Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Pulmonary Medicine

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Self-reported exercise and longitudinal outcomes in cystic fibrosis: a retrospective cohort study

  • Joseph M Collaco1Email author,
  • Scott M Blackman1,
  • Karen S Raraigh1,
  • Christopher B Morrow1,
  • Garry R Cutting1 and
  • Shruti M Paranjape1
BMC Pulmonary Medicine201414:159

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-14-159

Received: 7 June 2014

Accepted: 29 September 2014

Published: 6 October 2014

Abstract

Background

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is characterized by recurrent respiratory infections and progressive lung disease. Whereas exercise may contribute to preserving lung function, its benefit is difficult to ascertain given the selection bias of healthier patients being more predisposed to exercise. Our objective was to examine the role of self-reported exercise with longitudinal lung function and body mass index (BMI) measures in CF.

Methods

A total of 1038 subjects with CF were recruited through the U.S. CF Twin-Sibling Study. Questionnaires were used to determine exercise habits. Questionnaires, chart review, and U.S. CF Foundation Patient Registry data were used to track outcomes.

Results

Within the study sample 75% of subjects self-reported regular exercise. Exercise was associated with an older age of diagnosis (p = 0.002), older age at the time of ascertainment (p < 0.001), and higher baseline FEV1 (p = 0.001), but not CFTR genotype (p = 0.64) or exocrine pancreatic function (p = 0.19). In adjusted mixed models, exercise was associated with both a reduced decline in FEV1 (p < 0.001) and BMI Z-score (p = 0.001) for adults, but not children aged 10–17 years old.

Conclusions

In our retrospective study, self-reported exercise was associated with improved longitudinal nutritional and pulmonary outcomes in cystic fibrosis for adults. Although prospective studies are needed to confirm these associations, programs to promote regular exercise among individuals with cystic fibrosis would be beneficial.

Keywords

Cystic fibrosisLung functionFEV1 Body mass indexExercise

Background

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a life-limiting single gene disorder caused by mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene (CFTR) leading to progressive lung function decline. As half of the variation in CF lung disease is secondary to non-genetic factors [1, 2], examining the role of environmental factors is critical in reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with CF. Although a number of factors have been shown to have an impact on lung function in CF, including secondhand smoke exposure [35], health insurance [69], household income [10], adherence [11], air pollution [12], and ambient temperature [13], only two of these are readily modifiable: secondhand smoke and adherence. Another potential modifiable factor to improve outcomes may be exercise.

There have been a number of well designed randomized controlled trials of exercise among individuals with CF to determine the effects of exercise on lung function and nutritional status. These trials, lasting from 1 week to 3 years, have employed aerobic exercise, resistance training, or a combination of both. Some studies have demonstrated benefits to FEV1 [14, 15], and some have seen promising trends [16, 17], while others have not seen any benefit [1820]. Similarly, some studies have seen a benefit to FVC [1518], while others have not [14, 19, 20]. The mixed results of these studies may be related to the differing ages of participants or the differing types and duration of exercise regimens utilized, although it should be noted that no difference in FEV1 was seen in a 1 year trial of resistance training vs. aerobic training in CF. [21] Another reason for the differing results may be statistical power, as these studies range from 13 to 65 participants. A hypothetical study with 30 cases and 30 controls with an assumed baseline FEV1 percent predicted rate of decline of 2.0 ± 1.0% per year would only have a statistical power of 62% to detect a difference of 0.5% decline per year. However, a recent larger prospective study of exercise in children with cystic fibrosis (n = 212) did see an association between increased habitual physical activity and a reduced decline in FEV1 [22].

Many individuals with CF also have exocrine pancreatic insufficiency leading to lifelong malabsorption and poor weight gain. Thus a potential concern is the increased caloric expenditure resulting from exercise. Limited data suggest that individuals with CF expend more energy with exercise than do healthy controls independent of baseline resting energy expenditures [23]. The results are mixed for the effects of exercise on nutritional status in randomized controlled trials; at least one study has seen benefits for body mass index (BMI) or ideal weight-for-height for certain types of exercise [14], one study observed a trend towards benefit [16], and other studies have not seen any benefit [1820].

In the absence of a larger randomized controlled trial, we examined longitudinal respiratory and nutritional outcomes in a large, well characterized sample of individuals with cystic fibrosis. Exercise was self-reported representing a real-world scenario of asking patients whether they participate in regular exercise. Using data from the CF Twin-Sibling Study, we hypothesized that exercise would be associated with a reduced decline in lung function (FEV1) and improved nutritional status (body mass index Z-scores) over time for individuals who exercised compared to those who did not. Secondary analyses included assessing the prevalence of wheezing in individuals who exercised versus those who did not as we hypothesized that individuals reporting wheezing with exercise would be less likely to participate in exercise. Given our study sample size, we were also able to examine whether specific subgroups of subjects were more likely to benefit from exercise (i.e., males vs. females, children vs. adults, etc.).

