Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Treatment outcomes of tuberculous meningitis in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMC Pulmonary Medicine volume 19, Article number: 200 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Tuberculous meningitis is the most devastating presentation of disease with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. We sought to evaluate treatment outcomes for adult patients with this disease.

Methods

The Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched to identify all relevant studies. We pooled appropriate data to estimate treatment outcomes at the end of treatment and follow-up.

Results

Among the articles identified, 22 met our inclusion criteria, with 2437 patients. In a pooled analysis, the risk of death was 24.7% (95%CI: 18.7–31.9). The risk of neurological sequelae among survivors was 50.9% (95%CI: 40.2–61.5). Patients diagnosed in stage III or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive were significantly more likely to die (64.8, 53.4% respectively) during treatment. The frequency of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) acid-fast-bacilli smear positivity was 10.0% (95% CI 5.5–17.6), 23.8% (15.2–35.3) for CSF culture positivity, and 22.3% (17.8–27.5) for CSF polymerase chain reaction positivity. We found that the headache, fever, vomiting, and abnormal chest radiograph were the most common symptoms and diagnostic findings among tuberculous meningitis patients.

Conclusions

Despite anti-tuberculosis treatment, adult tuberculous meningitis has very poor outcomes. The mortality rate of patients diagnosed in stage III or HIV co-infection increased significantly during treatment.

Peer Review reports

Background

Tuberculosis, caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB), remains one of the leading causes of infection-related mortality worldwide [1]. In 2017, an estimated 10 million incident cases of tuberculosis were recorded globally with approximately 1.57 million deaths [1]. Tuberculous meningitis is the most devastating presentation of disease with MTB [2], which accounts for approximately 1% of all cases of active tuberculosis, and 5 to 10% of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis cases [3, 4]. Tuberculous meningitis is especially common in children and those infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), in whom outcomes are poor [2, 5].

Early diagnosis, prompt anti-tuberculosis treatment and corticosteroids are the main determinants of outcome in tuberculous meningitis [2]. However, early diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis remains a great challenge because symptoms such as fever, headache, vomiting and so on, are not specific. Since identification of acid-fast bacilli in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and culture of MTB lack sensitivity, the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis is often based on clinical suspicion combined with empirical decision making [3]. The disease severity is first classified into three stages according to the British Medical Research Council (BMRC) [6]. The following clinical stages are defined: stage I: fully conscious patient with no focal neurological deficits; stage II: there is altered sensorium but not to the degree of coma and minor focal neurological deficits such as a single cranial nerve palsy; stage III: marked alteration of level of consciousness, coma. With the introduction of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) [7], this was modified as grade I (GCS 15; no focal neurological signs), grade II (GCS 11–14, or 15 with focal neurological signs), and grade III (GCS ≤10) disease [8]. This type of classification is useful to predict prognosis.

Without treatment, tuberculous meningitis leads to death. An effective treatment regimen recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) consists of isoniazid, rifampicin, and pyrazinamide, usually with a fourth drug such as ethambutol or streptomycin, as first-line anti-tuberculosis drugs in patients with tuberculous meningitis [9, 10]. In addition to effective anti-tuberculosis treatment, adjuvant corticosteroid treatment is also recommended for tuberculous meningitis patients [2, 4, 9, 10].

There were many studies described the treatment outcome for tuberculous meningitis, but the results varied between studies due to inconsistent diagnostic criteria, treatment methods, study populations and settings. A previous systematic review of research showed that the prognosis of tuberculous meningitis in children are very poor, Especially for patients in stage III [5]. However, outcomes for adult patients have not been systematically reviewed.

Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the prognosis of adult tuberculous meningitis. Our primary objective was to establish risks of death in adult tuberculous meningitis patients during treatment. Additionally, we reported the pooled frequencies of symptoms and diagnostic findings at presentation.

Methods

This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

Search strategy and selection criteria

We searched the Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases to identify all relevant studies published up to May 8, 2018. The search terms were used as follows: “tuberculous meningitis” OR ((tubercul* OR tb) AND mening*) OR tuberculous meningitis.

Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) original study; (2) reported in English; (3) described treatment regimens and outcomes, disaggregated outcomes for adult tuberculous meningitis; (4) including at least 10 adults, and less than 10% of patients lost-to-follow-up. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) studies of children < 14 years; (2) patients already included in another report. For duplicative or overlapping publications, the study with the largest sample size was included. Studies obtained from the literature search were checked by title and abstract. Relevant studies were examined in full text. Two authors (MG W and YX Z) independently screened all potentially relevant studies and tried to reach a consensus on all items. Any disagreements were assessed by a third author (XM L).

The diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis was based on clinical, CSF, radiological criteria and evidence of tuberculosis elsewhere [11]. Tuberculous meningitis was classified as “definite” if CSF smear was positive for AFB and/or culture positive for MTB, or positive for polymerase chain reaction for MTB, or AFB seen in the context of histological changes consistent with TB brain or spinal cord together with suggestive symptoms/signs and CSF changes, or visible meningitis (on autopsy) [11]. Tuberculous meningitis was termed as “probable” if total score of ≥12 when neuroimaging available or total score of ≥10 when neuroimaging unavailable. At least 2 points should either come from CSF or cerebral imaging criteria [11]. Tuberculous meningitis was classified as “possible” if total score of 6–11 when neuroimaging available, or total score of 6–9 when neuroimaging unavailable [11].

Data extraction and definitions

Two independent authors (MG W and YX Z) extracted data from included studies using a standardized abstraction form, and a third (XM L) arbitrated discrepancies. The following data were extracted from each study: treatment outcomes, characteristics of studies and patients, and frequencies of symptoms and diagnostic results. Outcome indicators included death, neurological sequelae, and lost-to-follow-up (treatment abandonment or loss to follow-up). Survival is defined as being alive at the time of completion of treatment. Neurological sequelae are defined as any motor, sensory, cognitive, or hypothalamic impairment that emerged during the disease and continuous the treatment period.

Quality assessment

The quality of individual studies was assessed with only high quality studies included for analysis. High quality studies were prospective cohort, retrospective consecutive cohort, or randomized control in design; reported a treatment duration at least 6 months, and follow-up of at least 6 months; reported basic demographic data; had less than 10% of patients lost-to-follow-up.

Statistical analysis

Microsoft Excel (version 13.0) and R (version 3.5.1) software were used for data entry and analysis. The random effects model was used to generate summary effect. Logit transformation was used for all meta-analyses.

First, we pooled all studies to estimate the risk of death and the proportion of survivors in adult patients with tuberculous meningitis during treatment. To further explore the relationship between disease severity and treatment outcome, studies that stratified outcomes by BMRC or the modified BMRC disease stage were used to calculate the risk of death at different disease stages during treatment [6, 8].

Secondly, we also pooled the demographic characteristics of all patients, including the frequencies of symptoms and diagnostic results.

Results

A flow chart outlining our literature search is shown in Fig. 1. We identified 16,247 publications from our initial database search. After removal of repetitive studies, 8547 articles were screened by titles and abstracts. Of these, 348 articles were identified for full text review and 90 articles were not assessed for eligibility. Two hundred and thirty-six studies were removed prior to analysis, as shown in Fig. 1. Consequently, 22 articles were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis (Table 1) [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. Publication bias was found by both Begg’s test and Egger’s test Fig. 2.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow diagram of included studies

Full size image
Table 1 Characteristics of included studies
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

The Egger’s funnel plot of publication bias

Full size image

The basic characteristics of the included studies are shown in Table 1. Of the 22 eligible studies, 11 were retrospective chart reviews, 9 were prospective cohorts, and two were randomized controlled trial. The study periods ranged from 1998 to 2017. The study populations of these studies came from nine countries. Seventeen studies were conducted in countries currently on the WHO list of countries with high TB burden [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25, 27,28,29, 31]. The majority of patients were male (61.2%). In studies with available data, 10.6% (95% CI: 4.2–24.6) of patients were infected with HIV.

The 22 cohorts included data from 2437 patients. All tuberculous meningitis patients received anti-tuberculosis treatment. Among adult tuberculous meningitis patients, risk of death was 24.7% (95%CI: 18.7–31.9) (Fig. 3). Among survivors, risk of neurological sequelae was 50.9% (95%CI: 40.2–61.5) (Fig. 4). By summarizing the results of 17 studies that stratified treatment outcomes according to disease stages, we found that the risk of death was significantly higher among patients diagnosed in stage III (64.8%) than stage I (17.5%) or II (28.5%) (Table 2). Moreover, patients co-infected with HIV were found to have higher mortality (HIV positive: 53.4% (42.4–64.1), HIV negative: 17.5% (12.1–24.7)) (Table 2). Considerable heterogeneity was observed for all outcomes.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Frequency of death among tuberculous meningitis in adults

Full size image
Table 2 Subgroup analyses of deaths
Full size table
Fig. 4
figure 4

Frequency of neurological sequelae among survivors

Full size image

Subgroup analyses were conducted to investigate the sources of heterogeneity, including study type, BMRC disease stage, HIV infection, treatment duration, and the use of streptomycin (Table 2). Unfortunately, we can not fully explain the heterogeneity of the research.

The population characteristics are summarized in Table 3. The most common features of patients were fever, headache, vomiting, weight-loss, abnormal chest radiograph and basilar enhancement (Table 3). Among 17 studies stratified patients by disease severity, 24.9% (21.1–29.1%) of patients were in stage I, 46.9% (41.4–52.4%) in stage II and 26.4% (20.7–32.9%) in stage III. Nearly 38.8% of the patients were diagnosed as definite tuberculous meningitis. The frequency of CSF acid-fast-bacilli smear positivity was 10.0% (5.5–17.6), the frequency of CSF culture positivity for MTB was 23.8% (15.2–35.3), and the frequency of CSF polymerase chain reaction positivity for MTB was 22.3% (17.8–27.5) of patients. All these pooled proportions showed significant between study heterogeneity.

Table 3 Frequency of symptoms and diagnostic findings at admission
Full size table

Discussion

This systematic review and meta-analysis estimated the treatment outcomes among adult tuberculous meningitis patients. The findings suggested that the treatment outcomes for adult patients with tuberculous meningitis are poor. In addition, our results show that the treatment outcomes are related to the BMRC grades and HIV co-infection.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis to access the treatment outcome of tuberculous meningitis among adults. The results showed that 24% of tuberculous meningitis died during the treatment. More importantly, our subgroup analyses indicated that mortality increased with the severity of the disease. The more serious the disease was, the worse the treatment outcome was. Furthermore, tuberculous meningitis patients who were HIV positive had higher mortality. According to the WHO, 9.2% new tuberculosis cases were HIV positive (0.92 million) and 0.3 million deaths that were attributed to co-infection in 2017 [1]. Our study found that approximately 10.4% of patients with tuberculous meningitis were HIV positive. It has been reported that tuberculosis patents co-infected with HIV were more likely to have poor treatment outcome and death [34, 35]. Consisted with those studies, our results showed half of HIV-positive tuberculous meningitis patients died during the treatment, which was significantly higher than HIV negative patients (17.4%).

Early diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis is a great challenge for early treatment as there are limitations in the current widely used methods, such as the low sensitivity of the acid-fast bacilli smear and the long turn-around time of mycobacterial culture [36]. In this study, the definite diagnostic rate was 38.9%. Recently, rapid, sensitive and highly specific molecular detection methods have been favored [1, 37, 38]. Nearly 22.3% patients were positive for CSF polymerase chain reaction for MTB in this study. CSF molecular diagnostic methods (nucleic acid amplification tests) have previously been included in diagnostic criteria for tuberculous meningitis [37, 38]. While we found fever, headache, vomiting and weight-loss were the most common symptoms among tuberculous meningitis patients, these nonspecific clinical presentations are and thus may contribute to delayed diagnosis [2]. Hence, clinicians should be vigilant against the disease, and suspected patients should be treated with anti-tuberculosis drug based on rich clinical experience without waiting for confirmatory testing.

Effective anti-tuberculosis therapy is crucial for the treatment outcome of tuberculous meningitis. We excluded 56 of 258 full-text articles that do not specify treatment regimens, and 9 for lack of follow-up time or incomplete anti-tuberculosis treatment. As recommended by the WHO, all populations included in this study were treated for at least 2 months of intensive phase treatment (consisting of isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol or streptomycin) [4, 9], followed by a continuation phase (consisting of isoniazid, rifampicin). Our results showed that the mortality of tuberculous meningitis was nearly in patients treated with streptomycin (17.1%) compared with ethambutol (20.3%). Which means neither the use streptomycin or not has no significant effect on treatment outcome. While the studies utilized the same regimens for tuberculous meningitis, the treatment durations were varied between studies [4, 9, 39]. In this systematic review, only those who completed anti-tuberculosis treatment for at least 6 months were included. This study found that mortality was high for both treatment at least 6 months and 9 months. Duo to the high mortality and sequelae of tuberculous meningitis, we believe that the course of treatment should be individualized.

