Skip to main content
Download PDF

The diaphragmatic electrical activity during spontaneous breathing trial in patients with mechanical ventilation: physiological description and potential clinical utility

BMC Pulmonary Medicine volume 24, Article number: 263 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Backgrounds

Increased respiratory drive has been demonstrated to correlate with weaning failure, which could be quantified by electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi). We described the physiological process of EAdi-based parameters during the spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) and evaluated the change of EAdi-based parameters as potential predictors of weaning failure.

Methods

We conducted a prospective study in 35 mechanically ventilated patients who underwent a 2-hour SBT. EAdi and ventilatory parameters were continuously measured during the SBT. Diaphragm ultrasound was performed before the SBT and at the 30 min of the SBT. Three EAdi-based parameters were calculated: neuro-ventilatory efficiency, neuro-excursion efficiency and neuro-discharge per min.

Results

Of the thirty 35 patients studied, 25 patients were defined as SBT success, including 22 patients weaning successfully and 3 patients reintubated. Before the SBT, neuro-excursion efficiency differed significantly between two groups and had the highest predictive value for SBT failure (AUROC 0.875, p < 0.01). Early increases in EAdi were observed in SBT, which are more prominent in SBT failure group. One minute, changes in EAdi and neuro-discharge per min also predicted weaning outcome (AUROCs 0.944 and 0.918, respectively).

Conclusions

EAdi-based parameters, especially neuro-excursion efficiency and changes in neuro-discharge per min, may detect impending weaning failure earlier than conventional indices. EAdi monitoring provides physiological insights and a more tailored approach to facilitate successful weaning. Further research should validate these findings and explore the utility of combined EAdi and diaphragm ultrasound assessment in weaning ICU patients from mechanical ventilation.

Trial Registration

Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on 20 September 2022 (Identifier: NCT05632822).

Peer Review reports

Background

In intensive care units (ICUs), timely weaning from mechanical ventilation is crucial for patients recovering from respiratory failure. Delayed or premature liberation from mechanical ventilation has been associated with increased mortality rates and prolonged ICU stays [1, 2]. The weaning processes, particularly spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs) in the ICU are typically guided by clinical signs and experience [3, 4]. Despite adequate evaluation, 20–30% of patients experience unexpected mechanical ventilation liberation failure [5].

Over the years, several parameters have been developed to assess weaning readiness from mechanical ventilation and predict weaning failure, however, their efficacy were unsatisfactory [6]. As the most commonly reported parameter, the rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) is calculated as the ratio of respiratory rate (RR) to tidal volume (VT) [7]. An RSBI value exceeding 105 min/L is indicative of breathing exhaustion. Nonetheless, RSBI has shown only moderate sensitivity and poor specificity in clinical practice [7, 8]. Diaphragm ultrasound is a non-invasive and feasible method for evaluating respiratory muscle function and the cause of weaning failure [9]. However, its limited a sensitivity and positive predictive value hinder its effectiveness as monitoring indicator during SBTs [10, 11]. Given that the success of weaning is contingent upon the equilibrium among respiratory system load, respiratory muscle strength, and respiratory drive, there remains an ongoing requirement for a reliable, accurate, and pragmatic approach to forecast weaning outcomes [12, 13].

Patients experiencing weaning failure might have respiratory load or weak respiratory muscles, leading to an increase in neural respiratory drive as a compensatory mechanism [13]. Therefore, elevated neural drive during the SBT might be an interesting surrogate predictor for weaning failure. The electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi) had been utilized to reflect and quantify neural respiratory drive [14, 15]. Previous studies suggested that changes in EAdi could predict SBT failure earlier than conventional parameters [16, 17]. However, the precise usefulness of early changes in EAdi parameters during SBTs is still uncertain.

This study aimed to describe the physiological behavior of SBT by EAdi-based parameters and evaluate the predictive value of EAdi-based parameters for weaning failure. We evaluated neuro-ventilatory efficiency [17, 18], a surrogate for the ability to convert nerve drive into inspiratory tidal volume; neuro-excursion efficiency, a surrogate for the conversion of nerve impulses into muscle movements; and neuro-discharge per min, a surrogate for the total neural drive discharge per unit time.

Materials and methods

The prospective observational study was performed in a 15-bed medical intensive care unit (ICU) at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital, which is a tertiary teaching center located in Beijing, China, from September 2022 to March 2023. The original study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of Peking Union Medical College Hospital (K2603). The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05632822), and informed consent was obtained. Patients were not included in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of our research.

Patients

In the study, all adult patients who underwent invasive mechanical ventilation for over 48 h due to acute respiratory failure were eligible for enrollment if they were considered ready for weaning trials. Patients who had phrenic nerve injury, unstable respiratory rhythm, or contraindications for gastric tube, such as esophagogastric varices, upper gastrointestinal perforations, or esophageal surgery were excluded. After admission, the participants were ventilated with the Servo-U ventilator (Maquet, Solna, Sweden), and experienced doctors inserted an EAdi catheter (Maquet, Solna, Sweden) as per the manufacturer’s recommendations before the start of SBT [19]. Details for positioning the EAdi catheter and checking positions were shown in the Supplement Table S1.

Study protocol

All patients underwent daily screening to determine their readiness for SBT. SBT were conducted according to the recommendations from the International Consensus Conference on weaning [20]: (1) resolving the primary cause of mechanical ventilation; (2) arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)/ fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ≥ 200 and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) 4–5 cmH2O; (3) Pressure support (PS) level with 10 cmH2O for at least 24 h with stable respiration; (4) arterial pH>7.32; (5) rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI)<105 (min·L)−1 and respiratory rate (RR)<30 breaths/min; (6) stable hemodynamics (heart rate ≤ 110 bpm, mean artery pressure ≥ 65 mmHg, norepinephrine ≤ 0.1 µg/kg/min). When initiating the SBT, the PS was reduced from 10 cmH2O to 0 cmH2O, while the PEEP was maintained at 4-5cmH2O. The SBT was to be performed for 120 min and patients were reconnected to mechanical ventilation if any of the following events occurred: (1) breathing frequency > 35 breaths/min or < 6 breaths/min; (2) blood oxygen saturation (SpO2)<90% with unchanged FiO2; (3) new cardiac arrhythmia, heart rate or mean artery pressure increasing>10%; (4) agitation, diaphoresis or complaints of dyspnea [5]. After evaluating the patients’ airway protection,, airway secretions, cough strength, and level of consciousness, two experienced ICU doctors determined whether to extubate patients who had successfully completed the SBT and reconnected to mechanical ventilation for at least 1 h after the SBT [21]. Weaning failure was defined as SBT failure, reintubation, or the use of noninvasive ventilation within 48 h of extubation due to labored breathing.

Data acquisition and analysis

During the initial 30 min of SBT, we collected EAdi-based parameters and ventilatory parameters at 6 time points, including 0 min (PS 10cmH2O) and 1, 5, 10, 20, and 30 min during the SBT. We obtained three measurements at each point and averaged all parameters according to previous studies [22, 23]. EAdi waveforms and other ventilatory parameters were sampled at 100 Hz through an RS232 cable connected to a laptop with dedicated software (Servo-tracker software version 4.2, Solna, Sweden).

We calculated EAdi as EAdi peak minus EAdi minimum. The area under the curve of EAdi from baseline to peak was represented as EAdiAUC. Neuro-ventilatory efficiency was calculated as VT divided by EAdi. Neuro-discharge per min was calculated as EAdi multiplied by respiratory rate. We calculated RSBI as RR divided by VT.

Changes in conventional and EAdi-derived parameters were defined as the difference between the value at each time point of SBT and the value at PS 10. An experienced intensivist carried out diaphragm ultrasound at PS 10 and 30 min after the initiation of SBT. We assessed diaphragm excursion using a low-frequency phased array probe and measured diaphragm thickness during inspiration and expiration using a high-frequency linear probe (Vivid, GE Healthcare, Horten, Norway). Diaphragm excursion and diaphragm thickening fraction were measured three times at PS 10 and 30 min after initial of the SBT. We calculated an average value of the measurements. Diaphragm thickening fraction (DTF) was calculated as (inspiratory thickness-expiratory thickness)/ expiratory thickness. Neuro-excursion efficiency (NEE) was calculated as diaphragm excursion divided by EAdi. Arterial blood gases were collected before SBT and at the end of the SBT before reinstitution of ventilator support.

Statistical analysis

The minimum sample size was calculated for the diagnostic study using Raosoft sample size calculator. Considering the alpha value of 0.05, power of 80% and the expected sensitivity and specificity to be 0.85 ± 0.1, a total of 35 patients was required [24].

We represented continuous variables as mean ± standard deviation and categorical variables as absolute values and percentages. Shapiro-Wilk normality test was performed to check the distributional characteristics of data. Wilcoxon rank-sum test or Chi-test was used to determine group differences. Given that data distribution was non-normal, Friedman test was used to compare the variance of each time-point within the group. For each tested predictive variable, we calculated areas under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROCs), sensitivity, and specificity to determine the value of predicting weaning outcome. We determined the best cut-off value by computing the Youden index. Correlation analysis was performed using Spearman correlation. For all tests, we considered a two-tailed P value less than 0.05 as significant. IBM SPSS software package version 21.0 (IBM, Armonk, New York) and MedCalc 19.5.6 (MedCalc Software, Mariakerke, Belgium) were used for statistical analysis.

Results

Baseline characteristics

A total of 35 were enrolled, with a mean age of 56 ± 16 years. Eighteen (52%) patients were male. The clinical characteristics of enrolled patients were shown in Table 1 and S2. Of the thirty-five patients, thirteen patients experienced failure weaning, with ten patients failing the SBT and three patients requiring reintubated. Pneumonia was the most common primary diagnosis for ICU admission. The SBT failure group had a significantly greater number of ventilation days, more ventilation days before the first SBT, and longer ICU stay compared to the SBT success group. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups with respect to other clinical characteristics. Multivariate analysis did not reveal any significant potential confounding factors affecting weaning outcome except for EAdi (Table S3).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of all patients enrolled
Full size table

Respiratory parameters at PS 10 cmH2O

Table 2 showed the description of SBT success group and failure group at PS 10 cmH2O. The SBT success group had a lower average EAdi of 7 ± 3µV, whereas the SBT failure group had an average EAdi of 11 ± 4µV. All EAdi-based parameters indicated a statistically significant difference between the two groups. The success group had lower EAdi, EAdiAUC, neuro-discharge per min, but higher neuro-ventilatory efficiency, and neuro-excursion efficiency compared with the failure group (p < 0.01). The success group also showed a higher diaphragm excursion (p < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups at baseline regarding other respiratory parameters.

Table 2 Comparison of respiratory parameters between groups and predictability of weaning failure before the SBT
Full size table

Predictability of respiratory parameters at PS 10 cmH2O

At PS 10 cmH2O, the EAdi and EAdiAUC had AUROCs of 0.763 and 0.710, respectively, for predicting SBT failure. EAdi-derived parameters demonstrated excellent predictive ability. Neuro-ventilatory efficiency and neuro-discharge per min had AUROCs of 0.807 and 0.777, respectively, while neuro-excursion efficiency had the best predictive ability with an AUROC of 0.875. However, the ultrasonic index including diaphragm excursion, thickening fraction, and end-expiratory thickness of diaphragm had only moderate or poor predictive ability (Fig. 1).

Temporal trend of parameters during the SBT

Figure 2 illustrates the temporal trend of parameters during the SBT. Significant changes in VT, RR, and RSBI were observed in both groups at the partial time point compared to PS 10 cmH2O. After initiation of the SBT trial, RR and RSBI rapidly increased in both groups. During the rest of the SBT, RR and RSBI gradually increased in the failure group and remained stable in the success group. Significant differences were observed between the two groups in the RSBI at the 30-minute mark of the SBT, and in the RR at 1, 10, 20, and 30-minute marks. Traditional indicators showed no continuous inter-group differences during the SBT. After removing the PS, EAdi increased from approximately 11 to 20 µV in the failure group and from 7 to 10 µV in the success group within a minute. From the 1-minute mark to the 30-minute mark of the SBT, EAdi increased in the failure group and remained stable in the success group. Similar trends were observed in neuro-discharge per min, with the changes in the failure group being more significant. All EAdi-based parameters showed significant differences between the two groups (p < 0.05).

Figure 3 illustrates diaphragm ultrasonography parameters before and 30 min after the initial of the SBT. No differences were found in DE and DTF before and at the 30 min of the SBT, independently of the weaning outcome. SBT success groups had significantly more DE than SBT failure group before and at the 30 min of the SBT.

Predictability of absolute value and change of respiratory parameters for weaning failure during the SBT

Following the removal of pressure support, most parameters exhibited higher predictability compared to the PS 10 cmH2O, as illustrated in Fig. 4. Overall, EAdi-based parameters showed better predictability than conventional parameters. During the 30-minute SBT, the AUROCs of RR and RSBI were 0.886 and 0.769, respectively. Throughout the entire SBT, EAdi, neuro-ventilatory efficiency, and neuro-discharge per min presented AUROCs of 0.897–0.918, 0.881–0.920, and 0.883–0.930, respectively. Changes in EAdi and neuro-discharge per min at 1 min were found to provide higher AUROCs of 0.918 and 0.944, respectively. However, changes in neuro-ventilatory efficiency only provide a AUROC of 0.503–0.581. Details of AUROC values, cut-off points, specificity, and sensitivity for each parameter at each time point were shown in the Table S4–S7.

Discussion

In this prospective study, we were able to describe the physiological behavior and explore the role evaluate the possibility of weaning success. Several major findings were observed. First, the EAdi-based parameters exhibited significant differences between the SBT success group and failure group. Second, in patients with SBT failure, the changes of EAdi parameters in SBT were more significant than diaphragmatic ultrasound and conventional respiratory parameters, especially in SBT failure group. Third, early changes of EAdi-based parameters during the SBT showed excellent predictability for weaning failure. Neuro-excursion efficiency was the best predictor at the PS 10 and the change of neuro-discharge per min at 1 min after SBT initiation was the best predictor during the SBT.

To our knowledge, this study is the first report on the feasibility of combined EAdi parameters and diaphragm ultrasound in weaning patients. Neuro-excursion efficiency was employed to evaluate the readiness of weaning before SBT trials were implemented. This parameter was able to reflect the ability of the diaphragm to convert respiratory drive into diaphragmatic movement. In previous studies, other parameters were used to convert respiratory neural drive into ventilation, such as neuro-ventilatory efficiency and neuro-mechanical efficiency, which respectively used VT and the decrease in airway pressure during inspiratory effort, divided by EAdi [12, 18, 25]. However, VT and inspiratory effort are influenced by accessory inspiratory muscles besides the diaphragm, which could not represent the efficiency of the direct conversion from the phrenic nerve to phrenic muscle [26]. In our patients, the AUROC of neuro-ventilatory efficiency for weaning outcome was 0.844, but neuro-excursion efficiency exhibited the best predictive value (AUROC 0.874) before the weaning initiation. In addition, neuro-mechanical efficiency was not measured because repeated measurements of neuro-mechanical efficiency showed high variability, limiting the ability of a single action to estimate neuromuscular efficiency [25].

While our study and Dres’s study revealed a baseline difference in EAdi, other studies have failed to demonstrate such variations [16, 17, 27, 28]. We hypothesized that the increased neural drive in the failure group was insignificant during ventilator assistance but became significant upon the withdrawal of ventilator support. Barwing and colleagues reported a significant increase in EAdi during weaning failure using a standard SBT protocol [16]. These changes in EAdi, EAdiAUC, and EAdi/VT were also found in Dres’s study [17]. However, the potential value of this early change in predicting weaning outcomes has never been investigated. We chose to collect data one minute after starting the SBT to assess the immediate compensation of patients’ neural drive following the removal of ventilatory support. As anticipated, our results suggested that monitoring the early changes in EAdi and neuro-discharge per min during SBT might help predict weaning outcomes.

At PS 10, EAdi showed a significant difference between groups, whereas RR and RSBI did not. This suggested that EAdi may detect potential dyspnea that cannot be clinically recognized through fast shallow breathing. During the SBT, EAdi also exhibited more differences than conventional parameters in the failure group. Barwing and colleagues continuously monitored EAdi during the SBT and found that patients who failed the SBT experienced an earlier increase in EAdi than in RR and VT [16]. In our study, we found that the AUROC of RR and VT gradually increased and reached a maximum at 30 min of the SBT. However, EAdi-based parameters achieved better predictivity in the early stages of the SBT. These findings might aid in understanding the physiological processes of respiratory drive. When the inspiratory muscle strength is unable to match the respiratory system’s burden, the respiratory drive increases to meet the ventilation as much as possible. When the respiratory drive increases to a certain extent, a decrease in VT and compensatory RR is shown.

Diaphragmatic ultrasound is increasingly used to assess the readiness for weaning from mechanical ventilation [11, 29]. Nevertheless, the predictability for weaning failure and the utility of diaphragmatic ultrasound in the SBT are still controversial [10, 30]. In SBT failure group, the diaphragmatic ultrasound indexes did not change significantly before and after 30-min SBT, but the EAdi-based parameters significantly change, suggesting that EAdi was more suitable for SBT monitoring. It can be also speculated that the increase in neural drive appeared earlier than diaphragm fatigue. Our study also confirmed the better predictive performance of EAdi-based parameters for SBT failure. In a recent study, Tayar and Abdelshafey found that diaphragmatic ultrasound measurements were more useful than EAdi parameters in predicting liberation outcome [28], which contradicted our results. Our study produced AUROCs of 0.714 and 0.703 for diaphragm excursion and thickening fraction, respectively, which were comparable to the results of a previous meta-analysis [10]. However, diaphragm dysfunction alone did not necessarily indicate weaning failure, as other factors like pulmonary disorders and heart failure might also influence weaning outcome [31]. Furthermore, the conflicting findings might be related to the study population, as patients with severe neuromuscular diseases such as motor neuron disease might present with normal or low EAdi and obvious diaphragm dysfunction [32]. Importantly, reliability of ultrasound-depending parameters might be influenced by intra- and inter-investigator variability but EAdi might be more stable and continuous real-time monitoring of EAdi would be a major advantage. We therefore recommend EAdi-based parameters. While diaphragmatic ultrasound was not a reliable predictor of weaning outcome, it could still aid in the assessment of diaphragm function and identification of the underlying cause of weaning failure.

The optimal duration of SBT is still controversy. Studies have shown that 120-min SBT presented no difference with 30-min SBT in weaning failure rate [33, 34]. Conversely, a large scale RCT recently showed that 30-min SBT has been considered to led to significantly higher rates of successful extubation [35]. Vallverdú et al. found that among patients failing a 2-hour T-piece SBT, 36% failed occurred between 30 min and 2 h [35]. Evidence has been presented that patients with SBT failures after 30 min were older, had more cardiopulmonary disease than patients with SBT failures before the initial 30 min. Taking our patients’ characteristics into account, 2-h SBT was selected for weaning evaluation in this study. CPAP as selected for weaning evaluation because removal of PS could be used to evaluated patients’ compensatory ability to withdrawal of pressure support and tidal volume could be monitored during the SBT. The present studies suggested that CPAP was not inferior to PS and t-piece [36, 37].

In this study, the failure group had a significantly greater number of ventilation days, ventilation days before the first SBT, and length of ICU stay compared to the success group. Spearman correlation analysis showed there is no correlation between EAdi and ventilation days before the first SBT (P>0.05) (Table S9). Neuro-excursion efficiency and diaphragm excursion at PS 10 had a significant correlation with ventilation days before the first SBT (P<0.05). We therefore speculated that prolonged mechanical ventilation affects the conversion efficiency mainly by impairing the diaphragm function, as shown in previous studies [29, 38].

Our study had several limitations. First, it was an open-label study, which leaves it vulnerable to performance and detection biases. Second, the study population was small and confined to a single center, making it difficult to generalize the predictive value of certain parameters and introducing sample bias. Further external validation is warranted. Third, we did not conduct subgroup analysis for different diseases, despite the possibility of differing pathophysiological mechanisms of weaning failure. Although we included patients with various diseases, further data is needed to assess the predictive value of EAdi-based parameters in different populations. Besides, the percentage of weaning failure might be low because PS were not used to compensate for the resistance of the tracheal intubation. Lastly, neuro-excursion efficiency was measured with PS and part of the diaphragm excursion is due to positive pressure ventilation. Umbrello suggested patients should be briefly disconnected for the evaluation of diaphragm excursion [39]. However, the contraction of the diaphragm after disconnection is not stable and might lead to measurement bias.

Conclusion

Patients with failed weaning showed reduced efficiency in converting neural drive into muscle force. Early increases in EAdi occur in SBT, which are more prominent in SBT failure group. Our study supported the potential use of monitoring EAdi-based parameters before and during the SBT to predict weaning outcomes. Larger studies are needed to validate our findings and develop standardized protocols for monitoring EAdi in clinical settings.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Receiver operating characteristic curves to predict SBT outcome at PS 10 cmH2O. EAdi electrical activity of the diaphragm, calculated as maximum EAdi during inspiration minus EAdi minimum; EAdiAUC area under the curve of EAdi signal over time from its onset to its peak value; Neuro-discharge per min, calculated as RR multiplied by EAdi; NVE Neuro-ventilatory efficiency, calculated as VT divided by EAdi; DE diaphragmatic excursion; DTF diaphragm thickening fraction; TEE, end-expiratory thickness of diaphragm; NEE neuro-excursion efficiency, calculated as diaphragm excursion divided by EAdi

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Conventional parameters and EAdi-based parameters before and during the SBT (1, 5, 10, 20 and 30 min) in patients in patients successfully passed the SBT (square) and failed the SBT (circle). VT tidal volume; RR respiratory rate; RSBI rapid shallow breathing index, calculated as RR divided by VT; MV minute ventilation volume; EAdi electrical activity of the diaphragm, calculated as maximum EAdi during inspiration minus EAdi minimum; EAdiAUC area under the curve of EAdi signal over time from its onset to its peak value; Neuro-ventilatory efficiency, calculated as VT divided by EAdi; Neuro-discharge per min, calculated as RR multiplied by EAdi. * P<0.05 versus PS 10 cmH2O(SBT 0 min)within each group, # P<0.05 in comparison to the same time between two groups; AUROC area under the receiver operating characteristic; CI confidence interval

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Diaphragm ultrasonography parameters before and at the 30 min of the SBT in patients successfully passed the SBT (square) and failed the SBT (circle). DE Diaphragmatic excursion; NEE Neuro-excursion efficiency, calculated as diaphragm excursion divided by EAdi; DTF Diaphragm thickening fraction, calculated as (inspiratory thickness-expiratory thickness)/ expiratory thickness*100%. # P<0.05 in comparison to the same time between two groups

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

AUROC (area under receiver operating characteristic) for the accuracy of absolute value and change of conventional and EAdi-based parameters from the baseline(SBT 0 min)to predict weaning failure during the SBT. VT tidal volume; RR respiratory rate; RSBI rapid shallow breathing index, calculated as RR divided by VT; MV minute ventilation volume; EAdi electrical activity of the diaphragm, calculated as maximum EAdi during inspiration minus EAdi minimum; EAdiAUC area under the curve of EAdi signal over time from its onset to its peak value; Neuro-ventilatory efficiency, calculated as VT divided by EAdi; Neuro-discharge per min, calculated as RR multiplied by EAdi

Full size image

Data availability

The datasets and materials analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Torrini F, Gendreau S, Morel J, Carteaux G, Thille AW, Antonelli M, Mekontso Dessap A. Prediction of extubation outcome in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2021;25:391.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Sellares J, Ferrer M, Cano E, Loureiro H, Valencia M, Torres A. Predictors of prolonged weaning and survival during ventilator weaning in a respiratory ICU. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37:775–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Matsuda W. Strategies to avoid extubation failure among ICU patients. JAMA. 2020;323:891–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jung B, Vaschetto R, Jaber S. Ten tips to optimize weaning and extubation success in the critically ill. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:2461–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Boles J-M, Bion J, Connors A, Herridge M, Marsh B, Melot C, Pearl R, Silverman H, Stanchina M, Vieillard-Baron A, Welte T. Weaning from mechanical ventilation. Eur Respir J. 2007;29:1033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Baptistella AR, Sarmento FJ, da Silva KR, Baptistella SF, Taglietti M, Zuquello RÁ, Nunes Filho JR. Predictive factors of weaning from mechanical ventilation and extubation outcome: a systematic review. J Crit Care. 2018;48:56–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Trivedi V, Chaudhuri D, Jinah R, Piticaru J, Agarwal A, Liu K, McArthur E, Sklar MC, Friedrich JO, Rochwerg B, Burns KEA. The usefulness of the Rapid shallow breathing index in Predicting successful extubation. Chest. 2022;161:97–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. de Souza LC, Lugon JR. The rapid shallow breathing index as a predictor of successful mechanical ventilation weaning: clinical utility when calculated from ventilator data. J bras Pneumol. 2015;41:530–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Poulard T, Bachasson D, Fossé Q, Niérat M-C, Hogrel J-Y, Demoule A, Gennisson J-L, Dres M. Poor correlation between Diaphragm Thickening Fraction and Transdiaphragmatic pressure in mechanically ventilated patients and healthy subjects. Anesthesiology. 2022;136:162–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Le Neindre A, Philippart F, Luperto M, Wormser J, Morel-Sapene J, Aho SL, Mongodi S, Mojoli F, Bouhemad B. Diagnostic accuracy of diaphragm ultrasound to predict weaning outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021;117:103890.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Llamas-Álvarez AM, Tenza-Lozano EM, Latour-Pérez J. Diaphragm and lung ultrasound to Predict Weaning Outcome: systematic review and Meta-analysis. Chest. 2017;152:1140–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Doorduin J, Roesthuis LH, Jansen D, Hoeven JG, van van der, Hees HWH. Heunks LMA: respiratory muscle effort during expiration in successful and failed Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2018;129:490–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Walterspacher S, Gückler J, Pietsch F, Walker DJ, Kabitz H-J, Dreher M. Activation of respiratory muscles during weaning from mechanical ventilation. J Crit Care. 2017;38:202–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Piquilloud L, Beloncle F, Richard J-CM, Mancebo J, Mercat A, Brochard L. Information conveyed by electrical diaphragmatic activity during unstressed, stressed and assisted spontaneous breathing: a physiological study. Ann Intensive Care. 2019;9:89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Beck J, Sinderby C. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in newborns. Clin Perinatol. 2021;48:783–811.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Barwing J, Pedroni C, Olgemöller U, Quintel M, Moerer O. Electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi) as a monitoring parameter in difficult weaning from respirator: a pilot study. Crit Care. 2013;17:R182.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Dres M, Schmidt M, Ferre A, Mayaux J, Similowski T, Demoule A. Diaphragm electromyographic activity as a predictor of weaning failure. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38:2017–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rozé H, Repusseau B, Perrier V, Germain A, Séramondi R, Dewitte A, Fleureau C, Ouattara A. Neuro-ventilatory efficiency during weaning from mechanical ventilation using neurally adjusted ventilatory assist. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111:955–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Barwing J, Ambold M, Linden N, Quintel M, Moerer O. Evaluation of the catheter positioning for neurally adjusted ventilatory assist. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35:1809–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. MacIntyre NR. Evidence-based guidelines for Weaning and discontinuing ventilatory support: a collective Task Force facilitated by the American College of Chest Physicians; the American Association for Respiratory Care; and the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Chest. 2001;120:S375–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Esteban A, Alía I, Tobin MJ, Gordo Gila, Vallverdú F, Bonet Iblanchl, Vázquez A. Pablo R De, Torres A, Cal Ma De La, Macías S: Effect of spontaneous breathing trial duration on Outcome of attempts to discontinue mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;159:512–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sklar MC, Madotto F, Jonkman A, Rauseo M, Soliman I, Damiani LF, Telias I, Dubo S, Chen L, Rittayamai N, Chen G-Q, Goligher EC, Dres M, Coudroy R, Pham T, Artigas RM, Friedrich JO, Sinderby C, Heunks L, Brochard L. Duration of diaphragmatic inactivity after endotracheal intubation of critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2021;25:26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Duperret S, Lhuillier F, Piriou V, Vivier E, Metton O, Branche P, Annat G, Bendjelid K, Viale JP. Increased intra-abdominal pressure affects respiratory variations in arterial pressure in normovolaemic and hypovolaemic mechanically ventilated healthy pigs. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33:163–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu L, Liu H, Yang Y, Huang Y, Liu S, Beck J, Slutsky AS, Sinderby C, Qiu H. Neuroventilatory efficiency and extubation readiness in critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2012;16:R143.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Jansen D, Jonkman AH, Roesthuis L, Gadgil S, Hoeven JG, van der, Scheffer G-JJ, Girbes A, Doorduin J, Sinderby CS, Heunks LMA. Estimation of the diaphragm neuromuscular efficiency index in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2018;22:238.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Bellani G. Accessory and expiratory muscles activation during spontaneous breathing trial: a physiological study by surface electromyography. Front Med 2022; 9.

  27. Wolf GK, Walsh BK, Green ML, Arnold JH. Electrical activity of the diaphragm during extubation readiness testing in critically ill children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2011;12:e220–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Al Tayar AS, Abdelshafey EE. Diaphragm Electromyography Versus Ultrasonography in the prediction of mechanical Ventilation Liberation Outcome. Respir Care 2022:respcare09779. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.09779.

  29. Laguado-Nieto MA, Roberto-Avilán SL, Naranjo-Junoy F, Meléndez-Flórez HJ, Lozada-Martinez ID, Domínguez-Alvarado GA, Campos-Castillo VA, Ríos-Orozco SU. Narváez-Rojas AR: Diaphragmatic dynamics and thickness parameters assessed by ultrasonography predict extubation success in critically ill patients. Clin Med Insights Circ Respir Pulm Med. 2023;17:117954842311659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vetrugno L, Orso D, Corradi F, Zani G, Spadaro S, Meroi F, D’Andrea N, Bove T, Cammarota G, De Robertis E, Ferrari S, Guarnieri M, Ajuti M, Fusari M, Grieco DL, Deana C, Boero E, Franchi F, Scolletta S, Maggiore SM, Forfori F. Diaphragm ultrasound evaluation during weaning from mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 patients: a pragmatic, cross-section, multicenter study. Respir Res. 2022;23:210.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. MacIntyre N. Discontinuing mechanical ventilatory support. Chest. 2007;132:1049–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zoccolella S, Giugno A, Logroscino G. Split phenomena in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: current evidences, pathogenetic hypotheses and diagnostic implications. Front Neurosci. 2023;16:1100040.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Perren A, Vizzardi N. Protocol-directed weaning from mechanical ventilation: clinical outcome in patients randomized for a 30-min or 120-min trial with pressure support ventilation.

  34. Liang G, Liu T, Rn YZ, Shi Y, Yang W, Yang Y, Kang Y. Characteristics of subjects who failed a 120-Minute spontaneous breathing trial. Respir Care 2018; 63.

  35. Subirà C, Hernández G, Vázquez A, Rodríguez-García R, González-Castro A, García C, Rubio O, Ventura L, López A, Arauzo V, Hermosa C, Sánchez C, Tizón A, Tenza E, Laborda C, Cabañes S, Lacueva V. Effect of pressure support vs T-Piece ventilation strategies during spontaneous breathing trials on successful extubation among patients receiving mechanical ventilation 2019.

  36. Molina-Saldarriaga FJ, Fonseca-Ruiz NJ, Cuesta-Castro DP, Esteban A, Frutos-Vivar F. [Spontaneous breathing trial in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) versus T-piece]. Med Intensiva. 2010;34:453–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Vishwa CR. Pressure support versus continuous positive airway pressure for predicting successful liberation from invasive ventilation in children: an open label, randomized non-inferiority trial 2023; 14.

  38. Dong Z, Liu Y, Gai Y, Meng P, Lin H, Zhao Y, Xing J. Early rehabilitation relieves diaphragm dysfunction induced by prolonged mechanical ventilation: a randomised control study. BMC Pulm Med. 2021;21:106.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Umbrello M, Formenti P, Longhi D, Galimberti A, Piva I, Pezzi A, Mistraletti G, Marini JJ, Iapichino G. Diaphragm ultrasound as indicator of respiratory effort in critically ill patients undergoing assisted mechanical ventilation: a pilot clinical study. Crit Care. 2015;19:161.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The manuscript has been read and approved by all the authors, that the requirements for authorship as stated earlier in this document have been met, and that each author believes that the manuscript represents honest work. And this manuscript has not been published elsewhere and is not under consideration by another journal.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) from Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences 2021-I2M-1-062;National Key R&D Program of China from Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China 2022YFC2304601, 2021YFC2500801; National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding(2022-PUMCH-D-005, 2022-PUMCH-B-126); National key clinical specialty construction projects from National Health Commission; Wujieping Medicine Foundation (supported since 2024).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medical Intensive Care Unit, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China

    Shitong Diao, Shan Li, Run Dong, Wei Jiang, Chunyao Wang, Yan Chen, Jingyi Wang, Shuhua He, Yifan Wang, Bin Du & Li Weng

Authors
  1. Shitong Diao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Run Dong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wei Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chunyao Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yan Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jingyi Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Shuhua He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yifan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Bin Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Li Weng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.D., L.W. and B.D. conceptualized the literature search, completed acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of the data, drafted the initial manuscript, and revised it subsequently. All other authors participated in data interpretation and critical revision of the manuscript for intellectual content. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li Weng.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the protocol was approved by the institutional review board of Peking Union Medical College Hospital (K2603). Informed consent to participate and consent to publish was obtained.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Generative AI in scientific writing

No AI tools were used as part of the research process.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Diao, S., Li, S., Dong, R. et al. The diaphragmatic electrical activity during spontaneous breathing trial in patients with mechanical ventilation: physiological description and potential clinical utility. BMC Pulm Med 24, 263 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-024-03077-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-024-03077-8

Keywords

BMC Pulmonary Medicine

ISSN: 1471-2466

Contact us