Skip to main content

Mendelian randomization analysis to analyze the genetic causality between different levels of obesity and different allergic diseases

Abstract

Background

The causal relationship between obesity and different allergic diseases remains controversial.

Methods

The Two Sample MR package and Phenoscanner database were used to obtain and filter Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) data from the Open GWAS database. Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was used to study the causal relationship between different levels of obesity and different allergic diseases. The data sets related to obesity and asthma were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were screened by the limma package. Cluster Profiler and GO plot packages were used for enrichment analysis to verify the results of MR analysis.

Results

Two-sample MR analysis showed a causal relationship between obesity and childhood allergy (age < 16), allergic asthma and atopic dermatitis (P < 0.05). In addition, there was also a causal relationship between allergic asthma and obesity (P < 0.05), while there was no genetic causal relationship between obesity and allergic rhinitis, eczema, lactose intolerance and so on (P > 0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed a causal relationship between both class 1 and class 2 obesity and childhood allergy (age < 16) (P < 0.05). Obesity class 1 was associated with allergic asthma, while obesity class 3 was associated with atopic dermatitis (P < 0.05). Bioinformatics analysis shows that there were common DEGs between obesity and allergic asthma.

Conclusion

Obesity is a risk factor for childhood allergy (age < 16), allergic asthma and atopic dermatitis, while allergic asthma is also a risk factor for obesity. Class 1 and class 2 obesity are both causally associated with childhood allergy (age < 16). In addition, there is a causal relationship between milder obesity and allergic asthma, while heavier obesity is causally related to atopic dermatitis.

Peer Review reports

Obesity now affects more than 2 billion people worldwide [1], and the COVID-19 pandemic has further increased this figure in recent years [2]. Obesity is classified as obesity class 1, obesity class 2 and obesity class 3 [3]. Previous studies have shown a correlation between obesity and diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, rheumatoid arthritis and fatty liver [4,5,6]. Allergic diseases include allergic asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, allergic purpura, allergic conjunctivitis, and lactose intolerance and can occur in children and adults. In addition, allergic diseases affect at least 20% of the global population and their incidence continues to increase annually, affecting both the physical and mental health of patients and imposing a huge economic burden on society and families. Some studies have shown that the total costs associated with allergic asthma in Europe now exceed 19.3 billion euros, in addition to the fact that the proportion of work absences due to allergic asthma reaches twice the proportion of normal employee absences [78].

In recent years, the debate and research on the relationship between different levels of obesity and different allergic diseases have increased each year. Several studies have suggested that obesity and allergic asthma may be risk factors for each other, and there may also be a correlation between obesity and allergic rhinitis [910]. However, the reliability of the above studies is questionable, large cohort studies have shown that the relationship between obesity and allergic asthma is not clear, probably because the current studies are influenced by a number of confounding factors [11]. In addition, studies on the correlation between different levels of obesity and other allergic diseases such as atopic dermatitis, eczema, allergic urticaria, allergic purpura, allergic conjunctivitis, and lactose intolerance are still relatively scarce. Considering the increasing incidence of obesity and allergic diseases worldwide every year, it is important to clarify whether there is a causal relationship between different levels of obesity and different allergic diseases [12]. Moreover, there is an urgent need to find new epidemiological techniques because traditional epidemiological methods, such as cohort studies, are subject to confounding factors and ethics and thus fail to obtain exact causal relationships [13].

With developments in genomics and genetic epidemiology, numerous genetic variants associated with human diseases have been identified. MR is an epidemiological technique to assess causality through genetic data. As the human genome cannot be changed at will once it is identified, MR analysis greatly reduces the influence of confounding factors, and thus obtains more reliable causal associations [13]. The core of MR analysis is to find instrumental variables (IVs) that can play a connecting role through the 3 core assumptions of IVs, namely, the assumption of association, independence, and exclusivity. The assumption of association is that there should be a strong correlation between the genetic variant and the exposure factor. The assumption of independence means that genetic variation is independent of confounding factors affecting “exposure and outcome”. And the exclusivity assumption requires that genetic variation can only act on outcomes through exposure and not by other means. At the same time, MR analyses need to adhere to the principles of random assignment and free combination in order to minimize the impact of external interventions on the results of the study. For the above reasons, we used MR analysis to analyze the effects of different levels of obesity on different allergic diseases [14].

Materials and methods

GWAS data acquisition

GWAS is a research method that searches for genetic factors associated with complex diseases by typing large-scale population DNA samples, which can comprehensively reveal the genes involved in the occurrence, development and treatment of diseases. Data for this study were obtained from the OpenGWAS database (https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/). Data from exposed subjects (obesity, childhood allergy (age < 16 years), allergic asthma, atopic dermatitis, obesity class 1, obesity class 2, obesity class 3) and outcome subjects (childhood allergy (age < 16 years), allergic asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, eczema, allergic urticaria, allergic purpura, allergic conjunctivitis, lactose intolerance, and obesity) were extracted for subsequent analysis with the help of TwoSampleMR package of R software (version 4.3. 0). The flow chart and the word cloud chart are shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

A: The flow chart. B: The word cloud chart

Data screening

IVs were screened for the following conditions: (1) correlation with exposed subjects (P < 1e-5) [15]; (2) exclusion of linkage disequilibrium (LD) (r2 > 0.001, kb = 10,000) [16]; (3) validation of the strength of association between IVs and exposed subjects (F > 10) [17]; (4) removal of confounding factors using the Phenoscanner database (http://www.phenoscanner.medschl.cam.ac.uk/) [18]. The above conditions will screen for more reliable IVs in this study and thus increase the reliability of the results of this study.

R software was used to merge the data of the exposed and outcome subjects and to match the effect alleles [19].

MR analysis

MR analysis includes 5 analysis methods, among which IVW and MR-Egger are the most important analysis methods in this study [20]. P < 0.05, indicating that exposed subjects affected the outcome subjects.

Sensitivity analysis

Heterogeneity between each IV was verified using a heterogeneity test. The difference between a fixed effects model and a random effects model is whether an individual variable that does not change over time is correlated with the predicted or independent variable. Fixed effects are more appropriate for examining differences between samples, while random effects are appropriate for inferring overall characteristics from samples. When P > 0.05, no heterogeneity was considered to exist, and a fixed-effects model was selected for MR analysis; when P < 0.05, heterogeneity was considered to exist, and a random-effects model was selected [21]. The sensitivity of the MR analysis results to individual IV was verified using leave-one-out sensitivity analysis [22].

The presence of horizontal pleiotropy among the multiple IVs was verified using multiple validity test. The biggest difference between the MR-Egger and IVW is whether or not the presence of an intercept term is considered in the regression analysis. The results of IVW analysis were used as the main results of MR analysis when P > 0.05 was considered as no horizontal pleiotropy, and the results of MR-Egger analysis were used as the main results of MR analysis when P < 0.05 was considered as horizontal pleiotropy [23].

Subgroup analysis

Obesity was divided into obesity class 1, obesity class 2 and obesity class 3 to perform subgroup analysis. On the one hand, the results of MR analysis were validated, and on the other hand, the causal relationship between different levels of obesity and allergic diseases was further explored.

Bioinformatic analysis

GSE151839 is a dataset related to obesity obtained from the GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gds/). GSE43696 is a dataset related to allergic asthma. Differential expression analysis was performed using the limma package to obtain DEGs (|log2(FC)|>1 and p.adj < 0.05), and the results were visualized using the ggplot2 package. The results of MR analysis were validated by verifying whether there were common DEGs between DEGs for obesity and DEGs for allergic asthma by means of a Venn diagram. The obtained DEGs were analyzed for Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment using the clusterProfiler package and GOplot package to understand the main functions and pathways involved in DEGs.

