Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Genetic influences on right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

  • Janet G Shaw1, 3Email author,
  • Annette G Dent1, 3,
  • Linda H Passmore1,
  • Darryl J Burstow2,
  • Rayleen V Bowman1, 3,
  • Paul V Zimmerman1, 3,
  • Kwun M Fong1, 3 and
  • Ian A Yang1, 3
BMC Pulmonary Medicine201212:25

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-12-25

Received: 4 November 2011

Accepted: 28 May 2012

Published: 13 June 2012

Abstract

Background

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a complication of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study examined genetic variations in mediators of vascular remodelling and their association with PH in patients with COPD. In patients with COPD, we genotyped 7 SNPs in 6 candidate PH genes (NOS3, ACE, EDN1, PTGIS, SLC6A4, VEGFA). We tested for association with right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP), spirometry and gas transfer, and hypoxemia.

Methods

In patients with COPD, we genotyped 7 SNPs in 6 candidate PH genes (NOS3, ACE, EDN1, PTGIS, SLC6A4, VEGFA). We tested for association with right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP), spirometry and gas transfer, and hypoxemia.

Results

580 COPD patients were recruited, 341 patients had a transthoracic echocardiogram, with RVSP measurable in 278 patients (mean age 69 years, mean FEV1 50% predicted, mean RVSP 44 mmHg, median history of 50 pack-years). Of the 7 tested SNPs, the NOS3-VNTR polymorphism was significantly associated with RVSP in a dose-dependent fashion for the risk allele: mean RVSP for a/a and a/b genotypes were 52.0 and 46.6 mmHg respectively, compared to 43.2 mmHg for b/b genotypes (P = 0.032). No associations were found between RVSP and other polymorphisms. ACE II or ID genotypes were associated with a lower FEV1% predicted than the ACE DD genotype (P = 0.028). The NOS3-298 TT genotype was associated with lower KCO % predicted than the NOS3-298 GG or GT genotype (P = 0.031).

Conclusions

The NOS3-VNTR polymorphism was associated with RVSP in patients with COPD, supporting its involvement in the pathogenesis of PH in COPD. ACE and NOS3 genotypes were associated with COPD disease severity, but not with the presence of PH. Further study of these genes could lead to the development of prognostic and screening tools for PH in COPD.

Keywords

COPD Pulmonary hypertension Genetic polymorphism

Background

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a serious complication of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and develops in 30% to 70% of patients with COPD, increasing their morbidity and mortality [1]. PH is progressive in COPD, with mean pulmonary arterial pressure increasing over time [2, 3]. Understanding variations in susceptibility to PH in patients with COPD could significantly enhance diagnosis, risk stratification and therapy for these patients.

Vascular remodelling is the main pathological feature in PH and is mediated via vasoactive molecules [4]. Genes encoding these mediators contain genetic polymorphisms that potentially affect their function and could influence PH in COPD [518]. Polymorphisms exist in vasodilator (nitric oxide synthase (NOS3) [8, 13], prostacyclin synthase (PTGIS) [19]) and vasoconstrictor (angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) [17], endothelin-1 (ET1), serotonin transporter (SLC6A4)[14]) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGFA) [20] genes.

We hypothesised that genetic variation in genes encoding mediators acting on pulmonary vessels alters right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) in patients with COPD, even after adjustment for clinical factors associated with elevated RVSP. Additionally, we hypothesised that these polymorphisms are associated with COPD disease severity. We selected variants previously associated with vascular disease, in vasoactive mediators of biological importance in pulmonary hypertension.

Methods

Participants

Patients with a thoracic physician’s diagnosis of COPD, based on chronic airflow limitation not fully reversible with bronchodilator [21], reduced gas transfer (KCO) and/or emphysema on CT scan, were recruited from thoracic clinics and wards of The Prince Charles Hospital (TPCH). Patients with other major respiratory diseases, including interstitial lung disease, lung cancer, pneumonia, cystic fibrosis, bronchiectasis, pleural effusion and lung surgery, were excluded. All participants gave written informed consent. This study was approved by the research ethics committees of TPCH (EC9865 and EC2108) and The University of Queensland (H372).

Clinical phenotyping

Participants completed a clinical questionnaire about their lung disease, symptoms, smoking history and ethnicity. One pack-year of smoking was defined as the equivalent of 20 cigarettes smoked per day for one year. Chronic bronchitis was defined as a cough with sputum production for at least 3 months in each of two consecutive years [21].