Methods

Study sample

All subjects were part of the CF Twin-Sibling Study (n = 1038 individuals in 575 families) and were recruited from CF centers in the United States (n = 952), Australia (n = 48), Israel (n = 24), and United Kingdom (Scotland)(n = 14) between 2000 and 2013 on the basis of having CF and having a twin or sibling with CF. The CF Twin-Sibling Study was designed to assess genetic and environmental modifiers of clinical outcomes in CF. Written consent was obtained from all subjects and the study was approved by the Johns Hopkins University Institutional Review Board (Protocol #NA_00035659). Baseline questionnaires were obtained upon enrollment and included (cross-sectional) questions on whether exercise was routinely undertaken. English-language questionnaires included questions (Additional file 1: Table S1) on whether various types of exercise were undertaken (i.e., competitive, recreational, or both), which was tabulated for subjects ≥10 years of age. The questionnaires used are not validated and not age-specific; caregivers routinely completed questionnaires for children less than 18 years of age.

Demographics

Age for each subject was defined by the date the questionnaire was completed. Race/ethnicity was self-defined with subjects reporting any non-white ancestry defined as non-white. Pancreatic sufficiency was defined by genotype data (n = 911) as having one or more “pancreatic sufficient” mutations, and by clinical data (n = 106) where genotype data was indeterminate or not available. We were unable to ascertain pancreatic function status for 21 subjects.

Outcome ascertainment

The presence or absence of wheezing with exertion was defined by self-report. Pulmonary function test and body mass index outcome data was collected through chart review with data supplementation from the U.S. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry. Longitudinal data from non-U.S. locations were not necessarily available. All raw FEV1 (liters) measurements were converted into FEV1 percent predicted values as defined by the U.S. CF Foundation [24, 25]. Baseline FEV1 for a subject was defined as the average FEV1 of all measurements obtained the 12 months preceding or after the exercise questionnaire date. Change in lung function over time was calculated from linear regression of all FEV1 percent predicted measurements in the 5 years following questionnaire completion for subjects with a minimum of 4 FEV1 values taken over a period of no less than 2 years. Body mass indices were converted into Z-scores using CDC reference equations [26]. Baseline BMI Z-score and change in BMI Z-score were calculated in a similar manner to FEV1.

Statistical analysis

Differences in baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared using T-tests for continuous variables and Pearson’s chi-square for categorical variables. To assess the effect of self-reported exercise on longitudinal changes in lung function while accounting for confounders, we employed mixed-effects regression modeling for longitudinal repeated measures with unstructured covariance and random effects for intercept and slope. For longitudinal effects, we only assessed subjects over the age of 10 years based on when rates of exercise participation stabilized (Figure 1). Baseline FEV1, sex, age of diagnosis, and age of questionnaire completion were included as potential confounders as these variables differed between those who reported exercising and those who did not (Table 1). All models used a dependent variable of FEV1 percent predicted consisting of all FEV1 measurements obtained over 5 years following the time of ascertainment of exercise status (t = 0). The independent variables were time since ascertainment, exercise status, and a time-exercise interaction term. Exercise status was defined as no exercise = 0 and any exercise = 1 for the any exercise models and as no competitive exercise = 0 and any competitive exercise = 1 for the competitive exercise models. All adjusted models included the covariates of baseline FEV1 percent predicted age at diagnosis, age at t = 0, and sex. We tested whether different subgroups of the study sample (females, adults, and subjects with reduced lung function) had different changes in lung function with exercise using time-exercise-sex, time-exercise-adult (adults being ≥18 years old), and time-exercise-reduced lung function (reduced lung function being baseline FEV1 < 80%) interaction terms. The interaction for sex (female = 1; male = 0) model included a time-exercise-sex interaction term. The interaction for age (≥18yo = 1; <18yo = 0) model included both the term dichotomous term for age and a time-exercise-dichotomous age interaction term. The interaction for baseline FEV1 (≥80% = 0; <80% = 1) model included both the term dichotomous term for baseline FEV1 and a time-exercise-dichotomous FEV1 interaction term. P values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Similar analyses were performed for BMI Z-scores, except both baseline BMI Z-score and baseline FEV1 were retained as covariates. In addition, the interaction term for time-exercise-reduced BMI Z-score was defined by reduced BMI-Z score < 0. All analyses were performed using Stata IC 11.0 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX).
Figure 1

Exercise participation vs. age. Lowess regression of percentage of subjects reporting specific types of exercise versus age at the time of ascertainment.