Results

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)

SNPs are DNA sequence polymorphisms caused by single nucleotide variants at the genomic level and account for more than 90% of known polymorphisms. The most recent and largest sample size of GWAS data was selected for all data in this study. The GWAS ID for obesity was finn-b-E4_OBESITY and contained 218, 735 samples, including 8, 908 in the experimental group and 209, 827 in the control group. This GWAS contained 16, 380, 465 SNPs, and 47 IVs were included after rigorous screening. The GWAS for childhood allergy (age < 16) contained 16, 380, 466 SNPs, and 27 IVs were finally screened. Allergic asthma and atopic dermatitis were screened with 37 IVs and 71 IVs, respectively.

The relevant studies of the outcome subjects were mainly published in 2014–2021, and the study population was from European (Table S1-S2).

MR analysis

Two-sample MR analysis showed a causal relationship between obesity and childhood allergy (age < 16) (P < 0.05), and obesity was a risk factor for childhood allergy (age < 16) (OR = 1.108, 95%CI: 1.003–1.223). In addition, there was also a causal relationship between obesity and allergic asthma (OR = 1.091, 95%CI: 1.010–1.179) and atopic dermatitis (OR = 1.097, 95%CI: 1.033–1.164) (P < 0.05), while there was no genetic causal relationship between obesity and allergic rhinitis, eczema, allergic urticaria, allergic purpura, allergic conjunctivitis, lactose intolerance and so on (P > 0.05) (Figs. 2 and 3). Finally, MR analysis was performed with childhood allergy (age < 16), allergic asthma, and atopic dermatitis as the exposed subjects and obesity as the outcome subject. The results showed that there was also a causal relationship between allergic asthma and obesity (P < 0.05), and that allergic asthma was also a risk factor for obesity (OR = 1.060, 95%CI: 1.004–1.119) (Fig. 4; Table 1).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Forest plot for MR analysis of obesity and different allergic diseases. A: childhood allergy (age < 16). B: allergic asthma. C: allergic rhinitis. D: atopie dermatit is. E: eczema. F: allergic urticaria. G: allergic purpura. H : allergic conjunctivitis. I: lactose intolerance. MR: mendel ian random ization

Fig. 3
figure 3

Scatter plot for MR analysis of obesity and different allergic diseases. A: childhood allergy (age < 16). B: allcrgic asthma. C: allcrgic rhinitis. 0: atopic dennatitis. E: eczema. f: allergic unicaria. G: allergic purpura. II: allergic conjunctivitis. I : lactose intolerance

Fig. 4
figure 4

Forest plot and scatter plot for MR analysis of childhood allergy, allergic asthma, atopic dermatitis and obesity. A-B: childhood allergy (age < 16) and obesity. C-D: allergic asthma and obesity. E-F: atopic dermatitis and obesity. MR: mendelian random ization

Table 1 Main results of MR analysis

Sensitivity analysis

The results of the heterogeneity test showed all P > 0.05. Therefore, it can be concluded that there was no heterogeneity among the IVs, and the fixed-effects model was finally selected to present the results of the MR analysis (Figure S1, S3). The multiplicity test also showed all P > 0.05. Therefore, it was concluded that there was no horizontal multiplicity among the IVs, and the results of the IVW analysis were selected as the main results of the MR analysis (Figure S2-S3, Table 2).

Table 2 Sensitivity Analysis

Subgroup Analysis

There were 41, 26 and 11 IVs for obesity class 1, obesity class 2 and obesity class 3, respectively (Table S1-S2). Subgroup analysis revealed a causal relationship between both class 1 (OR = 1.165, 95%CI: 1.034–1.313) and class 2 obesity (OR = 1.110, 95%CI: 1.003–1.229) and childhood allergy (age < 16) (P < 0.05). In addition, obesity was causally associated with allergic asthma in the milder class 1 obesity (OR = 1.097, 95%CI: 1.004–1.198) and with atopic dermatitis in the more severe class 3 obesity (OR = 1.064, 95%CI: 1.010–1.121) (Figs. 5 and 6; Table 1) (P < 0.05). The results of the subgroup analysis were also free of heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy (P > 0.05) (Figure S4-S5, Table 2).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Forest plots for MR analysis of different levels of obesity and different allergic diseases. A-C: obesity class I and childhood allergy (age < 16), allergic asthm a, atopic dennatitis. D-F: obesity class 2 and childhood allergy (age < 16), allergic asthma, atopic dermatitis. G-1: obesity class 3 and childhood allergy (age < 16), allergic asthma, atopic dermatitis

Fig. 6
figure 6

Scatter plots for MR analysis of different levels of obesity and different allergic diseases. A -C: obesity class I and childhood allergy (age < 16). allergic asthma. atopic dermatitis. D-F: obesity class 2 and childhood allergy (age < 16), allergic asthma. atopic dermatitis. G-1:obesity class 3 and childhood allergy (age < 16). allergic asthma, atopic dermatitis

Bioinformatic analysis

A total of 260 DEGs (|log2(FC)|>1 and p.adj < 0.05) were obtained after analysis of the obesity-related dataset GSE151839, of which 167 were highly expressed and 93 were underexpressed (Fig. 7A-B). A total of 111 DEGs (|log2(FC)|>1 and p.adj < 0.05) for asthma were obtained, of which 37 were highly expressed and 74 were underexpressed (Fig. 7C-D). The Venn diagram showed that there are indeed common DEGs between obesity and asthma, namely IL36RN, PHACTR3, SLAMF7, AKR1B10 and RNF182 (Fig. 7E). These results suggest that the inference that obesity may cause asthma or that asthma may cause obesity is equally supported from a genetic perspective. GO-KEGG enrichment analysis revealed that DEGs common to obesity and allergic asthma mainly have functions such as negative regulation of interleukin-17 production, interleukin-1 receptor binding, tertiary alcohol metabolic process, polyketide metabolic process and so on. In addition, these DEGs are involved in pathways such as folate biosynthesis, galactose metabolism, glycerolipid metabolism and so on (Fig. 7F-G).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Bioinfonnatic Analysis. A-B: Volcano map and heat map of obesity-associated DEGs. C-D: Volcano map and heat map of asthma-associated DEGs. E : Venn diagram of DEGs common to obesity and asthma. F-G: GO-KEGG enrichment analysis of DEGs. DEGs: differentially expressed genes; GO: Gene Ontology; KEGG : Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

Discussion

The causal relationship between different levels of obesity and different allergic diseases remains controversial. In this study, the causal relationship between different levels of obesity and different allergic diseases was studied by MR analysis, and bioinformatics analysis was used to verify the results of MR analysis. The traditional epidemiological methods, such as cohort studies, are subject to confounding factors and ethics and thus fail to obtain exact causal relationships. At the same time, the results of observational studies may be confounded by reverse causation, where the chronological sequence of the emergence of some of the exposures and outcomes is difficult to discern. Thus, on the one hand, the use of MR analysis compensated for the inability of traditional statistical methods to remove confounding factors, and on the other hand, the validation by bioinformatics analysis further increased the reliability of the results of this study.

Obesity and allergic asthma are risk factors for each other. The two-sample MR analysis in this study showed that obesity is a risk factor for childhood allergy (age < 16), allergic asthma and atopic dermatitis, while allergic asthma is also a risk factor for obesity (P < 0.05). There was no genetic causal relationship between obesity and allergic rhinitis, eczema, allergic urticaria, allergic purpura, allergic conjunctivitis, lactose intolerance and so on (P > 0.05). Previous studies have pointed out that obesity may contribute to the development of a range of chronic inflammatory conditions in children. The reason may be due to the fact that obesity can lead to dysregulation of the immune system in children by altering the activation status of immune cells [24]. Although obesity has been found to be a common manifestation of asthma in clinical practice, there has been an unending debate about whether obesity causes asthma or asthma causes obesity [25]. This study found that obesity is a risk factor for allergic asthma after better removal of confounding factors by MR analysis, while at the same time allergic asthma is also a risk factor for obesity. Unfortunately, there are still few high-quality studies on allergic asthma causing obesity [9]. Since allergic asthma is mainly associated with Th2 inflammation, some studies have found that obese children may have increased Th2 inflammation and eosinophilia, which This may be one of the associations between obesity and allergic asthma [2627]. Meta-analysis showed that obesity was positively correlated with allergic asthma and vitamin D deficiency in children, which was also consistent with the results of this study [28]. Atopic dermatitis as an inflammatory skin disease is closely related to the Th2 immune response and microbial homeostasis. Obesity, as a manifestation of metabolic disorder, is associated with gut microbes, which explains why obesity can be a risk factor for atopic dermatitis, consistent with the results of this study [2930].

Subgroup analyses and bioinformatics analyses similarly supported the association of obesity with allergic diseases, allergic asthma, and atopic dermatitis. Subgroup analysis revealed a causal relationship between both class 1 and class 2 obesity and childhood allergy (age < 16) (P < 0.05). In addition, there is a causal relationship between milder obesity and allergic asthma, while heavier obesity is causally related to atopic dermatitis (P < 0.05). The results of subgroup analysis to some extent explain why there are some contradictions in previous studies on obesity and allergic diseases [11]. On the one hand, the previous traditional epidemiological studies cannot eliminate confounding factors, but this study uses the method of MR analysis, the causal relationship is more reliable. On the other hand, previous studies have not grouped obese patients into groups to conduct a more in-depth subgroup analysis, so the results may be highly biased. Bioinformatics, a research method that has received considerable attention in recent years, was used for reverse validation of the results of this study. The Venn diagram shows that there were common DEGs between obesity and allergic asthma, which further confirms the results of MR analysis. IL36RN is mainly expressed in the esophagus and skin, and its encoded protein is a member of the IL-1 cytokine family, which plays an important role in the occurrence and development of asthma and psoriasis. At the same time, the IL-36 subfamily participates in the pathogenesis of asthma by secreting cytokines and chemokines for the recruitment and infiltration of T cells, neutrophils and eosinophils [3132]. PHACTR3 is mainly expressed in the brain and lung and is associated with the development of lung cancer [33]. AKR1B10 was found to be involved in signaling pathways in diabetes, obesity and atopic dermatitis, probably because AKR1B10 is closely associated with the conversion of glycans and lipids in the organism, and in addition is one of the triggers of cytokine storms [34,35,36]. SLAMF7 and RNF182 are related to immune response and protein ubiquitin, respectively. Studies have likewise found a strong association between SLAMF7 and neutropenic asthma and obesity [37, 38]. The study by Sharma V found that obesity may affect the expression of biomarkers of asthma, which in turn promotes asthma onset and progression, consistent with the results of the present study [39]. GO analysis showed that the main functions of the DEGs in common between obesity and allergic asthma were negative regulation of interleukin-17 production, interleukin-1 receptor binding, tertiary alcohol metabolic process, polyketide metabolic process and so on. In addition, these DEGs are involved in pathways such as folate biosynthesis, galactose metabolism, glycerolipid metabolism and so on, which again validated the results of MR analysis in this study.

There are certain strengths and weaknesses of this study. This study is the first to analyze the causal relationship between different levels of obesity and different allergic diseases by MR analysis with the help of GWAS data. We selected the most recent and largest sample size data for inclusion in the follow-up study to ensure the reliability and timeliness of the results. Meanwhile, the MR analysis process in this study was strictly quality controlled according to the 3 hypotheses and sensitivity analysis, thus reducing the influence of confounding factors on the results. The present study had some limitations. First, the samples included in this study were mainly from European, and there may be some geographical selection bias. Therefore, the findings of this study may not necessarily be applicable to Asian ethnic groups. In addition, this study mainly investigated the genetic causality between obesity and allergic diseases, while environment and lifestyle may also have some influence. Finally, to enable rigorous sensitivity analysis, P < 1e-5 was chosen as the association threshold for screening IVs in this study. Although the r2 and F values were strictly limited, the possibility of false-positive or false-negative results cannot be completely excluded. Considering these, further subgroup analyses in terms of race, age and so on can be attempted in subsequent studies, while high-quality RCT studies can be attempted to obtain more reliable conclusions when conditions permit.

In conclusion, the two-sample MR analysis in this study showed that obesity is a risk factor for childhood allergy (age < 16), allergic asthma and atopic dermatitis, while allergic asthma is also a risk factor for obesity. Class 1 and class 2 obesity are both causally associated with childhood allergy (age < 16). In addition, there is a causal relationship between milder obesity and allergic asthma, while heavier obesity is causally related to atopic dermatitis. Based on the above conclusions, on the one hand, we should strengthen the cooperation between multiple departments and increase the investment in research on the correlation between obesity and allergic diseases. On the other hand, we should strengthen the management of patients with obesity or allergic diseases at an early stage, implement dynamic monitoring and dynamic follow-up. In addition to managing and treating the original disease, it is important to prevent the disease before it occurs, and to prevent changes in the existing disease.

Data Availability

The data sets analyzed during the current study are available in the OpenGWAS database (https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/) (accession nos. finn-b-E4_OBESITY, finn-b-CHILDHOOD_ALLERGY, finn-b-ALLERG_ASTHMA, finn-b-L12_ATOPIC, ieu-a-90, ieu-a-91, ieu-a-92, finn-b-ALLERG_RHINITIS, ieu-a-996, finn-b-L12_URTICA_ALLERG, finn-b-D3_ALLERGPURPURA, finn-b-H7_ALLERGICCONJUNCTIVITIS and finn-b-E4_LACTOSEINT) and GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gds/) (accession nos. GSE151839 and GSE43696).

References

  1. Caballero B. Humans against Obesity: Who Will Win? [J]. Adv Nutr, 2019, suppl_1:S4-S9. https://doi.org/10.1093/advances/nmy055. PMID: 30721956; PMCID: PMC6363526.

  2. Cuda S, Censani M. Progress in pediatric obesity: new and advanced therapies. [J]. Curr Opin Pediatr, 1970, 4:407–413. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0000000000001150. PMID: 35797460.

  3. Neal K, Ullah S, Glastras SJ. Obesity class impacts adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes Independent of Diabetes. [J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;13:832678. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.832678. PMID: 35399939; PMCID: PMC8987983.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Piché ME, Tchernof A, Després JP. Obesity Phenotypes, Diabetes, and Cardiovascular Diseases. [J]. Circ Res,2020,11:1477–1500. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.316101. PMID: 32437302.

  5. Luo Y, Blackledge WC. Microbiome-based mechanisms hypothesized to initiate obesity-associated rheumatoid arthritis. [J]. Obes Rev, 2018, 6:786–797. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12671. PMID: 29426061.

  6. Huh JH, Kim KJ, Kim SU, et al. Obesity is an important determinant of severity in newly defined metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease. [J] Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2022;3:241–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbpd.2022.03.009. PMID: 35365418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dierick BJH, van der Molen T, Flokstra-de Blok BMJ, et al. Burden and socioeconomics of asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis and food allergy. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2020;5:437–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2020.1819793. PMID: 32902346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schuler Iv CF, Montejo JM. Allergic Rhinitis in Children and Adolescents. [J]. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am, 2021, 4:613–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iac.2021.07.010. PMID: 34602232.

  9. Boonpiyathad T, Sözener ZC, Satitsuksanoa P et al. Immunologic mechanisms in asthma. [J]. Semin Immunol, 2019, 46:101333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smim.2019.101333. PMID: 31703832.

  10. Tajima H, Pawankar R. Obesity and adiposity indicators in asthma and allergic rhinitis in children. [J]. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol, 2019, 1:7–11. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACI.0000000000000504. PMID: 30507714.

  11. Lang JE. Obesity and childhood asthma. [J]. Curr Opin Pulm Med, 2019, 1:34–43. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCP.0000000000000537. PMID: 30334826.

  12. Dooley AA, Pillai DK. Paediatric obesity-related asthma: Disease burden and effects on pulmonary physiology. [J]. Paediatr Respir Rev, 2021, 37:15–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prrv.2020.04.002. PMID: 32414555.

  13. Davey Smith G, Hemani G. Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies. [J]. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;R1:R89–98. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddu328. PMID: 25064373; PMCID: PMC4170722.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Birney E. Mendelian randomization. [J]. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2022;4:a041302. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a041302. PMID: 34872952; PMCID: PMC9121891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li P, Wang H, Guo L, et al. Association between gut microbiota and preeclampsia-eclampsia: a two-sample mendelian randomization study. [J]. BMC Med. 2022;1:443. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02657-x. PMID: 36380372; PMCID: PMC9667679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen Y, Shen J, Wu Y, et al. Tea consumption and risk of lower respiratory tract infections: a two-sample mendelian randomization study. [J]. Eur J Nutr. 2023;1:385–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-022-02994-w. PMID: 36042048; PMCID: PMC9427168.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Burgess S, Thompson SG, CRP CHD Genetics Collaboration. Avoiding bias from weak instruments in Mendelian randomization studies. [J]. Int J Epidemiol, 2011, 3:755 – 64. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyr036. PMID: 21414999.

  18. Kamat MA, Blackshaw JA, Young R, et al. [J] Bioinf. 2019;22:4851–3. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz469. PMID: 31233103; PMCID: PMC6853652. PhenoScanner V2: an expanded tool for searching human genotype-phenotype associations.

  19. Burgess S, Dudbridge F, Thompson SG. Combining information on multiple instrumental variables in mendelian randomization: comparison of allele score and summarized data methods. [J] Stat Med. 2016;11:1880–906. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6835. PMID: 26661904; PMCID: PMC4832315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Burgess S. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression. [J]. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;2:512–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyv080. PMID: 26050253; PMCID: PMC4469799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hemani G, Zheng J, Elsworth B, et al. The MR-Base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome. [J] Elife. 2018;7:e34408. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34408. PMID: 29846171; PMCID: PMC5976434.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee YH. Causal association between smoking behavior and the decreased risk of osteoarthritis: a Mendelian randomization. [J]. Z Rheumatol, 2019, 5:461–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00393-018-0505-7. PMID: 29974223.

  23. Yang M, Yu H, Xu K, et al. No evidence of a genetic causal relationship between ankylosing spondylitis and iron homeostasis: a two-sample mendelian randomization study. [J] Front Nutr. 2023;10:1047640. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2023.1047640. PMID: 37032771; PMCID: PMC10077893.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Fang X, Henao-Mejia J, Henrickson SE. Obesity and immune status in children. [J]. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2020;6:805–15. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0000000000000953. PMID: 33105275; PMCID: PMC8489265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Garcia-Rio F, Alvarez-Puebla MJ, Esteban-Gorgojo I et al. Obesity and Asthma: Key Clinical Questions. [J]. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol, 2019, 4:262–271. https://doi.org/10.18176/jiaci.0316. PMID: 30222113.

  26. Reyes-Angel J, Kaviany P, Rastogi D et al. Obesity-related asthma in children and adolescents. [J]. Lancet Child Adolesc Health, 2022, 10:713–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(22)00185-7. PMID: 35988550.

  27. Menegati LM, de Oliveira EE, Oliveira BC et al. Asthma, obesity, and microbiota: A complex immunological interaction. [J]. Immunol Lett, 2023, 255:10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imlet.2023.01.004. PMID: 36646290.

  28. Malden S, Gillespie J, Hughes A, et al. Obesity in young children and its relationship with diagnosis of asthma, vitamin D deficiency, iron deficiency, specific allergies and flat-footedness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. [J]. Obes Rev. 2021;3:e13129. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13129. PMID: 32808447; PMCID: PMC7611974.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bapat SP, Whitty C, Mowery CT, et al. Obesity alters pathology and treatment response in inflammatory disease. [J]. Nature. 2022;7905:337–42. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04536-0. PMID: 35355021; PMCID: PMC9165753.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Son MJ, Yang GJ, Jo EH, et al. Association of atopic dermatitis with obesity via a multi-omics approach: a protocol for a case-control study. [J] Med (Baltimore). 2019;29:e16527. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016527. PMID: 31335732; PMCID: PMC6708792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dong H, Hao Y, Li W, et al. IL-36 cytokines: their roles in Asthma and potential as a therapeutic. [J] Front Immunol. 2022;13:921275. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.921275. PMID: 35903102; PMCID: PMC9314646.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Catapano M, Vergnano M, Romano M, et al. IL-36 promotes systemic IFN-I responses in severe forms of Psoriasis. [J]. J Invest Dermatol. 2020;4:816–826e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2019.08.444. PMID: 31539532; PMCID: PMC7097848.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Bankovic J, Stojsic J, Jovanovic D et al. Identification of genes associated with non-small-cell lung cancer promotion and progression. [J]. Lung Cancer, 2010, 2:151-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2009.04.010. PMID: 19473719.

  34. Chabert C, Vitte AL, Iuso D et al. AKR1B10, One of the Triggers of Cytokine Storm in SARS-CoV2 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome. [J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2022, 3:1911. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23031911. PMID: 35163833; PMCID: PMC8836815.

  35. Ghosh D, Ding L, Sivaprasad U, et al. PLoS ONE. 2015;12:e0144316. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144316. PMID: 26717000; PMCID: PMC4696650. Multiple Transcriptome Data Analysis Reveals Biologically Relevant Atopic Dermatitis Signature Genes and Pathways. [J].

  36. Sárközy M, Szűcs G, Fekete V, et al. Transcriptomic alterations in the heart of non-obese type 2 diabetic Goto-Kakizaki rats. [J] Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016;1:110. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-016-0424-3. PMID: 27496100; PMCID: PMC4975916.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Fricker M, Qin L, Sánchez-Ovando S, et al. An altered sputum macrophage transcriptome contributes to the neutrophilic asthma endotype. [J] Allergy. 2022;4:1204–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.15087. Epub 2021 Sep 28. PMID: 34510493; PMCID: PMC9541696.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kluth O, Matzke D, Kamitz A, et al. Identification of four mouse diabetes candidate genes altering β-Cell proliferation. [J]. PLoS Genet. 2015;9:e1005506. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005506. PMID: 26348837; PMCID: PMC4562707.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Sharma V, Cowan DC, Obesity. Inflammation, and severe asthma: an update. [J]. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2021;12:46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-021-01024-9. PMID: 34921631; PMCID: PMC8684548.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable’ for that section.

Funding

This work was supported by Tianjin Key Medical Discipline (Specialty) Construction Project (TJYX2DXK-068 C) and Tianjin Medical University General Hospital Clinical Research Program (22ZYYLCCG03).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YL designed and conducted the whole research. XK revised and finalized the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xuan Kan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest in this work.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable’ for that section.

Consent for publication

Not applicable’ for that section.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Kan, X. Mendelian randomization analysis to analyze the genetic causality between different levels of obesity and different allergic diseases. BMC Pulm Med 23, 352 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-023-02636-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-023-02636-9

Keywords