Lung function tests

Participants had lung function tests at recruitment, during their routine care at the hospital, whilst clinically stable. Lung function testing consisted of spirometry and single breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO) and performed according to American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Taskforce (ATS/ERS) standards [2224]. Measurements were compared to predicted values [25, 26]. The lung function parameters FEV1, slow vital capacity (VC), FEV1/VC ratio and KCO were used to characterise COPD.

Echocardiography

A subgroup of patients had a transthoracic echocardiogram performed as a routine part of their clinical care, using standard techniques [27]. RVSP was calculated using the simplified Bernoulli equation. The pressure difference between the right ventricle and right atrium during systole is reflected by the velocity of the tricuspid regurgitation (TR) signal. RVSP can be estimated from right atrial pressure using the equation RVSP = 4(VTR)2 + RAP, where VTR is peak TR velocity (m/s) and RAP is mean right atrial pressure (mmHg). The mean RAP is estimated using inferior vena cava (IVC) size and reactivity as per American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) recommendations [28].

Arterial blood gases

Arterial blood gas (ABG) results were obtained from the patients’ medical records. Arterial blood was drawn from the radial artery while the patients breathed room air.

Genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood using a modified salt extraction method [29]. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to genotype two polymorphisms, PCR with restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) was used for three polymorphisms, and single base pair extension was used for one polymorphism (see Additional file 1: Table S1). PCR reactions were performed in a final volume of 20 μl containing 10 ng genomic DNA, 0.2 mM of dNTPs, and 0.25 μM of each of the forward and reverse primers. For five polymorphisms, 0.5 U REDTaq DNA polymerase (Sigma, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA) and 10x REDTaq PCR reaction buffer were used. For the SLC6A4 polymorphism, 1.5 U HotStarTaq DNA polymerase (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) and 10x HotStar PCR reaction buffer were used, together with 5x Q-Solution. The PCR amplification was performed in a thermal cycler. Genotypes were determined by agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR products. Ethidium bromide was added to each gel at 1 μg/ml final concentration. The stained bands were visualised by the Molecular Imager FX (Bio-Rad, Hercules, California, USA). To ensure reproducibility, 10% of the samples were chosen randomly and repeated for each polymorphism; these genotypes were confirmed by this repeated testing.

The EDN1 gene polymorphism was genotyped by single base extension with alleles identified by direct mass measurement of the analyte using the SEQUENOMTM MassARRAY® system (MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry) at the Australian Genome Research Facility.

Statistical methods

SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) for Windows Version 17.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago Illinois, USA) was used. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was calculated using the χ2 test to compare expected vs observed genotype frequencies. Associations of genotypes with RVSP or lung function were performed using ANOVA for additive genotype models (AA vs AB vs BB), and t-tests for dominant (AA vs AB + BB) and recessive (AA + AB vs BB) genotype models. Adjustment for clinical confounders was performed using multiple linear regression, in which genotypes and clinical covariates (age, gender, BMI, PaO2, FEV1% predicted, KCO % predicted) were independent variables, and RVSP was the dependent variable. Analyses were done for all available participants, and also with the subgroup of COPD patients with FEV1/VC < 0.7. In all analyses, a two-tailed P value of <0.05 was considered significant.

For the t-test analyses of RVSP using dominant or recessive models, power calculations indicated that a total of 190 participants with RVSP measurements were required to detect a difference of 15% in mean RVSP in the cohort, with 80% power (based on mean RVSP of 44 mmHg, SD 13 mmHg, P value of 0.05, and ratio of genotype groups of at least 1:2, which was the case for all variants studied, except the NOS3 VNTR which had a lower ratio) (PS Power calculation program [30]). Power varied according to allele frequency and type of genetic analysis.

