Skip to main content
Download PDF

High-dose methylprednisolone pulse therapy during refractory COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective observational study

BMC Pulmonary Medicine volume 23, Article number: 368 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Current COVID-19 guidelines recommend the early use of systemic corticoids for COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). It remains unknown if high-dose methylprednisolone pulse therapy (MPT) ameliorates refractory COVID-19 ARDS after many days of mechanical ventilation or rapid deterioration with or without extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

Methods

This is a retrospective observational study. Consecutive patients with COVID-19 ARDS treated with a parenteral high-dose methylprednisolone pulse therapy at the intensive care units (ICU) of two University Hospitals between January 1st 2021 and November 30st 2022 were included. Clinical data collection was at ICU admission, start of MPT, 3-, 10- and 14-days post MPT.

Results

Thirty-seven patients (mean age 55 ± 12 years) were included in the study. MPT started at a mean of 17 ± 12 days after mechanical ventilation. Nineteen patients (54%) received ECMO support when commencing MPT. Mean paO2/FiO2 significantly improved 3- (p = 0.034) and 10 days (p = 0.0313) post MPT. The same applied to the necessary FiO2 10 days after MPT (p = 0.0240). There were no serious infectious complications. Twenty-four patients (65%) survived to ICU discharge, including 13 out of 20 (65%) needing ECMO support.

Conclusions

Late administration of high-dose MPT in a critical subset of refractory COVID-19 ARDS patients improved respiratory function and was associated with a higher-than-expected survival of 65%. These data suggest that high-dose MPT may be a viable salvage therapy in refractory COVID-19 ARDS.

Peer Review reports

Background

Moderate to severe COVID-19 induced acute respiratory syndrome (ARDS) is associated with high fatality [1, 2]. Standards of care include mechanical ventilation, prone positioning and in case of refractory hypoxemia extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) [3]. A mainstay of supportive COVID-19 ARDS therapy is the administration of dexamethasone as an anti-inflammatory agent, reducing overall mortality [4]. German [3] and international guidelines [5] recommend its use. However, dexamethasone may not be the only glucocorticoid helping to ameliorate the outcome of COVID-19. Early administration of a medium dose methylprednisolone pulse improved the outcome in non-intubated COVID-19 patients [6], although without additional benefits to dexamethasone [7].

It remains unknown if high-dose methylprednisolone pulse therapy (MPT) ameliorates refractory COVID-19 ARDS after many days of mechanical ventilation and if needed ECMO. Supraphysiological quantities of methylprednisolone could help to reduce proinflammatory mediators, cells migrating into the lung and stop diffuse alveolar damage. To this extent high-dose methylprednisolone pulses, mostly administered over the course of three days, are common in acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [8, 9] and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia [10]. Moreover, methylprednisolone has been associated with improved pulmonary compliance in non-COVID ARDS patients presenting with ECMO weaning failure [11]. However, evidence remains scarce and patient selection as well as toxicity, in particular infectious complications, may be of concern.

The current study aimed to assess the effects of salvage MPT on pulmonary function and outcome of COVID-19 ARDS.

Methods

Study design and patient population

This is a retrospective observational study. Consecutive patients with COVID-19 ARDS receiving a parenteral high-dose methylprednisolone pulse therapy (1000 mg/d) over the course of three days during their ICU stay were included in the study. Patients received MPT in case of refractory COVID-19, if two intensivists considered it to be indicated. All patients were treated at the University Hospital Würzburg or the Saarland University hospital between January 1st 2021 and November 30st 2022.

Data collection and variable definition

Routine clinical data were collected at time of ICU admission, start of MPT, 3-, 10- and 14-days post MPT, as well as survival to ICU discharge using patient data management systems (University Hospital Würzburg: COPRA6 RM1.0, COPRA System GmbH, Berlin, Germany) or assessed via handwritten records (Saarland University Hospital). The data were retrieved according to the diagnostic standards of the individual center. Severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) subtypes were not routinely determined. Mechanical power (MP) was calculated as follows: MP = 0.098.RR.Vt'.[PEEP + ΔΔinsp] [12]. The term refractory COVID-19 relates to refractory hypoxemia in COVID-19 ARDS, defined as persistent or worsening hypoxemia unresponsive to lung protective ventilation. All patients included in the study had a piO2/FiO2≤150, FiO2≥50% and/or concomitant ECMO support. Since treatment and data acquisition were conducted according to the standard procedures of the respective hospital, diagnostics and reported parameters varied to some degree between the centers. Hence, if applicable the nominators and denominators are reported for each parameter separately, since not all parameters could be retrieved in the whole cohort of patients. All participating hospitals reported their data via a unified sheet (Microsoft® Excel 2019, Version 16.41, Microsoft® Corporation, Redmond, WA).

Statistical analysis

Pooled individual data reported as mean ± SD for continuous variables and n-numbers as well as frequencies for categorical variables. A mixed-effects model for repeated measures with post-hoc Tukey testing analysed differences of the overall study population. Mixed-effects analysis for multiple comparisons with post-hoc Šídák’s multiple comparisons test tested differences between groups. Prism 9.1.1 for macOS performed the data analysis. Statistical significance was determined at an α level of 0.05.

Results

Patient characteristics

Table 1 shows the characteristics of the 37 patients included in the retrospective analysis. Mean age at ICU admission was 55 ± 12 years; mean body mass index was 29 ± 5 kg/m2. MPT started 16 ± 12 days after ICU admission and 17 ± 12 days after starting mechanical ventilation. Seven patients received MPT < 10 days after ICU admission due to rapid deterioration. ECMO support was required in 21 patients with a mean duration of 40 ± 30 days. MPT commenced 11 ± 9 days after the initiation of ECMO. Seventeen patients had prone positioning. MPT was the only corticoid regime in 9 patients, whereas 15 patients received two different regimens and 13 patients had three or more different corticoids. In 21 patients, dexamethasone (in a dose of 6 mg once daily for up to 10 days [13] and MPT were the only two-corticoids. None of the patients had glucocorticoids as a long-term medication within the past six months. Four patients received tocilizumab (19, 16, 5 and 37 days prior to MPT, respectively). One patient received casirivimab and imdevimab in addition to tocilizumab.

Table 1 Patient Characteristics, ICU Treatment and Outcome
Full size table

Respiratory function and mechanical ventilation

Mean paO2/FiO2 was 110 ± 54 at ICU admission and 116 ± 44 at the start of MPT. Nineteen patients (54%) received ECMO support when commencing MPT. Mean paO2/FiO2 significantly improved 3- (p = 0.034) and 10 days (p = 0.0313) post MPT. The same applied to the FiO2, which was significantly lower 10 days after MPT (p = 0.024). Mean tidal volume, driving pressure and mechanical power did not change. Serum C-reactive protein was significantly lower 3 days post MPT compared to ICU-admission (p = 0.0071) as well as to the start of MPT (p = 0.0056). ECMO support stopped in four patients (20%) within 10 days after MPT. When comparing survivors to non-survivors mean paO2/FiO2 only improved in survivors (164 ± 69) 3 days post MPT, but not in non-survivors (115 ± 34) (p = 0.0569). FiO2 was 57 ± 23% in survivors and 76 ± 19% in non-survivors 3 days post MPT. Table 2 shows the characteristics of mechanical ventilation and respiratory mechanics of all patients receiving MPT. Severity of ARDS or FiO2 did not differ between survivors and non-survivors at ICU admission or start of MPT (Table S1). Characteristics of mechanical ventilation and respiratory mechanics in patients on ECMO support are shown in Table S2.

Table 2 Respiratory Function
Full size table

Outcome

Mean duration of ICU treatment was 42 ± 34 days. Mean duration of mechanical ventilation was 40 ± 31 days. Twelve patients had infectious complications, none of which resulted in septic shock. There were no other serious complications related to MPT, such as electrolyte disorders. Twenty-four patients (65%) survived to ICU discharge, including 13 out of 20 patients (65%) needing ECMO support.

Discussion

MPT was a salvage therapy due to COVID-19 ARDS unresponsive to standard therapy or concomitant ECMO. Our study cohort received prolonged ICU care with a mean stay of more than 40 days. Prolonged ICU care is often defined as > 21 days [14] and associated with increased mortality with each day beyond seven days [15]. On average MPT started after more than two weeks of mechanical ventilation and if applicable eleven days of ECMO support. Although mean FiO2 and paO2/FiO2 ratio were unchanged between ICU admission and start of MPT, native pulmonary function deteriorated as in the meantime half of the patients required ECMO support. As such, our study cohort represents a critical subset of COVID-19 ARDS patients with an expected survival in the range of 31.4% found in the German COVID-19 ECMO population [2]. Actual survival was much higher with 65% in both ECMO and non-ECMO patients. This is in accordance with a previously published cohort without prolonged ICU care [16] and is in range of a retrospective German reimbursement data analysis [17].

Prior studies investigating methylprednisolone in non-COVID-19 ARDS found varying results. Low dose prolonged infusions for up to 14–28 days starting in early ARDS had favorable effects on pulmonary function and duration of mechanical ventilation [18]. On the contrary, the administration of low dose methylprednisolone more than two weeks after the onset of on average moderate ARDS increased the risk of death [19]. Prior data on MPT in COVID-19 ARDS patients are limited and investigated a lower severity of illness. A recent observational retrospective study found an improved 28-day mortality in mechanically ventilated patients after high-dose MPT without significant increase in steroid-associated complications [20]. A lower dose MPT in severe COVID-19 requiring ICU treatment but not mechanical ventilation led to a significantly lower mortality [6]. In moderate COVID-19 MPT (250–500 mg/d for 3 days followed by oral prednisone for 14 days) lowered the need for ICU treatment and mortality [21]. A nationwide clinical cohort study in Japan showed that high-dose MPT was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality in patients receiving mechanical ventilation but increased the risk in patients not receiving mechanical ventilation. Moreover, benefits of pulse therapy were higher than intermediate doses [22].

We observed positive effects of short-term high-dose MPT onto respiratory function after more than two weeks of mechanical ventilation. PaO2/FiO2 ratio significantly improved 3 days after the completion of MPT. The required FiO2 was also lower with significant effects 10 days post MPT. When comparing survivors to non-survivors it was apparent that non-survivors had no improvement in paO2/FiO2 ratio or FiO2. ECMO weaning was not possible, whereas 25% of survivors needing ECMO completed weaning within 10 days and 50% within 14 days. Only 25% of survivors had ECMO 14 days post MPT compared to 75% of non-survivors. These data suggest that non-survivors may concomitantly be MPT non-responders. Side effects of high dose of methylprednisolone such as infectious complications and electrolyte disorders could be of concern, however, supraphysiological quantities of methylprednisolone are supposed to enhance therapeutic effects, while reducing toxicity. We did not observe severe complications. There were no septic complications or electrolyte disorders associated with MPT. Although an unspecific marker, serum C-reactive protein decreased, likely reflecting the immunosuppressive effects.

Our study has several limitations. It is only a small retrospective observational study. We cannot prove a survival benefit from MPT. The study cannot delineate MPT responders from non-responders. Our data do not allow the delineation of the underlying mechanisms or differences in SARS-CoV-2 subtypes. Sustained (hyper-)inflammatory injury due to dysregulation of many components of the innate immune system may be the responsible, followed by development of pulmonary fibrosis [23, 24]. Due to the uncontrolled design, use of any additional corticoid was at the discretion of the respective intensivists and the majority received dexamethasone as an additional glucocorticoid, in line with current German treatment guidelines [3]. We did not include a propensity score matched control group, as a sufficient number of matching patients with a similar protracted course was not available in our hospitals. Moreover, time points for the analysis of changes in respiratory function or laboratory parameters would not be available in propensity-matched controls, as data comparisons followed the start and course of MPT. These limitations reduce the validity of the results and additional evidence from randomized studies could control these biases.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that short-term high-dose MPT can be a viable therapeutic option in refractory COVID-19 ARDS with persistent hypoxemia after prolonged mechanical ventilation and failure of ECMO weaning.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ARDS:

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

COVID-19:

Coronavirus disease 2019

ECMO:

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

ICU:

Intensive Care Unit

MPT:

Methylprednisolone Pulse Therapy

FiO2 :

Fraction of inspired oxygen

paO2 :

Arterial partial pressure of oxygen

References

  1. Gunster C, Busse R, Spoden M, Rombey T, Schillinger G, Hoffmann W, et al. 6-month mortality and readmissions of hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a nationwide cohort study of 8,679 patients in Germany. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(8):e0255427.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Herrmann J, Lotz C, Karagiannidis C, Weber-Carstens S, Kluge S, Putensen C, et al. Key characteristics impacting survival of COVID-19 extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit Care. 2022;26(1):190.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Malin JJ, Spinner CD, Janssens U, Welte T, Weber-Carstens S, Schalte G, et al. Key summary of german national treatment guidance for hospitalized COVID-19 patients: key pharmacologic recommendations from a national german living guideline using an evidence to decision Framework (last updated 17.05.2021). Infection. 2022;50(1):93–106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Villar J, Ferrando C, Martinez D, Ambros A, Munoz T, Soler JA, et al. Dexamethasone treatment for the acute respiratory distress syndrome: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(3):267–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhimraj A, Morgan RL, Shumaker AH, Baden L, Cheng VCC, Edwards KM et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the treatment and management of patients with COVID-19. Clin Infect Dis. 2022.

  6. Edalatifard M, Akhtari M, Salehi M, Naderi Z, Jamshidi A, Mostafaei S et al. Intravenous methylprednisolone pulse as a treatment for hospitalised severe COVID-19 patients: results from a randomised controlled clinical trial. Eur Respir J. 2020;56(6).

  7. Salvarani C, Massari M, Costantini M, Merlo DF, Mariani GL, Viale P et al. Intravenous methylprednisolone pulses in hospitalised patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Eur Respir J. 2022;60(4).

  8. Collard HR, Ryerson CJ, Corte TJ, Jenkins G, Kondoh Y, Lederer DJ, et al. Acute Exacerbation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. An International Working Group Report. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;194(3):265–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Raghu G, Collard HR, Egan JJ, Martinez FJ, Behr J, Brown KK, et al. An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT statement: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183(6):788–824.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kondoh Y, Taniguchi H, Yokoi T, Nishiyama O, Ohishi T, Kato T, et al. Cyclophosphamide and low-dose prednisolone in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and fibrosing nonspecific interstitial pneumonia. Eur Respir J. 2005;25(3):528–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tabatabai A, Menaker J, Stene E, Kufera JA, Rabinowitz RP, Kon Z, et al. Methylprednisolone may be associated with improved lung compliance in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Perfusion. 2020;35(6):515–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chiumello D, Gotti M, Guanziroli M, Formenti P, Umbrello M, Pasticci I, et al. Bedside calculation of mechanical power during volume- and pressure-controlled mechanical ventilation. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):417.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Group RC, Horby P, Lim WS, Emberson JR, Mafham M, Bell JL, et al. Dexamethasone in hospitalized patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(8):693–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Martin CM, Hill AD, Burns K, Chen LM. Characteristics and outcomes for critically ill patients with prolonged intensive care unit stays. Crit Care Med. 2005;33(9):1922–7. quiz 36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moitra VK, Guerra C, Linde-Zwirble WT, Wunsch H. Relationship between ICU length of Stay and Long-Term Mortality for Elderly ICU survivors. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(4):655–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Herrmann J, Adam EH, Notz Q, Helmer P, Sonntagbauer M, Ungemach-Papenberg P, et al. COVID-19 Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome-A Multicenter Observational Study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020;7:599533.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kloka JA, Blum LV, Old O, Zacharowski K, Friedrichson B. Characteristics and mortality of 561,379 hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Germany until December 2021 based on real-life data. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):11116.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Meduri GU, Golden E, Freire AX, Taylor E, Zaman M, Carson SJ, et al. Methylprednisolone infusion in early severe ARDS: results of a randomized controlled trial. Chest. 2007;131(4):954–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Steinberg KP, Hudson LD, Goodman RB, Hough CL, Lanken PN, Hyzy R, et al. Efficacy and safety of corticosteroids for persistent acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(16):1671–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Okano H, Furuya R, Niida S, Minami S, Horiuchi H, Suzuki N, et al. Methylprednisolone pulse therapy for critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019: a single-center retrospective observational study. Acute Med Surg. 2022;9(1):e782.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Pinzon MA, Ortiz S, Holguin H, Betancur JF, Cardona Arango D, Laniado H, et al. Dexamethasone vs methylprednisolone high dose for Covid-19 pneumonia. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(5):e0252057.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Moromizato T, Sakaniwa R, Tokuda Y, Taniguchi K, Shibuya K. Intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy and the risk of in-hospital mortality among acute COVID-19 patients: Nationwide clinical cohort study. Crit Care. 2023;27(1):53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Gustine JN, Jones D. Immunopathology of Hyperinflammation in COVID-19. Am J Pathol. 2021;191(1):4–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Merad M, Martin JC. Pathological inflammation in patients with COVID-19: a key role for monocytes and macrophages. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020;20(6):355–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

None.

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Philipp M. Lepper and Christopher Lotz contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Internal Medicine V, Saarland University Hospital, Kirrbergerstr. 100, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Germany

    Carsten Zeiner, Selina Metzner & Philipp M. Lepper

  2. Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberduerrbacherstr. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany

    Malte Schröder, Johannes Herrmann, Quirin Notz, Sebastian Hottenrott, Daniel Röder, Patrick Meybohm & Christopher Lotz

Authors
  1. Carsten Zeiner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Malte Schröder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Selina Metzner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Johannes Herrmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Quirin Notz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sebastian Hottenrott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Daniel Röder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Patrick Meybohm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Philipp M. Lepper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Christopher Lotz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CZ contributed to the conception of the study, data acquisition, analysis and data interpretation, as well as revising the manuscript MS contributed to data acquisition and data interpretation SM contributed to data analysis and interpretation JH contributed to data analysis and interpretation QN contributed to data acquisition and data interpretation SH contributed to the conception of the study DR contributed to the conception of the study PM revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content PL contributed to the conception of the study, data interpretation, as well as revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content CL contributed to the conception of the study, data acquisition, analysis and data interpretation, as well as drafted the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Lotz.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the Julius-Maximilians-University of Wuerzburg (20220620 01) and the Saarland Medical Council (333/21) approved the study. Due to the nature of this retrospective study and the preserved anonymity of patients, a waiver of informed consent was obtained from ethics committee of Julius-Maximilians-University of Wuerzburg and the Saarland Medical Council. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zeiner, C., Schröder, M., Metzner, S. et al. High-dose methylprednisolone pulse therapy during refractory COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective observational study. BMC Pulm Med 23, 368 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-023-02664-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-023-02664-5

Keywords

BMC Pulmonary Medicine

ISSN: 1471-2466

Contact us