Skip to main content
Download PDF

Underdiagnosis of obstructive lung disease: findings from the French CONSTANCES cohort

BMC Pulmonary Medicine volume 21, Article number: 319 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The burden of undiagnosed obstructive lung disease (OLD) (mainly asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) is not fully established, and targets for corrective action are yet to be identified. We assessed the underdiagnosis of OLD and its determinants in France.

Methods

CONSTANCES is a French population-based cohort of adults aged 18–69 years at inception. We analysed data collected at inclusion in 2013–2014. Undiagnosed OLD was defined as spirometry-confirmed airflow limitation (FEV1/FVC < lower limit of normal) without prior diagnosis of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or bronchiectasis. Multivariate analysis was performed with weighted robust Poisson regression models to estimate the adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) of undiagnosed OLD.

Results

Spirometry results were available for 19,398 participants. The prevalence of airflow limitation was 4.6%. Overall, 64.4% of adults with airflow limitation did not report a previous diagnosis of OLD. Individuals with high cumulative tobacco consumption (≥ 10 pack-years) (aPR: 1.72 [1.28–2.32]), without respiratory symptoms (aPR: 1.51 [1.28–1.78]), and with preserved lung function (aPR: 1.21 [1.04–1.41] for a 10-point increase in FEV1% predicted) had a higher risk of being undiagnosed. Half of symptomatic individuals with airflow limitation (45% of those with moderate to severe airflow limitation) were undiagnosed with OLD.

Conclusion

Underdiagnosis of OLD is very common among French adults, even in patients with respiratory symptoms. Efforts should be made in France to raise awareness about OLD in the general population, improve the detection of respiratory symptoms, and increase the use of spirometry among primary care professionals.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Obstructive lung disease (OLD), which mainly relates to asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), is both common and serious, representing a growing public health challenge worldwide [1]. Nevertheless, asthma and COPD are frequently undiagnosed. Regarding asthma, population-based studies showed that 20% to 70% of adults with current asthma remained undiagnosed [2]. A pooled analysis of national and international COPD surveys estimated that 81% of COPD patients were undiagnosed [3]. In France, the most recent estimate of the prevalence of current asthma in adults varies from 6 to 9% according to the definition [4]. In the early 2000s, the prevalence of airflow limitation (based on pre-bronchodilator tests) was estimated at 7.5% among non-asthmatic individuals aged 45 years and over [5]. A recent study conducted in middle-aged adults living in two northern French cities showed prevalence estimates ranging from 9.5% to 16.0% according to the city and definition used [6]. More than 70% of those with airflow limitation did not report a diagnosis of OLD.

Undiagnosed OLD is associated with negative health outcomes such as respiratory symptoms, functional impairment and exacerbation, treatment delays, and substantial healthcare utilisation [7,8,9]. Identifying the factors that contribute to undiagnosed OLD is therefore essential. The present analysis aimed to estimate the prevalence of undiagnosed OLD and identify the risk factors for underdiagnosis in the large French population-based CONSTANCES cohort.

Methods

Study population

The methodology of the CONSTANCES cohort study has already been described [10]. For each year of inclusion, individuals aged 18–69 years, affiliated to the main national health insurance covering around 85% of the population, and living in selected administrative areas in France (called “départements”), were randomly chosen to participate in the study according to an unequal probability sampling stratified by gender, age, social category and area. Participants who gave informed consent completed a self-administered questionnaire and underwent a health examination at one of the health prevention centres (HPCs) in the selected areas. Additionally, data were collected for participants and a random sample of non-participants through a linkage to two national databases: the National Health Database (SNDS) that covers all reimbursements for outpatient and hospital healthcare, and the National Retirement Insurance Database that gathers occupational data throughout life. The longitudinal follow-up of participants is still ongoing. This includes annual self-administered questionnaires, health examinations every 4 years, and passive data collection by linkage to the two national databases.

The present analysis was conducted using data collected at inclusion in 2013–2014. The study population comprised all participants with spirometry results (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of the study population

Full size image

Data collected at inclusion

The self-administered questionnaire included data on sociodemographic characteristics, occupational history, lifestyle, and health. Questions on respiratory health, taken from the European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS) questionnaire, covered asthma-like symptoms, chronic bronchitis, and dyspnoea [11]. Dyspnoea was quantified using the modified Medical Research Council scale [12].

Participants were interviewed by a physician about their medical history, including respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, and underwent a comprehensive health examination that included anthropometric measurements, blood pressure, electrocardiogram, vision and hearing tests, spirometry, and blood and urine sampling for biological testing. For participants aged 45 years and older, a specific work-up of functional, physical, and cognitive capacities was performed. To maintain high-quality standards in the measurements, strict quality management was implemented as previously described [13].

Spirometry and airflow limitation

Spirometry was performed following ATS/ERS guidelines without administering a bronchodilator, as French HPCs are not allowed to administer medication even for diagnostic purposes [14]. For the present study, repeatability criteria were extended to a 200 mL threshold for both forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC). FEV1 and FVC were expressed as percentages of predicted values (FEV1% predicted and FVC% predicted) using the 2012 Global Lung Initiative (GLI) predictive equations [15]. Airflow limitation was defined using the Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria as FEV1/FVC < 0.70 and the lower limit of normal (LLN) criteria with GLI equations. Airflow limitation severity was determined using GOLD criteria (mild: FEV1 ≥ 80% predicted; moderate: [50–80%[; severe: [30–50%[; very severe: < 30% predicted) [12].

Statistical analysis

The outcome was undiagnosed OLD, defined as spirometry-confirmed airflow limitation with no previous diagnosis of OLD (asthma, COPD, emphysema, chronic bronchitis, or bronchiectasis) reported by participants during the medical interview. Participants with undiagnosed OLD were compared to those with diagnosed asthma and COPD for demographic and anthropometric characteristics, education level (coded with the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) [16]), lifetime tobacco consumption (none; > 0 and < 10 pack-years; ≥ 10 pack-years), respiratory symptoms (wheezing in the past 12 months, chronic cough or sputum, dyspnoea), cardiovascular history, and spirometry results. Multivariate analysis was performed using robust Poisson regression models to estimate adjusted prevalence ratios of undiagnosed OLD according to the factors studied. Two models were built: the first was adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics (gender, age, education level in two groups of similar size), tobacco consumption, and clinical data (respiratory symptoms, cardiovascular comorbidities), and the second for these features plus FEV1% predicted.

All analyses incorporated appropriate weights. Using the sampling weights calculated for each year of inclusion, two consecutive steps of reweighting were performed: the first took into account non-participation in the clinical exam, and the second the unavailability of spirometry results in participants who attended the clinical exam. Reweighting was performed with the equal quantile score method using demographic, socioeconomic, and health-related data, along with inclusion data (tobacco status, presence of respiratory symptoms, body mass index, blood pressure) for the second step [17]. Finally, as 2013 and 2014 samples were independent, annual weights were combined [18]. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata v14 (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA).

Results

Study population and previous diagnoses of OLD

Spirometry results were available (≥ 3 acceptable and ≥ 2 reproducible manoeuvres) for 19,398 out of 34,238 CONSTANCES participants included in 2013 or 2014 (Fig. 1). Overall, 765 participants had FEV1/FVC ratio less than LLN, leading to a weighted prevalence of airflow limitation of 4.6% [95% confidence interval: 4.1–5.1%]: 5.2% [4.5–6.0%] in men and 4.0% [3.3–4.6%] in women (P = 0.01). Using FEV1/FVC ratio < 0.70, the prevalence of airflow limitation was 5.0% [4.5–5.5%]: 6.6% [5.8–7.4%] in men and 3.5% [2.9–4.1%] in women (P < 0.001).

In the following analyses, we considered only participants with airflow limitation (FEV1/FVC < LLN). Their characteristics are described in Table 1. Women with airflow limitation were younger, were more likely to be never-smokers, and had a better lung function than men. Men with airflow limitation were more likely to report a previous diagnosis of COPD and cardiovascular comorbidities. Overall, a previous diagnosis of OLD (asthma, COPD, emphysema, chronic bronchitis, or bronchiectasis) was reported by 35.6% of individuals with airflow limitation, leading to a proportion of undiagnosed OLD of 64.4%. This proportion did not differ in men and women.

