Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Pulmonary Medicine

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Is there any association between Sarcoidosis and infectious agents?: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMC Pulmonary MedicineBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:165

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-016-0332-z

Received: 17 May 2016

Accepted: 22 November 2016

Published: 28 November 2016

Abstract

Background

During the last few years, investigators have debated the role that infectious agents may have in sarcoidosis pathogenesis. With the emergence of new molecular biology techniques, several studies have been conducted; therefore, we performed a meta-analysis in order to better explain this possible association.

Methods

This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement from the Cochrane collaboration guidelines. Four different databases (Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Collaboration) were searched for all original articles published from 1980 to 2015. The present meta-analysis included case–control studies that reported the presence of microorganisms in samples of patients with sarcoidosis using culture methods or molecular biology techniques. We used a random effects or a fixed-effect model to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed in order to explore the heterogeneity among studies.

Results

Fifty-eight studies qualified for the purpose of this analysis. The present meta-analysis, the first, to our knowledge, in evaluation of all infectious agents proposed to be associated with sarcoidosis and involving more than 6000 patients in several countries, suggests an etiological link between Propionibacterium acnes and sarcoidosis, with an OR of 18.80 (95% CI 12.62, 28.01). We also found a significant association between sarcoidosis and mycobacteria, with an OR of 6.8 (95% CI 3.73, 12.39). Borrelia (OR 4.82; 95% CI 0.98, 23.81), HHV-8 (OR 1.47; 95% CI 0.02, 110.06) as well as Rickettsia helvetica, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Epstein-barr virus and Retrovirus, although suggested by previous investigations, were not associated with sarcoidosis.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis suggests that some infectious agents can be associated with sarcoidosis. What seems clear is that more than one infectious agent might be implicated in the pathogenesis of sarcoidosis; probably the patient’s geographical location might dictate which microorganisms are more involved. Future investigations and more clinical trials are need to bring these evidences to a more global level.

Keywords

SarcoidosisPropionibacterium acnesMycobacteriaInfectionMeta-analysis

Background

Sarcoidosis is a systemic disorder of unknown origin that is characterized by the presence of non-caseating granulomas. With worldwide distribution, more than one causative agent may be implicated in its pathogenesis [1], with numerous infectious and non-infectious etiological agents having been identified [2]. Currently, the focus is on infectious agents, especially species of Mycobacterium and Propionibacterium. Other infectious agents have been investigated with inconclusive or conflicting results, such as Borrelia burgdorferi, Rickettsia helvetica, Chlamydia pneumoniae, viruses, fungal infections, and Leishmania species [311].

There are only two relevant meta-analyses in the literature [12, 13], which address the causal relationship of some infectious agents in sarcoidosis. Since then, more than 20 new investigations have been published, thus adding new relevant data to the discussion. This meta-analysis is the first to evaluate all infectious agents that may be involved in sarcoidosis.

Methods

Search strategy

This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement from the Cochrane collaboration guidelines. A checklist is available (Additional file 1). Since this study was a literature review and meta-analysis of previously reported studies, ethical approval or additional consent from participants was not required. Four different databases (Medline, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Database) were searched for all original articles without language restriction published from January 1980 to May 2015, using the search strategy described in online supplementary data (Additional file 2).

Inclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria were as follows: (i) the diagnosis of sarcoidosis was made according to the classical criteria: a compatible clinical and radiological picture, histopathological demonstration of non-caseating granulomas with negative stains for mycobacterium and fungi, and exclusion of other granulomatous diseases; [14] (ii) case–control studies that reported the presence of microorganisms in samples, both histological and cellular, of patients with sarcoidosis, using either culture methods (direct isolation of the organism) or molecular biology techniques (analysis of DNA, RNA or proteins); (iii) odds ratios (OR) and the corresponding confidence intervals (CI) or sufficient information to calculate them; (iv) patients without sarcoidosis were used as a reference group.

Exclusion criteria

Studies involving other techniques (e.g. ELISA, immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence) were excluded from the analysis.

Data extraction

First, two independent authors (T. Esteves and V. Garcia-Patos) reviewed all titles and abstracts. A second selection was based on a full-text review of potentially relevant articles and any disagreement was resolved by discussion between the three authors of this meta-analysis. A standardized data collection form was used to extract the following items: author(s), title of article, study design, year of publication, country of origin, study size, details of molecular or other techniques used.

Statistical analysis and methodological quality assessment

The measure of interest was the OR and 95% CI calculated from each study, in order to assess the presence of microorganisms in sarcoidosis samples versus controls. Data analyses were performed using Stata Statistical Software 2015 (StataCorp LP, College Station, Texas, USA). We used a random-effects model to calculate the OR and 95% CI from each study [15].

We assessed the heterogeneity among studies using Cochran’s Q test [16], complemented by the I2-test. [17] An I2 value of 76–100% represents high heterogeneity, 51–75% moderate heterogeneity and 0–50% low or insignificant heterogeneity [17]. If the result of the Chi-square heterogeneity test was not significant (p > 0.10), we used the fixed-effects model described by Mantel and Haenszel [18] to calculate the pooled OR estimate. Additionally, sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed in order to explore the heterogeneity among studies.

Results

Studies included

A total of 2465 articles were identified from the initial electronic search using the outlined search term parameters (Additional file 2). Among these, 2401 studies were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. A total of 64 articles were identified as investigating the role of infectious agents in sarcoidosis using either microbial culture or molecular methods. Six of these were later excluded since they were descriptive studies without a control group. Therefore, 58 case–control studies were qualified for the analysis according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Additional file 3 summarizes the study flow.

In total, the 58 studies involved 2467 samples from patients with proven sarcoidosis and 3656 samples from control patients with other non-sarcoid disorders. All studies used molecular techniques to identify the different types of infectious agents except for two, which used microbial culture in their analyses [19, 20].

With regard to the infectious agents investigated, 36 studies evaluated the presence of mycobacteria [2055] (Table 1), 11 evaluated P. acnes [19, 22, 24, 25, 31, 35, 38, 5659] (Table 2), seven evaluated human herpesvirus-8 (HHV-8) [22, 40, 6064] (Table 3), and six evaluated Borrelia species [4, 6569] (Table 4). Other infectious agents were investigated in some of the studies included, but there were insufficient cases to perform a meta-analysis. Three studies evaluated the presence of Rickettsia species, and one found a strong association between Rickettsia helvetica and sarcoidosis [70] (OR 21.72; CI:1.23–384.74). The second study did not reveal a significant association [3] (OR 0.43; CI:0–23.23), while in the third, all real-time PCR analyses for the detection of Rickettsia were negative [71]. None of the studies reported a significant association with Chlamydia pneumonia [7, 8, 72], Epstein-Barr virus [40], or retrovirus [73].
Table 1

Case–control studies evaluating the role of mycobacteria in sarcoidosis

First author/Year (Ref.)