Table 1

Study sample demographics and clinical outcomes

Mean ± S.D. [range]

Entire study sample

No exercise

Any exercise

Pvalue

n

1038

264

774

-

Sex (% male)

51.8

47.0

53.5

0.07

Race/Ethnicity (% non-white)

9.2

11.0

8.5

0.23

(n = 1036)

(n = 263)

(n = 773)

Age at Diagnosis (years)

2.5 ± 5.7

1.5 ± 4.7

2.8 ± 6.0

0.002

[0, 52]

[0, 51]

[0, 52]

(n = 1025)

(n = 259)

(n = 766)

CFTR Genotype (% F508del homozygotes)

45.2

46.4

44.7

0.64

(n = 1023)

(n = 263)

(n = 760)

Exocrine Pancreatic Function (% insufficient)

83.3

85.9

82.4

0.19

(n = 1017)

(n =256)

(n = 761)

Age at Ascertainment of Exercise Status (years)

13.8 ± 10.2

10.1 ± 11.1

15.0 ± 9.6

<0.001

[0.1, 61.3]

[0.1, 61.3]

[1.4, 57.8]

Wheezing Reported with Exercise (% yes)

23.4

22.0

23.9

0.54

(n = 995)

(n = 250)

(n = 745)

Baseline FEV 1 % Predicted

84.5 ± 22.5

78.0 ± 26.7

85.6 ± 21.5

0.001

[19.7, 145.8]

[19.7, 145.8]

[21.4, 137.6]

(n = 766)

(n = 115)

(n = 651)

Change in FEV 1 % Predicted/Year ††

-1.33 ± 4.65

-0.99 ± 5.48

-1.39 ± 4.47

0.44

[-26.4, 24.3]

[-26.4, 23.4]

[-23.2, 24.3]

(n = 558)

(n = 94)

(n = 464)

Baseline BMI Z-score

-0.15 ± 0.99

-0.12 ± 1.05

-0.16 ± 0.98

0.55

[-4.72, 3.12]

[-4.06, 3.12]

[-4.72, 2.50]

(n = 904)

(n = 207)

(n = 697)

Change in BMI Z-score/Year ††

-0.01 ± 0.20

0.02 ± 0.23

-0.01 ± 0.19

0.16

[-1.02, 0.83]

[-1.02, 0.70]

[-0.82, 0.83]

(n = 591)

(n = 134)

(n = 457)

All FEV1 % predicted values were generated using U.S. CFF guidelines. All BMI Z-scores were generated using CDC percentiles. Baseline function represents the mean of all measurements obtained within 1 year before and after the age of exercise status ascertainment.

†† Change in function represents the predicted change using linear regression and all measurements obtained 5 years after the age of exercise ascertainment for each subject. Only subjects with a minimum of 4 measurements and a minimum of 2 years of data were included.

Results

Demographics

Of the 1038 subjects in the study sample, 774 (74.6%) reported performing exercise and (25.4%) reported no exercise (Table 1). For the 605 subjects over the age of 10 years at the time of exercise ascertainment, 278 (46.0%) reported participating in any competitive exercise, 235 (38.8%) reported participating in recreational exercise only, and 92 (15.2%) reported no exercise. As seen in Figure 1, participation rates in any exercise increased steadily until 10 years of age, then reached a plateau of ~80%, which remained relatively constant in males, but gradually decreased in females. There were no differences in the percentage of non-white individuals (p = 0.23) by exercise participation. There was a slight trend to more males (53%) reporting exercise than females (47%; p = 0.07). The group that reported no exercise had a younger age of diagnosis (1.5 ± 4.7 years) than the exercise group (2.8 ± 6.0 years; p = 0.002); however, no differences were seen with exocrine pancreatic function status (p = 0.19) or CFTR genotype (frequency of F508del homozygotes)(p = 0.64). The group that reported no exercise had a younger age of exercise ascertainment (10.1 ± 11.1 years) than the exercise group (15.0 ± 9.6 years; p < 0.001). Between countries, there were differences in the frequency of F508del homozygotes (U.S., 45.9%; Australia, 62.2%; Israel, 0%; U.K., 21.4%; p < 0.001), frequency of exocrine pancreatic function (U.S., 84.2%; Australia, 81.3%; Israel, 66.7%; U.K., 57.1%; p = 0.006), and age at the time of exercise ascertainment (U.S., 14.1 years; Australia, 8.4; Israel, 16.2; U.K., 8.3; p < 0.001), but no other demographic differences (Additional file 1: Table S2).