Table 1 Characteristics of the study populationparticipants with airflow limitation
Full size table

Characteristics of individuals with airflow limitation, with versus without a previous diagnosis of OLD

We investigated the characteristics of individuals who reported a previous diagnosis of asthma or COPD as compared to those with undiagnosed OLD (Table 2). Individuals with undiagnosed OLD had sociodemographic characteristics and smoking habits that ranged between those of individuals with diagnosed asthma and those with diagnosed COPD, although they tended to be closer to those with diagnosed asthma. However, they reported fewer symptoms and had better lung function. Overall, 60.3% of individuals with undiagnosed OLD reported no respiratory symptoms, compared to 27.4% and 20.3% of those with diagnosed asthma and COPD, respectively.

Table 2 Comparison of people individuals with diagnosed and undiagnosed obstructive lung disease among thoseparticipants with airflow limitation
Full size table

Symptoms by severity of airflow limitation and previous diagnoses

To investigate whether under-diagnosis might relate to different patterns of symptoms, we explored the relationship between respiratory symptoms and airflow limitation severity, stratified by a previous diagnosis of OLD (Table 3). Among individuals with undiagnosed OLD, the prevalence of respiratory symptoms increased markedly with the severity of airflow limitation (from 28.8% in individuals with mild airflow limitation to 84.1% in those with severe airflow limitation). Among individuals with diagnosed OLD, the proportion of those reporting symptoms was already high (71.2%) in those with mild airflow limitation and increased up to 80.9% in those with severe airflow limitation. Conversely, considering individuals with respiratory symptoms, 49.4% had undiagnosed OLD: 60.8% in those with mild airflow limitation, and 44.9% in those with moderate to severe airflow limitation.

Table 3 Respiratory symptoms according to the severity of airflow limitation in participants with and without a previous diagnosis of OLD
Full size table

Factors associated with undiagnosed OLD

After adjusting for gender, age, education level, tobacco consumption, respiratory symptoms, and cardiovascular history, only two factors were found to be independently associated with undiagnosed OLD: ever-smokers with a tobacco consumption of ≥ 10 pack-years and individuals without respiratory symptoms had a higher risk of undiagnosed OLD (Table 4, model 1). These associations remained unchanged after further adjustment for FEV1% predicted (model 2), and preserved lung function was also independently associated with a higher risk of undiagnosed OLD. Restricting the study population to participants with moderate to severe airflow limitation (FEV1 < 80% predicted) or those aged 40 years and over gave similar results (Additional file 1: Tables A.1 and A.2). When restricting the study population to participants under 40 years, however, only the absence of respiratory symptoms was associated with an increased risk of undiagnosed OLD (Additional file 1: Table A.3).

Table 4 Factors associated with undiagnosed obstructive lung disease (OLD), multivariate analyses in participants with airflow limitation
Full size table

Discussion

This study highlights a high level of OLD underdiagnosis in France. Only 36% of adults with airflow limitation reported a previous diagnosis of OLD. High tobacco consumption, an absence of respiratory symptoms (wheezing, chronic cough or phlegm, dyspnoea), and preserved lung function were associated with a higher risk of being undiagnosed. However, nearly half (45%) of adults with moderate to severe airflow limitation (FEV1/FVC < LLN and FEV1 < 80% predicted) remained underdiagnosed with OLD despite experiencing respiratory symptoms.

The major strength of our study is the large sample of the French population, randomly drawn from the general population. We employed reweighting procedures using demographic, socioeconomic, clinical, and healthcare consumption data to correct for non-participation in the study. However, reweighting procedures did not fully correct for the selection bias of the study population. No participants in the CONSTANCES cohort had very severe airflow limitation, which tends to underestimate the prevalence of airflow limitation, and since such severe patients are likely to be diagnosed, to overestimate OLD underdiagnosis.

In our study, airflow limitation was defined based on pre-bronchodilator spirometry, which does not distinguish between asthma and COPD. To estimate the overall prevalence of undiagnosed OLD, pre-bronchodilator (ideally, both pre- and post-bronchodilator) spirometry is more relevant than only post-bronchodilator spirometry, which may miss asthmatic patients with fully reversible airflow limitation. However, lung function testing cannot estimate the rate of asthma underdiagnosis, since many patients, even untreated, can have normal spirometry. Further, pre-bronchodilator spirometry cannot be used to estimate the prevalence and underdiagnosis of COPD, since this diagnosis requires airflow limitation to persist after administering bronchodilators. Another limitation of our study is that diagnosed OLD was defined as a previous diagnosis of asthma, COPD, chronic bronchitis, emphysema, or bronchiectasis reported by participants with airflow limitation, without validating the diagnoses in their medical charts.