Country

Molecular technique

Sarcoidosis patients

Non-sarcoidosis controls

OR (95% CI)

n/N

Type of microorganisms

n/N

Type of microorganisms

Bocart, 1992 [23]

France

PCR of 65 kDa mycobacterial antigen and IS6110

2/22

MTBC

0/22

-

5.49 (0.25–121.18)

Hofland, 2014 [20]

Netherlands

NAAT for Mycobacteria and Culture

0/32

-

2/86

1 MTBC, 1NTM

0.52 (0.02–11.13)

Robinson, 2013 [24]

USA

PCR for 16S rDNA, hsp65 and rpoB

2/30

NTM

1/30

NTM

2.07 (0.18–24.15)

Oswald-Richter, 2012 [25]

USA

MALDI-IMS for ESAT-6

5/15

Mycobacterium spp

0/4

-

4.71 (0.21–104.49)

Svendsen, 2011 [26]

Denmark

BD ProbeTec IS6110 amplification

1/52

MTBC

0/50

-

2.94 (0.12–73.93)

Mootha, 2010 [27]

India

PCR of 65 kDa mycobacterial antigen and IS6110

13/27

10 MTBC, 3 NTM

2/40

NTM

17.64 (3.53–88.25)

Zhou, 2008 [28]

China

Real-time PCR of IS986 and human β-blobin gene

20/104

MTBC

7/55

MTBC

1.63 (0.64–4.14)

Dubaniewicz, 2006 [29]

Poland

BD ProbeTec IS6110 amplification

3/50

MTBC

0/10

-

1.55 (0.07–32.27)

Fite, 2006 [30]

Spain

PCR of IS6110 and Southern blot hybridisation

9/23

MTBC

1/23

MTBC

14.14 (1.61–124.11)

Yasuhara, 2005 [31]

Japan

PCR of IS6110

0/6

-

0/6

-

-

Song, 2005 [32]

USA

PCR of MTB 16S rRNA

6/16

MTBC

0/16

-

20.43 (1.04–401.67)

Marcoval, 2005 [33]

Spain

NAAT for rRNA of MTBC

0/35

-

0/39

_

-

Yu-Yun Lee, 2002 [34]

Taiwan

Nested PCR for mycobacterial hsp65 DNA

7/21

NTM

0/16

-

17.07 (0.89–325.59)

Drake, 2002 [21]

USA

PCR of 16S rRNA, rpoB and IS6110

15/25

11 MTBC, 3 NTM, 1 both

0/25

_

75.29 (4.12–1377.06)

Gazouli, 2002 [22]

Greece

PCR of IS6110/IS1245/IS900/IS901, 16S rRNA, MPB64 and mtp40

33/46

MTBC

0/20

-

101.74 (5.74–1804.62)

Eish, 2002 [35]

Japan

PCR of IS6110/IS900

5/108

MTBC

2/86

MTBC

2.04 (0.39–10.78)

Klemen, 2000 [36]

Austria

PCR of IS6110 and mycobacterial chaperonin

3/4

NTM

0/39

_

184.33 (6.26–5425.48)

Li, 1999 [37]

USA

PCR of 65 kDa mycobacterialantigen and RFLP analysis

16/20

2 MTBC, 14 NTM

0/20

_

150.33 (7.54–2997.83)

Ishige, 1999 [38]

Japan

PCR of IS6110

3/15

MTBC

1/15

MTBC

3.50 (0.32–38.23)

Wilsher, 1998 [39]

NZ

PCR of IS6110, nested PCR to amplify 85 bp sequence within the 123 bp product

0/31

_

0/10

-

-

Di Alberti, 1997 [40]

Italy

Heminested PCR for 16S rRNA

17/38

4 NTM, 13 Mycobacterium spp

39/113

39 Mycobacterium spp

1.54 (0.73–3.24)

Vokurka, 1997 [41]

France

PCR of IS6110 and DR region

0/15

_

0/27

_

-

Ozcelik, 1997 [42]

Turkey

PCR of IS6110

5/11

MTBC

2/15

MTBC

5.42 (0.81-36.36)

Popper, 1997 [43]

Austria

PCR of 65 kDa mycobacterial antigen and IS6110

11/35

NTM

0/39

-

37.08 (2.09–657.90)

El-Zaatari, 1996 [44]

USA

PCR of IS900/IS902, MAC-specific PCR assay and Western blot

7/7

NTM

13/38

NTM

28.33 (1.50–534.74)

Fidler, 1993 [45]

UK

PCR of 65 kDa mycobacterial antigen and IS6110

7/16

MTBC

1/16

MTBC

11.67 (1.23–110.95)

Thakker, 1992 [46]

UK

PCR of groEL

1/14

MTBC

1/11

MTBC

0.77 (0.04–13.87)

Gerdes, 1992 [47]

Germany

PCR of 16S rDNA

0/14

-

0/10

-

-

Mitchell, 1992 [48]

UK

Mycobacterial rRNA detection by liquid phase hybridisation

5/5

MTBC

0/5

-

121 (2.02–7259.18)

Saboor, 1992 [49]

UK

PCR of IS986/IS6110 and groEL

14/20

10 MTBC, 4 NTM

5/22

3 MTBC, 2 NTM

7.93 (1.99–31.59)

Lisby, 1993 [50]

Denmark

Nested PCR for IS900

0/18

-

0/18

-

-

Grosser, 1999 [51]

Germany

PCR of IS986/IS6110

35/65

MTBC

1/34

MTBC

38.50 (4.96–298.57)

Vago, 1998 [52]

Italy

PCR of IS6110

2/30

MTBC

0/17

-

3.07 (0.14–67.75)

Richter, 1996 [53]

Germany

PCR of mycobacterial 16S rDNA

1/24

MTBC

3/57

MTBC

0.78 (0.08–7.93)

Ghossein, 1994 [54]

USA

PCR of 65 kDa mycobacterial antigen

0/10

-

0/10

-

-

Cannone, 1997 [55]

Italy

PCR of IS6110

2/30

MTBC

0/10

-

1.84 (0.08–41.62)

n Mycobacteria-positive samples, N total samples, PCR polymerase chain reaction, 65 kDa 65-Kilodalton mycobacteria antigen, IS6110 insertion sequence to identify Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC), NTM non-tuberculous mycobacteria, NAAT nucleic acid amplification test, 16S rDNA ribosomal DNA common to all mycobacteria, rpoB RNA polymerase β-subunit gene, MALDI-IMS matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization as a mass spectrometry imaging, ESAT-6 6 kDa early secretory antigenic target produced by Mycobacterium tuberculosis, IS986 insertion sequence to identify MTBC, rRNA ribosomal RNA, IS1245/IS900/IS901/IS902 insertion sequence to identify Mycobacterium avium complex, MPB64 mycobacterial protein, mtp40 Specific primers of MTB species, RFLP restriction fragment length polymorphism DR direct repeat, groEL gene encoding 65 kDa antigen

Table 2

Case–control studies evaluating the role of P. acnes in sarcoidosis

First author/Year (Ref.)

Country

Molecular technique

Sarcoidosis

Controls

OR (95% CI)

n/N

n/N

Robinson, 2013 [24]

USA

PCR for bacterial 16S rDNA

7/30

1/30

8.83 (1.01–76.96)

Oswald-Richter, 2012 [25]

USA

MALDI-IMS for propionibacterial proteins

7/15

1/4

2.63 (0.22–31.35)

Yasuhara, 2005 [31]

Japan

PCR for 16S rRNA

2/6

0/6

7.22 (0.28–189.19)

Gazouli, 2002 [22]

Greece

PCR for 16S rRNA

0/46

0/20

-

Eish, 2002 [35]

Japan

PCR for 16S rRNA

93/108

25/86

15.13 (7.39–30.99)

Ishige, 1999 [38]

Japan

Quantitative PCR for 16S rRNA

12/15

3/15

16 (2.67–95.75)

Negi, 2012 [56]

Japan

Immunohistochemical methods (PAG and TIG antibodies) and western blot

149/196

0/79

500.43 (30.44–8226.20)

Yamada, 2002 [57]

Japan

Quantitative real-time PCR for 16S rRNA

8/9

2/9

28 (2.07–379.25)

Eishi, 1994 [58]

Japan

PCR for P. acnes DNA

36/39

12/29

17 (4.23–68.28)

Abe, 1984 [19]

Japan

Isolation of P acnes in culture

31/40

38/180

12.87 (5.65–29.34)

Hiramatsu, 2003 [59]

Japan

Nested PCR for 16S rRNA

21/30

7/30

7.67 (2.42–24.24)

16S rDNA ribosomal DNA, MALDI-IMS matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization as a mass spectrometry imaging, rRNA ribosomal RNA

Table 3

Selected studies on the association between HHV-8 and sarcoidosis

First author/Year (Ref.)

Country

Molecular technique

Patients

Controls

OR (95% CI)

n/N

n/N

Knoell, 2005 [60]

USA

PCR for HHV-8 DNA

0/8

0/8

-

Gazouli, 2002 [22]

Greece

PCR for HHV-8 DNA

0/46

0/20

-

Fredricks, 2002 [61]

USA

PCR for HHV-8 ORF 26 DNA

0/18

0/4

-

Maeda, 2000 [62]

Japan

Hemi-nested PCR for HHV-8 DNA

4/119

4/120

1.01 (0.25–4.13)

Sugaya, 1999 [63]

Japan

Nested PCR for HHV-8 ORF 26 DNA

0/12

1/1

0.01 (0.00–0.95)

Bélec, 1998 [64]

France

Nested PCR for HHV-8 ORF 25/26 DNA

0/14

2/17

0.21 (0.01–4.84)

Di Alberti, 1997 [40]

Italy

Nested PCR for HHV-8 ORF 26 DNA and Heminested PCR for HHV-8 ORF 25 DNA

38/39

6/113

677.67 (79.01–5812.52)

HHV-8 Human Herpesvirus 8, ORF 25/26 DNA insertion sequence to identify HHV-8

Table 4

Selected studies on the association between Borrelia species and sarcoidosis

First author/Year (Ref.)

Country

Molecular Technique

Sarcoidosis

Controls

OR (95% CI)

n/N

Type of microorganism

n/N

Type of microorganism

Derler, 2009 [4]

Austria

Focus-floating microscopy and Borrelia-specific PCR DNA

13/35

Borrelia sp.

1/61

Borrelia sp.

35.45 (4.38–287.16)

Ishihara, 1998 [65]

Japan

Dot-blot analysis (Dotblot Borrelia Kit)

15/46

Borrelia sp.

2/100

Borrelia sp.

23.71 (5.14–109.46)

Martens, 1997 [66]

Germany

Western blot for Borrelia burgdorferi

1/60

Borrelia burgdorferi

27/1000

Borrelia burdorferi

0.61 (0.08–4.57)

Lian, 1995 [67]

China

PCR for Borrelia burgdorferi DNA

6/49

Borrelia burgdorferi

2/28

Borrelia burgdorferi

1.81 (0.34–9.66)

Xu, 1996 [68]

China

In situ PCR for Borrelia burgdorferi DNA

0/23

-

0/23

-

-

Ishihara, 1996 [69]

Japan

Elisa and Dot-blot analysis for Borrelia sp.

1/38

Borrelia sp.

1/80

Borrelia sp.

2.14 (0.13–35.08)

Meta-analysis

Mycobacteria (Table 1)

Both Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) and nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) were investigated in most of the 36 relevant studies, although some used primers to detect only M. tuberculosis [26, 2833, 38, 39, 41, 42, 51, 52, 55], and others detected only nontuberculous mycobacteria [44, 50].

Figure 1 provides a forest plot for sarcoidosis and mycobacteria based on a total of 1034 sarcoidosis patients and 1054 controls. Of the 1034 sarcoidosis cases, 173 were positive for MTBC, and 58 were positive for NTM. It was not possible to identify the type of mycobacteria involved in 18 samples, while both types of mycobacteria DNA were present in one sample. In total, 250 sarcoidosis samples were positive for some form of mycobacteria DNA sequence for a positive signal rate of 24.2%. We found a significant association between sarcoidosis and mycobacteria with an OR of 6.8 (95% CI:3.73–12.39). A strong association was also found between sarcoidosis and NTM alone with an OR of 10.39 (95% CI:5.25–20.56), as well as for M. tuberculosis complex (OR 4.29; CI:2.60–7.08). There was moderate heterogeneity among studies (I2 test 52.1%; p = 0.001), although all but three studies estimated a risk above unity with significance in most cases.
Fig. 1

Forest plot of studies that show the presence of mycobacteria in sarcoidosis patients versus controls

P. acnes (Table 2)

The risk of sarcoidosis associated with P. acnes was provided by the study design (Fig. 2). The OR derived from 11 studies with 534 cases and 488 controls was 18.80 (95% CI:12.62–28.01), and there was low heterogeneity (I2 test 25.9%; p = 0.206). There was a positive signal rate of 68.54% for P. acnes (366 positive samples from 534 patients). When accounting for the source of biological samples studied, we found that nine of the 11 studies [19, 22, 24, 25, 35, 38, 5658] evaluated the presence of P. acnes in lymph node samples, of which seven evaluated this location exclusively [19, 24, 35, 38, 57, 58]. This could justify the low heterogeneity among studies, contrary to what was observed in the forest plot of mycobacteria, where the studied biological samples were more heterogeneous.
Fig. 2

Forest plot of studies that show the presence of P. acnes in sarcoidosis patients versus controls

Borrelia and HHV-8 (Tables 3 and 4)

Of the six articles assessing the presence of Borrelia in sarcoidosis tissues, three used polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques for DNA amplification of B. burgdorferi [6668], whereas the other three did not specify which species of Borrelia were involved [4, 65, 69]. The pooled OR derived from these six studies with 251 cases and 1292 controls was 4.82, but this result did not reach statistical significance (95% CI:0.98–23.81). Statistical heterogeneity was moderate with an I2 of 70% and p = 0.01 Fig. 3 a).
Fig. 3

Forest plot: a summary OR for the presence of Borrelia species in sarcoidosis patients; b summary OR for the presence of HHV-8 in sarcoidosis patients

Di Alberti et al [40] were the only ones to report a significant association between sarcoidosis and HHV-8 in comparison with controls. However, the remaining six studies refuted those results [22, 6064]. Overall, there was no significant association between sarcoidosis and HHV-8 (OR 1.47; CI:0.02–110.06), and there was high heterogeneity among studies (I2 test 92%; p = 0.000) (Fig. 3 b).