Substantial heterogeneity was found between studies. Although we detected subgroup analysis based on the characteristics of the included studies, we still can not fully explain the source of heterogeneity. Although we failed to determine the source of heterogeneity, the following factors may related to heterogeneity. First, the different study designs of included studies, which might have led to the heterogeneity of the results. However, the similar result detected in prospective cohort study subgroups, reinforced our conclusion. Since, only two randomized controlled studies were included, the subgroup could not be assessed. Second, the study publication years ranged from 1998 to 2017, and the enrollment in some studies occurred before 1998. Although there had not been dramatic changes in how tuberculous meningitis was treated, the study period may be a cause of heterogeneity. Third, the severity of the disease in each study was different, which might be another factor leading to heterogeneity.

Our study has some limitations. First, in this meta-analysis, we only included studies published in English, eight studies reported in other language were not assessed for full-text reading. Second, we excluded studies with more than 10% of patients lost-to-follow-up. Although we did not include these studies, the treatment outcomes of patients with tuberculous meningitis were consistent with our results [40, 41]. Third, the high mortality rate of tuberculous meningitis may be associated with several factors, such as stage of tuberculous meningitis disease, HIV co-infection, treatment delay, drug resistance, corticosteroid use or the incidence of stroke. Previous studies demonstrated that HIV co-infection, drug resistance, advanced stage of tuberculous meningitis at admission and the incidence of stroke were associated with poor outcome and mortality among tuberculous meningitis patients [10, 17, 20]. Although we were unable to assess all of these associations, the high mortality in stage III and HIV co-infection among tuberculous meningitis patients, also suggested that the severity of tuberculous meningitis and HIV co-infection are associated with treatment outcome. Forth, we did not evaluate the effect of corticosteroid use on the treatment outcomes of patients with tuberculous meningitis. However, previous randomized controlled trials provided us evidence that tuberculous meningitis patients will benefit from corticosteroid use [15, 42]. Fifth, substantial publication bias was found by both Begg’s test and Egger’s test. The following reasons may lead to publication bias. Language bias, we only included studies published in English language in this study. Methodological quality differences, smaller studies were conducted and analyzed with less methodological rigour than larger studies. The sample size of the included studies ranged from 31 to 545, and we also found that the sample sizes of 12 studies were less than 100. Moreover, we only included studies had less than 10% of patient lost-to-follow-up, which may be another cause of publish bias. Since, there is a certain publication bias in this study, further prospective cohort and randomized controlled trial studies are needed.

Conclusion

Tuberculosis remains a major global health problem. Treatment outcomes for adult tuberculous meningitis are very poor, especially for patients diagnosed in stage III or HIV co-infection. The early diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis is hampered by the low sensitivity of cerebrospinal fluid microscopy and the slow growth of MTB in conventional culture systems. Rapid, sensitive and specific molecular detection methods should be widely used in the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis. Effective anti-tuberculosis and adjunctive corticosteroid therapy is crucial for the treatment outcome of tuberculous meningitis.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

BMRC:

British Medical Research Council

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

E:

Ethambuto

GCS:

Glasgow Coma Scale

H:

Isoniazid

HIV:

Human immunodeficiency virus

Mfx:

Moxifloxacin

MTB:

Mycobacterium tuberculosis

PC:

Prospective cohort

PRISMA:

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

R:

Rifampicin

RC:

Retrospective cohort

RCT:

Randomized controlled trial

S:

Streptomycin

WHO:

World Health Organization

Z:

Pyrazinamide

References

  1. Whalen C, Horsburgh CR Jr, Hom D, Lahart C, Simberkoff M, Ellner J. Site of disease and opportunistic infection predict survival in HIV-associated tuberculosis. AIDS. 1997;11(4):455–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Thwaites GE, van Toorn R, Schoeman J. Tuberculous meningitis: more questions, still too few answers. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12(10):999–1010.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Torok ME. Tuberculous meningitis: advances in diagnosis and treatment. Br Med Bull. 2015;113(1):117–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Thwaites G, Fisher M, Hemingway C, Scott G, Solomon T, Innes J, et al. British Infection Society guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis of the central nervous system in adults and children. J Infect. 2009;59(3):167–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chiang SS, Khan FA, Milstein MB, Tolman AW, Benedetti A, Starke JR, et al. Treatment outcomes of childhood tuberculous meningitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14(10):947–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Medical Research Council. Streptomycin treatment of tuberculous meningitis. Lancet. 1948;1(6503):582–96.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet. 1974;2(7872):81–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Thwaites GE, Tran TH. Tuberculous meningitis: many questions, too few answers. Lancet Neurol. 2005;4(3):160–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. World Health Organization. Treatment of tuberculosis guidelines. 4th edition, 2010. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44165/1/9789241547833_eng.pdf?ua=1&ua=1 (accessed 15 May 2018).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Davis A, Meintjes G, Wilkinson RJ. Treatment of Tuberculous meningitis and its complications in adults. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2018;20(3):5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Marais BJ, Heemskerk AD, Marais SS, van Crevel R, Rohlwink U, Caws M, et al. Standardized methods for enhanced quality and comparability of Tuberculous meningitis studies. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64(4):501–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hosoglu S, Ayaz C, Geyik MF, Kokoglu OF, Ceviz A. Tuberculous meningitis in adults: an eleven-year review. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1998;2(7):553–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Katrak SM, Shembalkar PK, Bijwe SR, Bhandarkar LD. The clinical, radiological and pathological profile of tuberculous meningitis in patients with and without human immunodeficiency virus infection. J Neurol Sci. 2000;181(1–2):118–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chan KH, Cheung RTF, Fong CY, Tsang KL, Mak W, Ho SL. Clinical relevance of hydrocephalus as a presenting feature or tuberculous meningitis. QJM. 2003;96(9):643–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Thwaites GE, Bang ND, Dung NH, Quy HT, Oanh DTT, Thoa NTC, et al. Dexamethasone for the treatment of tuberculous meningitis in adolescents and adults. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(17):1741–1751+1811.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Torok ME, Chau TTH, Mai PP, Phong ND, Dung NT, Van Chuong L, et al. Clinical and microbiological features of HIV-associated tuberculous meningitis in Vietnamese adults. PLoS One. 2008;3(3):e1772.

  17. Anuradha HK, Garg RK, Agarwal A, Sinha MK, Verma R, Singh MK, et al. Predictors of stroke in patients of tuberculous meningitis and its effect on the outcome. QJM. 2010;103(9):671–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hsu PC, Yang CC, Ye JJ, Huang PY, Chiang PC, Lee MH. Prognostic factors of Tuberculous meningitis in adults: a 6-year retrospective study at a tertiary Hospital in Northern Taiwan. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2010;43(2):111–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sinha MK, Garg RK, Anuradha H, Agarwal A, Singh MK, Verma R, et al. Vision impairment in tuberculous meningitis: predictors and prognosis. J Neurol Sci. 2010;290(1–2):27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Marais S, Pepper DJ, Schutz C, Wilkinson RJ, Meintjes G. Presentation and outcome of tuberculous meningitis in a high HIV prevalence setting. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e20077.

  21. Sharma P, Garg RK, Verma R, Singh MK, Shukla R. Incidence, predictors and prognostic value of cranial nerve involvement in patients with tuberculous meningitis: a retrospective evaluation. Eur J Intern Med. 2011;22(3):289–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Torok ME, Yen NTB, Chau TTH, Mai NTH, Phu NH, Mai PP, et al. Timing of initiation of antiretroviral therapy in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated tuberculous meningitis. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(11):1374–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Raut T, Garg RK, Jain A, Verma R, Singh MK, Malhotra HS, et al. Hydrocephalus in tuberculous meningitis: incidence, its predictive factors and impact on the prognosis. J Infect. 2013;66(4):330–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ruslami R, Ganiem AR, Dian S, Apriani L, Achmad TH, van der Ven AJ, et al. Intensified regimen containing rifampicin and moxifloxacin for tuberculous meningitis: an open-label, randomised controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13(1):27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen CH, Chang YJ, Sy HN, Chen WL, Yen HC. Risk assessment of the outcome for cerebral infarction in tuberculous meningitis. Rev Neurol. 2014;170(8–9):512–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Imam YZB, Ahmedullah HS, Akhtar N, Chacko KC, Kamran S, Al Alousi F, et al. Adult tuberculous meningitis in Qatar: a descriptive retrospective study from its referral center. Eur Neurol. 2014;73(1–2):90–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Iype T, Pillai AK, Cherian A, Nujum ZT, Pushpa C, Dae D, et al. Major outcomes of patients with tuberculous meningitis on directly observed thrice a week regime. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2014;17(3):281–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jha SK, Garg RK, Jain A, Malhotra HS, Verma R, Sharma PK. Definite (microbiologically confirmed) tuberculous meningitis: predictors and prognostic impact. Infection. 2015;43(6):639–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Misra UK, Kalita J, Betai S, Bhoi SK. Outcome of tuberculous meningitis patients requiring mechanical ventilation. J Crit Care. 2015;30(6):1365–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tai M-L S, Nor HM, Kadir KAA, Viswanathan S, Rahmat K, Zain NRM, et al. Paradoxical manifestation is common in HIV-negative tuberculous meningitis. Medicine. 2016;95(1):e1997.

  31. Li K, Tang H, Yang Y, Li Q, Zhou Y, Ren M, et al. Clinical features, long-term clinical outcomes, and prognostic factors of tuberculous meningitis in West China: a multivariate analysis of 154 adults. Expert Rev Anti-Infect Ther. 2017;15(6):629–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Raberahona M, Rakotoarivelo RA, Razafinambinintsoa T, Andrianasolo RL, Randria MJ. d D. Clinical features and outcome in adult cases of tuberculous meningitis in tertiary care Hospital in Antananarivo, Madagascar. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:9316589.

  33. Cagatay AA, Ozsut H, Gulec L, Kucukoglu S, Berk H, Ince N, et al. Tuberculous meningitis in adults--experience from Turkey. Int J Clin Pract. 2004;58(5):469–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Tavares AM, Fronteira I, Couto I, Machado D, Viveiros M, Abecasis AB, et al. HIV and tuberculosis co-infection among migrants in Europe: a systematic review on the prevalence, incidence and mortality. PLoS One. 2017;12(9):e0185526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gupta RK, Lucas SB, Fielding KL, Lawn SD. Prevalence of tuberculosis in post-mortem studies of HIV-infected adults and children in resource-limited settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS. 2015;29(15):1987–2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hale YM, Pfyffer GE, Salfinger M. Laboratory diagnosis of mycobacterial infections: new tools and lessons learned. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33(6):834–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Denkinger CM, Schumacher SG, Boehme CC, Dendukuri N, Pai M, Steingart KR. Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J. 2014;44(2):435–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Marais S, Thwaites G, Schoeman JF, Toeroek ME, Misra UK, Prasad K, et al. Tuberculous meningitis: a uniform case definition for use in clinical research. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10(11):803–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Jullien S, Ryan H, Modi M, Bhatia R. Six months therapy for tuberculous meningitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;9:CD012091.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. van Laarhoven A, Dian S, Ruesen C, Hayati E, Damen MSMA, Annisa J, et al. Clinical parameters, routine inflammatory markers, and LTA4H genotype as predictors of mortality among 608 patients with Tuberculous meningitis in Indonesia. J Infect Dis. 2017;215(7):1029–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Heemskerk AD, Bang ND, Mai NTH, Chau TTH, Phu NH, Loc PP, et al. Intensified Antituberculosis therapy in adults with Tuberculous meningitis. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(2):124–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Prasad K, Singh MB, Ryan H. Corticosteroids for managing tuberculous meningitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4:CD002244.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81870015 and Grant No. 81370121), and the National Scientific and Technological Major Project of China (Grant No. 2018ZX10715003), and grant 2014SZ0220 from the Science and Technology Support Program of Sichuan Province.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Ming-Gui Wang and Lan Luo contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guo Xue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, China

    Ming-Gui Wang, Lan Luo, Xiangming Liu & Jian-Qing He

  2. Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, People’s Republic of China

    Yunxia Zhang

  3. Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 363 Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, People’s Republic of China

    Lin Liu

Authors
  1. Ming-Gui Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lan Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yunxia Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiangming Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lin Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jian-Qing He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed substantially to the study design, data interpretation, and the writing of the manuscript. Dr. JQH contributed to the study design and ran and updated the searches. MGW and YZ screened the abstracts, completed full text reviews, data extraction and assessments of quality and bias. LL1 and XL contributed to data collection and analysis. LL2 contributed to data collection and the search strategy. All authors reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian-Qing He.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval for this study was waived (West China Hospital of Sichuan University) as it involved analysis only of previously collected de-identified data received by the authors from individual study sites.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, MG., Luo, L., Zhang, Y. et al. Treatment outcomes of tuberculous meningitis in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pulm Med 19, 200 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-019-0966-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-019-0966-8

Keywords

BMC Pulmonary Medicine

ISSN: 1471-2466

Contact us