Respiratory outcomes

There was no difference in the proportion of subjects who reported wheezing with exertion between those who did not routinely exercise (22.0%) vs. those did (23.9%)(Table 1). Those who reported exercise had a higher baseline FEV1 percent predicted (85.6 ± 21.5%) than those who did not (78.0 ± 26.7%; p = 0.001). Similar findings were seen in F508del homozygotes where those who reported any exercise had a higher mean baseline FEV1 (84.5 ± 21.7; n = 283) compared to the no exercise group (73.7 ± 27.0; n = 53; p = 0.002). For the entire study sample, there were no differences in the rates of lung function decline in the 5 years following ascertainment of exercise status between those who exercised vs. those who did not.

To account for differences in baseline FEV1, differences in age at the time of exercise status ascertainment, and sex-related and age-at-diagnoses differences in exercise participation, we employed mixed model regressions including these factors as covariates. We also limited all mixed model samples to subjects ≥10 years of age at exercise ascertainment as exercise participation rates appeared to plateau after 10 years of age (Figure 1). After these adjustments, we found that the baseline decline in FEV1 percent predicted per year for 389 subjects where complete data were available was -2.03% per year (Table 2). An increase of 0.35% per year with exercise compared to the adjusted baseline FEV1 decline was observed, giving a reduced FEV1 decline of -1.68% per year with any exercise, but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.59). We also tested several interaction terms to assess whether differences in FEV1 decline with exercise were observed by sex, age, or severity of lung disease, more specifically to determine if certain subgroups would be more likely to benefit from exercise. We found that exercising adults with CF (≥18 years old) would experience a smaller decline in FEV1 (-0.50% /year) compared to exercising children (10–17 years old)(-2.48% /year)(p < 0.001), suggesting that adults may receive more of a benefit than children from exercise (Additional file 1: Figure S1). A graphic depiction of average lung function decline is shown in Figure 2 for each of the three exercise groups, showing that those reporting exercise do have higher lung function at earlier ages with a decreased decline in adulthood. An interaction term for sex was not significant. We did observe that exercising subjects with a reduced baseline FEV1 (<80%) experienced a smaller decline in FEV1 (-1.05%/year) compared to exercising subjects with a baseline FEV1 ≥ 80% (-2.13%/year)(p < 0.001). We also performed the same analysis comparing those who reported any competitive exercise vs. recreational only or no exercise to determine whether possibly more intense exercise might result in greater benefits (Table 2). No statistical reduction in the rate of FEV1 decline was observed, except as before, competitively exercising adults with CF (≥18 years old) would experience less of decline in FEV1 compared to competitively exercising children (10–17 years old)(p = 0.001).
Table 2

Change in lung function with exercise with interaction term analyses (Subjects ≥ 10 years old)

Models: n = 389 subjects

Estimated FEV1% at time = 0 without exercise*

Estimated FEV1% at time = 0 with exercise* (pvalue)

Baseline Change in FEV1% per year (pvalue)

Change in FEV1% over baseline per year with exercise (pvalue)

Change in FEV1% over baseline per year for interaction (pvalue)

Any Exercise

Unadjusted Model (No Covariates)

74.8

82.6 (0.020)

-2.01 (0.001)

0.28 (0.67)

-

Adjusted Model

81.7

81.6 (0.95)

-2.03 (0.001)

0.35 (0.59)

-

Adjusted Model + Interaction for Sex

81.9

81.8 (0.92)

-2.03 (0.001)

0.05 (0.94)

0.67 (0.17)

Adjusted Model + Interaction for Age

82.2

82.1 (0.93)

-2.03 (0.001)

-0.45 (0.50)

1.98 (<0.001)

Adjusted Model + Interaction for Baseline FEV 1

81.6

81.4 (0.87)

-2.03 (0.001)

-0.10 (0.88)

1.08 (0.028)

Competitive Exercise

Unadjusted Model (No Covariates)

77.9

85.7 (0.001)

-1.70 (<0.001)

-0.16 (0.74)

-

Adjusted Model

81.7

81.6 (0.98)

-1.64 (<0.001)

-0.18 (0.70)

-

Adjusted Model + Interaction for Sex

81.7

81.7 (0.98)

-1.64 (<0.001)

-0.28 (0.61)

0.22 (0.73)

Adjusted Model + Interaction for Age

81.1

81.1 (0.93)

-1.64 (<0.001)

-0.84 (0.11)

1.83 (0.004)

Adjusted Model + Interaction for Baseline FEV 1

81.7

81.6 (0.93)

-1.65 (<0.001)

-0.49 (0.35)

0.87 (0.17)

*Estimated intercepts were calculated using the regression coefficients assuming the subject was male and had the mean values for baseline FEV1 percent predicted (80.8 ± 22.2), age of diagnosis (3.6 ± 7.5 years), and age at time of exercise ascertainment (19.5 ± 9.4 years)(n = 389). The estimated FEV1 values are not statistically different for the adjusted models owing to the adjustment for baseline FEV1.