Evaluation of publication bias

We performed funnel plots to evaluate publication bias (Fig. 4). The funnel plots of HHV-8 and mycobacteria showed evidence of publication bias (Fig. 4b and c), while the graphs regarding the presence of Borrelia and P. acnes are fairly symmetrical (Fig. 4a and d). Thus, no suggestion of publication bias is indicated in these cases.
Fig. 4

Funnel plot of all studies: (a) Borrelia; (b) Herpes; (c) Mycobacteria; (d) P. acnes

Sensitivity and subgroup analysis

To verify the robustness of the results, as well as the potential sources of heterogeneity, subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed (especially for mycobacteria).

Subgroup analysis

Concerning the studies of mycobacteria, we conducted subgroup meta-analysis by various study characteristics (Table 5). The pooled OR was calculated in subgroups of studies according to geographical area, publication year, type of study, and molecular technique used. There was a significant association between sarcoidosis and mycobacteria in all subgroups, except in three studies included in the subgroup of molecular techniques (BD ProbeTec and culture). The pooled OR was significantly higher with some covariates, however almost all of the ORs derived from these subgroup data were significantly above unity.
Table 5

Subgroup and sensitivity analysis of the association between sarcoidosis and mycobacteria

 

No. of studies

OR (95%CI)

P-value heterogeneity

I2 (%)

Subgroup analysis

 1 - Geographical region

 Europe

22

6.92 (3.05, 15.71)

0.004

53.8

 USA

7

18.21 (4.64, 71.53)

0.238

26.2

 Asia

7

4.09 (1.38, 12.12)

0.093

49.8

 2 - Publication year

   < 2000

20

6.63 (2.84, 15.51)

0.006

54.2

   > =2000

16

8.40 (3.31, 21.31)

0.012

53

 3 – Type of study

  Prospective

10

11.91 (4.94, 28.69)

0.743

0.0

  Retrospective

26

6.41 (3.14, 13.09)

0.001

57.1

 4 - Molecular technique

  PCR

29

7.04 (3.57, 13.89)

0.000

58.8

  Hybridization

2

37.81 (3.40, 420.43)

0.484

0.0

  Protein analysis

2

12.12 (1.44, 102.20)

0.408

0.0

  BD ProbeTec

2

2.09 (0.23, 19.10)

0.776

0.0

  Culture

1

0.52 (0.02, 11.13)

-

-

Sensitivity analysis

 1 - Biological samples

  Only lymph nodes

11

3.82 (1.53, 9.49)

0.384

4.0

  Only lung

5

2.93 (1.09, 7.86)

0.098

56.9

  Only skin

2

11.58 (0.06, 2016.91)

0.021

81.3

 2 – Incidence of tuberculosis

  Only countries with low burden of TB

33

4.33 (2.06, 9.10)

0.042

45.7

CI confidence interval, OR odds ratio, BD ProbeTec molecular detection based on strand displacement amplification (SDA) technology, TB tuberculosis

Through the subgroup analyses, it was noted that the variables that most influenced the results of heterogeneity were: a) the study type, being null the heterogeneity in the ten prospective studies, contrasting with the moderate heterogeneity in retrospective studies; b) the geographical location, verifying a low heterogeneity in studies conducted in the USA and Asia.

Sensitivity analysis

We also performed a sensitivity analysis to complement the subgroup analysis in order to better explain the heterogeneity between studies (Table 5).

Regarding sarcoidosis and mycobacteria, there was a strong and significant association (OR 4.33; CI:2.06–9.10) in subgroup analysis of geographic locations when we restricted to studies performed in countries with low burden of tuberculosis [24, 30, 35, 38, 40, 42, 4446, 49, 51, 53]. There was low heterogeneity among these studies (I2 test 45.7%; p = 0.042) (Table 5).

Another subgroup analysis compared the results according to the different biological samples used. Most of the studies included in our meta-analysis used biological samples from different locations, including the skin, lymph nodes, and lungs. However, when we restricted the analysis to include only studies that performed PCR on biological samples of the same type, the associations were also significant in both lung samples [30, 40, 45] (OR 2.93; CI:1.09–7.86; I2 = 56.9%) and lymph node samples [24, 35, 38, 40, 46] (OR 3.82; CI:1.53–9.49; I2 = 4%), but not skin biological specimens [37, 40] (OR 11.58; CI:0.06–2016.91; I2 = 81.3%). Once again, the heterogeneity among studies was low to moderate except in two studies performed on skin biopsies (Table 5).

In sensitivity analysis on studies of sarcoidosis and P. acnes, we found a significant association compared with the controls when we selected only studies performed outside Asia [22, 24, 25], with a pooled OR of 5.5 (95% CI:1.13–27.42) and no heterogeneity among studies.

Discussion

The present meta-analysis is the first to evaluate all infectious agents proposed to be associated with sarcoidosis and involving more than 6000 patients in several countries. The results point to an etiological link between P. acnes and sarcoidosis with a positive signal rate of 68.54%. Also, almost one quarter of sarcoidosis patients show the presence of mycobacteria within the lesions. The associations are fairly specific, since P. acnes (OR 18.80) and mycobacteria (OR 6.8) were significantly increased in sarcoidosis patients, while Borrelia (OR 4.82; CI:0.98–23.81) and HHV-8 (OR 1.47; CI:0.02–110.06) were not associated with sarcoidosis, contrary to previous investigations.

Three decades ago, Abe et al [19] reported that P. acnes was the only bacterium isolated in lymph node biopsy samples taken from sarcoidosis patients. Studies published in recent years have confirmed that P. acnes could be a possible infectious agent implicated in the pathogenesis of sarcoidosis [24, 56, 7476]. However, some studies suggest that P. acnes is not specific for sarcoidosis because it is a normal inhabitant of peripheral lung tissue and mediastinal lymph nodes, apart from the skin [77]. Despite this, the results of our meta-analysis show a significant quantitative difference in the presence of the P. acnes genome in sarcoidosis patients compared to control subjects. This suggests that this microorganism may be present abnormally or may proliferate ectopically in such sarcoid lesions.

