Skip to main content

Time controlled adaptive ventilation™ as conservative treatment of destroyed lung: an alternative to lung transplantation

Abstract

Background

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) often requires controlled ventilation, yielding high mechanical power and possibly further injury. Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) can be used as a bridge to recovery, however, if this fails the end result is destroyed lung parenchyma. This condition is fatal and the only remaining alternative is lung transplantation. In the case study presented in this paper, lung transplantation was not an option given the critically ill state and the presence of HLA antibodies. Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) may be valuable in ARDS, but APRV settings recommended in various patient and clinical studies are inconsistent. The Time Controlled Adaptive Ventilation (TCAV™) method is the most studied technique to set and adjust the APRV mode and uses an extended continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) Phase in combination with a very brief Release Phase. In addition, the TCAV™ method settings are personalized and adaptive based on changes in lung pathophysiology. We used the TCAV™ method in a case of severe ARDS, which enabled us to open, stabilize and slowly heal the severely damaged lung parenchyma.

Case presentation

A 43-year-old woman presented with Staphylococcus Aureus necrotizing pneumonia. Progressive respiratory failure necessitated invasive mechanical ventilation and VV-ECMO. Mechanical ventilation (MV) was ultimately discontinued because lung protective settings resulted in trivial tidal volumes. She was referred to our academic transplant center for bilateral lung transplantation after the remaining infection had been cleared. We initiated the TCAV™ method in order to stabilize the lung parenchyma and to promote tissue recovery. This strategy was challenged by the presence of a large bronchopleural fistula, however, APRV enabled weaning from VV-ECMO and mechanical ventilation. After two months, following nearly complete surgical closure of the remaining bronchopleural fistulas, the patient was readmitted to ICU where she had early postoperative complications. Since other ventilation modes resulted in significant atelectasis and hypercapnia, APRV was restarted. The patient was then again weaned from MV.

Conclusions

The TCAV™ method can be useful to wean challenging patients with severe ARDS and might contribute to lung recovery. In this particular case, a lung transplantation was circumvented.

Peer Review reports

Background

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is most often caused by severe infection. The pathology is mediated via severe edema and alveolar collapse [1] and can be exacerbated by mechanical ventilation [2, 3]. Gas exchange is often hampered due to damaged lung parenchyma. Besides pharmacological interventions such as surfactant therapy, inhalation of agents contributing to vasodilatation and anti-microbial therapy [4], ventilation strategies are an important factor in the treatment of ARDS. Lung protective ventilation [5] is defined by peak inspiratory pressures less than 30 cm H2O and tidal volumes 4–6 ml/kg/BW, and has been shown to be beneficial in patients with severe ARDS [6]. However, ARDS is still associated with a high mortality rate of about 30–45% [7,8,9], which allows for the trial of other ventilation strategies. It has been proposed that airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) [10] is applicable in patients with severe ARDS, but the APRV settings reported by various studies and clinical cases [11] are inconsistent. Time-controlled adaptive ventilation (TCAV™) [12]—developed by Dr. Habashi (see attached protocol, ©2021, www.aprvnetwork.org. All rights reserved)—is an APRV protocol that uses extended high plateau pressure times (continuous positive airway pressure, CPAP Phase) in combination with brisk periods of partial pressure release (Release Phase). The very brief Release Phase is set and adjusted based on changes in lung pathophysiology, which is measured by a shift in the slope of the expiratory flow curve (SlopeEF). The SlopeEF curve is a breath-by-breath measurement of respiratory system compliance (CRS). Termination of expiratory flow is calculated by multiplying the peak expiratory flow by 75%, which will determine the Release Phase time. The steeper the SlopeEF, indicating a fall in CRS, the shorter the Release Phase (to prevent derecruitment of alveoli with fast collapse time constants) and the smaller the tidal volume (Vt) (to prevent overdistension of alveolar ducts). As the lung begins to heal and the CRS improves the Release Phase time will increase as will the size of Vt. However, driving pressure will not increase because Vt only increases with an increase in CRS. The TCAV™ method prevents the lung from depressurizing and thereby creates a time controlled positive end-expiratory pressure (TC-PEEP). Alveoli open and collapse as a viscoelastic system and thus the TCAV™ method makes use of the time lag between lung opening after start of inspiration and the time lag between start of expiration and alveolar collapse. The application of continuous positive pressure causes the alveoli to stabilize, and releasing this pressure for a short period of time will not result in alveolar collapse [13]. As a result, this method may prevent ventilator-associated lung injury by averting repetitive alveolar collapse and expansion [14, 15].

The pressure of the CPAP Phase should be set high enough to enable sufficient lung opening and to prevent regional lung strain [16]. Since these pressures are also a function of the time they are applied, longer periods of positive pressures in combination with short expiration periods will result in the maximal opening of alveoli [17]. Since the short expiratory time prevents total expiration, the low-pressure setting is always zero. If these settings are used correctly, APRV might be applied to treat severely damaged lung tissue [18]. The TCAV™ method is designed to rapidly stabilize viscoelastic lung tissue using a very brief Release Phase. Viscoelastic alveoli simply do not have sufficient time to collapse. The extended CPAP Phase will gradually open viscoelastic lung tissue over hours or days, depending on the severity of lung injury when the TCAV™ method is first applied. The end product is a stable and open lung that is highly resistant to VILI-induced injury.

In the case presented here, the lung parenchyma was severely damaged necessitating the use of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) to treat the refractory hypoxemia and hypercapnia. VV-ECMO is often used as a bridge until a donor can be found for a lung transplant [19, 20] However, lung transplantation was not possible for this patient, but the TCAV™ method was highly effective at stabilizing and opening this severely injured lung, which eventually allowed for weaning from ECMO and then mechanical ventilation.

Case presentation

A 43-year-old woman with no remarkable medical history underwent diagnostic arthrography of her right shoulder due to ongoing symptoms following a traumatic injury. Ten days later, the patient was admitted to the same general hospital with Staphylococcus Aureus sepsis. Ultrasound examination showed a fluid collection in her right shoulder. Repeated arthrocentesis was performed in order to drain the fluid and antibiotics were started. Three days after admission, she developed respiratory failure for which she was intubated and mechanical ventilation was started. The CT scan showed severe pneumonic infiltrates. Due to further deterioration, the patient was transferred to an academic hospital.

On transfer the patient was ventilated in the prone position [21]. During the first week, a spontaneous right-sided pneumothorax developed for which a chest tube was placed. Surgical debridement of the right shoulder was performed in order to eliminate the persistent infection. After 7 days she developed refractory respiratory failure and VV-ECMO was initiated. Consecutive CT scans showed a large bronchopleural fistula of the right lung, multiple abscesses and lung parenchyma which at that time was regarded as being destroyed (Fig. 1a). The patient continued to deteriorate and due to the ongoing septic profile, she was referred to our center where the proposal was made to perform a bilateral pneumectomy and then clear the infection, whilst keeping the patient on ECMO until such time as bilateral lung transplantation was possible [22].

Fig. 1
figure1

Consecutive CT images showing subsequent phases in the disease course. a CT scan performed in the referring academic hospital. ECMO, chest tube and tracheostomy tube in situ; the patient was not ventilated, since lung protective settings failed to produce significant tidal volumes. The scan shows bilateral atelectasis, a right-sided bronchopleural fistula, consolidations, destroyed lung parenchyma and a right-sided pneumothorax. b CT scan after ICU discharge and first APRV period. VV-ECMO has been removed; chest tube and tracheostomy in situ. The APRV mode was set and adjusted by the TCAV™ method with auto-release mode set at 75%. Tidal volumes increased and FiO2 could be decreased during recovery of lung parenchyma. Although the lungs are opened, there are persisting parenchymatic abnormalities of both lungs and persisting air leakage via the bronchopleural fistula. c CT scan after surgery for right bronchopleural fistula closure. Chest tube and tracheostomy in situ. Pleural effusion is visible after unsuccessful right-sided bronchopleural fistula closure, as well as a persisting pneumothorax. APRV was then restarted. d CT scan after second discharge and APRV period. Chest tube and tracheostomy in situ. Significant improvement of lung parenchyma is seen after reinstitution of APRV

At the time of admission to our ICU, 35 days after intubation, the patient was in respiratory distress despite maximum VV-ECMO settings and tracheostomal high-flow oxygen therapy. She was not mechanically ventilated due to the impossibility of achieving adequate tidal volumes with lung protective settings. Successful donor matching for lung transplantation was considered highly unlikely due to the presence of multiple HLA antibodies (Panel-reactive antibody test = 100%). Furthermore, the patient was immobilized and had critical illness polyneuropathy, providing a further contraindication to transplantation. In order to facilitate lung recovery, we applied the TCAV™ method to set and adjust the APRV mode [14, 16] (Dräger Evita® V800). The TCAV™ method applies an extended high pressure CPAP Phase with intermittent very brief Release Phases for CO2 removal. We set the auto-release at 75%, resulting in termination of expiration at 75% of the peak expiratory flow rate, which initially yielded high frequencies and small tidal volumes (9). Our goal was to stabilize the lung with the very short Release Phase to minimize repetitive alveolar collapse-induced atelectrauma. The bronchopleural fistula and corresponding significant air leak persisted and initially worsened, however, because the patient’s collapsed lung parenchyma recruited increasing lung volume, tidal volumes were able to be increased and FiO2 decreased. A tracheostomy was performed eleven days after admission. After a month of APRV and while still on VV-ECMO, her arterial blood gas (ABG) normalized (see Table 1). This strategy enabled the patient to be weaned off VV-ECMO and subsequently mechanical ventilation. After three months the patient was discharged from ICU (Fig. 1b), her tracheostoma had been closed but the chest tube was still in situ.

Table 1 Modes and settings of mechanical ventilation and corresponding arterial blood gases (ABG)

Two months after ICU discharge, surgery was performed to close several remaining bronchopleural fistulas and the patient was readmitted to ICU. Due to drain dysfunction, the fistulas unfortunately reopened. She was extubated the day after surgery, however, due to weakness, atelectasis and ongoing significant air leakage, the patient had to be reintubated after 3 days. One day later, a repeat tracheostomy was performed. Traditional pressure support and control ventilation modes were insufficient and resulted in significant atelectasis so the TCAV™ method was restarted. PHigh was reduced very slowly. Her clinical situation improved and attending physicians switched to pressure support ventilation, which was regarded as being more comfortable for the patient. However, hypercapnia occurred and after 2 days the patient was exhausted and the TCAV™ method was again restarted. Due to clinical suspicion of infection, antibiotic therapy was broadened. After this infection had been cleared, weaning from ventilation was initiated which was successful after a further 20 days (Fig. 1d).

After less than 2 months, the patient was discharged home with a portable chest tube. The tube dislocated but this did not result in pneumothorax. In October 2020, the patient tested positive for COVID-19, but she only had minor symptoms and there was no need for admission to hospital.

Discussion and conclusions

In this patient, APRV set with use of the TCAV™ protocol contributed to lung recovery. It enabled us to wean her first from VV-ECMO and then from mechanical ventilation (twice), despite the presence of a large bronchopleural fistula. The TCAV™ method prevented alveolar collapse, which due to lack of surfactant in alveoli easily occurs in lungs affected by ARDS. If the implementation of APRV (both on and off VV-ECMO) earlier on in the course of the disease prevents deterioration and destroyed lung is still only a hypothesis. However, in exceptional cases such as ours, it may be a useful strategy in delaying the indication for lung transplantation.

The beneficial effects of the TCAV™-method have been described in animal models. Using the TCAV™ protocol to set the APRV in Lewis rats, Silva et al. [23] showed that in pulmonary ARDS—but not in extra-pulmonary ARDS—this ventilation strategy was beneficial and resulted in less ventilation-induced injury. Using the same protocol, Roy et al. [24] reported that in pig models with intestinal ischemia and sepsis, that the animals that were ventilated using the TCAV™ method were less likely to develop ARDS than the animals receiving lung protective ventilation. In 2017, Zhou et al. [25] compared the beneficial effects of APRV with auto-release in humans with those of traditional lung protective ventilation. They showed that patients with APRV needed fewer days on mechanical ventilation and were more likely to be extubated. The methodology used in this study closely resembled the TCAV™ protocol, but showed some differences with our strategy because we initially used higher pressures and higher respiratory rates. Recently, the beneficial effects of APRV ventilation have been shown in patients with COVID-19, further emphasizing the relevance of this ventilation mode [26].

The correct settings of this ventilation mode are of great importance, as if Release Phase settings are inadequate they can cause repeated alveolar collapse and corresponding atelectrauma [27]. However, by using the auto-release setting that initiates the stop of expiration at the set percentage of the peak expiratory flow level, alveolar collapse can be prevented. Alternatively, the Release Phase time can be obtained by multiplying the Peak Expiratory Flow by 0.75 to obtain the Termination of Expiratory Flow point. Using the Release Phase time adjustment (Tlow) set the expiratory duration to stop at the calculated Termination of Expiratory Flow value, at which point the lung is rapidly reinflated. In fact, we generated a cast which protected the lungs from ventilation-induced injury. Low tidal volumes were sufficient and increased over time with ongoing tissue recovery.

Conclusions and directions for further research

In our patient, lungs that were considered beyond repair necessitating a lung transplantation, in fact slowly recovered. In our opinion the TCAV™ method may therefore be a useful tool to aid the recovery of severely damaged lungs. It could even be argued that the severe lung pathology in this patient could have been prevented by initiating the TCAV™ method earlier on in the course of the disease, as suggested by Andrews et al. [28]. Both larger case series and randomized controlled trials are warranted to demonstrate the beneficial effect of the TCAV™ method in different patient groups with ARDS more comprehensively.

Availability of data and materials

Data is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

APRV:

Airway pressure release ventilation

ARDS:

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

COVID-19:

Coronavirus induced disease 2019

CPAP:

Continuous positive airway pressure

CRS:

Compliance of the respiratory system

CT:

Computed tomography

FiO2:

Fraction of inspired oxygen

HLA:

Human leukocyte antigen

ICU:

Intensive care unit

MV:

Mechanical ventilation

SlopeEF:

Slope of the expiratory flow curve

TCAV™:

Time controlled adaptive ventilation

Vt(i):

Tidal volume (inspiration)

VV-ECMO:

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

References

  1. 1.

    Schiller HJ, McCann UG 2nd, Carney DE, Gatto LA, Steinberg JM, Nieman GF. Altered alveolar mechanics in the acutely injured lung. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:1049–55.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Hasan D, Satalin J, van der Zee P, et al. Excessive Extracellular ATP Desensitizes P2Y2 and P2X4 ATP Receptors Provoking Surfactant Impairment Ending in Ventilation-Induced Lung Injury. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:1185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Albert RK. The role of ventilation-induced surfactant dysfunction and atelectasis in causing acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185:702–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Fan E, Brodie D, Slutsky AS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: advances in diagnosis and treatment. JAMA. 2018;319:698–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Camporota L, Hart N. Lung protective ventilation. BMJ Br Med J. 2012;344:e2491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Needham DM, Colantuoni E, Mendez-Tellez PA, et al. Lung protective mechanical ventilation and two year survival in patients with acute lung injury: prospective cohort study. BMJ Br Med J. 2012;344:e2124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome N, Brower RG, Matthay MA, et al. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1301–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Writing Group for the Alveolar Recruitment for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Trial I, Cavalcanti AB, Suzumura É A, et al. Effect of lung recruitment and titrated positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) vs low PEEP on mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017 318: 1335–1345.

  9. 9.