Results

Participant characteristics

580 patients with COPD were studied (Table 1); most were Caucasian males (only two of Asian ethnicity), with a mean age of 68 years. Chronic bronchitis was present in 35% of patients. All were current or former smokers, with the exception of six never smokers who nevertheless satisfied criteria for COPD. 514 patients (89%) had moderate to severe airflow limitation (FEV1% predicted < 80%), with mean FEV1 50% predicted. Gas transfer (KCO) was measured in 97% (561/580) of patients, and was below the lower limit of normal (75% predicted) in 78% (437/561). Mean gas transfer (KCO % predicted) was 58%. ABG results were obtained for 271 patients who also had a measureable RVSP, 81% of the patients had an ABG within 12 months of their echocardiogram.
Table 1

Demographic characteristics of participants

Characteristics

All COPD patients

Subgroup with RVSP results

Subgroup without measureable RVSP

Pvalue

Males/Females

364/216

167/111

42/21

 

%Males/%Females

63/37

60/40

67/33

 

Mean (SD) age at recruitment (yr)

68.1 (9.3)

69.3 (9.0)

67.3 (9.8)

0.11

Range

35.1–87.0

38.3-87.0

35.1-81.2

 

Median smoking history (pack years)

50

50

47

0.93

(IQR)

(33.8-69.0)

(31.5-69.0)

(34.0-68.8)

 

Range

0.0-186.0

0.0-186.0

8.5-172.5

 

Chronic bronchitis present (% of total)

201 (35%)

99 (36%)

26 (41%)

0.33

Mean (SD) FEV1 (L)

1.2 (0.63)

1.20 (0.55)

1.13 (0.50)

0.40

Range

0.2-4.7

0.2-3.9

0.34-3.09

 

Mean (SD) FEV1% predicted

50 (21.8)

50 (20.8)

44.5 (18.1)

0.062

Range

7-129

7-129

11.4-89.3

 

Mean (SD) VC (L)

2.8 (0.92)

2.7 (0.83)

2.81 (0.87)

0.28

Range

0.9-6.4

0.9-5.6

1.15-4.88

 

Mean (SD) VC (L) % predicted

77.3 (17.8)

76.0 (17.4)

75.5 (16.6)

0.88

Range

28.5-132.3

28.8-132.3

36.3-111.0

 

Mean (SD) FEV1/VC ratio %

45 (15)

45 (14)

40.9 (13.5)

0.026

Range

7-80

7-80

17.5-67.9

 

Mean (SD) KCO (ml/min/mmHg/L)

2.5 (0.96)

2.4 (0.97)

2.56 (0.97)

0.36

Range

0.44-6.6

0.44-6.6

0.49-4.7

 

Mean (SD) KCO % predicted

58 (22.5)

58 (23.4)

59.8 (22.4)

0.60

Range

9.8-134.5

12.6-134.5

9.8-109.8

 

Mean (SD) RVSP (mmHg)

44.2 (12.7)

44.2 (12.7)

Unable to

 

Range

16.0-94.0

16.0-94.0

measure

 

Mean (SD) PaO2 (mmHg)

70.5 (11.6)

69.4 (11.8)

71.7 (11.5)

0.23

Range

35.0-99.0

35.0-99.0

53.0-95.0

 

Mean (SD) PaCO2 (mmHg)

41.3 (7.7)

41.6 (8.1)

40.8 (7.7)

0.49

Range

26.0-76.0

27.0-76.0

26.0-62.0

 

Mean (SD) BMI (kg/m2)

25.0 (5.5)

24.9 (5.3)

26.0 (5.5)

0.14

Range

13.0-46.1

13.5-44.0

15.9-46.1

 

Echocardiography

Echocardiography was performed in 341 of the 580 (59%) patients. RVSP was measurable in 278 of the 341 patients who had an echocardiogram (82% of total 341). The demographic characteristics of patients who had echocardiography did not differ significantly from those of patients with no echocardiography. Echocardiography was performed but no RVSP measurement was possible in 63 patients either because there was no tricuspid regurgitation or the echocardiogram was technically difficult and echo signals could not be obtained. Demographic and disease characteristics were similar between patients with and without measurable RVSP, except for a lower FEV1/VC ratio in those without measurable RVSP. Both these subgroups had similar characteristics to the whole cohort (Table 1). RVSP measurements ranged from 16 to 94 mmHg, 115 patients were within the normal range chosen for this study (15-39 mmHg) and 163 patients (59%) had RVSP ≥ 40 mmHg [31].

Data on the left ventricular ejection fraction (EF), mitral valve and aortic valve were collected for each patient. 13 patients had missing EF measurements and 6 patients had missing information on both mitral and aortic valves. A normal EF (>50%) was recorded for 275 (80% of 328) of the patients (range 11% - 82%, mean (SD) 59% (12.2)). 60% (205 of 335) of the patients had a normal mitral valve, with 123 (36%) having some degree of mitral regurgitation (of whom 38 had moderate to severe mitral regurgitation), 5 (1.5%) having mitral stenosis (of whom 3 had moderate to severe mitral stenosis) and 2 (0.6%) having both. A normal aortic valve was found in 48% (165 of 335) of the patients, 103 (30%) had aortic valve sclerosis, 54 (16%) had aortic regurgitation (of whom 14 had moderate to severe aortic regurgitation) and 13 (3.8%) had aortic stenosis (of whom 7 had moderate to severe aortic stenosis).

Genotypes

98.6% to 100% of all the patients were successfully genotyped by the PCR or PCR-RFLP methods, and the EDN1 polymorphism had a 95.7% success rate using the single base extension method. The distribution of the genotypes for 6 of the 7 polymorphisms were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE), with the exception being NOS3-Glu298Asp SNP which deviated from HWE (P = 0.02).

Association of genotypes with RVSP measurements

One-way ANOVA was used to test the relationship between genotype and RVSP (Table 2). There was a significant association between RVSP and NOS3-VNTR SNP genotypes (P = 0.032), with highest mean RVSP in patients with 4aa genotype of the VNTR. There were no statistically significant associations with RVSP for SNP genotypes of other genes tested (VEGFA, ACE, SLC6A4, PTGIS, NOS3-298 and EDN1). The distribution of genotypes in the subgroup of COPD patients with a RVSP measurement were in agreement with the HWE predicted frequencies except for EDN1 (P = 0.04).
Table 2

Association of genotypes with RVSP measurements in COPD patients with an RVSP measurement, using ANOVA

Gene

Genotypes

Number

Mean RVSP (mmHg)

Standard

Deviation

Pvalue

VEGFA

GG

123

42.8

12.0

0.24

 

GC

117

45.2

13.6

 
 

CC

38

46.0

12.1

 
  

Total 278

44.2

12.7

 

NOS3-VNTR

4bb

199

43.2

11.8

0.032

 

4ab

70

46.6

13.8

 
 

4aa

8

52.0

20.2

 
  

Total 277

44.3

12.7

 

ACE

II

69

45.6

14.2

0.61

 

ID

139

44.0

12.5

 
 

DD

69

43.6

11.6

 
  

Total 277

44.3

12.7

 

SLC6A4

LL

90

42.7

12.6

0.43

 

LS

131

44.8

13.2

 
 

SS

53

45.1

11.3

 
  

Total 274

44.2

12.6

 

PTGIS

CC

172

43.9

12.2

0.83

 

CA

90

45.0

13.6

 
 

AA

15

44.3

13.8

 
  

Total 277

44.3

12.7

 

NOS3-298

GG

120

44.4

12.6

0.83

 

GT

135

43.9

12.4

 
 

TT

22

45.6

15.7

 
  

Total 277

44.3

12.7

 

EDN1

GG

159

43.5

12.8

0.15

 

GT

83

46.0

12.8

 
 

TT

24

40.7

9.3

 
  

Total 266

44.0

12.6

 

Some samples could not be genotyped, making the totals less than 278.

When considering only those COPD patients with FEV1/VC < 0.7 (n = 263), the NOS3-VNTR SNP genotype association remained statistically significant in a t-test analysis (4bb, mean (SD) 43.5 mmHg (11.8), n = 186 vs 4ab/4aa, mean (SD) 47.1 mmHg (14.6) n = 77, P = 0.034).

Association of clinical factors with RVSP measurements

Clinical factors potentially confounding the association of genotypes with RVSP include arterial PaO2, FEV1% predicted, KCO % predicted and FEV1/VC ratio, all of which showed weak inverse correlations with RVSP (Table 3).
Table 3

Correlation of clinical factors with RVSP in COPD patients with an RVSP measurement

Clinical Factor

Number

Correlation (r)

Pvalue

PaO2 vs RVSP

222

−0.245

0.00023

PaCO2 vs RVSP

222

0.041

0.55

FEV1% predicted vs RVSP

278

−0.118

0.050

KCO percent predicted vs RVSP

268

−0.258

0.000019

Age at recruitment vs RVSP

278

0.117

0.050

Smoking history: pack years vs RVSP

278

−0.042

0.48

FEV1/VC ratio vs RVSP

278

−0.133

0.027

BMI vs RVSP

278

−0.115

0.055

Association of genotypes with lung function impairment

To detect disease-modifying effects of the candidate SNPs one-way ANOVA analyses were performed between genotypes and FEV1 (% predicted) and KCO (% predicted). No significant associations were found (Tables 4 and 5).
Table 4

Association of genotype groups with FEV 1 % predicted, using ANOVA

Gene

Genotypes

Number

Mean FEV1% predicted

Standard

Deviation

Pvalue

VEGFA

GG

246

48.7

21.0

0.23

 

GC

256

50.6

22.7

 
 

CC

75

53.5

20.4

 
  

Total 577

 

21.7

 

NOS3-VNTR

4bb

414

50.0

22.3

0.80

 

4ab

148

51.0

20.6

 
 

4aa

15

47.7

17.7

 
  

Total 577

 

21.7

 

ACE

II

142

49.6

20.9

0.09

 

ID

283

48.8

21.9

 
 

DD

153

53.6

22.2

 
  

Total 578

 

21.8

 

SLC6A4

LL

179

49.7

22.7

0.97

 

LS

285

50.2

21.2

 
 

SS

107

50.2

22.1

 
  

Total 571

 

21.8

 

PTGIS

CC

336

50.0

21.0

0.77

 

CA

200

49.9

22.8

 
 

AA

42

52.4

23.1

 
  

Total 578

 

21.7

 

NOS3-298

GG

258

50.1

21.0

0.61

 

GT

276

50.9

22.8

 
 

TT

41

47.4

18.3

 
  

Total 575

 

21.7

 

EDN1

GG

322

50.0

22.4

0.77

 

GT

178

50.6

21.3

 
 

TT

42

47.9

19.1

 
  

Total 542

 

21.8

 

Some samples could not be genotyped, making the totals less than 580.

Table 5

Association of genotype groups with KCO % predicted, in COPD patients with a KCO measurement, using ANOVA

Gene

Genotypes

Number

Mean KCO % predicted

Standard Deviation

Pvalue

VEGFA

GG

241

58.4

23.0

0.88

 

GC

244

57.7

21.8

 
 

CC

73

59.1

23.9

 
  

Total 558

 

22.6

 

NOS3-VNTR

4bb

401

58.1

22.9

0.36

 

4ab

142

59.1

21.5

 
 

4aa

15

50.3

24.5

 
  

Total 558

 

22.6

 

ACE

II

136

60.3

24.9

0.42

 

ID

273

57.3

22.1

 
 

DD

150

57.6

21.2

 
  

Total 559

 

22.6

 

SLC6A4

LL

176

58.0

22.4

0.84

 

LS

275

58.7

22.8

 
 

SS

101

57.2

22.0

 
  

Total 552

 

22.5

 

PTGIS

CC

327

58.5

21.4

0.11

 

CA

192

56.2

23.8

 
 

AA

40

64.3

25.0

 
  

Total 559

 

22.6

 

NOS3-298

GG

250

58.5

24.0

0.10

 

GT

265

58.9

21.7

 
 

TT

41

50.9

16.7

 
  

Total 556

   

EDN1

GG

310

57.5

22.4

0.17

 

GT

173

57.5

22.7

 
 

TT

40

64.6

24.5

 
  

Total 523

 

22.7

 

Some samples could not be genotyped, making the totals less than 580.

Linear regression modelling of associations with RVSP measurements

Multiple linear regression modelling was used to test whether genotypes associated with RVSP remained significantly associated, when controlled for clinical factors. Arterial PaO2 and KCO % predicted were significantly associated with RVSP in all analyses (see Additional file 1: Table S2). The association with NOS3-VNTR, as grouped genotypes 4aa + 4ab vs 4bb, remained significantly associated with RVSP, even when controlling for the clinical factors (see Additional file 1: Table S3).

Additional genetic modelling

Patients with the NOS3-VNTR 4aa or 4ab genotypes had significantly higher RVSP levels than the NOS3-VNTR 4bb genotype (see Additional file 1: Table S3). There were no other significant differences observed between genotypes and RVSP when using dominant and recessive genetic models. The ACE II or ID genotypes were associated with a significantly lower FEV1% predicted than the DD genotype (P = 0.028) (see Additional file 1: Table S4). All other genotypes were not associated with FEV1% predicted. The NOS3-298 TT genotype was associated with lower KCO % predicted than GG or GT genotypes (P = 0.031) (see Additional file 1: Table S5). No other significant differences were found between genotypes and KCO % predicted.

Discussion

Few previous studies have examined multiple polymorphisms in relation to PH associated with COPD. In our study we examined seven SNPs in six candidate genes which encode mediators that act on pulmonary vessels. We tested whether these SNPs were associated with RVSP, which is a measure of PH. We found that patients with the NOS3-VNTR 4aa or 4ab genotype had significantly higher RVSPs than those with the NOS3-VNTR 4bb genotype. In contrast, a study of 42 COPD patients and 40 controls found that the NOS3-VNTR 4bb genotype was associated with PH in COPD [13]. The smaller number of patients in their study raises the possibility of a type I error Further studies are required to validate our findings.

There have been conflicting functional studies of the NOS3-VNTR 4aa genotype and plasma nitrite and nitrate (NOx) levels. A study of 428 healthy Caucasian members of 108 nuclear families found significantly higher levels of plasma NOx associated with the 4aa genotype compared to the 4bb and 4ab genotypes [32]. However another study found that there was a strong association between plasma NOx levels and the NOS3-VNTR polymorphism in 413 healthy Japanese subjects, the subjects with the 4aa genotype having significantly lower NOx levels [33]. The discordant results between these two studies may be due to ethnicity or methodological differences in measuring NOx levels. The functional results from this second study would support our finding of the 4aa genotype (with potentially lower nitric oxide levels and therefore less vasodilatation) being associated with higher RVSP (higher vascular resistance). The exact functional mechanisms of how the VNTR, or a nearby SNP which is in linkage disequilibrium with it, affects either nitric oxide or vascular remodelling, needs further elucidation.

We identified a number of clinical factors as being significantly associated with elevated RVSP on univariate analysis. These factors are well-known clinical markers of severity of COPD, and would be expected to correlate with elevated RVSP, since PH is related to COPD severity [31]. The NOS3-VNTR polymorphism was significantly associated with RVSP, and remained so when controlling for these factors.

Considering potential links between COPD severity and PH, we examined the effect of SNPs in relation to respiratory function tests. Patients with the ACE II or ID genotypes showed a statistically significantly lower FEV1% predicted, albeit a clinically small difference, than the ACE DD genotypes. Analysis of the other genetic models for ACE genotypes did not show associations. This is in contrast to a previous study of Caucasian Mediterraneans which found a higher frequency of ACE DD genotypes in 74 male smokers with COPD than in 77 male smokers with normal lung function (odds ratio 2.2) [34]. Additional studies are required to clarify this relationship.

Patients with the NOS3-298 TT genotype had significantly lower KCO than those with the GG or GT genotypes. Sun and co-workers’ hypothesis [8] supports our results in that the lower NO levels associated with the TT genotype would potentially predispose those patients to greater lung tissue damage from cigarette smoke reflected in a reduced KCO.

Potential limitations of this study should be considered. Two of the SNPs showed minor deviation in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, although these did not show positive associations. The reason for the minor deviation could include chance or differences in population sampling; we had performed repeat genotyping in 10% of samples and the results were concordant. In some COPD patients, RVSP measurement was not successful because of hyperinflated lungs causing a large retrosternal window, or because the tricuspid regurgitant jet was insufficient to enable calculation of RVSP. Use of echo contrast may have increased the yield of RVSP measurements in these cases. Given the exploratory nature of this study of 7 SNPs and RVSP in COPD, we did not correct for multiple comparisons, and the statistical significance of the results should be considered in light of this. Even with this relatively large cohort of patients, replication in other cohorts is needed. Functional analysis of polymorphisms in model systems and genome-wide association studies of PH in COPD would be worthwhile in the future.

Conclusions

This study has shown a significant association between RVSP in COPD patients and the NOS3-VNTR 4aa or 4ab genotype. We also found associations between the ACE II or ID genotypes and lower FEV1% predicted and the NOS3-298 TT genotype and lower KCO % predicted. These results suggest that these polymorphisms may influence disease phenotype in COPD patients. Further study of these genes could lead to the development of prognostic and screening tools for PH in COPD, eventually leading to novel therapy targeting these pathways.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank the patients and staff of The Prince Charles Hospital for their participation in this study. We acknowledge funding support from The Prince Charles Hospital Foundation, NHMRC Career Development Award (IY) and NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship (KF).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Thoracic Medicine, The Prince Charles Hospital
(2)
Department of Echocardiography, The Prince Charles Hospital
(3)
School of Medicine, The University of Queensland

References

  1. Minai OA, Chaouat A, Adnot S: Pulmonary hypertension in COPD: epidemiology, significance, and management: pulmonary vascular disease: the global perspective. Chest. 2010, 137 (6 Suppl): 39S-51S. 10.1378/chest.10-0087.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Weitzenblum E, Sautegeau A, Ehrhart M, Mammosser M, Hirth C, Roegel E: Long-term course of pulmonary arterial pressure in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1984, 130 (6): 993-998.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kessler R, Faller M, Weitzenblum E, Chaouat A, Aykut A, Ducolone A, Ehrhart M, Oswald-Mammosser M: "Natural history" of pulmonary hypertension in a series of 131 patients with chronic obstructive lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001, 164 (2): 219-224.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Jyothula S, Safdar Z: Update on pulmonary hypertension complicating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2009, 4: 351-363.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Chaouat A, Savale L, Chouaid C, Tu L, Sztrymf B, Canuet M, Maitre B, Housset B, Brandt C, Le CP, et al: Role for interleukin-6 in COPD-related pulmonary hypertension. Chest. 2009, 136 (3): 678-687. 10.1378/chest.08-2420.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ulrich S, Hersberger M, Fischler M, Nussbaumer-Ochsner Y, Treder U, Russi EW, Speich R: Genetic polymorphisms of the serotonin transporter, but not the 2a receptor or nitric oxide synthetase, are associated with pulmonary hypertension in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases. 2010, 79 (4): 288-295. 10.1159/000226243.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Castaldi PJ, Hersh CP, Reilly JJ, Silverman EK: Genetic associations with hypoxemia and pulmonary arterial pressure in COPD. Chest. 2009, 135 (3): 737-744. 10.1378/chest.08-1993.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Sun LR, Wang C, Wu AQ, Yan BM, Li DM, Zhang JL, Wang GJ, Zhang Y, Li XQ, Zhang QZ: Gene polymorphism of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase enzyme and pulmonary hypertension in patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2008, 31 (5): 335-340.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Eddahibi S, Chaouat A, Tu L, Chouaid C, Weitzenblum E, Housset B, Maitre B, Adnot S: Interleukin-6 gene polymorphism confers susceptibility to pulmonary hypertension in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2006, 3 (6): 475-476. 10.1513/pats.200603-037MS.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Tkacova R, Joppa P, Stancak B, Salagovic J, Misikova S, Kalina I: The link between angiotensin-converting enzyme genotype and pulmonary artery pressure in patients with COPD. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2005, 117 (5–6): 210-214.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ahsan A, Ram R, Baig MA, Pasha MA: ACE I allele and eNOS G allele crosstalk may have a role in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin Biochem. 2004, 37 (11): 1037-1040. 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2004.05.026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kanazawa H, Tateishi Y, Yoshikawa J: Acute effects of nifedipine administration in pulmonary haemodynamics and oxygen delivery during exercise in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: implication of the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymorphisms. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2004, 24 (4): 224-228. 10.1111/j.1475-097X.2004.00552.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Yildiz P, Oflaz H, Cine N, Erginel-Unaltuna N, Erzengin F, Yilmaz V: Gene polymorphisms of endothelial nitric oxide synthase enzyme associated with pulmonary hypertension in patients with COPD. Respir Med. 2003, 97 (12): 1282-1288. 10.1016/j.rmed.2003.06.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Eddahibi S, Chaouat A, Morrell N, Fadel E, Fuhrman C, Bugnet AS, Dartevelle P, Housset B, Hamon M, Weitzenblum E, et al: Polymorphism of the serotonin transporter gene and pulmonary hypertension in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Circulation. 2003, 108 (15): 1839-1844. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000091409.53101.E8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kanazawa H, Hirata K, Yoshikawa J: Effects of captopril administration on pulmonary haemodynamics and tissue oxygenation during exercise in ACE gene subtypes in patients with COPD: a preliminary study. Thorax. 2003, 58 (7): 629-631. 10.1136/thorax.58.7.629.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Kanazawa H, Otsuka T, Hirata K, Yoshikawa J: Association between the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymorphisms and tissue oxygenation during exercise in patients with COPD. Chest. 2002, 121 (3): 697-701. 10.1378/chest.121.3.697.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kanazawa H, Okamoto T, Hirata K, Yoshikawa J: Deletion polymorphisms in the angiotensin converting enzyme gene are associated with pulmonary hypertension evoked by exercise challenge in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000, 162 (4 Pt 1): 1235-1238.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. van Suylen RJ, Wouters EF, Pennings HJ, Cheriex EC, van Pol PE, Ambergen AW, Vermelis AM, Daemen MJ: The DD genotype of the angiotensin converting enzyme gene is negatively associated with right ventricular hypertrophy in male patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999, 159 (6): 1791-1795.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Nakayama T, Soma M, Saito S, Honye J, Yajima J, Rahmutula D, Kaneko Y, Sato M, Uwabo J, Aoi N, et al: Association of a novel single nucleotide polymorphism of the prostacyclin synthase gene with myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2002, 143 (5): 797-801. 10.1067/mhj.2002.122171.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Watson CJ, Webb NJ, Bottomley MJ, Brenchley PE: Identification of polymorphisms within the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene: correlation with variation in VEGF protein production. Cytokine. 2000, 12 (8): 1232-1235. 10.1006/cyto.2000.0692.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. [www.goldcopd.com]
  22. Miller MR, Crapo R, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, Enright P, van der Grinten CP, Gustafsson P, et al: General considerations for lung function testing. Eur Respir J. 2005, 26 (1): 153-161. 10.1183/09031936.05.00034505.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, Crapo R, Enright P, van der Grinten CP, Gustafsson P, et al: Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J. 2005, 26 (2): 319-338. 10.1183/09031936.05.00034805.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Macintyre N, Crapo RO, Viegi G, Johnson DC, van der Grinten CP, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, Enright P, et al: Standardisation of the single-breath determination of carbon monoxide uptake in the lung. Eur Respir J. 2005, 26 (4): 720-735. 10.1183/09031936.05.00034905.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Morris JF, Koski A, Johnson LC: Spirometric standards for healthy nonsmoking adults. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1971, 103 (1): 57-67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Cotes JE: Lung Function. 1993, Blackwell Scientific Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Celli BR, Thomas NE, Anderson JA, Ferguson GT, Jenkins CR, Jones PW, Vestbo J, Knobil K, Yates JC, Calverley PM: Effect of pharmacotherapy on rate of decline of lung function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results from the TORCH study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008, 178 (4): 332-338. 10.1164/rccm.200712-1869OC.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pellikka PA, Picard MH, Roman MJ, Seward J, Shanewise JS, et al: Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005, 18 (12): 1440-1463. 10.1016/j.echo.2005.10.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HF: A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988, 16 (3): 1215-10.1093/nar/16.3.1215.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Dupont WD, Plummer WD: Power and sample size calculations. A review and computer program. Control Clin Trials. 1990, 11 (2): 116-128. 10.1016/0197-2456(90)90005-M.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Higham MA, Dawson D, Joshi J, Nihoyannopoulos P, Morrell NW: Utility of echocardiography in assessment of pulmonary hypertension secondary to COPD. Eur Respir J. 2001, 17 (3): 350-355. 10.1183/09031936.01.17303500.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang XL, Mahaney MC, Sim AS, Wang J, Blangero J, Almasy L, Badenhop RB, Wilcken DE: Genetic contribution of the endothelial constitutive nitric oxide synthase gene to plasma nitric oxide levels. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997, 17 (11): 3147-3153. 10.1161/01.ATV.17.11.3147.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Tsukada T, Yokoyama K, Arai T, Takemoto F, Hara S, Yamada A, Kawaguchi Y, Hosoya T, Igari J: Evidence of association of the ecNOS gene polymorphism with plasma NO metabolite levels in humans. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998, 245 (1): 190-193. 10.1006/bbrc.1998.8267.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Busquets X, MacFarlane NG, Heine-Suner D, Morla M, Torres-Juan L, Iglesias A, Llado J, Sauleda J, Agusti AG: Angiotensin-converting-enzyme gene polymorphisms, smoking and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2007, 2 (3): 329-334.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2466/12/25/prepub

Copyright

© Shaw et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement