Skip to main content
Download PDF

Prevalence, clinical characteristics, and disease burden of chronic cough in Italy: a cross-sectional study

BMC Pulmonary Medicine volume 24, Article number: 288 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Chronic cough has been associated with reduced health-related quality of life, negative impacts on sleep, work, and other daily activities, and increased use of health care resources. Little is known about the prevalence of chronic cough in Italy. In the present study we sought to estimate the prevalence of chronic cough in Italy, describe sociodemographic and clinical characteristics associated with chronic cough, and characterize the impact of chronic cough on overall health and wellness, work and other daily activities, and health care resource use.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study to collect sociodemographic and health-related data from Italian residents who participated in the 2020 National Health and Wellness Survey (N = 10,026). To assess the characteristics and burden of chronic cough, adults who indicated that they had experienced chronic cough during the prior 12 months were compared with propensity score-matched controls without chronic cough.

Results

The estimated weighted lifetime and 12-month prevalence of chronic cough were estimated as 9.2% and 6.3%, respectively. Compared with matched controls, respondents with chronic cough had significantly lower measures of overall physical and mental health (P < .001 for both comparisons), and significantly higher rates of anxiety, depression, and sleep disorders (P < .001 for all comparisons). Chronic cough was significantly associated with higher rates of impairment of work and other activities (P < .001 for all comparisons) in the past 7 days, any-cause emergency department visits and hospitalizations in the prior 6 months (P < .001 for both comparisons), and more visits to general and specialist health care providers (P < .001 for both comparisons) in the prior 6 months.

Conclusions

In Italy, chronic cough affects an estimated 3.3 million adults annually and represents a significant burden to individuals and the health care system.

Take home message

Little is known about the prevalence of chronic cough in Italy. We found that, in Italy chronic cough represents a significant burden to individuals and the health care system, affecting an estimated 3.3 million adults annually.

Peer Review reports

Background

Globally, approximately 10% of adults have chronic cough [1], a protracted and debilitating condition, in which over 40% of affected adults report living with this condition for ≥ 5 years [2, 3]. A 2015 meta-analysis of global studies found that the burden of chronic cough is highest in North America and Europe, the latter having an estimated prevalence of 12.7% [1]. Factors associated with chronic cough in clinic- and population-based studies from Europe include smoking, female sex, and, to a lesser extent, older age [4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. However, the findings of clinic-based studies may not be generalizable due to differences in cough severity and health utilization patterns. Furthermore, population-based studies from Europe do not use a consistent definition of chronic cough, and prevalence estimates for individual European countries are frequently limited in number [1, 11]. Current estimates of chronic cough prevalence in Italy are based on studies with limited sample sizes primarily conducted during the 1980s and 1990s [4, 5, 12].

In the current study, we sought to address this knowledge gap by using a nationally representative survey to estimate the 12-month and lifetime prevalence of chronic cough among Italian adults. We further sought to describe the sociodemographic factors, comorbidities, and health care utilization patterns associated with chronic cough in Italy.

Methods

Study design

An analysis of chronic cough in Italy was carried out using data from the National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS). The NHWS is an international, self-administered, internet-based health survey conducted annually in Italy, other countries in Europe and Asia, and the United States. The data reported here were derived from the 2020 fielding of the NHWS, which was administered to an age- and sex-representative sample of adults in Italy from December 2019 through March 2020. The prevalence of chronic cough was estimated in a cross-sectional analysis; factors associated with chronic cough were identified in a matched case-control analysis. All study respondents underwent informed consent, and respondent information was fully anonymized. The study (protocol, 19-KANT-205) received an exempt status upon evaluation by the Pearl Institutional Review Board.

Study sample

Respondents to the NHWS were recruited via an existing general-purpose, voluntary, web-based survey. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years at the time of the survey, literacy in Italian, and the ability to provide informed consent; there were no specific exclusion criteria. Respondents were stratified based on their history of chronic cough: those who indicated that they had ever experienced chronic cough (defined as daily cough for ≥ 8 weeks, in alignment with clinical guidelines [13,14,15]) were included in calculations of lifetime prevalence, whereas those who indicated experiencing chronic cough in the past 12 months were included in calculations of 12-month prevalence. Respondents who did not experience chronic cough in the past 12 months were retained as a control group for propensity score-matched comparisons.

Study measures

Study measures have been detailed elsewhere [16]. Health-related quality of life was assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study 12-item Short Form Survey v2 (SF-12v2; Quality Metric, Lincoln, RI [17]) and the EuroQol 5-Dimension Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5 L™; EuroQol Research Foundation) [18]. Three summary measures derived from the SF-12v2 were used in the NHWS: the physical and mental health components of the SF-12v2 (calculated using a mean score of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10) and the SF-6D, a preference-based health utility index. For all three measures, higher scores represent better health. The composite index score was reported for the EQ-5D descriptive system, with 0 representing death and 1 the best possible health state. The EQ-5D also includes a vertical visual analogue scale (VAS), asking respondents to indicate on a number line their self-rated health for that day with 0 representing the “worst imaginable health state” and 100 representing the “best imaginable health state”. The General Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7) was used to assess anxiety [19], and the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item scale (PHQ-9) was used to assess depression [20]. Both the GAD-7 and the PHQ-9 measure symptom frequency during the prior 2 weeks using a Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Total scores for the GAD-7 range from 0 to 21, with values 15 and above indicating severe anxiety symptoms. Total scores for the PHQ-9 range from 0 to 27, with values 20 and above indicating severe depression.

Health-related impairment of work and activity during the past 7 days was measured using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) [21]. The 6-item WPAI measures four impairment outcomes: the percentage of work time missed due to health (absenteeism), the percentage of working hours impaired due to health (presenteeism), total work productivity loss due to health (productivity impairment), and the percentage of non-work activity impairment due to health (activity impairment). All respondents provided data for activity impairment; only respondents who reported being employed provided data on work-related impairments.

Difficulty sleeping was evaluated with yes or no questions regarding whether the respondent regularly experienced the following: difficulty falling asleep, waking during the night and not being able to get back to sleep, waking up several times during the night, waking up earlier than desired, sleep apnea, poor quality of sleep, daytime sleepiness, or difficulty staying awake.

All-cause health care resource use was measured as the number of hospitalizations and visits to health care practitioners (general or family clinicians, specialists, or emergency department [ED] clinicians) made in the past 6 months.

Data analysis

The prevalence of chronic cough was calculated using unweighted estimates, as well as weighted estimates adjusted for the age and sex distribution of the Italian population. The unweighted estimates of lifetime and 12-month prevalence of chronic cough were calculated using the total number of NHWS respondents as the denominator. The weighted prevalence estimates were generated by applying Horvitz-Thompson sampling weights calculated using the age and sex distributions reported for Italy in the 2019–2020 International Data Base of the United States Census Bureau [22].

Comparisons were conducted between adults with chronic cough and matched controls without chronic cough using propensity score matching. Adults who experienced chronic cough within the past 12 months were compared with a propensity score-matched sample of adults without chronic cough from the general population (i.e., those who did not experience chronic cough within the past 12 months) using a 1:3 matching ratio. Logistic regression modeling was used to estimate propensity scores. Explanatory variables included in the logistic model were age, sex, marital status, household income, an interaction term for marital status x household income, and a modified Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) that excluded chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), as this condition is commonly associated with chronic cough. The variables were selected for matching based on clinical importance/interest or those deemed to be potential confounders to account for differences in health care and general health status between adults of different sexes, age, and socioeconomic status and comorbid conditions not associated with chronic cough. Data were reported as means and SD for continuous variables, and frequency counts and percentages for categorical variables. Statistical comparisons were conducted using chi-square tests and t-tests, as appropriate. Two-tailed P values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Prevalence of chronic cough in Italy

Among all the 10,026 NHWS survey respondents, 905 (9.0%) reported experiencing chronic cough during their lifetime and 619 (6.2%) respondents reported experiencing chronic cough during the previous 12 months (Table 1). The weighted analysis resulted in similar findings, with the lifetime and 12-month prevalence rates of chronic cough in Italy’s adult population estimated to be 9.2% and 6.3% or 4.8 million and 3.3 million adults, respectively.

Table 1 Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of chronic cough among italian adults
Full size table

In the weighted analysis, the lifetime prevalence of chronic cough was higher among females compared with males (10.3% vs. 7.9%; P < .001; Table 1) and among respondents with a history of smoking compared with those who had never smoked (11.2% vs. 6.5%; P < .001). Regional differences in the lifetime prevalence of chronic cough were also observed (P < .001), with a higher prevalence in southern Italy (11.8%) than in central (8.9%) and northern (7.6%) Italy. Trends in the 12-month prevalence of chronic cough were similar to those of lifetime prevalence. The 12-month prevalence of chronic cough was higher in females compared with males (7.5% vs. 4.9%; P < .001) and in former or current smokers compared with never smokers (7.9% vs. 4.1%; P < .001). Unweighted lifetime and 12-month prevalence estimates were similar to weighted estimates, varying by less than 0.4% in 90% of strata.

Sociodemographic characteristics of respondents with chronic cough

A total of 614 respondents with chronic cough were matched (five of the 619 respondents with chronic cough were not matched; four respondents had only two matches and another three respondents had only one match). Thus, the total number of matched controls without chronic cough is 1,832.

In the propensity score-matched analysis, respondents with chronic cough differed from matched controls by level of education (P = .026) and region of residence (P < .001; Supplementary Table 1). As expected, due to the matching, there is no significant difference between respondents with chronic cough compared with propensity score - matched controls in distributions of age, sex, household income and marital status; employment status and type of insurance also did not significantly differ between respondents with chronic cough and propensity score-matched controls.

Health and health-related quality of life impacts of chronic cough

Respondents with chronic cough during the past 12 months reported poorer health-related quality of life compared with propensity score-matched controls without chronic cough, as shown by lower mean values of the physical (47.22 vs. 50.19) and mental (40.68 vs. 44.83) component summary scores of the SF-12v2 and the SF-6D utility score (0.63 vs. 0.68; P < .001 for all comparisons; Table 2). Further, EQ-5D scores were lower, indicating a worse health state, for those with chronic cough compared to those without (0.83 vs. 0.88; P < .001) and VAS (65.70 vs. 73.72; P < .001). Compared with propensity score-matched controls without chronic cough, respondents with chronic cough more frequently reported digestive (38.8% vs. 23.7%), respiratory (64.2% vs. 24.8%), and sleep (31.3% vs. 14.4%) conditions during the past 12 months (P < .001 for all comparisons).

Table 2 Health characteristics of respondents with and without chronic cough in the previous 12 months
Full size table

Health care resource use burden of chronic cough

In total, 94.1% of respondents with chronic cough reported the use of health care provider services for any reason during the prior 6 months compared with 87.0% of propensity score-matched controls (P < .001; Table 3). On average, respondents with chronic cough had two more visits with any health care provider during the prior 6 months than did the matched controls (7.84 vs. 5.46; P < .001). Compared with propensity score-matched controls, respondents with chronic cough more frequently reported hospitalization (12.5% vs. 7.4%), the use of ED care (23.0% vs. 12.9%), the use of specialist care provided by general or family practitioners (75.9% vs. 69.8%; P < .004), and visits to allergists (11.4% vs. 4.9%), cardiologists (20.5% vs. 13.6%), gastroenterologists (9.6% vs. 5.6%), geriatricians (1.6% vs. 0.2%), otolaryngologists (7.2% vs. 3.8%), and pulmonologists (9.3% vs. 2.0%; P < .001 for all comparisons except general or family practitioners P = .004). Significant differences between groups in the use of services provided by internists, neurologists, psychiatrists, or psychologists/therapists were not observed.

Table 3 Health care resource use in prior 6 months by respondents with and without chronic cough in the previous 12 months
Full size table

Impact of chronic cough on impairment of work and other activities

Compared with propensity score-matched controls, respondents with chronic cough reported more work impairment, including absenteeism (mean % of missed working hours: 12.8% vs. 6.2%), presenteeism (mean % of impaired working hours: 37.3% vs. 23.4%), and impaired total work productivity (mean %: 41.7% vs. 25.2%; P < .001 for all comparisons; Fig. 1). Activity impairment was also more frequently reported by respondents with chronic cough than matched controls (mean %: 40.2% vs. 27.5%; P < .001).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Impairment of work and other daily activities in respondents with and without chronic cough in the previous 12 months. Chronic cough was defined as daily cough for ≥ 8 weeks. The bars represent absenteeism (mean % missed work hours; employed respondents only), presenteeism (mean % impaired work hours; employed respondents only); total work productivity impairment (mean % combined impact of absenteeism and presenteeism; employed respondents only), and activity impairment (mean % impairment of non-paid activities; all respondents) during the prior 7 days. Differences between the ‘chronic cough’ and ‘no chronic cough’ groups were statistically significant (P < .001) for all four measures

Full size image

Discussion

There is a lack of data describing chronic cough and its impact in Italy and the present study contributes to this knowledge gap. In summary, we found that Italian adults have an appreciable burden of chronic cough, corresponding to an estimated weighted lifetime and 12-month prevalences of 9.2% and 6.3%, respectively. The prevalence of chronic cough was highest among females, current and former smokers, and residents of southern Italy. In an analysis adjusted for age, sex, marital status, household income, and a modified CCI, chronic cough was associated with residence in southern Italy and having less than a high school education. Notably, chronic cough was associated with significantly increased health care utilization, work and activity impairment, and poorer health outcomes, including more comorbidities, lower physical and mental health status, anxiety, and depression.

Information on the prevalence chronic cough in Italy is limited, however, our estimated prevalences (9.2% [lifetime]/6.3% [12-month]) are similar to those reported by authors using the same definition of chronic cough and comparable survey-based methods as the current study; including Denmark (3.8% 12-month) [8], France (7.5% [lifetime]/4.8% [12-month]) [23], Germany (6.5% [lifetime]/4.9% [12-month]) [24], Spain (8.2% [lifetime]/5.5% [12-month]) [25], the United Kingdom (6.2% [lifetime]/4.9% [12-month]) [26], and the United States (5.0% 12-month) [16]. In contrast, the prevalence of chronic cough in Italy was estimated to be in the range of 10–15% in a 2015 meta-analysis [1]. However, the three Italian studies included in the meta-analysis were conducted in the 1980s and 1990s and defined chronic cough as a cough lasting ≥ 3 months during the past two years [4, 5, 12]. In the current study we defined chronic cough as a daily cough ≥ 8 weeks duration, the definition which has been utilized in clinical guidelines [13,14,15]. Differences in the definition of chronic cough are unlikely to fully explain the lower prevalence of chronic cough reported in our study as studies using a threshold of 8 weeks to define chronic cough typically report higher prevalences than those using a threshold of 3 months [11]. It is possible that the burden of chronic cough among Italian adults, though still considerable, may have decreased from the 1980s and 1990s. This may be partially explained by changing demographics and cultural practices. For instance, smoking, an established risk factor for chronic cough [27], has decreased in Italy with male smoking prevalence decreasing from 41.6% in 1986 to 29.5% in 2009 [28] and female smoking prevalence decreasing from 19.2% in 1986 to 17.0% in 1993 [28].

We evaluated age- and sex-related differences in chronic cough, finding a significantly higher prevalence of chronic cough among females and a numerical trend of increasing prevalence of cough in the prior 12 months with older age. These findings align with those of European and North American studies of cough clinics, which report a preponderance of older women [29]. Our findings also align with those of most [5,6,7,8], but not all population-based studies from Europe [30], showing higher chronic cough prevalence with increasing age. In contrast, many [4, 6, 8, 30], but not all [7], population surveys from Europe report either no sex-related differences in chronic cough prevalence or a higher rate in males [5]. Mixed findings regarding sex-related trends in chronic cough may reflect sampling differences between clinic- and population-based studies, as well as complex epidemiology. Biological differences, including higher levels of estrogen and progesterone, may render women more susceptible to chronic cough, while cough risk factors, including smoking and occupational exposures, are higher among men than women in some settings [29].

In a propensity score-matched analysis controlling for age, sex, marital status, household income, and comorbidities, we found that chronic cough was associated with a lower education level. Several population-based studies support this finding, reporting an approximate 50% increase in the risk of chronic cough among individuals with a low compared with a high socioeconomic or educational level [4, 8, 9, 27]. Our propensity score-matched analysis also found a significantly higher prevalence of chronic cough among individuals residing in southern compared with central or northern Italy. Although evidence is scant regarding subnational differences in the burden of chronic cough, three studies from Italy have evaluated this issue. One study found sub-regional differences in the prevalence of chronic cough in Italy’s Po River valley [12]. Two other studies reported higher prevalences of asthma and respiratory symptoms in southern compared with central or northern Italy, which in quantitative analyses were primarily attributable to climatic factors [31, 32].

Our findings showed that Italian adults with chronic cough had an excess burden of comorbidities, including anxiety, depression, and sleep disorders. These findings accord with those of population-based surveys from Europe, including a multi-country survey in which over 90% of adults with chronic cough reported feeling depressed due to their cough [33]. The findings of these European surveys highlight ways in which chronic cough may undermine mental health by disrupting social interactions and engendering frustration over inadequate treatment for cough despite high health care utilization [33, 34].

We observed substantially greater health care utilization among Italian adults with chronic cough compared with adults without cough, including nearly twice the rate of ED visits and hospitalizations. Results of a 2020 fielding of the NHWS conducted in the United States similarly reported that adults with chronic cough visited the ED about twice as often as those without chronic cough [16]. Notably, the costs associated with respiratory disease are not limited to greater health care utilization, but also encompass impaired work productivity, particularly among individuals with severe symptoms. Indeed, we observed a striking burden of impaired work productivity associated with chronic cough in the previous 12 months, equating to over 40% of work hours. Recent studies from Asia, Europe, and the United States report a similar degree of work productivity impairment of 26-43% for adults with chronic cough [16, 23, 25, 26, 35, 36].

The current study has limitations that should be considered when interpreting the findings. The data reported here are derived from the 2020 fielding of the NHWS, which was administered during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. As data on the SARS-CoV-2 respiratory virus continues to unfold, and its effects on the prevalence and characteristics of chronic cough are not yet known [37, 38]. Therefore, the prevalence of chronic cough reported here may differ from the prevalence of chronic cough in Italy before, during, or after phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. Recall bias and self-presentation bias may have affected study results, as data on study outcomes were collected using a self-administered questionnaire. However, survey questions and response options were phrased to minimize these biases. For example, where possible, questions referred to recent timeframes to enable more accurate recall. Potentially sensitive questions included uninformative response options, such as ‘Don’t Know’ and ‘Refuse to Answer’ that allowed respondents to opt out. Further, the confidential nature of this survey may also have limited self-presentation bias. We conducted an adjusted analysis by propensity matching on age, sex, household income, marital status, and comorbidities; however, residual confounding by other factors may have affected the results. Although we enrolled a nationally representative sample of Italian adults, study findings may not be generalizable to subgroups excluded from the study, including institutionalized individuals or those who have severe disabilities, or limited internet access. In addition, the structure of the study population was skewed toward younger adults, and individuals > 75 years were under-represented. The study’s cross-sectional design limits the use of its findings for making causal inferences regarding chronic cough.

Conclusions

This study revealed a substantial burden of chronic cough among Italian adults. This burden included an estimated 12-month weighted prevalence of 6.3%, equivalent to over 3.3 million affected individuals, and an estimated weighted lifetime prevalence of 9.2%, equivalent to over 4.8 million affected individuals. This burden also manifested in greater rates of depression, anxiety, work impairment, and health care utilization among adults with chronic cough compared with their unaffected counterparts. Further research is warranted into the causes underlying the greater prevalence of chronic cough among women, individuals with lower education, and residents of southern Italy.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from Oracle Life Sciences, Seattle, WA, USA but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available.

Abbreviations

CCI:

Charlson Comorbidity Index

COPD:

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

ED:

Emergency department

EQ-5D-5L:

EuroQol 5-Dimension Health Questionnaire

GAD-7:

General Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale

NHWS:

National Health and Wellness Survey

PHQ-9:

Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item scale

SD:

Standard deviation

SF-12v2:

Medical Outcomes Study 12-item Short Form Survey v2

VAS:

Visual analog scale

WPAI:

Work Productivity and Activity Impairment

References

  1. Song WJ, Chang YS, Faruqi S, Kim JY, Kang MG, Kim S, et al. The global epidemiology of chronic cough in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J. 2015;45(5). https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00218714.

  2. Koskela HO, Latti AM, Purokivi MK. Long-term prognosis of chronic cough: a prospective, observational cohort study. BMC Pulm Med. 2017;17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-017-0496-1.

  3. Yousaf N, Montinero W, Birring SS, Pavord ID. The long term outcome of patients with unexplained chronic cough. Respir Med. 2013;107(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2012.11.018.

  4. Cerveri I, Accordini S, Corsico A, Zoia MC, Carrozzi L, Cazzoletti L, et al. Chronic cough and phlegm in young adults. Eur Respir J. 2003;22(3). https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.03.00121103.

  5. Viegi G, Paoletti P, Carrozzi L, Vellutini M, Diviggiano E, Di Pede C et al. Prevalence rates of respiratory symptoms in Italian general population samples exposed to different levels of air pollution. Environ Health Perspect. 1991;9410.1289/ehp.94-1567935.

  6. Arinze JT, de Roos EW, Karimi L, Verhamme KMC, Stricker BH, Brusselle GG. Prevalence and incidence of, and risk factors for chronic cough in the adult population: the Rotterdam Study. ERJ open Res. 2020;6(2). https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00300-2019.

  7. Bende M, Millqvist E. Prevalence of chronic cough in relation to upper and lower airway symptoms; the Skovde population-based study. Frontiers in physiology. 2012;310.3389/fphys.2012.00251.

  8. Colak Y, Nordestgaard BG, Laursen LC, Afzal S, Lange P, Dahl M. Risk factors for chronic Cough among 14,669 individuals from the General Population. Chest. 2017;152(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2017.05.038.

  9. Ford AC, Forman D, Moayyedi P, Morice AH. Cough in the community: a cross sectional survey and the relationship to gastrointestinal symptoms. Thorax. 2006;61(11). https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2006.060087.

  10. Morice AH, Jakes AD, Faruqi S, Birring SS, McGarvey L, Canning B, et al. A worldwide survey of chronic cough: a manifestation of enhanced somatosensory response. Eur Respir J. 2014;44(5). https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00217813.

  11. Song WJ, Chang YS, Faruqi S, Kang MK, Kim JY, Kang MG, et al. Defining chronic cough: a systematic review of the Epidemiological Literature. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2016;8(2). https://doi.org/10.4168/aair.2016.8.2.146.

  12. Viegi G, Paoletti P, Prediletto R, Carrozzi L, Fazzi P, Di Pede F, et al. Prevalence of respiratory symptoms in an unpolluted area of northern Italy. Eur Respir J. 1988;1:4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Morice AH, Millqvist E, Bieksiene K, Birring SS, Dicpinigaitis P, Domingo Ribas C, et al. ERS guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of chronic cough in adults and children. Eur Respir J. 2020;55(1). https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01136-2019.

  14. Irwin RS, Baumann MH, Bolser DC, Boulet LP, Braman SS, Brightling CE, et al. Diagnosis and management of cough executive summary: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2006;129(1 Suppl). https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.129.1_suppl.1S.

  15. Irwin RS, French CL, Chang AB, Altman KW, Chest Expert Cough Panel. Classification of Cough as a symptom in adults and management algorithms: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report. Chest. 2018;153(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2017.10.016.

  16. Meltzer EO, Zeiger RS, Dicpinigaitis P, Bernstein JA, Oppenheimer JJ, Way NA, et al. Prevalence and Burden of Chronic Cough in the United States. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021;9(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2021.07.022.

  17. Ware J Jr., Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item short-form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:(3). https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.

  18. Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual life Research: Int J Qual life Aspects Treat care Rehabilitation. 2011;20(10). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x.

  19. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(10). https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.

  20. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(9). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.

  21. Reilly MC, Zbrozek AS, Dukes EM. The validity and reproducibility of a work productivity and activity impairment instrument. PharmacoEconomics. 1993;4(5). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199304050-00006.

  22. Bureau USC. International Database: World Population Estimates and Projections updated December 21, 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/international-programs/about/idb.html.

  23. Guilleminault L, Li VW, Fonseca E, Martin A, Schelfhout J, Ding H, et al. Prevalence and burden of chronic cough in France. ERJ open Res. 2024;10(2). https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00806-2023.

  24. Virchow JC, Li VW, Fonseca E, Salmen H, Martin A, Brady J, et al. Chronic cough in Germany: results from a general-population survey. ERJ open Res. 2022;8(1). https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00420-2021.

  25. Dominguez-Ortega J, Plaza V, Li VW, Fonseca E, Cea-Calvo L, Martin A et al. Prevalence of chronic cough and patient characteristics in adults in Spain: a population-based cross-sectional survey. Chronic Resp Dis. 2022;1910.1177/14799731221098722.

  26. McGarvey L, Morice AH, Martin A, Li VW, Doane MJ, Urdaneta E, et al. Burden of chronic cough in the UK: results from the 2018 National Health and Wellness Survey. ERJ open Res. 2023;9(4). https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00157-2023.

  27. Zhang J, Perret JL, Chang AB, Idrose NS, Bui DS, Lowe AJ, et al. Risk factors for chronic cough in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Respirol (Carlton Vic). 2022;27(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.14169.

  28. Carreras G, Gorini G. Time trends of Italian former smokers 1980–2009 and 2010–2030 projections using a bayesian age period cohort model. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;11:(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110100001.

  29. Bai H, Sha B, Xu X, Yu L. Gender Difference in Chronic Cough: Are Women More Likely to Cough? Frontiers in physiology. 2021;1210.3389/fphys.2021.654797.

  30. Latti AM, Pekkanen J, Koskela HO. Persistence of chronic cough in a community-based population. ERJ open Res. 2020;6(2). https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00229-2019.

  31. Pesce G, Bugiani M, Marcon A, Marchetti P, Carosso A, Accordini S et al. Geo-climatic heterogeneity in self-reported asthma, allergic rhinitis and chronic bronchitis in Italy. Sci Total Environ. 2016;54410.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.015.

  32. Zanolin ME, Pattaro C, Corsico A, Bugiani M, Carrozzi L, Casali L, et al. The role of climate on the geographic variability of asthma, allergic rhinitis and respiratory symptoms: results from the Italian study of asthma in young adults. Allergy. 2004;59:(3). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1398-9995.2003.00391.x.

  33. Chamberlain SA, Garrod R, Douiri A, Masefield S, Powell P, Bucher C, et al. The impact of chronic cough: a cross-sectional European survey. Lung. 2015;193(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-015-9701-2.

  34. Everett CF, Kastelik JA, Thompson RH, Morice AH. Chronic persistent cough in the community: a questionnaire survey. Cough (London, England). 2007;310.1186/1745-9974-3-5.

  35. Kubo T, Tobe K, Okuyama K, Kikuchi M, Chen Y, Schelfhout J, et al. Disease burden and quality of life of patients with chronic cough in Japan: a population-based cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2021;8:(1). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000764.

  36. Yu CJ, Song WJ, Kang SH. The disease burden and quality of life of chronic cough patients in South Korea and Taiwan. World Allergy Organ J. 2022;15(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.waojou.2022.100681.

  37. Chen Y, Zhang X, Zeng X, Xu T, Xiao W, Yang X, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for postinfectious cough in discharged patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). J Thorac Disease. 2022;14(6). https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-876.

  38. Dicpinigaitis PV, Canning BJ. Is there (will there be) a Post-COVID-19 chronic cough? Lung. 2020;198:(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-020-00406-6.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Cath Ennis, PhD, and Ingrid Peterson, PhD, in collaboration with ScribCo for medical writing assistance.

Funding

This study was funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Università Campus Biomedico di Roma and Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy

    Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi & Antonio De Vincentis

  2. Oracle Life Sciences, Seattle, WA, USA

    Vicky W. Li & Ashley Martin

  3. MSD Italia S.r.l., Rome, Italy

    Danilo Di Laura

  4. Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA

    Eileen Fonseca & Helen Ding

Authors
  1. Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Antonio De Vincentis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vicky W. Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ashley Martin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Danilo Di Laura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Eileen Fonseca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Helen Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: RAI, ADV, EF. Methodology: VWL, AM. Formal Analysis: VWL, AM. Interpretation of the Results: DDL. Writing – original draft: RAI, ADV, HD. Writing - review & editing: RAI, ADV, DDL, EF, HD. Project Administration: AM. Supervision: HD. All authors approve the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helen Ding.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All study respondents underwent informed consent, and respondent information was fully anonymized. The study (protocol, 19-KANT-205) received an exempt status upon evaluation by the Pearl Institutional Review Board.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi and Antonio De Vincentis have no conflicts of interest to report. Vicky W. Li is an employee of Oracle Life Sciences, Seattle, WA, USA. Ashley Martin was an employee of Oracle Life Sciences, Seattle, WA, USA at the time of this work. Danilo Di Laura is an employee of MSD Italia. Eileen Fonseca and Helen Ding are employees of Merck Sharp & LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA and shareholders in Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Antonelli Incalzi, R., De Vincentis, A., Li, V.W. et al. Prevalence, clinical characteristics, and disease burden of chronic cough in Italy: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pulm Med 24, 288 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-024-03095-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-024-03095-6

Keywords

BMC Pulmonary Medicine

ISSN: 1471-2466

Contact us