Skip to main content
Download PDF

Association between number of dissected lymph nodes and survival in patients undergoing resection for clinical stage IA pure solid lung adenocarcinoma: a retrospective analysis

BMC Pulmonary Medicine volume 23, Article number: 401 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Lymph node dissection is essential for staging of pure solid lung adenocarcinoma and selection of treatment after surgical resection, particularly for stage I disease since the rate of lymph node metastasis can vary from 0 to 23.7%.

Methods

We retrospectively screened all adult patients (18 years of age or older) who underwent lobectomy for pure solid cT1N0M0 lung adenocarcinoma between January 2015 and December 2017 at our center. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to assess the association between the number of dissected lymph nodes and recurrence-free survival (RFS) and to determine the optimal number of dissected lymph nodes.

Results

The final analysis included 458 patients (age: 60.26 ± 8.07 years; 241 women). RFS increased linearly with an increasing number of dissected lymph nodes at a range between 0 and 9. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significantly longer RFS in patients with ≥ 9 vs. <9 dissected lymph nodes. In subgroup analysis, ≥ 9 dissected lymph nodes was not only associated with longer RFS in patients without lymph node metastasis (n = 332) but also in patients with metastasis (n = 126). In multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression, ≥ 9 dissected lymph nodes was independently associated with longer RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26 to 0.73; P = 0.002).

Conclusions

≥9 Dissected lymph nodes was associated with longer RFS; accordingly, we recommend dissecting 9 lymph nodes in patients undergoing lobectomy for stage IA pure solid lung adenocarcinoma.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The expansion of screening programs has allowed an increasing number of lung cancer patients to undergo surgery [1, 2]. In patients without lymph node metastasis, such as adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), lung cancer could be practically cured [3, 4]. Once the lymph nodes are involved, however, the risk of postoperative recurrence is significantly increased [5, 6]. The standard procedure for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) surgery is lobectomy plus lymph node dissection [7]. However, lymph nodal sampling is widely performed due to its convenience in the real-world settings. The non-inferiority of lymph nodal sampling compared to lymph node dissection on postoperative outcome is still controversial. Sufficient number of lymph nodes needs to be sampled to allow accurate disease staging and selection of appropriate postoperative treatment [8]. Several studies supported station-based sampling [9, 10] or lobe-specific systematic nodal dissection based on tumor histology [11], but others suggested a need for a higher and more precise number of dissected lymph nodes [12,13,14,15]. This issue is particularly important for clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma since the rate of nodal involvement varies substantially (0-23.7%) [16]. We conducted a retrospective analysis to examine the relationship between the number of dissected lymph nodes and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with clinical stage IA pure solid lung adenocarcinoma and to clarify the number of resected lymph nodes which did not lead to worse outcome.

Methods

Study design and patients

We retrospectively screened all adult patients aged 18 years or older who underwent lobectomy for pure solid cT1N0M0 lung adenocarcinoma at the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University during a period from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2017. The flowchart of the subject enrollment is provided in Fig. 1. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Review Board (2018mec160). Based on the retrospective design, informed consent was waived.

Fig. 1
figure 1

A flowchart of patient selection

Full size image

For inclusion in the final analysis, a diagnosis of primary lung adenocarcinoma must be confirmed by postoperative pathology, and preoperative computed tomography (CT) of the chest must show pure solid nodules. Patients with AIS or MIA were excluded from the analysis. Patients with part-solid nodules were excluded from the study due to the significant disparity in the rate of lymph node metastasis versus solid nodules [17].

Preoperative staging

Clinical staging was performed according to the 8th edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer [18] and based on thin-section CT on a 128-slice spiral system (Siemens, Definition, Flash). The following parameters were used during scanning: slice thickness, 5 mm; slice interval, 5 mm; voltage, 120 kVp; scanning matrix, 512 × 512; lung window width, 1,200 HU; lung window level, -600 HU; mediastinal window width, 350 HU; mediastinal window level, 40 HU.

Two thoracic surgeons (RY and NH) independently reviewed CT scans to determine the location of pulmonary nodules, their maximum diameter and density, and the presence or absence of enlarged lymph nodes. Disagreements were resolved by a senior thoracic surgeon with 40 years of experience (JL). Pure solid nodules were defined as opacification that completely obscured the underlying vascular pattern [19]. cT1 was defined as maximum diameter at < 30 mm on chest CT. cN0 was defined as absence of non-calcified lymph nodes with a short-axis diameter of > 1 cm in the mediastinum or hilum, parabronchial or intrapulmonary parenchyma [20]. Although PET-CT can identify positive lymph nodes more accurately than CT, routine preoperative PET-CT does not seem to be widely available in various hospitals in most cities in China [21]. Therefore, we still chose CT as the screening method for enrolled patients.

Postoperative staging and the number of dissected lymph nodes

The number of dissected lymph nodes was the sum of the mediastinal and intrapulmonary lymph nodes. Additional pulmonary lymph nodes identified during postoperative pathological examination were added to this sum at the discretion of the pathologists. The number of intact lymph nodes in the region that were clustered together after formalin fixation was calculated by the pathologist.

The pT and pN staging was defined according to the 8th edition of TNM staging system.

Follow-up

The routine follow-up schedule at authors’ institute was every 6 months during the first 2 years after surgery and every 12 months thereafter. Each follow-up visit included a clinical examination, CT of the chest and abdomen, and a panel of serum tumor markers that consisted of carcinoembryonic antigen, squamous cell carcinoma antigen, neuron-specific enolase, carbohydrate antigen 125, and cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen 21 − 1.

If recurrence was suspected, additional examinations were performed as appropriate, such as contrast-enhanced cranial magnetic resonance imaging and radioisotope skeletal scanning. Local recurrence was defined as recurrence of cancer in the ipsilateral lung or mediastinal/hilar lymph nodes. Distant metastasis was defined as recurrence in all other part than local recurrence. RFS was calculated from the time of surgery to recurrence (either locoregional of distant) or death, whichever came first. The last follow-up was conducted in July, 2022.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using R 4.1.2 (The R Foundation, www.r-project.org) and Empower (X&Y Solutions, Boston, MA, USA). P < 0.05 (2-sided) was considered statistically significant. Categorical variables were analyzed by chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test and reported as number and percentage. Continuous variables following normal distribution were analyzed by Student’s t-test and reported as mean ± standard deviation. Continuous variables not following normal distribution were analyzed by Mann–Whitney U test and reported as median (interquartile range; IQR).

Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to identify independent predictors of poor RFS. Independent variables (in addition to the number of dissected lymph nodes) were selected based on previous studies and > 10% change in effect estimates [22]. The relationship between RFS and the number of dissected lymph nodes was assessed using restricted cubic spline analysis and fitted using a model based on the log-likelihood ratio. A recursive algorithm was used to identify the inflection point in the number of dissected lymph nodes. Kaplan-Meier curves of RFS were compared between the patient subgroups using the log-rank test.

Sensitivity analyses were conducted by: (1) limiting the number of dissected lymph nodes in single-station to a maximum of 5. According to a previous randomized control study, the largest numbers dissected lymph nodes in a single station were resected from stations 4R and 7, with a median of four and three nodes, all less than 5, respectively [23]. Moreover, the number of lymph nodes fragment, which could not be counted exactly, was recounted to 5. This may help minimize the interference of lymph node fragments on the count results of the number of dissected lymph nodes; (2) treating occurrence and death as competing events using the Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard regression.

Results

Patient characteristics

Of the 3,966 patients screened,458 (241 women) were included in the final study, with a mean age of 60.3 ± 8.1 years) (Fig. 1) (Table 1). Disease stage was IA in 238 (51.96%), IB in 94 (20.52%), IIB in 56 (12.23%), and IIIA in 70 (15.28%) patients. The most frequent histological subtype was acinar predominant, followed by solid predominant, papillary predominant, lepidic predominant and micropapillary predominant. The median number of dissected lymph nodes was 15 (range, 0–39; IQR, 11–19). Lymph node metastasis was reported in 126 (27.51%) patients. Within the median follow-up of 60.20 (IQR, 54.87–66.03) months, recurrence occurred in 118 (25.76%) patients, and 93 (20.31%) patients died.

Table 1 Clinicodemographic characteristics of the 458 patients in the study
Full size table

Relationship between the number of dissected lymph nodes and RFS

The restricted cubic spline analysis showed an L-shape relationship between the number of dissected lymph nodes and RFS (Fig. 2). The relationship was non-linear (P for non-linearity = 0.033). P for the log-likelihood ratio test for a two-line model of RFS was 0.001, indicating the presence of an inflection point. In recursive algorithm analysis, the inflection point was 9.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Association between the number of lymph nodes examined and recurrence-free survival (RFS)

Adjusted for age, sex, age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, surgical year, tumor site, family history of malignancy, histopathological subtype, spread through air space, pT, pN and Postoperative adjuvant therapy

Full size image

The following variables were included in the Cox regression as covariates: sex (male vs. female), age (≤ 65 vs. > 65 year), tumor site (RUL vs. RML/RLL/LUL/LLL), age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index, year of surgery (2015 vs. 2016/2017), family history of malignant tumor (yes vs. no), histopathological subtype (micropapillary or solid predominant subtype vs. others), spread through air space (yes vs. no), pT stage (T1a vs. T1b/T1c/T2a), pN stage (N0 vs. N1/N2) and postoperative adjuvant therapy (yes vs. no). Within a range from 0 to 9 dissected lymph nodes, RFS increased linearly with increasing number of dissected lymph nodes (Table 2).

Table 2 Association between the number of dissected lymph nodes and recurrence-free survival according to piece-wise regression models
Full size table

Association of the number of dissected lymph nodes with RFS and OS

RFS was significantly longer in patients with ≥ 9 vs. <9 dissected lymph nodes (log-rank test P = 0.022; Fig. 3A). Such a difference was observed in the subgroup analysis that only included 332 patients without lymph node metastasis (log-rank test P = 0.031; Fig. 3B) as well as the analysis that only included 126 patients with lymph node metastasis (log-rank test P = 0.022; Fig. 3C).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Subgroup analysis of recurrence-free survival (RFS) in (A) all patients, (B) patients without lymph node metastasis (N0) and (C) patients with lymph node metastasis (N1 or N2)

Full size image

In the multivariate Cox regression, the following factors were independently associated with RFS: the number of dissected lymph nodes, aCCI, family history of malignancy, pN stage, and postoperative adjuvant therapy (Table 3). The association between ≥ 9 dissected lymph nodes and improved RFS was apparent in all sensitivity analyses (Table 4).

Table 3 Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression to identify independent predictors of survival
Full size table
Table 4 Sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of the association between number of dissected lymph nodes and Recurrence-free survival
Full size table

Discussion

Results from the current study suggest that 9 is the appropriate minimum number of lymph nodes that should be examined in patients with clinical stage IA pure solid lung adenocarcinoma. RFS increased in proportion to increasing number of dissected lymph nodes, but only up to 9. There was no further improvement beyond nodes. The association between improved RFS with ≥ 9 dissected lymph nodes was apparent in the subgroup analysis that not only included patients with no lymph node involvement, but also in patients with lymph node metastasis, adding support to the validity of the findings.

The issue of adequate lymph node sampling is universal for practically all cancers. For example, current guidelines recommend a minimum of 15 lymph nodes for gastric cancer [24], 8–20 lymph nodes for breast cancer depending on the T state [25], and 10–42 lymph nodes for esophageal cancer depending on the T state [26,27,28]. A prospective cohort study of lung cancer found that inadequate detection of intrapulmonary (N1) lymph nodes could lead to occult metastases of lymph nodes [29]. The consequence of erroneous labeling of N1 as N0 could lead to wrong decision with regards to adjuvant treatment [30, 31]. Our results showed that in patients without lymph node metastasis in postoperative pathology, the risk of recurrence decreased significantly in the group with a higher number of dissected lymph node. This may be because of the possibility that occult lymph node metastasis decreased as the number of dissected lymph node increased, and the true pathological status of the patient was more accurately assessed. Significantly, the aforementioned association remained consistent in the subgroup analysis of patients with positive lymph nodes in the current study. This finding may be attributed to the lower residual tumor burden in patient with higher number of dissected lymph nodes since more or even all metastatic lymph nodes have been resected. Patients with low number of dissected lymph nodes, in contrast, may have higher residual tumor burden after the surgery. Alternatively, detection of lymph node metastasis with a smaller number of dissected lymph node tends to suggest overall higher percentage/number of the lymph nodes with metastasis, which in turn is associated with poorer prognosis. A cohort study of 16,393 subjects with NSCLC by David and colleagues also supported the significance of higher number of lymph nodes sample in improved long-term prognosis in patients with stage I disease [32]. Unfortunately, no suggestions have been provided on the number of dissected lymph nodes in their study. A previous study of 442 patients with stage I NSCLC reported that a minimum of 6 lymph nodes needed to be examined to define lymph nodal staging and improve patient outcome [33]. The major reason for this discrepancy between this study and our findings is that their study enrolled some patients who underwent surgery before establishing rules for systematic lymph node sampling and about one-third of the enrolled patients admitted for surgery at community hospitals that lacked strict surgical quality control. The larger number in the current study (9) likely reflects the fact that the current study was conducted more recently in a more contemporary setting with improved quality control. A study based on SEER database plus a multi-center retrospective study in patients with NSCLC suggest that increasing the number of examined lymph node to 16 can result in superior overall survival [34]. Patients with stage IIIB or IV disease were excluded in their study and there was no consideration of treatment following tumor recurrence. Subsequent treatments, especially targeted therapy and immunotherapy, may have potential effects on overall survival [35, 36]. To minimize this influence, we chose recurrence-free survival as the primary outcome of our study. Different primary outcomes may be a reason for the different sampling thresholds for lymph nodes. Another reason may be the presence of T4 staging patients recruited by investigator, who may have developed more lymphatic metastasis and therefore may have contributed to the increase in numbers at the time of sampling. A study of patients with pure solid nodules with cT1a-2bN0-1M0 reported that approximately 16–17 lymph nodes were the optimal cut point for RFS [37]. This study also considered the imaging characteristics of patients when recruiting patients. However, the population enrolled in this study was NSCLC. Studies have clearly pointed to differences in the risk of recurrence between adenocarcinoma and other types of NSCLC [38]. In addition, different histologic subtypes of adenocarcinoma (especially micropapillary/solid subtypes) had a significant impact on survival outcomes [39, 40]. In patients with pure solid nodules, the high-risk subtype of adenocarcinoma has a higher chance of recurrence [41]. It is important to note the current study excluded patients with AIS and MIA, two subpopulations in which lymph node metastasis rarely occurs. Also, this study only included patients with adenocarcinoma, and the results may not apply to cases in which intraoperative pathology (wedge-resection or needle aspiration) is not performed prior to lobectomy in patients with preoperative histologic diagnosis.

The minimum number of dissected lymph nodes as derived from the current study (9) is similar to a previous study based on SEER database plus a Chinese multi-center retrospective study in patients with NSCLC [42]. The fact that we obtained the similar number despite adjusting for other variables (e.g., age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index, year of surgery, histopathological subtype, spread through air space) adds to the robustness of the findings. Our results may be more reliable partly because we only recruited patients with cT1 (tumor diameter ≤ 3 cm), and the effect of T stage on outcomes was greatly reduced, and on the other hand, we adjusted for covariates more comprehensively. In addition, our study also incorporated the prognostic potential of imaging, which was not included in the above studies [17].

Findings from the current study also suggest that “more is better, but only to a certain extent”. Consistent with the conclusion of a large trial of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0030 [23], prognosis did not improve with higher number of dissected lymph nodes at a range beyond 9. Indeed, higher number of dissected lymph nodes has been associated with longer operation time and increased bleeding [43]. The reliability of our findings is supported by their robustness to subgroup and sensitivity analyses.

Our findings should be interpreted with caution in light of several limitations. First, the retrospective design increases the risk that our analysis is confounded by other factors for which we did not control. Second, it remains unclear whether our results can be generalized to patients whose histological subtype of adenocarcinoma cannot be determined before or during surgery. Third, this study was conducted at a single-center, and therefore must be considered as preliminary.

Conclusion

In patients receiving lobectomy of stage IA pure solid lung adenocarcinoma, longer RFS was associated with higher number of dissected lymph nodes up to and not beyond 9 dissected lymph nodes.

Data Availability

(ADM)

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

References

  1. Tanoue LT, Tanner NT, Gould MK, Silvestri GA. Lung cancer screening. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191(1):19–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Puri V, Crabtree TD, Bell JM, Broderick SR, Morgensztern D, Colditz GA, et al. Treatment outcomes in Stage I Lung Cancer: a comparison of surgery and stereotactic body Radiation Therapy. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;10(12):1776–84.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(1):7–33.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yotsukura M, Asamura H, Motoi N, Kashima J, Yoshida Y, Nakagawa K, et al. Long-term prognosis of patients with resected Adenocarcinoma in situ and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma of the lung. J Thorac Oncol. 2021;16(8):1312–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Osawa J, Shimada Y, Maehara S, Hagiwara M, Kakihana M, Kajiwara N, et al. Clinical usefulness of the 3-tier classification according to the proportion of morphological patterns for patients with pathological stage I invasive lung adenocarcinoma. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;69(6):943–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rusch VW, Crowley J, Giroux DJ, Goldstraw P, Im JG, Tsuboi M, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the N descriptors in the forthcoming seventh edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2(7):603–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ginsberg RJ, Rubinstein LV. Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Study Group. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;60(3):615–22. discussion 622 – 613.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Massard G, Ducrocq X, Kochetkova EA, Porhanov VA, Riquet M. Sampling or node dissection for intraoperative staging of lung cancer: a multicentric cross-sectional study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;30(1):164–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Network NCC. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 6.2020. In:2020. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/nscl_blocks.pdf; Accessed 9 January, 2020.

  10. Heiden BT, Eaton DB Jr., Chang SH, Yan Y, Schoen MW, Patel MR, et al. Assessment of updated commission on Cancer Guidelines for Intraoperative Lymph Node Sampling in Early Stage NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol. 2022;17(11):1287–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lardinois D, De Leyn P, Van Schil P, Porta RR, Waller D, Passlick B, et al. ESTS guidelines for intraoperative lymph node staging in non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;30(5):787–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ludwig MS, Goodman M, Miller DL, Johnstone PA. Postoperative survival and the number of lymph nodes sampled during resection of node-negative non-small cell lung cancer. Chest. 2005;128(3):1545–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nwogu CE, Groman A, Fahey D, Yendamuri S, Dexter E, Demmy TL, et al. Number of lymph nodes and metastatic lymph node ratio are associated with survival in lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93(5):1614–9. discussion 1619–1620.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Dai J, Liu M, Yang Y, Li Q, Song N, Rocco G, et al. Optimal Lymph Node Examination and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage I Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2019;14(7):1277–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lim E. What is the Optimum Lymph Node Management in Patients undergoing surgery for Lung Cancer? J Thorac Oncol. 2020;15(10):1565–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Matsunaga T, Suzuki K, Takamochi K, Oh S. What is the radiological definition of part-solid tumour in lung cancer?†. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;51(2):242–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ye T, Deng L, Wang S, Xiang J, Zhang Y, Hu H, et al. Lung adenocarcinomas manifesting as Radiological Part-Solid Nodules define a special clinical subtype. J Thorac Oncol. 2019;14(4):617–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Goldstraw P, Chansky K, Crowley J, Rami-Porta R, Asamura H, Eberhardt WE, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for revision of the TNM Stage Groupings in the Forthcoming (Eighth) Edition of the TNM classification for Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11(1):39–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hattori A, Suzuki K, Maeyashiki T, Fukui M, Kitamura Y, Matsunaga T, et al. The presence of air bronchogram is a novel predictor of negative nodal involvement in radiologically pure-solid lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;45(4):699–702.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Casal RF, Sepesi B, Sagar AS, Tschirren J, Chen M, Li L et al. Centrally located lung cancer and risk of occult nodal disease: an objective evaluation of multiple definitions of tumour centrality with dedicated imaging software. Eur Respir J 2019, 53(5).

  21. Schmidt-Hansen M, Baldwin DR, Hasler E, Zamora J, Abraira V, Roqué IFM. PET-CT for assessing mediastinal lymph node involvement in patients with suspected resectable non-small cell lung cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(11):Cd009519.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kernan WN, Viscoli CM, Brass LM, Broderick JP, Brott T, Feldmann E, et al. Phenylpropanolamine and the risk of hemorrhagic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(25):1826–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Darling GE, Allen MS, Decker PA, Ballman K, Malthaner RA, Inculet RI, et al. Number of lymph nodes harvested from a mediastinal lymphadenectomy: results of the randomized, prospective American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0030 trial. Chest. 2011;139(5):1124–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Karpeh MS, Leon L, Klimstra D, Brennan MF. Lymph node staging in gastric cancer: is location more important than number? An analysis of 1,038 patients. Ann Surg. 2000;232(3):362–71.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Iyer RV, Hanlon A, Fowble B, Freedman G, Nicolaou N, Anderson P, et al. Accuracy of the extent of axillary nodal positivity related to primary tumor size, number of involved nodes, and number of nodes examined. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;47(5):1177–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Visser E, Markar SR, Ruurda JP, Hanna GB, van Hillegersberg R. Prognostic value of Lymph Node yield on overall survival in Esophageal Cancer Patients: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2019;269(2):261–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rice TW, Ishwaran H, Ferguson MK, Blackstone EH, Goldstraw P. Cancer of the Esophagus and Esophagogastric Junction: an Eighth Edition staging primer. J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12(1):36–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rizk NP, Ishwaran H, Rice TW, Chen LQ, Schipper PH, Kesler KA, et al. Optimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 2010;251(1):46–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Smeltzer MP, Faris N, Yu X, Ramirez RA, Ramirez LE, Wang CG, et al. Missed Intrapulmonary Lymph Node Metastasis and Survival after Resection of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102(2):448–53.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Arriagada R, Bergman B, Dunant A, Le Chevalier T, Pignon JP, Vansteenkiste J. Cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(4):351–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhong WZ, Chen KN, Chen C, Gu CD, Wang J, Yang XN, et al. Erlotinib Versus Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin as Neoadjuvant Treatment of Stage IIIA-N2 EGFR-Mutant non-small-cell Lung Cancer (EMERGING-CTONG 1103): a randomized phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(25):2235–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. David EA, Cooke DT, Chen Y, Nijar K, Canter RJ, Cress RD. Does Lymph Node Count Influence Survival in surgically resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer? Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103(1):226–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gajra A, Newman N, Gamble GP, Kohman LJ, Graziano SL. Effect of number of lymph nodes sampled on outcome in patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(6):1029–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Liang W, He J, Shen Y, Shen J, He Q, Zhang J, et al. Impact of examined Lymph Node count on Precise Staging and Long-Term Survival of Resected Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: a Population Study of the US SEER database and a chinese multi-institutional Registry. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(11):1162–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yue D, Xu S, Wang Q, Li X, Shen Y, Zhao H, et al. Updated overall survival and exploratory analysis from Randomized, Phase II EVAN Study of Erlotinib Versus Vinorelbine Plus Cisplatin adjuvant therapy in stage IIIA epidermal growth factor receptor + non-small-cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(34):3912–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Reck M, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Robinson AG, Hui R, Csőszi T, Fülöp A, et al. Five-year outcomes with Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy for metastatic non-small-cell lung Cancer with PD-L1 tumor proportion score ≥ 50. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(21):2339–49.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Chen D, Mao Y, Wen J, Shu J, Ye F, She Y, et al. Impact of the extent of Lymph Node Dissection on Precise Staging and Survival in Clinical I-II pure-solid Lung Cancer Undergoing Lobectomy. J Natl Compr Cancer Network: JNCCN. 2021;19(4):393–402.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Yamauchi Y, Muley T, Safi S, Rieken S, Bischoff H, Kappes J, et al. The dynamic pattern of recurrence in curatively resected non-small cell lung cancer patients: experiences at a single institution. Lung Cancer. 2015;90(2):224–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Cha MJ, Lee HY, Lee KS, Jeong JY, Han J, Shim YM, et al. Micropapillary and solid subtypes of invasive lung adenocarcinoma: clinical predictors of histopathology and outcome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147(3):921–928e922.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Miyahara N, Nii K, Benazzo A, Hoda MA, Iwasaki A, Klepetko W, et al. Solid predominant subtype in lung adenocarcinoma is related to poor prognosis after surgical resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncology: J Eur Soc Surg Oncol Br Association Surg Oncol. 2019;45(7):1156–62.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Perez-Johnston R, Araujo-Filho JA, Connolly JG, Caso R, Whiting K, Tan KS, et al. CT-based Radiogenomic Analysis of Clinical Stage I Lung Adenocarcinoma with histopathologic features and oncologic outcomes. Radiology. 2022;303(3):664–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhu Z, Song Z, Jiao W, Mei W, Xu C, Huang Q, et al. A large real-world cohort study of examined lymph node standards for adequate nodal staging in early non-small cell lung cancer. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021;10(2):815–25.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Osarogiagbon RU, Decker PA, Ballman K, Wigle D, Allen MS, Darling GE. Survival implications of variation in the thoroughness of pathologic lymph node examination in American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0030 (Alliance). Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102(2):363–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Kehong Zhang from lvy Medical Editing from for assistance in manuscript preparation. We thank Xiaoli Xu and Guo Tian from the Follow-up Center of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University for their support in the follow-up work.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 12 Jiankang Road, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050011, China

    Yu Rong, Junfeng Liu, Nianqiao Han, Zhihua Shi, Tao Jiang, Nan Zhang, Xi’e Xu & Jinhuan Yin

  2. Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou, Hebei, 075000, China

    Hui Du

Authors
  1. Yu Rong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Junfeng Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nianqiao Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhihua Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tao Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xi’e Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jinhuan Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Hui Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YR and JFL conceived the study. YR and NQH drafted the manuscript. YR, NZ, and NQH collected the clinical data. XEX and JHY collected the follow-up data. TJ, ZHS, and HD conducted statistical analysis on the data. JFL revised the manuscript rigorously. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junfeng Liu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University (2018mec160). Based on the retrospective design and the anonymous nature of the data collection, informed consent was waived by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University (Approval ID: 2018mec160; Board Chairperson: Guiying Wang). This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and all relevant local regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rong, Y., Liu, J., Han, N. et al. Association between number of dissected lymph nodes and survival in patients undergoing resection for clinical stage IA pure solid lung adenocarcinoma: a retrospective analysis. BMC Pulm Med 23, 401 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-023-02675-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-023-02675-2

Keywords

BMC Pulmonary Medicine

ISSN: 1471-2466

Contact us