    Máca J, Jor O, Holub M, et al. Past and present ARDS mortality rates: a systematic review. Respir Care. 2017;62:113–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Stock MC, Downs JB, Frolicher DA. Airway pressure release ventilation. Crit Care Med. 1987;15:462–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Jain SV, Kollisch-Singule M, Sadowitz B, et al. The 30-year evolution of airway pressure release ventilation (APRV). Intensive Care Med Exp. 2016;4:11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Habashi NM. Other approaches to open-lung ventilation: airway pressure release ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:S228-240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Nieman GF, Al-Khalisy H, Kollisch-Singule M, et al. A physiologically informed strategy to effectively open, stabilize, and protect the acutely injured lung. Front Physiol. 2020;11:227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Nieman GF, Andrews P, Satalin J, et al. Acute lung injury: how to stabilize a broken lung. Crit Care. 2018;22:136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kollisch-Singule M, Andrews P, Satalin J, Gatto LA, Nieman GF, Habashi NM. The time-controlled adaptive ventilation protocol: mechanistic approach to reducing ventilator-induced lung injury. Eur Respir Rev. 2019;28:180126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Nieman GF, Gatto LA, Andrews P, et al. Prevention and treatment of acute lung injury with time-controlled adaptive ventilation: physiologically informed modification of airway pressure release ventilation. Ann Intensive Care. 2020;10:3–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Bates JHT, Smith BJ. Ventilator-induced lung injury and lung mechanics. Ann Transl Med. 2018;6:378.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Nieman G, Satalin J, Andrews P, et al. Preemptive mechanical ventilation based on dynamic physiology in the alveolar microenvironment: novel considerations of time-dependent properties of the respiratory system. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;85:1081–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Wu MY, Huang CC, Wu TI, Wang CL, Lin PJ. Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory distress syndrome in adults: prognostic factors for outcomes. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95:e2870.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Noble DW, Peek GJ. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for respiratory failure: past, present and future. Anaesthesia. 2010;65:971–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Guérin C, Reignier J, Richard J-C, et al. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. New Engl J Med. 2013;368:2159–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Cypel M, Waddell T, Singer LG, et al. Bilateral pneumonectomy to treat uncontrolled sepsis in a patient awaiting lung transplantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;153:e67–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Silva PL, Cruz FF, Samary CDS, et al. Biological response to time-controlled adaptive ventilation depends on acute respiratory distress syndrome etiology. Crit Care Med. 2018;46:e609–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Roy S, Habashi N, Sadowitz B, et al. Early airway pressure release ventilation prevents ARDS-a novel preventive approach to lung injury. Shock. 2013;39:28–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Zhou Y, Jin X, Lv Y, et al. Early application of airway pressure release ventilation may reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43:1648–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Joseph DAK, Baltazar GA, Jacquez RA, et al. A Pilot Study of patients with COVID–19-related respiratory failure utilizing airway pressure release ventilation (APRV). Innovations in Surgery and Interventional Medicine; 2020.

  27. 27.

    Mireles-Cabodevila E, Dugar S, Chatburn RL. APRV for ARDS: the complexities of a mode and how it affects even the best trials. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10:S1058–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Andrews PL, Shiber JR, Jaruga-Killeen E, et al. Early application of airway pressure release ventilation may reduce mortality in high-risk trauma patients: a systematic review of observational trauma ARDS literature. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;75:635–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was obtained for this report.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MJ, JM and CU wrote the paper. MJ, JM, LS and CU provided patient care. LS provided reports on follow-up. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Malou Janssen.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable (standard care, no interventions).

Consent for publication

Patient provided signed consent to participate and for publication of radiographic material.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Janssen, M., Meeder, J.H.J., Seghers, L. et al. Time controlled adaptive ventilation™ as conservative treatment of destroyed lung: an alternative to lung transplantation. BMC Pulm Med 21, 176 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-021-01545-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Acute respiratory distress syndrome
  • Bronchopleural fistula
  • Destroyed lung
  • Lung protective ventilation
  • Time-controlled adaptive ventilation
  • Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation