Skip to main content

Rheological effects of hypertonic saline and sodium bicarbonate solutions on cystic fibrosis sputum in vitro

Abstract

Background

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a life-threatening multiorgan genetic disease, particularly affecting the lungs, where recurrent infections are the main cause of reduced life expectancy. In CF, mutations in the gene encoding the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein impair transepithelial electrolyte and water transport, resulting in airway dehydration, and a thickening of the mucus associated with abnormal viscoelastic properties. Our aim was to develop a rheological method to assess the effects of hypertonic saline (NaCl) and NaHCO3 on CF sputum viscoelasticity in vitro, and to identify the critical steps in sample preparation and in the rheological measurements.

Methods

Sputum samples were mixed with hypertonic salt solutions in vitro in a ratio of either 10:4 or 10:1. Distilled water was applied as a reference treatment. The rheological properties of sputum from CF patients, and the effects of these in vitro treatments, were studied with a rheometer at constant frequency and strain, followed by frequency sweep tests, where storage modulus (G′), loss modulus (G″) and loss factor were determined.

Results

We identified three distinct categories of sputum: (i) highly elastic (G′ > 100,000 Pa), (ii) elastic (100,000 Pa > G′ > 1000 Pa), and (iii) viscoelastic (G′ < 1000). At the higher additive ratio (10:4), all of the added solutions were found to significantly reduce the gel strength of the sputum, but the most pronounced changes were observed with NaHCO3 (p < 0.001). Samples with high elasticity exhibited the greatest changes while, for less elastic samples, a weakening of the gel structure was observed when they were treated with water or NaHCO3, but not with NaCl. For the viscoelastic samples, the additives did not cause significant changes in the parameters. When the lower additive ratio (10:1) was used, the mean values of the rheological parameters usually decreased, but the changes were not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Based on the rheological properties of the initial sputum samples, we can predict with some confidence the treatment efficacy of each of the alternative additives. The marked differences between the three categories suggest that it is advisable to evaluate each sample individually using a rheological approach such as that described here.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is one of the most common life-threatening genetic diseases. It affects many organs, including the lungs, where viscous mucus clogs the airways and recurrent infections shorten the patients’ lifespan [1]. In CF, transepithelial Cl and HCO3 transport is impaired due to mutations in the gene encoding the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein, which functions as a cAMP/PKA-regulated epithelial anion channel. Since, in addition, CFTR inhibits the activity of the epithelial Na+ channel (ENaC), there is also hyper-reabsorption of Na+ in CF airways. The reduced concentrations of Na+ and Cl in the airway surface liquid (ASL) cause water depletion, resulting in airway dehydration, and a thickening of the mucus associated with abnormal viscoelastic properties and osmotic pressures. The rheological properties of the mucus strongly influence the effectiveness of mucus clearance and cough [2,3,4]. Changes in these properties significantly reduce mucus clearance in CF and thus contribute to the colonization of the airways by bacteria and the development of recurrent infections [5, 6].

Recent studies have focused on impaired transepithelial HCO3 transport [4, 7, 8] because it has a key role in maintaining the normal pH of the ASL. Low levels of HCO3 lead to acidic ASL pH, which favours bacterial growth and compromises immune defence. However, HCO3 concentrations also determine the physiological properties of mucins. Negatively-charged amino acid residues in newly-formed mucin molecules are bound to Ca2+ and protons, which must be removed to ensure mucin expansion and hydration during the formation of the extracellular mucus gel. Physiologically, this process is facilitated by HCO3, which can form complexes with Ca2+ and protons [9, 10].

The gel structure of mucus also depends on various interactions within and between the mucin molecules. Major interactions include disulphide, hydrogen and ionic bonds, as well as physical entanglements [11]. In dehydrated ASL, the high concentration of mucin molecules increases the number of crosslinks, resulting in highly elastic sputum in CF patients. Mucolytic agents are designed to break these crosslinks, thereby improving the rheological properties of the ASL. Previous studies have shown that mucus viscosity can be reduced by the administration of a hypertonic NaCl solution, which disrupts the ionic interactions between the mucin chains [11]. In addition, when a hypertonic salt solution (HS) is used, fluid moves by osmosis from the interstitial space to the airways. This further weakens the gel structure, increases the volume of the ASL and stimulates mucociliary clearance (MCC) [12, 13].

The rheological properties of human sputum can be a useful indicator of disease severity or progression as well as treatment efficacy. In order to assess sputum viscoelasticity in clinical practice, a comprehensive understanding of practical rheology is required, including sample preparation, the choice of parameter settings, and knowledge of the external factors influencing the measurements.

Our specific aim in this study was to develop a rheological method for assessing the effects of hypertonic saline (NaCl) and NaHCO3 on CF sputum viscoelasticity in vitro.

Materials and methods

Materials

Hypertonic solutions, 300 mmol/L sodium chloride (Ph.Eur, Hungaropharma Zrt, Budapest, Hungary) and 300 mmol/L sodium bicarbonate (Ph.Eur, Hungaropharma Zrt, Budapest, Hungary), were freshly prepared.

Sputum samples of CF patients (both male and female over 18 age) were spontaneously produced and collected in the National Korányi Institute for Pulmonology (Budapest, Hungary). Patients were in a stable condition and had received neither hypertonic saline nor dornase alfa therapy for 8 h before the sputum collection. Sputum samples were immediately frozen and stored at − 20 °C. Before use, samples were thawed at room temperature. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Experimental protocols were approved by both the Ethics Committee of the National Korányi Institute for Pulmonology (registration number: 7/2019) and the Hungarian Medical Research Council (ETT-TUKEB, registration number: IV/8155-3/2020/EKU). Informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

In order to separate the sputum from saliva, samples were centrifuged (Hermle centrifuge) at 11,000 RCF for 10 min [4]. The supernatant saliva was then decanted, and the sputum samples from the same patient pooled and gently stirred for homogenization with a magnetic stirrer at 100 rpm for 10 min. This procedure enabled to analyse a concentrated sputum sample.

Sputum samples were divided into aliquots in order to compare the effects of different treatments on the same samples. Alternative methods (horizontal shaking, ultrasonication, magnetic stirring or gentle manual mixing) were evaluated for mixing the sputum samples with the additives (either water or the hypertonic solutions).

Sputum samples were treated with either distilled water (n = 87) or hypertonic NaCl (n = 74) or NaHCO3 (n = 55). The ratio of sputum to additive solution was either 10:4 or 10:1 by volume.

Rheological methods

The rheological properties of the sputum in CF, and the effects of the in vitro treatments, were studied with a Physica MCR302 rheometer (Anton Paar, Austria). The measuring device was of parallel plate type (diameter 25 mm, gap 0.1 mm). The measurements were carried out at 37 °C, and evaporation was blocked with a cap containing water.

In the first part of the measurement (the resting phase), the structural state of the sputum, and any changes resulting from the treatments, were determined over 30 min at a constant angular frequency of 1 rad/s and a constant strain of 0.4%. Each measurement was performed immediately after mixing the solutions and gentle agitation.

Viscoelastic characteristics were determined by frequency-sweep tests immediately after the resting-phase measurement, using a strain of 0.4%. Storage modulus (G′), loss modulus (G″) and loss factor (tanδ) were determined over an angular frequency range from 0.1 to 100 rad/s. The strain value (0.4%) used in the measurements was within the linear range of the viscoelasticity of the sputum.

We assessed both untreated and treated samples for each sputum specimen. During the development of the methodology, parallel samples from the same patient collected at a given time were used for the comparison of the different treatments.

Statistical analysis

One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test, with GraphPad Prism 8.0 software (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, USA) were applied for statistical analysis. p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant, whereas p ≤ 0.01 and p ≤ 0.001 were considered very and highly significant, respectively.

Results

In order to analyse the possible breakdown of mucus structure in CF, and to follow the recovery of the sputum samples after their treatment and insertion into the rheometer, a constant oscillation test was applied at low frequency and strain value. This part of the measurement, here denoted the ‘resting phase’, can be beneficial in gaining insight into the time-dependency of the in vitro treatments.

During initial trials of the methodology, we observed a strong increase in the G′ value, typical of gelation. The samples were routinely protected against evaporation by a blocking cap containing water, so these effects could have been due either to structural breakdown of the sample during insertion or to thermogelation of the sputum, which had been stored at room temperature before the measurements. In order to distinguish between these two possibilities, experiments were performed with sputum samples pre-incubated at 37 °C for 30 min and inserted into the pre-warmed instrument at the same temperature. The resting phase of the pre-warmed sputum showed the same characteristics as those that were not pre-warmed before the measurements (Fig. 1), indicating that the storage temperature did not influence the rheological behaviour of the sputum samples. This result suggests a destruction effect of the installation process on the gel structure of the sputum.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Time-dependent representative changes in the storage modulus (G′) of CF sputum samples during the resting phase of rheological measurements on pre-warmed and non-pre-warmed samples

The effects of different types of agitation were also assessed during the development of our in vitro treatment method. The sputum samples were divided into 3 parts: (i) untreated, (ii) mixed with an orbital shaker for 15 min at 450 rpm, and (iii) treated in an ultrasound bath for 5 min.

The recovery part of the same sample varied according to the different pre-treatments (agitations) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Resting phase of representative sputum samples after different types of agitation

The orbital shaker improved the increase in viscoelastic behaviour during the resting phase, while the US destroyed the structure. Sonication resulted in heating and the precipitation of some components of the sputum, therefore, we discontinued to use this method.

We tried to mimic physiological conditions while performing the in vitro treatments. When hypertonic saline solutions are used by inhalation, no real mixing occurs because the inhaled saline solution is simply sprayed onto the airway surface liquid. Therefore, we applied gentle manual agitation at room temperature for 10 s, followed by the insertion of the mixture into the rheometer and the immediate start of the measurement.

The resting phase was examined for all of the CF sputum samples obtained from the CF patients and subjected either to no treatment or mixing with water, hypertonic NaCl or hypertonic NaHCO3. Our data show that significant gel structure build-up occurred in some samples (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Resting phase of sputum samples after different treatments in the case of different patients

In many cases the storage modulus G' of the sputum sample increased significantly during the measurements (Fig. 3a, d, e, f), reflecting the recovery of gel structure. In some of those cases, the rate of recovery was significantly altered by the various pre-treatments. In general, the added water or hypertonic solutions slowed down recovery (Fig. 3a, c, d), while in some cases they completely prevented the recovery of the strong gel structure (Fig. 3b). In a few cases, however, there were no significant changes in this parameter (Fig. 3f).

This resting phase is very important because the structure of the sputum can change during insertion into the rheometer, and recovery can be observed even in the untreated samples, suggesting significant adverse effects of the sample insertion procedure.

Mixing with additives and gentle agitation can result in slower recovery, and in some cases the gel structure did not build up again. In order to gain information about the real gel structure and the effect of the pre-treatment and the additives, we considered the strong effects of mixing and installation on the gel structure and assessed the final gel structure, which requires the inclusion of a resting phase in the rheological measurements. In most cases, the additives delayed the recovery of the gel structure, but no significant differences were revealed between the effects of the additives.

The effects of the different additives were evaluated in detail based on frequency-sweep tests. Storage and loss moduli, G′ and G″ respectively, of both untreated and treated sputum samples were compared with each other. The values were interpreted at angular frequencies of 1 and 10 rad/s.

A centrifugation was applied during the sputum samples preparation, which resulted in a concentrated sputum sample [4]. Despite of standard pre-treatment, concentrated sputum samples presented very different gel strengths. The gel strengths of the original sputum samples were very different. We could distinguish 3 categories of sample based on the G′ values of the untreated samples determined at an angular frequency of 1 rad/s in the resting phase of the measurements: (i) highly elastic (G′ > 100,000 Pa), (ii) elastic (100,000 Pa > G′ > 1000 Pa) and (iii) viscoelastic (G′ < 1000) sputum samples. Based on these categories, the efficacy of the treatments was evaluated for all samples by category and the mixing ratio of the sputum and additives: 10:4 (Table 1) and 10:1 (Table 2).

Table 1 Rheological parameters of the sputum using a sputum: additive ratio of 10:4
Table 2 Rheological parameters of the sputum using a sputum: additive ratio of 10:1

When a large volume of additive (10:4, Table 1, Box plots of the results are presented in Additional file 1: Figures S-1–4) was applied, the viscoelastic moduli (G′ and G″) decreased, while the loss factor (tanδ) increased, indicating the destruction of the highly elastic gel structure. Only the hypertonic NaHCO3 solution caused significant changes in all rheological parameters, whereas distilled water and hypertonic NaCl solution did not change the loss factor values.

When the results were evaluated by category, all additives significantly decreased the rheological parameters of the highly elastic and elastic sputum samples (with the exception of the loss factor). However, the most effective additive was bicarbonate (the lowest G′ and G″ values).

For elastic and viscoelastic samples, where the sputum had a more liquid state, the additives did not induce significant changes in the rheological parameters, only in the case of bicarbonate or water we could find significant change in some parameters (G′ and loss factor).

When using lower volumes of additives (10:1, Table 2), we observed a tendency for decreased values in the rheological parameters (especially using NaHCO3 or NaCl solutions for highly elastic sputum samples). However, because of the variability of the samples, the differences were not statistically significant at this mixing ratio (Table 2, Box plots of the results are presented in Additional file 1: Figures S-5–8).

Discussion

Several previous studies have investigated the rheological properties of CF sputum samples and shown that they have viscoelastic behaviour, which can be studied by oscillatory rheometry (microbead rheology or shear rheology) [8]. Nonetheless, rheological measurements of sputum samples face a number of challenges. Samples from spontaneous expectoration are normally diluted by saliva, thus pre-separation is required to assess the properties of the sputum itself. Sputum samples may exhibit significant variability, even from the same individual. There are many possible explanations for this, for example colonization with different bacteria, differences in ASL composition, various degrees of contamination by saliva [14, 15], and different intensities or frequencies of repetitive voluntary cough. Any of these factors can alter the solid content and the hydration level of the sputum and thus its viscoelastic properties [16]. The small sample size and heterogeneity within the sample can also complicate the analysis.

In the present study, we investigated some of the methodological factors influencing the rheological measurements. Sputum samples were separated from saliva by using the centrifugation technique described previously in the literature [4, 17]. After separation, the sputum gel phase was gently homogenized by stirring. For rheological analysis, a resting measurement phase was introduced to investigate whether pre-homogenization, the mechanical effects of sample agitation and insertion into the rheometer, or storage temperature could affect the rheological parameters and their change over time. Our results clearly demonstrate that the introduction of the resting phase into the measurement protocol is recommended because sputum samples undergo significant changes once inserted into the rheometer, which could be due to the unavoidable but disruptive effects of sample operation. The length of this section can be optimized for a given instrument and preparatory operation. It should be long enough for stabilization of the parameters. However, efforts should be made to limit the preparation time as short as possible to avoid the dehydration and degradation of the samples. In our experiments we established this time period of 30 min.

The technique used to mix the sputum with additives, such as mucolytics, can significantly alter the initial rheological properties of the sample. For example, the gel structure was broken down after ultrasonication and did not recover during the test stage. In contrast, pre-warming the samples did not appear to change the gel structure.

The rheological properties of sputum can be influenced by a number of factors, such as solid content, the degree of hydration, pH, electrolyte concentrations, the quantity and types of mucins, extracellular materials (e.g. extracellular DNA and F-actin), and interactions between mucin chains or with other molecules [18]. Mucolytic agents mainly target these interactions, but they may also influence the pH and/or hydration state of the ASL.

The use of hypertonic saline (HS) solution is an inexpensive, safe, and effective additional therapy in CF patients with stable lung function [19]. The inhalation of HS solution can improve mucociliary clearance due to its hyperosmolarity, where water transport into the airways is driven by osmosis, resulting in a deeper periciliary fluid layer and enhanced mucus hydration [20, 21]. Elkins and co-workers reported significant benefits of hypertonic saline inhalation in a 48‐week parallel group study, in which 164 CF patients were randomised to receive either 7% HS (300 mmol/L NaCl) or placebo (150 mmol/L NaCl) [21]. It was demonstrated that FEV1 was approximately 3% higher in the HS than in the placebo group. The effects of other osmotic agents, mannitol [22] and xylitol [23, 24], have also been studied in CF patients.

The inhalation of bicarbonate-containing solutions could be another useful adjuvant therapy in CF. NaHCO3 is an effective, safe and well-tolerated therapeutic agent in CF and possibly in other chronically infected lung diseases [7, 25, 26]. Gomez et al. have recently demonstrated that the inhalation of hypertonic NaHCO3 increased the pH of the ASL and decreased the gel strength of the sputum, which could be explained by greater expansion of mucins and DNA. This weakening effect of bicarbonate on gel strength has also been reported by Stigliani et al. [4] who showed that elastic and viscous moduli, as well as complex viscosity, were reduced after in vitro treatment. This group has also investigated the dissolution and permeation properties of ketoprofen lysinate (Klys) in CF sputum. Interestingly, CF sputum treated with NaHCO3 exhibited more rapid Klys dissolution and permeation than sputum without added bicarbonate [4].

In our study, the effects of NaCl and NaHCO3 solutions (300 mmol/L) were investigated on CF sputum samples in vitro. As a reference treatment, water was added to some sputum samples, which can be regarded as an indicator of the hydrating effect of the additive solution without the salt or bicarbonate. The overall aim of the present work was to develop an in vitro method to predict the efficacy of topically applied mucolytics. This could help in selecting the most appropriate inhalation formulation for the disease status of each CF patient. However, it must be kept in mind that the method presented here is not suitable for assessing the beneficial in vivo osmotic effects of hypertonic solutions.

Storage and loss modulus as well as the loss factor can be used to compare the efficacy of different in vitro treatments. The gel structure and its viscoelastic characteristics can be well characterized by measuring these rheological parameters. Mucus clearance is known to be influenced by viscoelasticity [5]. Two main mucus clearance processes can be distinguished: (i) mucociliary clearance (MCC) and (ii) cough clearance (CC). The efficacy of these clearance processes depends upon the rheological properties of sputum. In previous studies, MCC was simulated by using low frequency deformations (1 rad/s), while CC was mimicked by applying 100 rad/s. In micro-rheology, these frequencies correspond to the beating frequency of epithelial cilia and coughing, respectively [5, 27]. In shear rheology, it has been suggested that higher frequencies should be avoided because the inertia of the instrument strongly affects the torque response of the soft CF sputum. Since it has been recommended to limit frequencies to no higher than 10 rad/s [14, 28], we compared the rheological parameters (G′, G″ and tanδ) of the untreated and treated sputum at 1 and 10 rad/s.

The sputum samples showed great variability based on the elastic modulus at 1 rad/s of the untreated samples. The range of these elastic moduli correspond to values described in a previous study [4] in which the same sputum preparation method was applied. Importantly, we detected 3 distinct categories: (i) highly elastic (G′ > 100,000 Pa), (ii) elastic (100,000 Pa > G′ > 1000 Pa), and (iii) viscoelastic (G′ < 1000) sputum samples. Visually the highly elastic samples were very compact and behaved as a solid material. Elastic samples showed remarkable elasticity, but they were deformable, while viscoelastic samples presented liquid characteristics. The changes in the rheological parameters, with time and additive pre-treatment, were therefore assessed in each category separately.

In this study, we did not assess the clinical status of the patients, thus the conclusions were drawn on the basis of the rheological properties of the sputum samples alone. They were treated either at 10:4 (n = 61) or 10:1 (n = 15) sputum/additive solution ratios. We used a ratio of 10:1 (sputum/additive) based on methods published by Stigliani et al. [4]. In addition, we have chosen a ratio of 10:4 which may mimic the luminal environment following application of the hypertonic saline and water secretion.

When using the larger volume of additive (10:4), the gel strength of the sputum decreased because the viscoelastic moduli decreased and the loss factor increased at each frequency. The pronounced variability of the samples is reflected in the large standard deviation values, which are even more noticeable in the treated samples. Importantly, we found that the added solutions significantly reduced the gel strength of the sputum considering all investigated samples, but the most pronounced changes (lowest p values) were observed for NaHCO3 (p < 0.001). Samples with high elasticity (G′ > 100,000 Pa) exhibited the greatest changes in the parameters, suggesting that dilution of the gel structure may result in the greatest structural breakdown in samples of this type. It is remarkable that even more significant effects were detected when the samples were treated by NaHCO3.

For less elastic samples, a weakening of the gel structure was also observed when they were treated with distilled water or NaHCO3, but not with NaCl solution, where there were no significant changes in the parameters. For viscoelastic samples with a low elastic content, the additives did not cause significant changes in the parameters.

For all samples at 10:4 ratio, the effect of additives significantly reduces the rheological parameters of the sputum, but when the changes within the categories are analysed, it is clear that the reducing effect is mostly limited to samples with significant elasticity (highly elastic and elastic samples), at low elasticity no significant effect can be observed.

When a lower additive volume (10:1 ratio) was used, the mean values of the rheological parameters usually decreased, especially in the case of the highly elastic sputum samples following treatment with either NaHCO3 or NaCl solutions. A decrease in modulus was also observed in this additive ratio. The effects of NaCl were the most remarkable (but not significant) in the most elastic samples, while the efficacy of NaHCO3 was highest in the middle category (lower mean values observed in the case of the treated samples, in Table 2). The beneficial effects of NaCl could also be observed in the sputum samples with the lowest elastic content (G′ < 1000 Pa). Considering all samples treated with 10:1 sputum to additive ratio, the bicarbonate treated samples showed the lowest mean rheological parameters (and thus the more effective treatment), but within the categories this tendency is not prevailed, the effect of additives is different in the case of samples with different rheological profiles. However, it should be noted that no significance was detected in this sputum/additive ratio.

When comparing the alternative sputum/additive ratios used here, it is evident that larger amounts of added water alone can significantly reduce the gel character of the sputum samples. Based on the rheological properties of the initial sputum samples, it may be appropriate to categorize the treatment efficacy by each additive. The difference between the categories suggests that it is advisable to evaluate each sample individually. These efficacy measurements in vitro may be suitable for such an assessment.

In accordance with previously published observations, the standard deviations of the mean values were also high in the present work, which rendered the statistical analysis of the data difficult. However, the introduction of the resting phase, or the equilibration of the samples immediately before measurements may reduce the inaccuracy of the data.

Conclusion

In this study we have assessed and compared in vitro the effects of hypertonic mucolytics that are used locally as inhaled aerosols for adjuvant therapy in CF. Our data suggest that the pre-treatment and handling of sputum samples can exert significant effects on their rheological properties. Thus, it is important to investigate the adverse effects of sample treatment in all applied rheological methods. In assessing the effects of hypertonic NaCl and NaHCO3 solutions on CF sputum samples, we observed that these mucolytic agents exhibit different effects on sputum samples according to their initial viscoelastic characteristics. Our results suggest that it is advisable to evaluate each sample individually, and our measurements for the analysis of the efficacy of the additives in vitro may be suitable for such an assessment.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CF:

Cystic fibrosis

CFTR:

Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator

G′:

Storage modulus

G″:

Loss modulus

tanδ:

Loss factor

ENaC:

Epithelial Na+ channel

ASL:

Airway surface liquid

MCC:

Mucociliary clearance

CC:

Cough clearance

HS:

Hypertonic saline

FEV1 :

Forced expiratory volume, the amount of air forced from the lungs in one second

References

  1. Yu E, Sharma S. Cystic fibrosis [updated 2020 Aug 10]. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493206/.

  2. Rubin BK. A superficial view of mucus and the cystic fibrosis defect. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1992;13:4–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.1950130103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rubin BK. Mucus structure and properties in cystic fibrosis. Paediatr Resp Rev. 2007;8:4–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.1950130107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stigliani M, Manniello MD, Zegarra-Moran O, Galietta L, Minicucci L, Casciaro R, Garofalo E, Incarnato L, Aquino RP, Del Gaudio P, Russo P. Rheological properties of cystic fibrosis bronchial secretion and in vitro drug permeation study: the effect of sodium bicarbonate. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2016;29(4):337–45. https://doi.org/10.1089/jamp.2015.1228.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cutting GR. Cystic fibrosis genetics: from molecular understanding to clinical application. Nat Rev Genet. 2015;16:45–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3849.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goss CH, Burns JL. Exacerbations in cystic fibrosis. 1. Epidemiology and pathogenesis. Thorax. 2007;62(4):360–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2006.060889.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Gomez CCS, Parazzi PLF, Clinckspoor KJ, Mauch RM, Pessine FBT, Levy CE, Peixoto AO, Ribeiro MÂGO, Ribeiro AF, Conrad D, Quinton PM, Marson FAL, Ribeiro JD. Safety, tolerability, and effects of sodium bicarbonate inhalation in cystic fibrosis. Clin Drug Investig. 2020;40(2):105–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-019-00861-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hill DB, Long RF, Kissner WJ, et al. Pathological mucus and impaired mucus clearance in cystic fibrosis patients result from increased concentration, not altered pH. Eur Respir J. 2018;52:1801297. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01297-2018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Quinton PM. Cystic fibrosis: impaired bicarbonate secretion and mucoviscidosis. Lancet. 2008;372(9636):415–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61162-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang N, Garcia MA, Quinton PM. Normal mucus formation requires cAMP-dependent HCO3− secretion and Ca2+- mediatedmucin exocytosis. J Physiol. 2013;591(18):4581–93. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2013.257436.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Zayas G, Dimitry J, Zayas A, O’Brien D, King M. A new paradigm in respiratory hygiene: increasing the cohesivity of airway secretions to improve cough interaction and reduce aerosol dispersion. BMC Pulm Med. 2005;2(5):11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-5-11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Enderby B, Doull I. Hypertonic saline inhalation in cystic fibrosis—salt in the wound, or sweet success? Arch Dis Child. 2007;92(3):195–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2006.094979.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Goralski JL, Donaldson SH. Hypertonic saline for cystic fibrosis: worth its salt? Expert Rev Respir Med. 2014;8(3):267–9. https://doi.org/10.1586/17476348.2014.896203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Radtke T, Böni L, Bohnacker P, Fischer P, Benden C, Dressel H. The many ways sputum flows—dealing with high within-subject variability in cystic fibrosis sputum rheology. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2018;254:36–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2018.04.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Antus B. Oxidative stress markers in sputum. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2016;2016:2930434. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2930434.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Cone RA. Barrier properties of mucus. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2009;61(2):75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2008.09.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Puchelle E, Tournier JM, Zahm JM, Sadoul P. Rheology of sputum collected by a simple technique limiting salivary contamination. J Lab Clin Med. 1984;103(3):347–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ma JT, Tang C, Kang L, Voynow JA, Rubin BK. Cystic fibrosis sputum rheology correlates with both acute and longitudinal changes in lung function. Chest. 2018;154(2):370–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2018.03.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Taylor LM, Kuhn RJ. Hypertonic saline treatment of cystic fibrosis. Ann Pharmacother. 2007;41(3):481–4. https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.1H425.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Daviskas E, Anderson SD. Hyperosmolar agents and clearance of mucus in the diseased airway. J Aerosol Med. 2006;19(1):100–9. https://doi.org/10.1089/jam.2006.19.100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Elkins MR, Robinson M, Rose BR, Harbour C, Moriarty CP, Marks GB, Belousova EG, Xuan W, Bye PT. National Hypertonic Saline in Cystic Fibrosis (NHSCF) study group—a controlled trial of long-term inhaled hypertonic saline in patients with cystic fibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(3):229–40. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa043900.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nevitt SJ, Thornton J, Murray CS, Dwyer T. Inhaled mannitol for cystic fibrosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;5(5):CD008649. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008649.pub4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Durairaj L, Launspach J, Watt JL, Mohamad Z, Kline J, Zabner J. Safety assessment of inhaled xylitol in subjects with cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros. 2007;6(1):31–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcf.2006.05.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Singh S, Hornick D, Fedler J, Launspach JL, Teresi ME, Santacroce TR, Cavanaugh JE, Horan R, Nelson G, Starner TD, Zabner J, Durairaj L. Randomized controlled study of aerosolized hypertonic xylitol versus hypertonic saline in hospitalized patients with pulmonary exacerbation of cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros. 2020;19(1):108–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcf.2019.06.016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dobay O, Laub K, Stercz B, Kéri A, Balázs B, Tóthpál A, Kardos S, Jaikumpun P, Ruksakiet K, Quinton PM, Zsembery Á. Bicarbonate inhibits bacterial growth and biofilm formation of prevalent cystic fibrosis pathogens. Front Microbiol. 2018;19(9):2245. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jaikumpun P, Ruksakiet K, Stercz B, Pállinger É, Steward M, Lohinai Z, Dobay O, Zsembery Á. Antibacterial effects of bicarbonate in media modified to mimic cystic fibrosis sputum. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(22):8614. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21228614.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. King M. The role of mucus viscoelasticity in cough clearance. Biorheology. 1987;24(6):589–97. https://doi.org/10.3233/bir-1987-24611.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Daviskas E, Anderson SD, Gomes K, Briffa P, Cochrane B, Chan HK, Young IH, Rubin BK. Inhaled mannitol for the treatment of mucociliary dysfunction in patients with bronchiectasis: effect on lung function, health status and sputum. Respirology. 2005;10(1):46–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1843.2005.00659.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Martin Steward for proofreading the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Hungarian Human Resources Development Operational Program (Grant No. EFOP-3.6.2-16-2017-00006). Funding was also received from the Thematic Excellence Program (2020-4.1.1.-TKP2020) of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology in Hungary within the framework of the Therapy thematic program at the Semmelweis University. The publication was supported by The University of Szeged Open Access Fund (Fund Ref, Grant No. 5203).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MBS, RA, PR, EC, AH, and AZ participated in the study design. MBS, AK, SB and PJ carried out the experiments and contributed to statistical analysis, data interpretation. MBS, RA, PR, AH and AZ participated in manuscript preparation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mária Budai-Szűcs.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Experimental protocols were approved by both the Ethics Committee of the National Korányi Institute for Pulmonology (registration number: 7/2019) and the Hungarian Medical Research Council (ETT-TUKEB, registration number: IV/8155-3/2020/EKU). Informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Consent for publication

Since the manuscript does not contain data from any individual person, consent for publication is not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Box plot of rheological parameters of the sputum samples.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Budai-Szűcs, M., Berkó, S., Kovács, A. et al. Rheological effects of hypertonic saline and sodium bicarbonate solutions on cystic fibrosis sputum in vitro. BMC Pulm Med 21, 225 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-021-01599-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-021-01599-z

Keywords