However, it is important to note that most of the studies in our meta-analysis evaluating the role of P. acnes in sarcoidosis were by Japanese groups testing Japanese patients, while only very limited data exist for African American or Caucasian patients [22, 24, 25]. The results were conflicting in these three studies, but interestingly, the pooled OR was above unity and statistically significant (5.58; CI:1.13–27.42). Despite these surprising results, the ORs observed in studies with Japanese patients were far superior, and the results were more consistent and robust. Differences between these two groups may be due to the geographical, ethnic, or racial composition of the study population. Sarcoidosis in Japanese patients is characterized by a high rate of ocular, cutaneous, and cardiac involvement, while in Europe and the USA, this disease mainly affects the lungs.

In 2002, the first large, relevant study was published as a collaboration between several countries [35]. The results of this international study suggest an association between P. acnes and sarcoidosis in not only Japanese patients (positive signal rate of 89.2%), but also in Europeans (positive signal rate of 81.4%). However, more international corporative studies with quantitative PCR are needed to clarify the role of P. acnes in sarcoidosis and for better understanding of the phenotypic variability of this disease.

Recent years have witnessed substantial discussion among investigators about the role that mycobacteria may have in the pathogenesis of sarcoidosis, and the issue remains unsettled, if not controversial. With the emergence of new microbiological techniques, especially in the molecular biology area, several studies have been conducted in order to investigate this possible association more deeply.

In the present meta-analysis, we identified 36 studies assessing the presence of mycobacteria in a total of 1034 sarcoidosis patients and 1054 controls. The results suggest a strong association of sarcoidosis with NTM (OR 10.39; CI:5.25–20.56) and with MTBC (4.29; CI:2.60–7.08). However, to evaluate the possible relationship between mycobacteria and sarcoidosis, the current incidence of tuberculosis should be taken into account in general populations of the different countries where the studies of sarcoidosis were performed. In the sensitivity analyses, a significant association was also found (OR 4.33; CI:2.06–9.10) when we restricted the analysis to include only studies performed in countries with low prevalence of tuberculosis. This further confirms the robustness of the results and the relevance of this association worldwide.

Despite the heterogeneity of analyzed studies and the potential publication bias suggested by the mycobacteria funnel plots, most of the ORs derived from individual data were significantly above unity. Furthermore, sensitivity and subgroup analyses including only studies performed on lung samples or lymph nodes showed low heterogeneity. Therefore, it is important to account for the heterogeneity in sarcoidosis specimens (lung versus skin or lymph nodes). We found significant increased ORs in studies performed on lung or lymph node samples but not in skin specimens. Possible explanations for this include the following: 1) In the initial phase of the disease, systemic sarcoidosis primarily affects and spreads through the lymphatic system, following the lymphatic vessels to the hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes. 2) Lung and lymph node samples are obtained sterilely by endoscopy biopsies and thus avoid possible microorganism contamination, in contrast to skin biopsies. 3) The two studies performed on sarcoidosis skin samples were both retrospective [37, 40]. In such studies, there is a greater possibility of both contamination of the paraffin-embedded specimens and more DNA fragmentation. In contrast, several studies performed on lung and lymph node samples were prospective, and only fresh tissues were used. Additionally, when we conducted the subgroup analysis according to the type of study, it was found a low heterogeneity in the 10 prospective studies (I2 = 0%), contrasting with the moderate heterogeneity in retrospective studies (I2 = 57.1%).

The hypothesis that B. burgdorferi could be a possible causal infectious agent for sarcoidosis was first mentioned in 1989 in epidemiological studies [78]. Since then, several studies have been conducted using serological or molecular techniques in order to clarify the role of Borrelia in the pathogenesis of sarcoidosis. We identified six articles assessing the presence of Borrelia in sarcoidosis tissues using molecular techniques (251 cases and 1292 controls), and we did not find a significant association (OR 4.82; CI:0.98–23.81). On the other hand, the two studies that reported a significant association between Borrelia and sarcoidosis [4, 65] were both conducted in regions where Lyme disease is endemic, in contrast to the four other articles performed in non-endemic areas [6669], where the results did not reach statistical significance.

It is important to note that the frequency of exposure to Borrelia. spirochete is different between patients living in regions where the disease is endemic and those in regions where it is not. Thus, in countries with elevated B. burgdorferi prevalence, a protective immunity against this microorganism has to be assumed in the general population. T-helper lymphocyte activity to this microorganism might be a trigger for the development of sarcoidosis in endemic regions, which could explain the positive results in studies published in Austria and Japan [4, 65]. Apart from these two studies, the fact that significant positive PCR results could not be found argues against the hypothesis of a connection between B. burgdorferi infection and sarcoidosis. However, more studies are needed to clarify the possible association, especially in endemic areas.

There are several clinical implications of this study. Currently, immune suppression remains the primary treatment modality for sarcoidosis. Given our meta-analysis, it is worth exploring whether certain antibacterial or antimycobacterial drugs might alter the course of sarcoidosis. In the past, some clinical trials have been published with conflicting results using classical antituberculous drugs, such as isoniazid, amino-salicylic acid, and streptomycin [7982]. Recently, Drake et al [83] conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled study to investigate the efficacy of oral antimycobacterial therapy (levofloxacin, ethambutol, azithromycin, and rifampin) in patients with cutaneous sarcoidosis. The results were promising, with significant reductions in cutaneous lesion size. The same authors also conducted an open-label investigation using the same therapy regimen in pulmonary sarcoidosis patients, and the results were again very interesting with significant improvements in forced vital capacity from baseline to completion of therapy [84].

Other antimicrobial agents such as minocycline and doxycycline have been shown to be quite effective in treating cutaneous sarcoidosis in some series [85, 86]. However, the exact mechanism of action of these drugs it is not fully understood [87].

Currently, other clinical trials are being done (NCT02024555 and NCT01245036) to clarify the role that antimicrobial agents might have in the treatment of sarcoidosis.

Several limitations in our study should be recognized. First, one of the main potential limitations relates to the variability and heterogeneity of the results analyzed. It is important to consider that the majority of these studies were assessed retrospectively and that data were obtained from different databases and hospitals. This could lead to different types of bias in the included studies and to variability in the results. Second, the risk of contamination or DNA fragmentation in PCR techniques can lead to false positive or false negative results. In addition, PCR does not discriminate between living and dead microorganisms. Third, the patients had varied clinical manifestations of sarcoidosis; moreover, the non-sarcoidosis controls were comprised of different types of subjects across the studies, which may cause misclassification bias and heterogeneity.

Conclusion

The present meta-analysis, involving more than 6000 patients from various countries worldwide, suggests a significant association between sarcoidosis and some infectious agents, taking into account the marked difference in the percentage of microbial DNA-positive samples in sarcoidosis patients versus controls, especially mycobacteria (OR 6.8) and P. acnes (OR 18.80). Furthermore, our study also suggests caution regarding a putative association between sarcoidosis and B. burgdorferi.

What seems clear is that more than one infectious agent might be implicated in the pathogenesis of sarcoidosis; probably the patient’s geographical location might dictate which microorganisms are more involved.

More studies and clinical trials are needed to extend this evidence to a more global level.

Abbreviations

B. burgdorferi

Borrelia burgdorferi

CI: 

Confidence interval

HHV-8: 

Human herpesvirus 8

MTBC: 

Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex

NTM: 

Nontuberculous mycobacteria

OR: 

Odds ratio

P. acnes

Propionibacterium acnes

PRISMA: 

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Miguel Angel Descalzo, responsible for the research unit of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV), for his assistance with statistical analysis and Rubina Alves, M.D., for reviewing an earlier version of the manuscript.

Funding

None.

Availability of data and materials

We declare that the data supporting the conclusions of this article are fully described in the article.

Authors’ contribution

TE and VGP contributed equally to the study. TE, GA and VGP conceived the study and designed the systematic review and meta-analysis. TE, GA and VGP contributed to the data extraction, performed the analysis and interpreted the results. TE and VGP wrote the first draft; TE, GA and VGP contributed to the revision of the final report. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Since this study was a literature review and meta-analysis of previously reported studies, ethical approval or additional consent from participants was not required.

Prior presentation

This data has not been published elsewhere.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
(2)
Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron

References

  1. Haimovic A, Sanchez M, Judson MA, Prystowsky S. Sarcoidosis: a comprehensive review and update for the dermatologist: part I. Cutaneous disease. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;66(5):699–718.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Newman LS, Rose CS, Bresnitz EA, Rossman MD, Barnard J, Frederick M, Terrin ML, Weinberger SE, Moller DR, McLennan G, Hunninghake G, DePalo L, Baughman RP, Iannuzzi MC, Judson MA, Knatterud GL, Thompson BW, Teirstein AS, Yeager Jr H, Johns CJ, Rabin DL, Rybicki BA, Cherniack R, ACCESS Research Group. A case control etiologic study of sarcoidosis: environmental and occupational risk factors. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;170(12):1324–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Svendsen CB, Milman N, Nielsen HW, Krogfelt KA, Larsen KR. A prospective study evaluating the presence of Rickettsia in Danish patients with sarcoidosis. Scand J Infect Dis. 2009;41(10):745–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Derler AM, Eisendle K, Baltaci M, Obermoser G, Zelger B. High prevalence of ‘Borrelia-like’ organisms in skin biopsies of sarcoidosis patients from Western Austria. J Cutan Pathol. 2009;36(12):1262–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Planck A, Eklund A, Grunewald J, Vene S. No serological evidence of Rickettsia Helvetica infection in Scandinavian sarcoidosis patients. Eur Respir J. 2004;24(5):811–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lebbé C, Agbalika F, Flageul B, Pellet C, Rybojad M, Cordoliani F, Farge D, Vignon-Pennamen MD, Sheldon J, Morel P, Calvo F, Schulz TF. No evidence for a role of human herpesvirus type 8 in sarcoidosis: molecular and serological analysis. Br J Dermatol. 1999;141(3):492–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Mills GD, Allen RK, Timms P. Chlamydia pneumoniae DNA is not detectable within sarcoidosis tissue. Pathology. 1998;30(3):295–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Blasi F, Rizzato G, Gambacorta M, Cosentini R, Raccanelli R, Tarsia P, Arosio C, Savini E, Cantoni C, Fagetti L, Allegra L. Failure to detect the presence of Chlamydia pneumoniae in sarcoid pathology specimens. Eur Respir J. 1997;10(11):2609–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Biberfeld P, Petrén AL, Eklund A, Lindemalm C, Barkhem T, Ekman M, Ablashi D, Salahuddin Z. Human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6, HBLV) in sarcoidosis and lymphoproliferative disorders. J Virol Methods. 1988;21(1–4):49–59.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Moravvej H, Vesal P, Abolhasani E, Nahidi S, Mahboudi F. Comorbidity of leishmania major with cutaneous sarcoidosis. Indian J Dermatol. 2014;59(3):316.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Suchankova M, Paulovicova E, Paulovicova L, Majer I, Tedlova E, Novosadova H, Tibenska E, Tedla M, Bucova M. Increased antifungal antibodies in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and serum in pulmonary sarcoidosis. Scand J Immunol. 2015;81(4):259–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gupta D, Agarwal R, Aggarwal AN, Jindal SK. Molecular evidence for the role of mycobacteria in sarcoidosis: a meta-analysis. Eur Respir J. 2007;30(3):508–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Zhou Y, Hu Y, Li H. Role of Propionibacterium Acnes in Sarcoidosis: A Meta-analysis. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2013;30(4):262–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Iannuzzi MC, Rybicki BA, Teirstein AS. Sarcoidosis. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(21):2153–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Greenland S. Variance estimators for attributable fraction estimates consistent in both large strata and sparse data. Stat Med. 1987;6(6):701–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–60.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959;22(4):719–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Abe C, Iwai K, Mikami R, Hosoda Y. Frequent isolation of Propionibacterium acnes from sarcoidosis lymph nodes. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A. 1984;256(4):541–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hofland RW, Thijsen SF, Bouwman J, van der Wel M, Bossink AW. Sarcoidosis and Purified Protein Derivative reactivity. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2014;31(2):142–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Drake WP, Pei Z, Pride DT, Collins RD, Cover TL, Blaser MJ. Molecular analysis of sarcoidosis tissues for mycobacterium species DNA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8(11):1334–41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Gazouli M, Ikonomopoulos J, Trigidou R, Foteinou M, Kittas C, Gorgoulis V. Assessment of mycobacterial, propionibacterial, and human herpesvirus 8 DNA in tissues of Greek patients with sarcoidosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40(8):3060–3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Bocart D, Lecossier D, De Lassence A, Valeyre D, Battesti JP, Hance AJ. A search for mycobacterial DNA in granulomatous tissues from patients with sarcoidosis using the polymerase chain reaction. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992;145(5):1142–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Robinson LA, Smith P, Sengupta DJ, Prentice JL, Sandin RL. Molecular analysis of sarcoidosis lymph nodes for microorganisms: a case–control study with clinical correlates. BMJ Open. 2013;3(12):e004065.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Oswald-Richter KA, Beachboard DC, Seeley EH, Abraham S, Shepherd BE, Jenkins CA, Culver DA, Caprioli RM, Drake WP. Dual analysis for mycobacteria and propionibacteria in sarcoidosis BAL. J Clin Immunol. 2012;32(5):1129–40.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Svendsen CB, Milman N, Rasmussen EM, Thomsen VØ, Andersen CB, Krogfelt KA. The continuing search for Mycobacterium tuberculosis involvement in sarcoidosis: a study on archival biopsy specimens. Clin Respir J. 2011;5(2):99–104.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mootha VK, Agarwal R, Aggarwal AN, Gupta D, Ahmed J, Verma I, Bal A. The Sarcoid-Tuberculosis link: evidence from a high TB prevalence country. J Infect. 2010;60(6):501–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhou Y, Li HP, Li QH, Zheng H, Zhang RX, Chen G, Baughman RP. Differentiation of sarcoidosis from tuberculosis using real-time PCR assay for the detection and quantification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2008;25(2):93–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Dubaniewicz A, Dubaniewicz-Wybieralska M, Sternau A, Zwolska Z, Izycka-Swieszewska E, Augustynowicz-Kopec E, Skokowski J, Singh M, Zimnoch L. Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and mycobacterial heat shock proteins in lymph node tissue from patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(9):3448–51.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Fité E, Fernández-Figueras MT, Prats R, Vaquero M, Morera J. High prevalence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA in biopsies from sarcoidosis patients from Catalonia, Spain. Respiration. 2006;73(1):20–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Yasuhara T, Tada R, Nakano Y, Tei M, Mochida C, Kamei M, Kinoshita S. The presence of Propionibacterium spp. in the vitreous fluid of uveitis patients with sarcoidosis. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2005;83(3):364–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Song Z, Marzilli L, Greenlee BM, Chen ES, Silver RF, Askin FB, Teirstein AS, Zhang Y, Cotter RJ, Moller DR. Mycobacterial catalase-peroxidase is a tissue antigen and target of the adaptive immune response in systemic sarcoidosis. J Exp Med. 2005;201(5):755–67.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Marcoval J, Benítez MA, Alcaide F, Mañá J. Absence of ribosomal RNA of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in sarcoidosis. Arch Dermatol. 2005;141(1):57–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lee JY, Chao SC, Yang MH, Yan JJ. Sarcoidosis in Taiwan: clinical characteristics and atypical mycobacteria. J Formos Med Assoc. 2002;101(11):749–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Eishi Y, Suga M, Ishige I, Kobayashi D, Yamada T, Takemura T, Takizawa T, Koike M, Kudoh S, Costabel U, Guzman J, Rizzato G, Gambacorta M, du Bois R, Nicholson AG, Sharma OP, Ando M. Quantitative analysis of mycobacterial and propionibacterial DNA in lymph nodes of Japanese and European patients with sarcoidosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40(1):198–204.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Klemen H, Husain AN, Cagle PT, Garrity ER, Popper HH. Mycobacterial DNA in recurrent sarcoidosis in the transplanted lung--a PCR-based study on four cases. Virchows Arch. 2000;436(4):365–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Li N, Bajoghli A, Kubba A, Bhawan J. Identification of mycobacterial DNA in cutaneous lesions of sarcoidosis. J Cutan Pathol. 1999;26(6):271–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ishige I, Usui Y, Takemura T, Eishi Y. Quantitative PCR of mycobacterial and propionibacterial DNA in lymph nodes of Japanese patients with sarcoidosis. Lancet. 1999;354(9173):120–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Wilsher ML, Menzies RE, Croxson MC. Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA in tissues affected by sarcoidosis. Thorax. 1998;53(10):871–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Di Alberti L, Piattelli A, Artese L, Favia G, Patel S, Saunders N, Porter SR, Scully CM, Ngui SL, Teo CG. Human herpesvirus 8 variants in sarcoid tissues. Lancet. 1997;350(9092):1655–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Vokurka M, Lecossier D, du Bois RM, Wallaert B, Kambouchner M, Tazi A, Hance AJ. Absence of DNA from mycobacteria of the M. tuberculosis complex in sarcoidosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;156(3 Pt 1):1000–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Ozçelik U, Ozkara HA, Göçmen A, Akçören Z, Kocagöz T, Kiper N, Göğüs S, Cağlar M, Kale G, Kotiloğlu E. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA in tissue samples of children with sarcoidosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1997;24(2):122–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Popper HH, Klemen H, Hoefler G, Winter E. Presence of mycobacterial DNA in sarcoidosis. Hum Pathol. 1997;28(7):796–800.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. el-Zaatari FA, Naser SA, Markesich DC, Kalter DC, Engstand L, Graham DY. Identification of Mycobacterium avium complex in sarcoidosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34(9):2240–5.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Fidler HM, Rook GA, Johnson NM, McFadden J. Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA in tissue affected by sarcoidosis. BMJ. 1993;306(6877):546–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Thakker B, Black M, Foulis AK. Mycobacterial nucleic acids in sarcoid lesions. Lancet. 1992;339(8808):1537.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Gerdes J, Richter E, Rüsch-Gerdes S, Greinert V, Galle J, Schlaak M, Flad HD, Magnussen H. Mycobacterial nucleic acids in sarcoid lesions. Lancet. 1992;339(8808):1536–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Mitchell IC, Turk JL, Mitchell DN. Detection of mycobacterial rRNA in sarcoidosis with liquid-phase hybridisation. Lancet. 1992;339(8800):1015–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Saboor SA, Johnson NM, McFadden J. Detection of mycobacterial DNA in sarcoidosis and tuberculosis with polymerase chain reaction. Lancet. 1992;339(8800):1012–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Lisby G, Milman N, Jacobsen GK. Search for Mycobacterium paratuberculosis DNA in tissue from patients with sarcoidosis by enzymatic gene amplification. APMIS. 1993;101(11):876–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Grosser M, Luther T, Müller J, Schuppler M, Bickhardt J, Matthiessen W, Müller M. Detection of M. tuberculosis DNA in sarcoidosis: correlation with T-cell response. Lab Invest. 1999;79(7):775–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Vago L, Barberis M, Gori A, Scarpellini P, Sala E, Nebuloni M, Bonetto S, Cannone M, Marchetti G, Franzetti F, Costanzi G. Nested polymerase chain reaction for Mycobacterium tuberculosis IS6110 sequence on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues with granulomatous diseases for rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis. Am J Clin Pathol. 1998;109(4):411–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Richter E, Greinert U, Kirsten D, Rüsch-Gerdes S, Schlüter C, Duchrow M, Galle J, Magnussen H, Schlaak M, Flad HD, Gerdes J. Assessment of mycobacterial DNA in cells and tissues of mycobacterial and sarcoid lesions. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;153(1):375–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Ghossein RA, Ross DG, Salomon RN, Rabson AR. A search for mycobacterial DNA in sarcoidosis using the polymerase chain reaction. Am J Clin Pathol. 1994;101(6):733–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Cannone M, Vago L, Porini G, Bonetto S, Cassi C, Bramerio M, Rizzato G, Barberis MC. Detection of mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA using nested polymerase chain reaction in lymph nodes with sarcoidosis, fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin. Pathologica. 1997;89(5):512–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Negi M, Takemura T, Guzman J, Uchida K, Furukawa A, Suzuki Y, Iida T, Ishige I, Minami J, Yamada T, Kawachi H, Costabel U, Eishi Y. Localization of Propionibacterium acnes in granulomas supports a possible etiologic link between sarcoidosis and the bacterium. Mod Pathol. 2012;25(9):1284–97.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Yamada T, Eishi Y, Ikeda S, Ishige I, Suzuki T, Takemura T, Takizawa T, Koike M. In situ localization of Propionibacterium acnes DNA in lymph nodes from sarcoidosis patients by signal amplification with catalysed reporter deposition. J Pathol. 2002;198(4):541–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Eishi Y. Seeking a causative agent of sarcoidosis. Nihon Rinsho. 1994;52(6):1486–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Hiramatsu J, Kataoka M, Nakata Y, Okazaki K, Tada S, Tanimoto M, Eishi Y. Propionibacterium acnes DNA detected in bronchoalveolar lavage cells from patients with sarcoidosis. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2003;20(3):197–203.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Knoell KA, Hendrix Jr JD, Stoler MH, Patterson JW, Montes CM. Absence of human herpesvirus 8 in sarcoidosis and crohn disease granulomas. Arch Dermatol. 2005;141(7):909–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Fredricks DN, Martin TM, Edwards AO, Rosenbaum JT, Relman DA. Human herpesvirus 8 and sarcoidosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34(4):559–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Maeda H, Niimi T, Sato S, Kawaguchi H, Sugiura Y, Mori S, Ueda R. Human herpesvirus 8 is not associated with sarcoidosis in Japanese patients. Chest. 2000;118(4):923–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Sugaya M, Nakamura K, Takahiro W, Tamaki K. Human herpesvirus type 8 is not detected in cutaneous lesions of sarcoidosis. Br J Dermatol. 1999;141(4):769.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Bélec L, Mohamed AS, Lechapt-Zalcman E, Authier FJ, Lange F, Gherardi RK. Lack of HHV-8 DNA sequences in sarcoid tissues of French patients. Chest. 1998;114(3):948–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Ishihara M, Ohno S, Ono H, Isogai E, Kimura K, Isogai H, Aoki K, Ishida T, Suzuki K, Kotake S, Hiraga Y. Seroprevalence of anti-Borrelia antibodies among patients with confirmed sarcoidosis in a region of Japan where Lyme borreliosis is endemic. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1998;236(4):280–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Martens H, Zöllner B, Zissel G, Burdon D, Schlaak M, Müller-Quernheim J. Anti-Borrelia burgdorferi immunoglobulin seroprevalence in pulmonary sarcoidosis: a negative report. Eur Respir J. 1997;10(6):1356–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Lian W, Luo W. Borrelia burgdorferi DNA in biological samples from patients with sarcoidosis using the polymerase chain reaction technique. Chin Med Sci J. 1995;10(2):93–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Xu Z, Ma D, Luo W, Zhu Y. Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi DNA in granulomatous tissues from patients with sarcoidosis using polymerase chain reaction in situ technique. Chin Med Sci J. 1996;11(4):220–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Ishihara M, Ishida T, Isogai E, Kimura K, Oritsu M, Matsui Y, Isogai H, Ohno S. Detection of antibodies to Borrelia species among patients with confirmed sarcoidosis in a region where Lyme disease is nonendemic. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1996;234(12):770–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Nilsson K, Påhlson C, Lukinius A, Eriksson L, Nilsson L, Lindquist O. Presence of Rickettsia helvetica in granulomatous tissue from patients with sarcoidosis. J Infect Dis. 2002;185(8):1128–38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Svendsen CB, Milman N, Andersen CB, Rasmussen EM, Thomsen VØ, Krogfelt KA. Is sarcoidosis a rickettsiosis? An archival study. Scand J Infect Dis. 2011;43(5):349–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Puolakkainen M, Campbell LA, Kuo CC, Leinonen M, Grönhagen-Riska C, Saikku P. Serological response to Chlamydia pneumoniae in patients with sarcoidosis. J Infect. 1996;33(3):199–205.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Lyons DJ, Sinclair A, Smith HG, Mitchell DN, Dalgleish AG. Search for a retroviral cause for sarcoidosis: no evidence from peripheral blood studies. Eur Respir J. 1991;4(4):445–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Schupp JC, Tchaptchet S, Lützen N, Engelhard P, Müller-Quernheim J, Freudenberg MA, Prasse A. Immune response to Propionibacterium acnes in patients with sarcoidosis--in vivo and in vitro. BMC Pulm Med. 2015;15:75.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  75. Zhou Y, Wei YR, Zhang Y, Du SS, Baughman RP, Li HP. Real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction to detect propionibacterial ribosomal RNA in the lymph nodes of Chinese patients with sarcoidosis. Clin Exp Immunol. 2015;181(3):511–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  76. Yorozu P, Furukawa A, Uchida K, Akashi T, Kakegawa T, Ogawa T, Minami J, Suzuki Y, Awano N, Furusawa H, Miyazaki Y, Inase N, Eishi Y. Propionibacterium acnes catalase induces increased Th1 immune response in sarcoidosis patients. Respir Investig. 2015;53(4):161–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Ishige I, Eishi Y, Takemura T, Kobayashi I, Nakata K, Tanaka I, Nagaoka S, Iwai K, Watanabe K, Takizawa T, Koike M. Propionibacterium acnes is the most common bacterium commensal in peripheral lung tissue and mediastinal lymph nodes from subjects without sarcoidosis. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2005;22(1):33–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Jacob F. Could Borrelia burgdorferi be a causal agent of sarcoidosis? Med Hypotheses. 1989;30(4):241–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Edelson E. Isoniazid in the treatment of sarcoidosis; a preliminary report. J Invest Dermatol. 1953;21(2):71–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Israel HL, Sones M, Harrell D. Ineffectiveness of isoniazid and iproniazid in therapy of sarcoidosis. Am Rev Tuberc. 1953;67(5):671–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Holsinger RE, Dalton JE. Isoniazid therapy in cutaneous tuberculosis and sarcoidosis. J Am Med Assoc. 1954;154(6):475–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Chatterjee SC, Ghosh JC. Sarcoidosis treated with antituberculous drugs. J Indian Med Assoc. 1957;29(2):61–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Drake WP, Oswald-Richter K, Richmond BW, Isom J, Burke VE, Algood H, Braun N, Taylor T, Pandit KV, Aboud C, Yu C, Kaminski N, Boyd AS, King LE. Oral antimycobacterial therapy in chronic cutaneous sarcoidosis: a randomized, single-masked, placebo-controlled study. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149(9):1040–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  84. Drake WP, Richmond BW, Oswald-Richter K, Yu C, Isom JM, Worrell JA, Shipley GR. Effects of broad-spectrum antimycobacterial therapy on chronic pulmonary sarcoidosis. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2013;30(3):201–11.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  85. Sheu J, Saavedra AP, Mostaghimi A. Rapid response of tattoo-associated cutaneous sarcoidosis to minocycline: case report and review of the literature. Dermatol Online J. 2014;20(8):6.Google Scholar
  86. Steen T, English JC. Oral minocycline in treatment of cutaneous sarcoidosis. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149(6):758–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Miyazaki E, Ando M, Fukami T, Nureki S, Eishi Y, Kumamoto T. Minocycline for the treatment of sarcoidosis: is the mechanism of action immunomodulating or antimicrobial effect? Clin Rheumatol. 2008;27(9):1195–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement