Skip to main content
Download PDF

The ratio of respiratory rate to diaphragm thickening fraction for predicting extubation success

BMC Pulmonary Medicine volume 23, Article number: 109 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Several parameters are used to predict successful extubation but their accuracy varies among studies. We hypothesized that combining conventional and diaphragmatic parameters would be more effective than using just one. Our primary objective was to evaluate the performance of the respiratory rate in relation to the diaphragm thickening fraction (RR/DTF) ratio to predict the success of extubation.

Methods

We enrolled 130 adult patients who required invasive mechanical ventilation, planned to be extubated, and used a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) in the intensive care unit from July 2020 to April 2022. We measured the conventional parameters and the diaphragmatic parameters 2 h after SBT. The RR/DTF was calculated by dividing the respiratory rate (RR) by the diaphragm thickening fraction (DTF). The definition of weaning success is successful extubation within 48 h.

Results

Of 130 patients, 8 patients (6.2%) were reintubated within 48 h. The RR/DTF was significantly lower in the successful extubation group than in the extubation failure group (right hemidiaphragm; 0.47 (0.33–0.64) vs 1.1 (0.6–2.32), p < 0.001 and left hemidiaphragm; 0.45 (0.31–0.65) vs 0.78 (0.48–1.75), p < 0.001). The right RR/DTF using a cut-off point at ≤ 0.81 had a sensitivity of 87.7%, a specificity of 75%, and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.762 for predicting successful extubation (p = 0.013). The sensitivity, specificity, and AUROC for predicting extubation success of right DTF at a cut-off point of ≥ 26.2% were 84.3%, 62.5%, and 0.775, respectively (p = 0.009).

Conclusion

The RR/DTF ratio is a promising tool for predicting extubation outcome. Additionally, using RR/DTF was more reliable than conventional or diaphragmatic parameters alone in predicting extubation success.

Peer Review reports

Background

Predicting liberation from mechanical ventilation (MV) has long been a crucial clinical issue. Extubation failure was associated with an increased risk of death and an extended ICU stay [1]. Currently, parameters such as the rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI), vital capacity (VC), and maximal inspiratory pressure (PIMAX) are routinely used to predict extubation failure from MV. However, the results of these parameters in predicting weaning outcomes vary across studies [2,3,4,5].

The ratio of respiratory rate to tidal volume (RR/VT), known as the RSBI, is one of the most widely used predictors of weaning outcomes. However, some previous studies showed that RSBI is not a reliable predictor of extubation success [5,6,7]. These results may be because RSBI does not specifically measure diaphragmatic function. The diaphragm is the main respiratory muscle. It has been demonstrated that MV accelerates diaphragmatic atrophy [8]. Diaphragm dysfunction (DD) is common in critically ill patients especially in patients with respiratory failure who require MV [9]. Furthermore, DD is related to weaning failure [10]. Therefore, parameters that do not directly measure diaphragmatic function might be poor predictors of extubation outcomes.

Assessment of diaphragmatic function by the twitch magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation or measurement of transdiaphragmatic pressure with esophageal balloons is costly and invasive. Bedside ultrasound is increasingly performed in a critical care setting and may be of great utility for this purpose because it is non-invasive, widely available, and allows real-time evaluation of diaphragmatic movement. To determine diaphragmatic function, ultrasound can be used to obtain diaphragm thickening fraction (DTF), diaphragmatic excursion (DE), and time to peak inspiratory amplitude (TPIA) during contraction [10,11,12,13,14].

Spadaro et al. revealed that replacing VT with DE in the RSBI, named D-RSBI (RR/DE), had better diagnostic accuracy for predicting weaning outcomes than traditional RSBI [15]. The RSBI reflects the function of all inspiratory muscles and accessory muscles. In case of diaphragmatic dysfunction, the other inspiratory and accessory muscles will serve to preserve tidal volume (VT), which is used to calculate RSBI. However, those groups of muscles can only temporarily replace the diaphragm function because the accessory muscles are weaker and more fatigable than the diaphragm [16, 17]. These muscles will not be able to sustain adequate ventilation. Thus, we hypothesized that modifying RSBI by replacing VT with a diaphragmatic ultrasound parameter would provide a superior predictor to predict extubation outcome more than the conventional parameter or diaphragmatic parameter alone.

Several studies showed that DTF was more reliable than DE in terms of predicting weaning outcomes, with higher sensitivity and specificity [18, 19]. We hypothesized that RR/DTF would outperform RR/VT and RR/DE. Thus, the objective of this study was to determine the performance of RR/DTF ratio and to compare its accuracy with diaphragmatic and conventional parameters in predicting the success of extubation within 48 h.

Methods

This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted at the tertiary-care hospital between July 2020 and April 2022. The study was approved by the Ethics Clearance Committee on Human Rights Related to Research Involving Human subjected, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University (approval no. MURA2020/881).

Patients aged 18 years and older were enrolled in this study from the medical and surgical intensive care units (ICU). The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) patients with acute respiratory failure caused by medical or postoperative conditions who had been receiving MV for more than 48 h and tolerated 2 h spontaneous breathing trial (SBT); 2) readiness for weaning from MV as defined according to a local guideline (Additional file1: S1), including recovery from the cause of respiratory failure, hemodynamic stability in the absence of vasopressors, and no administration of neuromuscular blocking agents or sedative drugs for more than 24 h prior to enrollment with a Richmond agitation-sedation scale (RASS) score between -1 and + 1. All patients or their relatives were able to give written informed consent prior to enrollment.

Exclusion criteria included a history of neuromuscular disease or thoracic surgery, pneumothorax, presence of ascites, tracheostomized patients, and poor image quality.

Baseline characteristics were obtained including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), length of MV until SBT, underlying disease, cause of respiratory failure, and laboratory findings.

Measurements

All participants underwent a SBT by either using pressure support ventilation (PSV) with pressure support of 5 cmH2O and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH2O or a T-piece system with oxygen support to achieve oxygen saturation of ≥ 92%.

The decision to start weaning, extubation or reintubation was made based on the attending physician's discretion following local guidelines. Daily, patients were assessed by the attending physician for weaning readiness using local criteria (Additional file1: S1). Criteria for failed SBT are shown in Additional file1: S2. Investigators were informed when the ICU attendings decided to extubate. The attending physicians were blinded to the ultrasound results. Following extubation, patients who were considered to be at high risk of extubation failure may be extubated directly to preventative noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or high-flow nasal cannula based on the decision of the attending physicians. Patients at high risk of extubation failure include patients with hypercapnia, COPD, congestive heart failure, or high oxygen requirement. Reintubation was decided by the attending physicians. In our clinical practice, we generally use the local criteria for assessing extubation failure as shown in Additional file 1: S3.

Exhaled VT, RR, RSBI, VC, PIMAX, and diaphragmatic parameters were measured in all participants at 2 h after the SBT.

We used a hand-held Wright respirometer (Ferraris Medical Ltd., Herford, Hertfordshire, England) to measure minute ventilation. VT was calculated as minute ventilation divided by RR. The RSBI was obtained by dividing RR (breaths/min) with VT (litres). Measurement of VC was performed in the upright position after measurement of minute ventilation. PIMAX was obtained by occluding the airway at end-expiration through a unidirectional valve, a calibrated device attached to the end of an endotracheal tube (Instrument Industry, Inc., Bethel Park, PA, USA). PIMAX was the most negative pressure documented after airway occlusion when patients were instructed to take a maximal inspiratory effort against the closed valve [20].

Transthoracic ultrasonography was performed at the bedside by a well-trained pulmonary physician using SonoSite M-Turbo (SonoSite Inc., Bothell, WA, USA). All examinations were carried out with patients in a semi-recumbent position with the head of the bed at 30–45 degrees. We obtained diaphragmatic ultrasound values from three consecutive tidal breaths on each side of the hemidiaphragm, and average values were used for analysis.

The diaphragmatic inspiratory excursion (DE) and time to peak inspiratory amplitude of the diaphragm (TPIA) of each hemidiaphragm were measured in M-mode using a 1- to 5-MHz ultrasound transducer during tidal breathing. The ultrasound probe was placed at the junction of the mid-clavicular line and subcostal margin or intercostal space in which the ultrasound beam paralleled the direction of diaphragmatic movement. Using M-mode tracing, the normal diaphragm movement towards the probe during inspiration was recorded as an upward motion. The TPIA was defined as the time from the beginning of diaphragmatic contraction to the maximal amplitude of diaphragmatic excursion (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Image demonstrating measurement of the diaphragmatic inspiratory excursion (DE) and time to peak inspiratory amplitude (TPIA) in M-mode ultrasound. A-A is the TPIA. B-B is the DE

Full size image

Diaphragmatic thickness (DT) was subsequently measured at the zone of apposition, which is the area of the diaphragm attached to the rib cage between the eighth and tenth intercostal spaces. The DT was measured at both end inspiration and end expiration using a 6–13 MHz linear ultrasound transducer in M-mode (Fig. 2). The diaphragm thickening fraction (DTF) percentage was calculated with the following formula: thickness at the end of inspiration minus thickness at the end of expiration, divided by thickness at the end of expiration, then multiplied by 100 [21]. The RR/DTF was calculated by dividing the respiratory rate (RR) by the DTF. The RR/DE was calculated by dividing the respiratory rate (RR) by the DE.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Image at zone of opposition for measurement of diaphragmatic thickness (DT). A-A is the DT at end expiration, and B-B is the DT at end inspiration

Full size image

Outcomes

The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of the RR/DTF for predicting successful extubation. Extubation failure was defined as the requirement of reintubation within 48 h after extubation.

The secondary outcome was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the RR/DTF with diaphragmatic parameters (DE, DTF, TPIA) and conventional parameters (RSBI, VC, PIMAX) for predicting successful extubation.

Statistical analysis

The sample size was calculated with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of greater than 0.80 as acceptable diagnostic accuracy. Accordingly, assuming that the null hypothesis for AUROC was 0.5 at a power of 80%, a Type I error of 0.05, and a prevalence of 9.7% reintubation within 48 h [13], a minimal sample size of 83 patients was required in this study.

The patients were categorized into two groups based on the primary outcome. The unpaired Student's t-test was used to compare continuous variables and the Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables with a normal distribution and median with interquartile range for variables without normal distribution.

The variables associated with the primary and secondary outcomes were then analyzed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to determine their performance. Sensitivity and specificity were also analyzed to determine appropriate cut-off values for each parameter.

We analyzed inter-operator variability of all diaphragmatic ultrasound parameters in 10 cases by intraclass correlation coefficient. Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, version 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

In total, 138 patients were enrolled in our study. Eight patients were excluded due to poor image quality. A total of 130 patients were included for analysis. The mean age was 68.1 ± 16.1 years; 78 patients (60%) were male. One hundred and twenty-two patients (93.8%) were successfully extubated without reintubation within 48 h. The baseline characteristics, comorbidities, the reasons for intubation, and laboratory findings of the extubation success and failure groups were shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Baseline characteristic between extubation success and extubation failure groups
Full size table

All diaphragmatic parameters obtained from the right and left hemidiaphragm were compared, as shown in Table 2. The mean diaphragmatic excursion of the right and left hemidiaphragm was 1.6 ± 0.7 cm and 1.5 ± 0.7 cm (p = 0.15). The mean diaphragmatic thickening fraction of the right and left hemidiaphragm was 41.1 ± 17.6% and 42.6 ± 18.4% (p = 0.25). The mean TPIA of the right hemidiaphragm was statistically significantly higher than the left hemidiaphragm (1.2 ± 0.4 s vs. 1.1 ± 0.4 s, p < 0.001).

Table 2 Comparison between right and left diaphragmatic parameters
Full size table

RR/DTF from both hemidiaphragm was significantly lower in the extubation success group than in the extubation failure group. The RR/DTF of the right hemidiaphragm in both groups were 0.47 (0.33–0.64) vs 1.1 (0.6–2.32), p < 0.001, and that of the left hemidiaphragm were 0.45 (0.31–0.65) vs 0.78 (0.48–1.75), p < 0.001. As shown in Table 3, bilateral RR/DE was significantly lower in the extubation success group than in the extubation failure group. Bilateral diaphragmatic thickness fraction and right diaphragmatic excursion were significantly higher in the extubation success than in the failure group. RSBI was lower in the extubation success than in the failure group, 53.1 ± 24 vs. 80.6 ± 52.2, p = 0.005. The vital capacity (VC) significantly differed between patients who succeeded and failed extubation, 987.8 ± 361.3 vs. 720 ± 365.4 ml, p = 0.045.

Table 3 Comparison of parameters between extubation success and extubation failure groups
Full size table

The sensitivity, specificity, and AUROC for predicting of extubation success of RR/DTF, RR/DE, DTF, DE, TPIA, VC, and RSBI are shown in Table 4. The right RR/DTF provided the highest sensitivity and specificity compared to other parameters. To predict extubation success, the RR/DTF of the right hemidiaphragm with a threshold value of ≤ 0.81 provided a sensitivity of 87.7% and specificity of 75%, AUROC = 0.762. The receiver operating characteristic curve for predicting of extubation success of right RR/DTF, right RR/DE, and RSBI is demonstrated in Fig. 3.

Table 4 Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of parameters for predicting of extubation success
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

The receiver operating characteristic curve for predicting of extubation success of right RR/DTF, right RR/DE, and RSBI

Full size image

The inter-operator variability analysis of DE, TPIA, and DTF between the two operators revealed an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.99 (95%CI 0.98–0.99), 0.98 (95%CI 0.9–0.99), and 0.97 (95%CI 0.89–0.99); p < 0.001, respectively.

Discussion

This study demonstrated that the ratio of RR/DTF indicated good predictive performance for successful extubation. With the threshold value of ≤ 0.81, the right RR/DTF exhibited a sensitivity of 87.7% and a specificity of 75% for predicting extubation success. The right RR/DTF had higher sensitivity and specificity in predicting extubation success than other parameters.

We found that DTF had comparable sensitivity to RR/DTF in predicting extubation success. However, RR/DTF had a higher specificity than DTF. The most likely explanation is that RR/DTF incorporates RR, which represents overall respiratory muscle function [22], and DTF, which represents a diaphragmatic function, making it superior to the diaphragmatic parameter alone.

We found that RR/DTF was better than RSBI (RR/VT) for predicting extubation success. The superiority of RR/DTF may be attributed to the importance of the diaphragm muscle. RSBI uses division by VT, which is the result of respiratory muscles defeating the inspiratory load [23] to maintain adequate VT. However, the fact that respiratory muscles can overcome inspiratory load may reflect the overall function of the diaphragm and other respiratory muscles. Declined diaphragmatic functions can be compensated by other respiratory muscles. As a result, RSBI is inferior to RR/DTF, a parameter that directly evaluates the diaphragm function. Thus, replacing VT with DTF or DE would better predict the success of extubation.

This study also found that RR/DTF was better than RR/DE for predicting extubation success. This finding might be explained by the fact that DTF reflects the work of breathing [24]. Two physiologic studies discovered a correlation between DTF and esophageal pressure–time product and diaphragmatic pressure–time product [24, 25]. They demonstrated that diaphragm thickening accurately predicted changes in inspiratory muscle effort in response to changes in a support level. However, the diaphragmatic excursion was not correlated to any index of muscle effort under varying levels of muscle loading [25]. Therefore, DE may not be a reliable indicator of diaphragmatic contractile activity and inspiratory effort during PSV. Our study assessed diaphragmatic parameters in some patients while in PSV mode, which could explain why RR/DTF outperformed RR/DE in this study.

The cut-off value of DTF for predicting extubation success in our study is close to previous studies. In this study, the DTF cut-off value of ≥ 26.2% showed AUROC 0.775. DiNino et al. demonstrated that the AUROC of the right DTF for predicting extubation success was 0.79 when using a cut-off value of ≥ 30% [11]. According to Baess et al., while applying a cut-off value of ≥ 30%, the right DTF, AUROC for successful extubation prediction was 0.655 [26]. Differently, Ferrari et al. reported a cut-off value of 36% with an AUROC of 0.948 [21]. This discrepancy could be explained by method heterogeneity, such as differences in patient populations, definitions of weaning failure, and the method of diaphragmatic ultrasound.

There was no difference between the right and left hemidiaphragmatic parameters except the TPIA. However, the difference in the TPIA between 1.2 s of the right hemidiaphragm and 1.1 s of the left hemidiaphragm was considered clinically insignificant. Therefore, in patients without unilateral diaphragmatic weakness, physicians can use the right-sided parameters alone if the left hemidiaphragm cannot be assessed. Furthermore, we observed that the right diaphragmatic parameters were more accurate than the left ones in predicting extubation success. This finding could be related to the difficulty in assessing the left diaphragm due to the smaller acoustic window of the spleen and the gas interposition in the stomach and intestine [14]. As a result, the measurement of the left diaphragm may be less accurate.

Many studies revealed that integrating multiple parameters improves accuracy for predicting successful extubation compared to using only one parameter [27, 28]. Our study demonstrated a new combining parameter that is reliable and easy to use. We also demonstrated a strong inter-observer correlation. Nevertheless, there are some limitations to this study. First, our study has a low rate of extubation failure (6.2%) compared to other studies [11, 13] which may have an impact on the result of the study. Second, this study included both medical and postoperative patients. As a result, we cannot apply the outcomes to specific diseases. Third, we performed a diaphragmatic ultrasound on patients using a T-piece or PSV mode, which may affect the study's findings because ultrasound results may vary according to the method of SBT. A previous study in patients during post-extubation, the median value of DTF and transdiaphragmatic pressure–time product (PTPdi) was significantly lower in spontaneous breathing than during NIV at the pressure support level of 5 cmH2O [24]. Another study showed that patients on MV with a pressure support level of 0 had a significantly lower value of DTF and PTPdi compared to a pressure support level of 5 [25]. Thus, the difference in SBT method in our study may have an effect on the value of DTF and work of breathing. As a result, research that is restricted to one mode of SBT is necessitated. Fourth, only patients with hemodynamic stability in the absence of vasopressors and no sedative or neuromuscular blocking agents administered for more than 24 h before extubation were included. We used these criteria to standardize the included population. However, in real-world practice, minimal vasopressor with hemodynamic stability and discontinuation of sedation less than 24 h with adequate mentation before considering extubation are accepted [29]. As a result, these inclusion criteria may not be representative of real-world practice. Fifth, the extubation failure group had a longer length of MV until SBT than the extubation success group. The results of the diaphragmatic parameters may be affected by the longer MV time until SBT because prolonged MV results in diaphragmatic contractile dysfunction [30]. However, in our intensive care unit, we generally use a local guideline daily to determine whether each ICU patient is ready to wean so that time to SBT is not delayed.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study exhibits a new parameter to predict successful extubation. The ratio of RR/DTF demonstrated good performance for predicting the success of extubation, and RR/DTF was superior to RSBI (RR/VT), RR/DE, and DTF in predicting extubation success. The better performance of RR/DTF may be explained by the fact that it directly evaluates diaphragm function and reflects the work of breathing.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AUROC:

Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve

BMI:

Body mass index

DE:

Diaphragmatic inspiratory excursion

DTF:

Diaphragm thickening fraction

ICU:

Intensive care unit

IQR:

Interquartile range

MV:

Mechanical ventilation

NIV:

Noninvasive ventilation

PEEP:

Positive end-expiratory pressure

PIMAX :

Maximal inspiratory pressure

PSV:

Pressure support ventilation

PTPdi:

Transdiaphragmatic pressure–time product

RR:

Respiratory rate

RSBI:

Rapid shallow breathing index

SBT:

Spontaneous breathing trial

SD:

Standard deviation

TPIA:

Time to peak inspiratory amplitude of the diaphragm

VC:

Vital capacity

VT:

Tidal volume

References

  1. Epstein SK, Ciubotaru RL, Wong JB. Effect of failed extubation on the outcome of mechanical ventilation. Chest. 1997;112(1):186–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nemer SN, Barbas CSV. Predictive parameters for weaning from mechanical ventilation. J Bras Pneumol. 2011;37:669–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Savi A, Teixeira C, Silva JM, Borges LG, Pereira PA, Pinto KB, et al. Weaning predictors do not predict extubation failure in simple-to-wean patients. J Crit Care. 2012;27(2):221 e1-.e8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Karthika M, Al Enezi FA, Pillai LV, Arabi YM. Rapid shallow breathing index. Ann Thorac Med. 2016;11(3):167.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Trivedi V, Chaudhuri D, Jinah R, Piticaru J, Agarwal A, Liu K, et al. The usefulness of the rapid shallow breathing index in predicting successful extubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest. 2022;161(1):97–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Danaga AR, Gut AL, Antunes LCDO, Ferreira ALDA, Yamaguti FA, Christovan JC, et al. Evaluation of the diagnostic performance and cut-off value for the rapid shallow breathing index in predicting extubation failure. J Bras Pneumol. 2009;35:541–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Alam MJ, Roy S, Iktidar MA, Padma FK, Nipun KI, Chowdhury S, et al. Diaphragm ultrasound as a better predictor of successful extubation from mechanical ventilation than rapid shallow breathing index. Acute and Critical Care. 2022;37(1):94–100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Levine S, Nguyen T, Taylor N, Friscia ME, Budak MT, Rothenberg P, et al. Rapid disuse atrophy of diaphragm fibers in mechanically ventilated humans. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(13):1327–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dres M, Dubé B-P, Mayaux J, Delemazure J, Reuter D, Brochard L, et al. Coexistence and impact of limb muscle and diaphragm weakness at time of liberation from mechanical ventilation in medical intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;195(1):57–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim WY, Suh HJ, Hong S-B, Koh Y, Lim C-M. Diaphragm dysfunction assessed by ultrasonography: influence on weaning from mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(12):2627–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. DiNino E, Gartman EJ, Sethi JM, McCool FD. Diaphragm ultrasound as a predictor of successful extubation from mechanical ventilation. Thorax. 2014;69(5):431–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Goligher EC, Laghi F, Detsky ME, Farias P, Murray A, Brace D, et al. Measuring diaphragm thickness with ultrasound in mechanically ventilated patients: feasibility, reproducibility and validity. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(4):642–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Theerawit P, Eksombatchai D, Sutherasan Y, Suwatanapongched T, Kiatboonsri C, Kiatboonsri S. Diaphragmatic parameters by ultrasonography for predicting weaning outcomes. BMC polm. 2018;18(1):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Santana PV, Cardenas LZ, Albuquerque ALPD, Carvalho CRRD, Caruso P. Diaphragmatic ultrasound: a review of its methodological aspects and clinical uses. J Bras Pneumol. 2020;46(6):20200064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Spadaro S, Grasso S, Mauri T, Dalla Corte F, Alvisi V, Ragazzi R, et al. Can diaphragmatic ultrasonography performed during the T-tube trial predict weaning failure? the role of diaphragmatic rapid shallow breathing index. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):1–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Hershenson MB, Kikuchi Y, Loring SH. Relative strengths of the chest wall muscles. J Appl Physiol. 1988;65(2):852–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hershenson MB, Kikuchi Y, Tzelepis G, McCool F. Preferential fatigue of the rib cage muscles during inspiratory resistive loaded ventilation. J Appl Physiol. 1989;66(2):750–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Osman AM, Hashim RM. Diaphragmatic and lung ultrasound application as new predictive indices for the weaning process in ICU patients. The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2017;48(1):61–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Li C, Li X, Han H, Cui H, Wang G, Wang Z. Diaphragmatic ultrasonography for predicting ventilator weaning: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(22):10968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Marini JJ, Smith TC, Lamb V. Estimation of inspiratory muscle strength in mechanically ventilated patients: the measurement of maximal inspiratory pressure. J Crit Care. 1986;1(1):32–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ferrari G, De Filippi G, Elia F, Panero F, Volpicelli G, Aprà F. Diaphragm ultrasound as a new index of discontinuation from mechanical ventilation. Crit Ultrasound J. 2014;6(1):1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chourpiliadis C, Bhardwaj A. Physiology, respiratory rate. [Updated 2022 Sep 12]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537306/