Figure 2

Lung function and exercise. Average FEV1 Percent Predicted Trajectories by Exercise Group. Lowess regression of lung function constructed using 2 datapoints per subject (≥10 years old at the time of exercise ascertainment), specifically the baseline FEV1 and FEV1 at the end of follow-up based on lung function decline. Subjects were limited to these two points each to avoid overweighting subjects with substantially more FEV1 measurements. Estimates after 40 years of age may not be as robust owing to fewer older subjects. Although those reporting competitive exercise always appear to have higher lung function than those reporting no exercise, those report recreational exercise only appear to be similar to the no exercise group between ages 10 and 20 years old, then resemble the competitive exercise group in adulthood.

Nutritional outcomes

There were no differences in baseline BMI Z-score or BMI Z-score change over time between those who reported exercise, those who reported recreational only exercise, and those who reported competitive exercise. Again to account for potential confounders, we employed mixed model regressions including the baseline BMI Z-score, baseline FEV1, sex, age at diagnosis, and age at the time of exercise status ascertainment as covariates. After these adjustments, we found that the change in BMI Z-score per year for 366 subjects ≥10 years of age where complete data were available was not statistically different from zero (p = 0.08; Table 3). In addition, no statistically significant increase or decrease in BMI Z-score was seen with any exercise (p = 0.30). We also tested several interaction terms to determine whether differences in BMI Z-scores over time with exercise were observed by sex, age, or severity of lung disease. We found that exercising adults with CF (≥18 years old) would experience 0.08 Z-score per year increase compared to exercising children (10–17 years old)(p = 0.001), again suggesting that adults may receive more of a benefit than children from exercise (Additional file 1: Figure S2). Interaction terms for sex and baseline BMI Z-score were not significant. As before we performed the same analysis comparing those who reported any competitive exercise vs. recreational only or no exercise (Table 3). In this case we found that for competitively exercising subjects with a BMI less than the 50th percentile (BMI Z-score < 0) would experience 0.06 Z-score per year increase compared to competitively exercising subjects with a BMI greater than the 50th percentile (p = 0.044). Interaction terms for sex and adulthood were not significant.
Table 3

Change in BMI Z-scores with exercise with interaction term analyses (subjects ≥ 10 years old)

Models: n = 366 subjects

Estimated BMI Z-score at time = 0 without exercise*

Estimated BMI Z-score at time = 0 with exercise*(pvalue)

Baseline decline in BMI Z-score per year (pvalue)

Change in BMI Z-score over baseline per year with exercise (pvalue)

Change in BMI Z-score over baseline per year for interaction (pvalue)

Any Exercise

Unadjusted Model (No Covariates)

-0.36

-0.30 (0.65)

-0.05 (0.08)

0.03 (0.29)

-

Adjusted Model

-0.30

-0.30 (0.96)

-0.05 (0.08)

0.03 (0.30)

-

Adjusted Model + Interaction for Sex

-0.29

-0.30 (0.93)

-0.05 (0.08)

0.02 (0.48)

0.02 (0.36)

Adjusted Model + Interaction for Age

-0.32

-0.32 (0.91)

-0.05 (0.08)

0.001 (0.98)

0.08 (0.001)

Adjusted Model + Interaction for Baseline BMI Z-Score

-0.24

-0.25 (0.92)

-0.05 (0.08)

0.03 (0.92)

0.04 (0.07)

Competitive Exercise

Unadjusted Model (No Covariates)

-0.41

-0.18 (0.021)

-0.03 (0.025)

0.02 (0.27)

-

Adjusted Model

-0.30

-0.31 (0.72)

-0.03 (0.024)

0.03 (0.25)

-

Adjusted Model + Interaction for Sex

-0.30

-0.31 (0.72)

-0.03 (0.024)

0.02 (0.38)

0.01 (0.80)

Adjusted Model + Interaction for Age

-0.30

-0.31 (0.69)

-0.03 (0.024)

0.005 (0.85)

0.06 (0.06)

Adjusted Model + Interaction for Baseline BMI Z-Score

-0.24

-0.26 (0.67)

-0.03 (0.023)

-0.01 (0.68)

0.06 (0.044)

*Estimated intercepts were calculated using the regression coefficients assuming the subject was male and had the mean values for baseline BMI Z-score (-0.30 ± 0.95), baseline FEV1 percent predicted (80.3 ± 22.0), age of diagnosis (3.5 ± 7.2 years), and age at time of exercise ascertainment (19.4 ± 9.3 years)(n = 366). The estimated BMI Z-score values are not statistically different for the adjusted models owing to the adjustment for baseline BMI Z-scores.

Discussion

In our questionnaire-based study we found that approximately 75% of individuals with cystic fibrosis reported exercising on a regular basis. Exercise rates climbed through childhood and appeared to plateau in early adolescence, suggesting that exercise patterns may become fixed during childhood for cystic fibrosis. Exercise was associated with a higher baseline lung function, but not BMI Z-score. Using mixed models with interaction terms adjusted for baseline lung function, we found that adults who reported exercising had a less rapid decline in lung function and BMI Z-scores compared to their non-exercising peers. We also observed that subjects with reduced FEV1 who perform any exercise may benefit disproportionately better than those with better lung function in terms of FEV1 decline. Likewise, we observed that subjects with reduced BMI Z-scores who perform competitive exercise may benefit disproportionately better than those with better BMI Z-scores in terms of BMI Z-score changes over time. We did not see any differences in self-reported wheezing with exertion suggesting that wheezing with exertion may not be limiting regular exercise participation or that it may be well-controlled with medical therapy.

Although many previous randomized control trials of aerobic exercise have not seen a significant benefit to FEV1 with exercise, we did observe a reduced decline in FEV1 for adults who exercised compared to those who did not. This may be due to the fact that short-term randomized controlled trials may be capturing the physiological response to training, whereas our study is attempting to capture the long-term effects of more continuous exercise. Similar to our study, the longest randomized control trial (3 years) did see a trend towards a decreased rate of FEV1 decline in those assigned to the aerobic exercise group (-1.46% per year) vs. those in the control group (-3.47% per year; p = 0.07) [17]. Also, the effects of exercise may be accumulated over many years, which may be why many of the randomized controlled trials which predominantly enrolled participants <18yo do not see a benefit with FEV1 or nutritional measures, and these benefits are only observed in adults in our study. An alternative hypothesis is that children may perform a different mix of aerobic vs. anaerobic activities than adults, which may have different consequences. Finally, it should be noted that Schneiderman et al. did see and association between exercise and a reduced decline in lung function among children with cystic fibrosis, which may reflect a different means of exercise ascertainment (HAES questionnaire) or differences in care within the study locations in Canada [22].

We did observe that females were less likely to report performing exercise than their male counterparts starting at 25–30 years old. Previously published cross-sectional studies suggest that differences in activity levels between sexes may occur as early as pubescence [27]. This finding may contribute to sex-specific differences in survival observed in CF. [28, 29] Although at least one study has reported that rates of FEV1 decline were associated with activity levels in girls, but not in boys [29], we did not see any sex-specific benefits of exercise in interaction modeling and the response to exercise may be more a function of fitness rather than gender [30]. We also did not observe any differences in exercise rates by CFTR genotype; however, CFTR genotype may play a role in fitness level independent of lung function [31].

Strengths of this study include a well characterized population of individuals with CF with corresponding longitudinal phenotype data. Assessing exercise participation through a yes/no question does mimic real-world clinical practice where time may limit the use of validated questionnaires for exercise participation. However, assessing exercise in this categorical manner is the primary limitation of our study and may result in an overestimate of exercise rates. In our study sample, self-reported exercise rates reached 80% in adolescence and early adulthood. This compares to the 2010 CDC on physical activity where only 64.5% of U.S. adults were physically active as defined by ≥150 minutes/week of moderate-intensity activity or ≥75 minutes/week of vigorous activity [32]. It is possible that self-reported rates of exercise in cystic fibrosis may also be higher if exercise is being used as a form of airway clearance as part of the regular maintenance treatment regimen, but may also represent a form of social desirability bias when answering questionnaires. For these reasons we also assessed the effects of competitive activity, which may be a less biased measure in our population as 46% of our CF subjects over the age of 10 years reported any competitive activity, which compares to 43.5% of the general population reporting being highly active, which corresponds to ≥300 minutes/week of moderate-intensity activity or ≥150 minutes/week of vigorous activity [32]. Nevertheless, the potential misclassification bias associated self-report of exercise may lead to being underpowered to detect the effects of exercise. We also had the opportunity to assess exercise at one point in time and our data suggests that exercise patterns may change over time, at a minimum in young children as rates of exercise increase during childhood. Our data also does not include any quantitative assessment of exercise intensity or exercise types (e.g., aerobic vs. anaerobic), which could also affect outcomes. Lastly, although we did adjust for baseline lung function within our regression models, it is still possible that we overestimated the benefits of exercise as there may be unmeasured confounders that are associated with higher baseline lung function that reduce the rate of decline.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we found that adults may have more of a benefit from regular exercise than children aged 10–17 years old, both in terms of slowing lung function decline and preserving body mass index in CF. However, as exercise patterns may be established prior to young adulthood for individuals with CF, there may be some benefit for pediatric clinicians to promote regular exercise habits, despite the many barriers to adherence to exercise [33]. We also did not see any decline or reduced BMI Z-scores with exercise, suggesting that individuals with CF who exercise are likely able to increase their caloric intake to meet the increased expenditures with exercise. Previous studies have found that individuals with the lowest fitness levels may see the most benefits with exercise [30, 34], and we did observe disproportionate benefits for those with reduced FEV1 and/or reduced BMI Z-scores. While there is a theoretical need for large prospective studies to confirm these findings for individuals with CF, we believe the longitudinal outcome benefits associated with exercise outweigh the risks.

Abbreviations

BMI: 

Body mass index

CF: 

Cystic fibrosis

FEV1: 

Forced expiratory volume in 1 second.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the patients, their families, and clinical teams participating in the Cystic Fibrosis Twin-Sibling Study. We would also like to thank the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry, especially Emily Knapp and Bruce Marshall.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Eudowood Division of Pediatric Respiratory Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions

References

  1. Collaco JM, Blackman SM, McGready J, Naughton KM, Cutting GR: Quantification of the relative contribution of environmental and genetic factors to variation in cystic fibrosis lung function. J Pediatr. 2010, 157: 802-807. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.05.018.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Stanke F, Becker T, Kumar V, Hedtfeld S, Becker C, Cuppens H, Tamm S, Yarden J, Laabs U, Siebert B, Fernandez L, Macek M, Radojkovic D, Ballmann M, Greipel J, Cassiman JJ, Wienker TF, Tümmler B: Genes that determine immunology and inflammation modify the basic defect of impaired ion conductance in cystic fibrosis epithelia. J Med Genet. 2010, 48: 24-31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Collaco JM, Vanscoy L, Bremer L, McDougal K, Blackman SM, Bowers A, Naughton K, Jennings J, Ellen J, Cutting GR: Interactions between secondhand smoke and genes that affect cystic fibrosis lung disease. JAMA. 2008, 299: 417-424.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell PW, Parker RA, Roberts BT, Krishnamani MR, Phillips JA: Association of poor clinical status and heavy exposure to tobacco smoke in patients with cystic fibrosis who are homozygous for the F508 deletion. J Pediatr. 1992, 120: 261-264. 10.1016/S0022-3476(05)80438-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Rubin BK: Exposure of children with cystic fibrosis to environmental tobacco smoke. N Engl J Med. 1990, 323: 782-788. 10.1056/NEJM199009203231203.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Curtis JR, Burke W, Kassner AW, Aitken ML: Absence of health insurance is associated with decreased life expectancy in patients with cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997, 155: 1921-1924. 10.1164/ajrccm.155.6.9196096.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Schechter MS, Shelton BJ, Margolis PA, Fitzsimmons SC: The association of socioeconomic status with outcomes in cystic fibrosis patients in the United States. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001, 163: 1331-1337. 10.1164/ajrccm.163.6.9912100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Schechter MS, Margolis PA: Relationship between socioeconomic status and disease severity in cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr. 1998, 132: 260-264. 10.1016/S0022-3476(98)70442-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Schechter MS, McColley SA, Silva S, Haselkorn T, Konstan MW, Wagener JS: Association of socioeconomic status with the use of chronic therapies and healthcare utilization in children with cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr. 2009, 155: 634-639. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.04.059.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. O’Connor GT, Quinton HB, Kneeland T, Kahn R, Lever T, Maddock J, Robichaud P, Detzer M, Swartz DR: Median household income and mortality rate in cystic fibrosis. Pediatrics. 2003, 111: e333-e339. 10.1542/peds.111.4.e333.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Eakin MN, Bilderback A, Boyle MP, Mogayzel PJ, Riekert KA: Longitudinal association between medication adherence and lung health in people with cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros. 2011, 10: 258-264. 10.1016/j.jcf.2011.03.005.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Goss CH, Newsom SA, Schildcrout JS, Sheppard L, Kaufman JD: Effect of ambient air pollution on pulmonary exacerbations and lung function in cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004, 169: 816-821. 10.1164/rccm.200306-779OC.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Collaco JM, McGready J, Green DM, Naughton KM, Watson CP, Shields T, Bell SC, Wainwright CE: Effect of Temperature on Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease and Infections: A Replicated Cohort Study. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e27784-10.1371/journal.pone.0027784.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Selvadurai HC, Blimkie CJ, Meyers N, Mellis CM, Cooper PJ, Van Asperen PP: Randomized controlled study of in-hospital exercise training programs in children with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2002, 33: 194-200. 10.1002/ppul.10015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kriemler S, Kieser S, Junge S, Ballmann M, Hebestreit A, Schindler C, Stussi C, Hebestreit H: Effect of supervised training on FEV in cystic fibrosis: A randomised controlled trial. J Cyst Fibros. 2013, 12 (6): 714-720. 10.1016/j.jcf.2013.03.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Moorcroft AJ, Dodd ME, Morris J, Webb AK: Individualised unsupervised exercise training in adults with cystic fibrosis: a 1 year randomised controlled trial. Thorax. 2004, 59: 1074-1080. 10.1136/thx.2003.015313.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Schneiderman-Walker J, Pollock SL, Corey M, Wilkes DD, Canny GJ, Pedder L, Reisman JJ: A randomized controlled trial of a 3-year home exercise program in cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr. 2000, 136: 304-310. 10.1067/mpd.2000.103408.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hebestreit H, Kieser S, Junge S, Ballmann M, Hebestreit A, Schindler C, Schenk T, Posselt HG, Kriemler S: Long-term effects of a partially supervised conditioning programme in cystic fibrosis. Eur Respir J. 2010, 35: 578-583. 10.1183/09031936.00062409.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Santana SE, Groeneveld IF, Gonzalez-Saiz L, Lopez-Mojares LM, Villa-Asensi JR, Barrio Gonzalez MI, Fleck SJ, Perez M, Lucia A: Intrahospital weight and aerobic training in children with cystic fibrosis: a randomized controlled trial. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012, 44: 2-11. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318228c302.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Klijn PH, Oudshoorn A, van der Ent CK, van der Net J, Kimpen JL, Helders PJ: Effects of anaerobic training in children with cystic fibrosis: a randomized controlled study. Chest. 2004, 125: 1299-1305. 10.1378/chest.125.4.1299.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Orenstein DM, Hovell MF, Mulvihill M, Keating KK, Hofstetter CR, Kelsey S, Morris K, Nixon PA: Strength vs aerobic training in children with cystic fibrosis: a randomized controlled trial. Chest. 2004, 126: 1204-1214. 10.1378/chest.126.4.1204.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Schneiderman JE, Wilkes DL, Atenafu EG, Nguyen T, Wells GD, Alarie N, Tullis E, Lands LC, Coates AL, Corey M, Ratjen F: Longitudinal relationship between physical activity and lung health in patients with cystic fibrosis. Eur Respir J. 2014, 43: 817-823. 10.1183/09031936.00055513.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Richards ML, Davies PS, Bell SC: Energy cost of physical activity in cystic fibrosis. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2001, 55: 690-697. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang X, Dockery DW, Wypij D, Fay ME, Ferris BG: Pulmonary function between 6 and 18 years of age. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1993, 15: 75-88. 10.1002/ppul.1950150204.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hankinson JL, Odencrantz JR, Fedan KB: Spirometric reference values from a sample of the general U.S. population. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999, 159: 179-187. 10.1164/ajrccm.159.1.9712108.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Guo SS, Grummer-Strawn LM, Flegal KM, Mei Z, Wei R, Curtin LR, Roche AF, Johnson C: 2000 CDC Growth Charts for the United States: methods and development. Vital Health Stat. 2002, 11: 1-190.Google Scholar
  27. Selvadurai HC, Blimkie CJ, Cooper PJ, Mellis CM, Van Asperen PP: Gender differences in habitual activity in children with cystic fibrosis. Arch Dis Child. 2004, 89: 928-933. 10.1136/adc.2003.034249.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Rand S, Prasad SA: Exercise as part of a cystic fibrosis therapeutic routine. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2012, 6: 341-351. 10.1586/ers.12.19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Schneiderman-Walker J, Wilkes DL, Strug L, Lands LC, Pollock SL, Selvadurai HC, Hay J, Coates AL, Corey M: Sex differences in habitual physical activity and lung function decline in children with cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr. 2005, 147: 321-326. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.03.043.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Gruber W, Orenstein DM, Braumann KM, Paul K, Huls G: Effects of an exercise program in children with cystic fibrosis: are there differences between females and males?. J Pediatr. 2011, 158: 71-76. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.07.033.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Selvadurai HC, McKay KO, Blimkie CJ, Cooper PJ, Mellis CM, Van Asperen PP: The relationship between genotype and exercise tolerance in children with cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002, 165: 762-765. 10.1164/ajrccm.165.6.2104036.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. CfDCa P: State Indicator Report on Physical Activity, 2010. 2010, GA: AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  33. Prasad SA, Cerny FJ: Factors that influence adherence to exercise and their effectiveness: application to cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2002, 34: 66-72. 10.1002/ppul.10126.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Gruber W, Orenstein DM, Braumann KM: Do responses to exercise training in cystic fibrosis depend on initial fitness level?. Eur Respir J. 2011, 38: 1336-1342. 10.1183/09031936.00192510.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/14/159/prepub

Copyright

© Collaco et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement