Skip to main content
Download PDF

Efficacy of three sputum specimens for the diagnosis of Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease

BMC Pulmonary Medicine volume 23, Article number: 29 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

In Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease (MAC-PD), diagnosis requires a positive culture from at least two separate expectorated sputum specimens. The optimal number of sputum examinations remains unclear.

Objective

This study sought to elucidate the diagnostic yield of acid-fast bacilli in MAC-PD using 3 sputum specimens and to clarify the clinical characteristics of patients with MAC-PD diagnosed using 3 sputum specimens. Furthermore, we investigated the correlation between increased number of sputum specimens and diagnostic yield.

Methods

We reviewed the medical records of 139 patients with MAC-PD diagnosed at Toho University Omori Medical Center for whom at least three sputum specimens were examined before treatment from November 2014 through June 2021. Patients were classified into the 3-sputum diagnosed and the non-3 sputum diagnosed groups based on diagnostic procedure; clinical and radiological characteristics were compared. We also assessed diagnostic yield with the increased number of sputum specimens.

Results

Diagnostic yield with 3 sputum specimens was 16.5% (23/139). The 3-sputum diagnosed group had a lower body mass index [18.6(17–19.5) vs. 19.5(18–21.5); p = 0.014], and higher chest CT score [9(6.5–13) vs. 6(4–9); p = 0.011] including cavitary lesions (39.1% vs. 19%; p = 0.037) compared with the non-3 sputum diagnosed group. When the number of sputum specimens was increased to 6, the diagnostic yield increased to 23.7% (33/139).

Conclusion

Diagnostic yield with 3 sputum specimens was 16.5%. Patients diagnosed using 3 sputum specimens had more severe chest CT findings including cavitary lesions. Increasing the number of sputum specimens to 6 improved diagnostic yield by 7.2%.

Peer Review reports

Background

Nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD) is increasing in incidence worldwide and has become an important concern [1]. Likewise, the incidence of NTM-PD is gradually increasing in Japan and exceeded the incidence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) infection for the first time in 2014 [2]. The NTM type differs by region. In Japan, Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) accounts for about 90% of the total [2]. According to the current American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society/European Society of Clinical Microbiology/Infectious Disease Society of America (ATS/ERS/ESCMID/IDSA) guidelines, a diagnosis of MAC pulmonary disease (MAC-PD) requires a positive culture from at least 2 separate expectorated sputum specimens or at least 1 bronchial lavage sample as well as pulmonary symptoms and chest computed tomography (CT) findings consistent with MAC-PD [3]. This is based on a study where 98% of patients with ≥ 2 sputum cultures had clinically significant MAC-PD [4]. Also, 3 sputum specimens are recommended for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) [5]. In Japan, 3 sputum specimens are also customarily used for the diagnosis of MAC-PD. Although PTB can be definitively diagnosed based on single culture-positive or PCR-positive results, the diagnosis of MAC-PD requires 2 positive cultures. However, the optimal number of sputum specimens to obtain 2 positive cultures is unclear. This study aimed to clarify the diagnostic yield of acid-fast bacilli (AFB) for MAC-PD using 3 sputum specimens and the clinical characteristics of the patients leading to the diagnosis. We also assessed the diagnostic yield with an increased number of sputum specimens. Furthermore, we proposed new criteria to improve the diagnostic yield while maintaining the quality of diagnosis.

Methods

Study design

This single-center retrospective cohort study included 444 patients with suspected NTM-PD on chest CT findings, seen at Toho University Omori Medical Center from November 2014 through June 2021. We excluded those patients who had difficulty with sputum collection, those for whom less than 3 sputum specimens were collected before treatment for MAC, and who had diagnoses of mycobacterium tuberculosis and NTM other than MAC, and history of treatment for MAC. Of the remaining 283 patients with clinically suspected MAC-PD, 139 patients who satisfied the ATS/ERS/ESCMID/IDSA guidelines diagnostic criteria for MAC-PD were enrolled (Fig. 1). Sputum specimen induction was not performed. The interval between collection of the 3 sputum specimens differed for each patient, but the shortest interval from the first sputum specimen to the third was 2 days; the longest was 3 months.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart showing the study design between November 2014 and June 2021. NTM, Nontuberculous mycobacteria; MAC, Mycobacterium avium complex; GPL, Glycopeptidolipid

Full size image

Based on the examination of 3 sputum specimens, the 139 patients were classified into the 3 sputum specimens diagnosed group (3-sputum diagnosed group) and non-3 sputum specimens diagnosed group (non-3 sputum diagnosed group); their clinical and radiological characteristics were compared. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors independently associated with a diagnosis of MAC-PD using 3 sputum specimens. We assessed the diagnostic yield when the number of sputum specimens was increased.

Additionally, we ascertained whether the new diagnostic criteria for MAC-PD proposed by Kawasaki et al. [6] would improve diagnostic yield in 3 sputum specimens as follows, “ ≥ 1 positive sputum culture and GPL-core serum IgA positivity”.

Data collection

We collected data on age, sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking history, serum anti-glycopeptidolipid (GPL)-core IgA titer, comorbidities, chest and paranasal sinuses CT, and sputum and bronchoscopy culture results. Overall, 118 of 139 (84.9%) patients underwent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessment testing (CAT) to confirm subjective symptoms at the time of diagnosis [7].

Microbiological examination

Sputum specimens were subjected to Ziehl–Neelsen and Gram staining and cultured for mycobacteria, other bacteria, and fungi. Mycobacteria culture was carried out using a 2% Ogawa egg medium (Kyokuto Pharmaceutical Industrial Co., Tokyo, Japan). PCR assays were performed for M. tuberculosis, M. avium, and M. intracellulare. We used DNA–DNA hybridization to identify non-MAC species.

Chest CT score

Chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) score was reviewed as previously described [8, 9]. We divided the lungs into 6 zones at the levels of the carina and inferior pulmonary vein. We then categorized the 4 types of pulmonary lesions in MAC [cavities, bronchiectasis, nodules (less than 10 mm), and infiltration (an area of opacity larger than 10 mm)] into 5 stages, according to the occupation area in each Sect. (0: no lesion, 1: 1% to 24% occupied, 2: 25% to 49% occupied, 3: 50% to 74% occupied, and 4: 75% to 100% occupied). Two respiratory physicians with over 15 years of experience reviewed the chest CT scores independently.

Glycopeptidolipid core serum IgA assay

Levels of serum IgA antibody against the GPL-core antigen of MAC were measured using an enzyme immunoassay kit (TAUNS Laboratory Inc., Shizuoka, Japan). This kit is used to measure antibody levels via an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. GPL-core IgA antibody was developed by Kitada et al. [10] and has been commercially available in Japan since 2011.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as the number of patients and percentages. Age, BMI, chest CT score, and CAT score are expressed as median values (with interquartile range). Associations of categorical and continuous variables between patients in the 3-sputum diagnosed group and non-3 sputum diagnosed group were tested with the Chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test, and the Mann–Whitney U test, respectively. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to evaluate factors independently associated with a definitive diagnosis. Multivariate logistic regression was performed using a stepwise method. A p value of < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS software version 27 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY).

Ethics

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Toho University Omori Medical Center (Approval No. M21239). All experiments were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki guidelines for studies involving human participants (2008).

Results

Clinical characteristics

This study included 139 patients; the 3-sputum diagnosed group comprised 23 (16.5%) patients (5 men, 18 women; median age 73 years) and the non-3 sputum diagnosed group included 116 patients (17 men, 99 women; median age 70 years). Table 1 shows the characteristics of all 139 patients. The 3-sputum diagnosed and non-3 sputum diagnosed groups showed significant differences in BMI [18.6(17–19.5) vs. 19.5(18–21.5); p = 0.014], and subjective cough symptoms in CAT score [2.5(1–3) vs. 1(0–2); p = 0.038]. Both groups differed significantly in chest CT scores [9(6.5–13) vs. 6(4–9); p = 0.011], and the proportion of patients with cavitary lesions (39.1% vs. 19%; p = 0.037). Table 2 shows the results of microbiological analysis. The proportion of patients with ≥ 2 out of 3 positive sputum MAC-PCR and smear tests was significantly higher in the 3-sputum diagnosed group [(87% vs. 12.1%; p < 0.001), (26.1% vs. 1.7%; p < 0.001)]. Bronchoscopy was performed significantly more frequently in the non-3 sputum diagnosed group (47.8% vs. 87.9%; p = 0.049).

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of patients in the 3-sputum diagnosed and non-3 sputum diagnosed groups
Full size table
Table 2 Sputum specimens and bronchoscopy culture results of patients in the 3-sputum diagnosed and non-3 sputum diagnosed groups
Full size table

Factors independently associated with diagnosis using 3 sputum specimens

Table 3 shows the results of univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis of independent associations with diagnosis in 3 sputum specimens. Lower BMI (Odds Ratio [OR], 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7–0.99; p = 0.039), cavitary lesion (OR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.05–7.16; p = 0.039) higher chest CT score (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.05–1.31; p = 0.004), higher cough score in CAT score (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.06–2.16; p = 0.021) were independently associated with diagnosis in 3 sputum specimens in univariate analysis. Lower BMI (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59–0.99; p = 0.039) and higher chest CT score (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.04–1.44; p = 0.018) were independently associated with diagnosis in 3 sputum specimens in multivariate analysis.

Table 3 Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis of independent associations with diagnosis using 3 sputum specimens
Full size table

Change in diagnosed yield with increased number of sputum specimens

Table 4 shows the change in diagnostic yield with increased number of sputum specimens. There were 73, 53, 41, 29, 24, 21, and 16 patients for whom sputum specimens were obtained 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 times before initiation of treatment for MAC. The cumulative diagnostic yield for MAC-PD was 18% (25/139), 21.6% (30/139), 23.7% (33/139), 23.7% (33/139), 24.5% (34/139), 25.2% (35/139), and 25.2% (35/139), respectively. Median intervals between collecting the 3rd sputum specimen to the 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, and 10th sputum specimens were 4 (1–9), 9 (4.8–16), 15 (5.8–24), 14 (10–24), 17 (11–27), 20 (12–32) and 21 (17–27.5) months, respectively.

Table 4 Cumulative diagnostic yield for MAC-PD with increased number of sputum specimens
Full size table

Validation of new diagnostic criteria proposed by Kawasaki et al. for the diagnosis of MAC-PD

Figure 2 shows the distribution of diagnosis for patients with MAC-PD illustrated using a Venn diagram. Among the 139 MAC-PD patients, the 3-sputum diagnosed group (≥ 2 out of 3 positive sputum cultures), ≥ 1 out of 3 positive sputum cultures, and positive results for GPL-core serum IgA comprised 23 (16.5%), 59 (42.4%), and 99 (71.2%), respectively. Patients with 1 out of 3 positive sputum cultures and GPL-core serum IgA positivity comprised 25 (18%). According to the new diagnostic criteria of “ ≥ 1 positive sputum culture and GPL-core serum IgA positivity” proposed by Kawasaki et al., now added to the conventional ATS/ERS/ESCMID/IDSA criteria [3], the diagnostic yield was 34.5% (48/139) using 3 sputum specimens.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Distribution of diagnosis of MAC-PD patients as illustrated using a Venn diagram. Gray area represents patient with confirmed diagnosis of MAC-PD using 3 sputum specimens. MAC, Mycobacterium avium complex; GPL, Glycopeptidolipid

Full size image

Discussion

The diagnostic yield for MAC-PD using 3 sputum specimens was 16.5%. In MAC-PD, 3 sputum specimens are insufficient for definitive diagnosis. No study has yet investigated the number of sputum specimens required for a definitive diagnosis of MAC-PD, however, there have been studies in PTB. For instance, the cumulative positive proportion of AFB in induced sputum specimens of patients with active PTB from smear, PCR, and culture analysis was 64%, 89%, and 70% for 1, 81%, 95%, and 91% for 2, 91%, 99%, and 99% for 3, and 98%, 100%, and 100% for 4 sample inductions [11]. Repeated sputum specimens could considerably improve diagnostic accuracy for PTB. The ATS/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/IDSA statement of 2017, strongly recommended 3 sputum specimens [5]. Because M. tuberculosis is not an environmentally endemic pathogen, even a single culture-positive or PCR-positive result suffices to establish a definitive diagnosis; MAC, however, has been isolated from environmental sources, including water and soil [12, 13]. Therefore, ≥ 2 positive cultures from sputum specimens are required for the diagnosis of MAC-PD considering the possibility of contamination from the environment or colonization. In Japan, conventionally 3 sputum specimens are collected for MAC-PD but in this study, this can be considered insufficient for diagnosis. Furthermore, the actual diagnostic yield of 3 sputum specimens may even be lower, because among the 72 patients with GPL-core serum IgA positivity with no definitive diagnosis in this study, it cannot be excluded that bronchoscopy may contribute to the diagnosis of MAC-PD. Moreover, the 72 patients positive for GPL-core serum IgA and with no definitive diagnosis had a significantly lower rate of undergoing bronchoscopy than the 139 patients with a definitive diagnosis (Additional file 1: Table S1).

Patients diagnosed using 3 sputum specimens had severe findings on chest CT, including cavitary lesions, severe subjective symptoms, and low BMI. Two previous studies compared patients diagnosed using sputum specimens with those diagnosed using bronchoscopy. Tamura et al. reported a higher proportion of patients diagnosed using sputum specimens among patients with cavitary lesions than those without (67% vs. 43%); there was no significant difference [14]. In a study by Maekawa et al., patients diagnosed using sputum specimens were significantly more symptomatic and had more widespread lesions, but there was no difference in the presence of cavities [15]. The characteristics of the patients in the previous reports are similar to those in this study.

By increasing the number of sputum specimens from 3 to 6 before the initiation of treatment for MAC, the cumulative diagnostic yield was increased from 16.5 to 23.7%. In patients with MAC-PD, bronchoscopy is often performed when sputum specimens do not aid in diagnosis. Some studies have reported the usefulness of bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of MAC-PD [16,17,18,19]. Bronchoscopy is generally relatively safe, but associated be performed are limited particularly in resource-limited areas, hence diagnosis using sputum specimens should be applied more frequently, if possible. Increasing the number of sputum specimens from 3 to 6 increased the cumulative diagnostic yield by 7.2% but an increase from 6 to 10 only increased the yield by 1.5%. There was no significant difference, but 50% of the 10 patients diagnosed using 6 sputum specimens had 1 positive culture in the first 3 sputum specimens (50% vs. 18.4%; p = 0.094) (Additional file 2: Table S2). Thus, for patients with at least 1 positive culture from 3 sputum specimens, it may be plausible to increase the number to 6 to facilitate a diagnosis of MAC-PD.

According to the new diagnostic criteria “ ≥ 1 positive sputum culture and GPL-core serum IgA positivity” previously proposed by Kawasaki et al. [6], now added to the conventional ATS/ERS/ESCMID/IDSA criteria [3], the diagnostic yield was 34.5% (48/139) using 3 sputum specimens. While “loose” diagnostic criteria may unnecessarily expose patients to harmful and expensive treatments, overly stringent diagnostic criteria may hinder diagnosis and delay initiation of treatment. NTM isolates including MAC have been identified in patients with chronic lung disease [20, 21]. Furthermore, MAC is an environmental commensal therefore the possibility of clinical specimen contamination cannot be excluded. In a study of 118 men in a gold-mining workforce in South Africa from whom NTM isolates were detected, only 27% met the ATS case definitions for pulmonary NTM disease [22]. Thus, the significance of a single positive culture in sputum specimens is unclear. The GPL-core IgA antibody serodiagnostic test was developed by Kitada et al. for diagnosing MAC-PD. They further assessed its accuracy by comparing with bronchial wash culture results; sensitivity and specificity were 78.6% and 96.4%, respectively [23]. A meta-analysis of the GPL-core serum IgA kit reported summary sensitivity and specificity estimates of 69.6% (95% CI, 62.1 to 76.1) and 90.6% (95% CI, 83.6 to 95.1), respectively (cutoff value, 0.7 U/mL) [24]. Considering the disease specificity of GPL-core serum IgA, chest CT findings consistent with MAC-PD, GPL-core serum IgA positivity, and 1 positive sputum culture might be sufficient criteria for the definitive diagnosis of MAC-PD. Kawasaki et al. reported that 95.5% (640/670) patients met the criteria of “1 positive sputum culture and GPL-core serum IgA positivity” and subsequently satisfied the ATS/ERS/ESCMID/IDSA guidelines diagnostic criteria for MAC-PD [6]. In this study, 6 of the 72 patients with “GPL-core serum IgA positivity and no definitive diagnosis” (Additional file 1: Table S1) and 25 of the 139 diagnosed patients met this criterion; the final diagnostic yield of this criterion was 80.1% (25/31). However, because 6 non-diagnosed patients did not undergo bronchoscopy, it is possible that the diagnostic yield would increase if bronchoscopy were performed.

This study had several limitations. Firstly, it was a single-center study in a small number of patients. Thus, the findings may not be generalizable to a larger, more diverse population. Secondly, bronchoscopy was not performed for all participants, therefore the overall diagnostic yield was possibly overestimated. Thirdly, after the first 3 sputum specimens the possibility that of disease progression over time to culture positive specifically in subsequent sputum specimens cannot be excluded. Fourthly, there was likely selection bias because some patients were diagnosed using bronchoscopy, and treatment was introduced without subsequent sputum examinations, further, there were no pre-established criteria indicating the need to perform a bronchoscopy. Fifth, diagnostic yield with 3 sputum specimens may be less than that for NTM-PD patients suspected based on chest radiograph because this study included patients with suspected NTM-PD by chest CT findings and may include those with mild clinical features also. All patient’s data generated or analyzed during this study showed in supplementary material files (Additional file 3: Table S3).

Conclusion

The diagnostic yield for MAC-PD in 3 sputum specimens was 16.5% (23/139). Patients diagnosed using 3 sputum specimens had more severe chest CT findings including cavitary lesions. Increasing the number of sputum specimens to 6 improved diagnostic yield by 7.2%. In MAC-PD, increasing the number of sputum specimens to 6 is plausible for a definitive diagnosis.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article and its Additional file files (Additional file 3: Table S3). Further enquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

AFB:

Acid-fast bacilli

ATS:

American Thoracic Society

BMI:

Body mass index

COPD:

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

CAT:

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease assessment testing

CT:

Computed tomography

CI:

Confidence interval

ERS:

European Respiratory Society

ESCMID:

European Society of Clinical Microbiology

GPL:

Glycopeptidolipid

IDSA:

Infectious Disease Society of America

HRCT:

High-resolution CT

MAC:

Mycobacterium avium complex

NTM:

Nontuberculous mycobacteria

OR:

Odds Ratio

PTB:

Pulmonary tuberculosis

References

  1. Brode SK, Daley CL, Marras TK. The epidemiologic relationship between tuberculosis and non-tuberculous mycobacterial disease: a systematic review. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2014;18(11):1370–7. https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.14.0120.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Namkoong H, Kurashima A, Morimoto K, Hoshino Y, Hasegawa N, Ato M, et al. Epidemiology of pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterial disease. Japan Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22(6):1116–7. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2206.151086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Daley CL, Iaccarino JM, Lange C, Cambau E, Wallace RJ Jr, Andrejak C, et al. Treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease: an official ATS/ERS/ESCMID/IDSA clinical practice guideline. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71:e1–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tsukamura M. Diagnosis of disease caused by Mycobacterium avium complex. Chest. 1991;99(3):667–9. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.99.3.667.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lewinsohn DM, Leonard MK, LoBue PA, Cohn DL, Daley CL, Desmond E, et al. Official American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Clinical Practice Guidelines: Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in Adults and Children. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64:e1–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciw778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kawasaki T, Kitada S, Fukushima K, Akiba E, Haduki K, Saito H, et al. The diagnosis of nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease by single bacterial isolation plus anti-GPL-core IgA antibody. Microbiol Spectr. 2022;10(1):e0140621. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01406-21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jones PW, Tabberer M, Chen WH. Creating scenarios of the impact of COPD and their relationship to COPD Assessment Test (CAT™) scores. BMC Pulm Med. 2011;11:42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-11-42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Morimoto K, Yoshiyama T, Kurashima A, Sasaki Y, Hoshino Y, Yoshimori K, et al. Nutritional indicators are correlated with the radiological severity score in patients with Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease: a cross-sectional study. Intern Med. 2014;53(5):397–401. https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.53.1277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Urabe N, Sakamoto S, Ito A, Sekiguchi R, Shimanuki Y, Kanokogi T, et al. Bronchial brushing and diagnosis of pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacteria infection. Respiration. 2021;100(9):877–85. https://doi.org/10.1159/000515605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kitada S, Maekura R, Toyoshima N, Fujiwara N, Yano I, Ogura T, et al. Serodiagnosis of pulmonary disease due to Mycobacterium avium complex with an enzyme immunoassay that uses a mixture of glycopeptidolipid antigens. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35(11):1328–35. https://doi.org/10.1086/344277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Al Zahrani K, Al Jahdali H, Poirier L, René P, Menzies D. Yield of smear, culture and amplification tests from repeated sputum induction for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2001;5(9):855–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Marras TK, Wallace RJ Jr, Koth LL, Stulbarg MS, Cowl CT, Daley CL. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis reaction to Mycobacterium avium in household water. Chest. 2005;127(2):664–71. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.127.2.664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tzou CL, Dirac MA, Becker AL, Beck NK, Weigel KM, Meschke JS, et al. Association between Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease and mycobacteria in home water and soil. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020;17(1):57–62. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201812-915OC.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tamura A, Muraki K, Shimada M, Suzuki J, Kashizaki F, Matsui Y, et al. Usefulness of bronchofiberscopy for the diagnosis of pulmonary non-tuberculous mycobacteriosis—an analysis mainly on pulmonary M. avium complex disease. Kekkaku. 2008;83(12):785–91.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Maekawa K, Naka M, Shuto S, Harada Y, Ikegami Y. The characteristics of patients with pulmonary Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex disease diagnosed by bronchial lavage culture compared to those diagnosed by sputum culture. J Infect Chemother. 2017;23(9):604–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiac.2017.05.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tanaka E, Amitani R, Niimi A, Suzuki K, Murayama T, Kuze F. Yield of computed tomography and bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;155(6):2041–6. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.155.6.9196113.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ikedo Y. The significance of bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) pulmonary disease. Kurume Med J. 2001;48(1):15–9. https://doi.org/10.2739/kurumemedj.48.15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sugihara E, Hirota N, Niizeki T, Tanaka R, Nagafuchi M, Koyanagi T, et al. Usefulness of bronchial lavage for the diagnosis of pulmonary disease caused by Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex (MAC) infection. J Infect Chemother. 2003;9(4):328–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10156-003-0267-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Urabe N, Sakamoto S, Sano G, Ito A, Homma S. Characteristics of patients with bronchoscopy-diagnosed pulmonary Mycobacterium avium complex infection. J Infect Chemother. 2018;24(10):822–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiac.2018.06.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. O’Brien RJ, Geiter LJ, Snider DE Jr. The epidemiology of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases in the United States. Results from a national survey. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1987;135(5):1007–14. https://doi.org/10.1164/arrd.1987.135.5.1007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang Y, Yakrus MA, Graviss EA, Williams-Bouyer N, Turenne C, Kabani A, et al. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis study of Mycobacterium abscessus isolates previously affected by DNA degradation. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(12):5582–7. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.42.12.5582-5587.2004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Corbett EL, Blumberg L, Churchyard GJ, Moloi N, Mallory K, Clayton T, et al. Nontuberculous mycobacteria: defining disease in a prospective cohort of South African miners. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;160(1):15–21. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.160.1.9812080.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kitada S, Kobayashi K, Nishiuchi Y, Fushitani K, Yoshimura K, Tateishi Y, et al. Serodiagnosis of pulmonary disease due to Mycobacterium avium complex proven by bronchial wash culture. Chest. 2010;138(1):236–7. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.10-0248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shibata Y, Horita N, Yamamoto M, Tsukahara T, Nagakura H, Tashiro K, et al. Diagnostic test accuracy of anti-glycopeptidolipid-core IgA antibodies for Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:29325. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29325.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study received no funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Omori Medical Center, Toho University, 6-11-1 Omori-nishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8541, Japan

    Naohisa Urabe, Susumu Sakamoto, Marie Masuoka, Chiaki Kato, Asuka Yamaguchi, Nozomi Tokita, Sakae Homma & Kazuma Kishi

Authors
  1. Naohisa Urabe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Susumu Sakamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marie Masuoka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chiaki Kato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Asuka Yamaguchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nozomi Tokita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sakae Homma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Kazuma Kishi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

NU designed the study, analyzed, and drafted the manuscript; SS and KK designed the study and participated in editing the manuscript; MM confirmed the analyses, and revised the article for intellectual content; CK conceptualized the study and revised the article for intellectual content; AY conceptualized the study, supervised; NT and SH participated in editing the manuscript and revised the article for intellectual content. All authors read and critically revised the first as well as the subsequent and final drafts of this manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naohisa Urabe.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted in accordance with the amended Declaration of Helsinki and the Ethics Committee of Toho University Omori Medical Center approved the protocol (Approval No.M21239). All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. All patients provided written informed consents to participate in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Supplement Table 1. Clinical characteristics of patients in the diagnosis and non-diagnosis + positive GPL-core IgA groups.

Additional file 2.

Supplement Table 2. Clinical characteristics of patients for whom up to 6 sputum specimens led to diagnosis.

Additional file 3.

Supplement Table 3. Detailed data of all patients.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Urabe, N., Sakamoto, S., Masuoka, M. et al. Efficacy of three sputum specimens for the diagnosis of Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease. BMC Pulm Med 23, 29 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-023-02327-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-023-02327-5

Keywords

BMC Pulmonary Medicine

ISSN: 1471-2466

Contact us