  23. Da Fonsêca JDM, Resqueti VR, Benício K, Fregonezi G, Aliverti A. Acute effects of inspiratory loads and interfaces on breathing pattern and activity of respiratory muscles in healthy subjects. Front Physiol. 2019;10:993.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Vivier E, Mekontso Dessap A, Dimassi S, Vargas F, Lyazidi A, Thille AW, et al. Diaphragm ultrasonography to estimate the work of breathing during non-invasive ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(5):796–803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Umbrello M, Formenti P, Longhi D, Galimberti A, Piva I, Pezzi A, et al. Diaphragm ultrasound as indicator of respiratory effort in critically ill patients undergoing assisted mechanical ventilation: a pilot clinical study. Crit Care. 2015;19(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Baess AI, Abdallah TH, Emara DM, Hassan M. Diaphragmatic ultrasound as a predictor of successful extubation from mechanical ventilation: thickness, displacement, or both? Egyptian Journal of Bronchology. 2016;10(2):162–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Huaringa AJ, Wang A, Haro MH, Leyva FJ. The weaning index as predictor of weaning success. J Intensive Care Med. 2013;28(6):369–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pirompanich P, Romsaiyut S. Use of diaphragm thickening fraction combined with rapid shallow breathing index for predicting success of weaning from mechanical ventilator in medical patients. J Intensive Care. 2018;6(1):1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Boles J-M, Bion J, Connors A, Herridge M, Marsh B, Melot C, et al. Weaning from mechanical ventilation. Eur Respir J. 2007;29(5):1033–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Powers SK, Shanely RA, Coombes JS, Koesterer TJ, McKenzie M, Van Gammeren D, et al. Mechanical ventilation results in progressive contractile dysfunction in the diaphragm. J Appl Physiol. 2002;92(5):1851–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Prangthip Charoenpong for the English editing.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Pulmonary and Pulmonary Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, 270 Ramathibodi Hospital, Rama VI Road, Bangkok, 10400, Ratchathewi, Thailand

    Dararat Eksombatchai, Chalermwut Sukkratok, Yuda Sutherasan & Detajin Junhasavasdikul

  2. Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, 270 Ramathibodi Hospital, Rama VI Road, Bangkok, 10400, Ratchathewi, Thailand

    Pongdhep Theerawit

Authors
  1. Dararat Eksombatchai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chalermwut Sukkratok
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yuda Sutherasan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Detajin Junhasavasdikul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Pongdhep Theerawit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

DE is the guarantor of the content of the manuscript, including the data and analysis. DE, CS, and PT had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. DE, CS, and PT contributed to the study design, data analysis and interpretation, and the writing of the manuscript. YS and DJ contributed to the study design. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pongdhep Theerawit.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Clearance Committee on Human Rights Related to Research Involving Human subjected, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University (approval no. MURA2020/881). All methods were performed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. All patients or their relatives were able to give written informed consent prior to enrollment.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eksombatchai, D., Sukkratok, C., Sutherasan, Y. et al. The ratio of respiratory rate to diaphragm thickening fraction for predicting extubation success. BMC Pulm Med 23, 109 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-023-02392-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-023-02392-w

Keywords

BMC Pulmonary Medicine

ISSN: 1471-2466

Contact us