltransferase inhibitors in Bcr/Abl-positive lymphoblastic leukemia by increased expression of a novel ABC transporter homolog ATP11a. Blood. 2005;106(4):1355–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Bullard JE, Wert SE, Whitsett JA, Dean M, Nogee LM. ABCA3 mutations associated with pediatric interstitial lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;172(8):1026–31.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Fagerberg L, Hallström BM, Oksvold P, Kampf C, Djureinovic D, Odeberg J, et al. Analysis of the human tissue-specific expression by genome-wide integration of transcriptomics and antibody-based proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014;13(2):397–406.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fingerlin TE, Murphy E, Zhang W, Peljto AL, Brown KK, Steele MP, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies multiple susceptibility loci for pulmonary fibrosis. Nat Genet. 2013;45(6):613–20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Vidal R, Frangione B, Rostagno A, Mead S, Revesz T, Plant G, et al. A stop-codon mutation in the BRI gene associated with familial British dementia. Nature. 1999;399(6738):776–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Vidal R, Revesz T, Rostagno A, Kim E, Holton JL, Bek T, et al. A decamer duplication in the 3′ region of the BRI gene originates an amyloid peptide that is associated with dementia in a Danish kindred. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(9):4920–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Selkoe D, Kopan R. Notch and Presenilin: regulated intramembrane proteolysis links development and degeneration. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2003;26:565–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Matsuda S, Matsuda Y, D’Adamio L. BRI3 inhibits amyloid precursor protein processing in a mechanistically distinct manner from its homologue dementia gene BRI2. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(23):15815–25.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Yasukawa T, Tsutsui A, Tomomori-Sato C, Sato S, Saraf A, Washburn MP, et al. NRBP1-containing CRL2/CRL4A regulates amyloid β production by targeting BRI2 and BRI3 for degradation. Cell Rep. 2020;30(10):3478-91.e6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang M, Liu Y, Qian X, Wei N, Tang Y, Yang J. Downregulation of occludin affects the proliferation, apoptosis and metastatic properties of human lung carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2018;40(1):454–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zou J, Li Y, Dong L, Nusain AN, Shen L, et al. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is associated with tight junction protein alterations. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 2020;1862(5):183205.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Toyohara T, Suzuki T, Morimoto R, Akiyama Y, Souma T, Shiwaku HO, et al. SLCO4C1 transporter eliminates uremic toxins and attenuates hypertension and renal inflammation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20(12):2546–55.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Guerrero-Preston R, Michailidi C, Marchionni L, Pickering CR, Frederick MJ, Myers JN, et al. Key tumor suppressor genes inactivated by “greater promoter” methylation and somatic mutations in head and neck cancer. Epigenetics. 2014;9(7):1031–46.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Hu X, Han T, Bian Y, Tong H, Wen X, Li Y, et al. Knockdown of SLCO4C1 inhibits cell proliferation and metastasis in endometrial cancer through inactivating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Oncol Rep. 2020;43(3):919–29.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Li X, Zhang W, Song J, Zhang X, Ran L, He Y. SLCO4C1 promoter methylation is a potential biomarker for prognosis associated with biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy. Clin Epigenet. 2019;11(1):99.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Chen ZL, Indyk JA, Strickland S. The hippocampal laminin matrix is dynamic and critical for neuronal survival. Mol Biol Cell. 2003;14(7):2665–76.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Brandt-Bohne U, Keene DR, White FA, Koch M. MEGF9: a novel transmembrane protein with a strong and developmentally regulated expression in the nervous system. Biochem J. 2007;401(2):447–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Feliciano A, Castellvi J, Artero-Castro A, Leal JA, Romagosa C, Hernandez-Losa J, et al. miR-125b acts as a tumor suppressor in breast tumorigenesis via its novel direct targets ENPEP, CK2-α, CCNJ, and MEGF9. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(10):e76247.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai, China (Grant No. 19ZR1442900). The funders had no role in the experimental design, data collection and analysis, interpretation of the data, or writing of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HL conceived and designed the study. HC performed all analyses as well as directed and supervised data interpretation. HL and HC wrote and approved publication of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. 

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongcheng Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cai, H., Liu, H. Immune infiltration landscape and immune-marker molecular typing of pulmonary fibrosis with pulmonary hypertension. BMC Pulm Med 21, 383 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-021-01758-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-021-01758-2

Keywords

  • Immune infiltration analysis
  • Weighted correlation network analysis
  • Protein interaction network
  • Disease classification