We estimated that 64% of French adults with OLD (as identified by pre-bronchodilator airflow limitation) were undiagnosed. Studies assessing OLD underdiagnosis based on pre-bronchodilator spirometry are relatively scarce. In the USA, the analysis of two nationally representative health examination surveys showed that more than 70% of adults aged 20–79 years with obstructive spirometry pattern (pre-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.70) were not diagnosed with asthma or COPD and that underdiagnosis did not change from the first study in 1988–1994 to the second in 2007–2012 [19]. A large underdiagnosis of asthma has been evidenced in both children and adults, including the elderly, with underdiagnosis rates ranging from 20 to 70% [2]. The rate of COPD underdiagnosis appeared to be even higher. Using data from national or international surveys conducted in randomly selected adults aged ≥ 40 years, it was found that 50% to 98% of COPD cases (defined by a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < LLN) were undiagnosed, with an average rate of 81% [3]. In France, a study conducted in the early 2000s estimated that 94% of non-asthmatics aged 40 years and over with airflow limitation (pre-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.70) had not been diagnosed with chronic respiratory disease [5]. In northern France in 2011–2013, 72% of middle-aged adults with pre-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < LLN did not report a diagnosis of asthma or COPD [6]. Using the same definition for airflow limitation, we estimated a slightly lower rate (64% overall, and 62% among adults aged 40–69 years).

Several factors may explain the high underdiagnosis of OLD. First, respiratory symptoms may not be present. We found that 48% of individuals with airflow limitation did not report respiratory symptoms (including past-year wheezing, chronic cough or sputum, and dyspnoea grade ≥ 2), with this rate being still high (39%) among those with moderate to severe airflow limitation. However, 49% of individuals with airflow limitation remained underdiagnosed despite the presence of respiratory symptoms. The underreporting of respiratory symptoms to general practitioners by asthmatic patients was shown to contribute significantly to the underdiagnosis of asthma [20]. Regarding COPD, the general population’s limited awareness about this disease and its consequences probably plays an important role in the underreporting of symptoms to general practitioners. In 2017, in France, only 22% of adults reported knowing about COPD, among whom only one-third cited tobacco use as the main cause [21]. Similar figures have been reported worldwide [22,23,24]. The poor recognition of respiratory symptoms suggestive of COPD by primary care professionals might also play a role. Another reason for the underdiagnosis of OLD is the low use of spirometry. In France, spirometry testing is mainly performed in hospital settings or pulmonologists’ offices. As in many other countries, screening for COPD in the general population is not recommended, but early case finding of COPD is. According to clinical guidelines, spirometry tests should be performed in all patients aged 40 years and over with respiratory symptoms, along with cumulative tobacco exposure of ≥ 15 pack-years or occupational exposure to smoke, gas, or dust [25]. Several initiatives are currently being developed to expand spirometry testing to general practices to decrease the underdiagnosis of COPD, but the results are still pending.

In line with previous population-based studies on COPD underdiagnosis [3, 26], we found that OLD underdiagnosis was more frequent in adults with fewer symptoms and better lung function. COPD is often not recognised in patients with limited respiratory symptoms and preserved lung function, with the diagnosis being delayed until late in the disease process. Studies showed that 20–30% of patients admitted to emergency departments or hospitalised for the first time for COPD exacerbation had not been previously diagnosed or treated [27,28,29].

We defined airflow limitation using pre-bronchodilator spirometry, which encompasses both persistent and reversible airflow limitation. To increase the specificity of pre-bronchodilator airflow limitation for COPD, we restricted the study population to participants with moderate to severe airflow limitation (FEV1 < 80% predicted). It was shown that the proportion of pre-bronchodilator airflow limitation that persists after administering bronchodilators was higher (above 85%) in adults with FEV1 < 80% predicted [30]. We also restricted the study population to participants aged 40 years and over, since COPD is extremely rare in young adults. These analyses yielded similar results to those observed for all participants with airflow limitation, with an increased risk of being undiagnosed in those without respiratory symptoms, with preserved lung function, and with a high cumulative tobacco consumption. By contrast, in participants aged under 40 years, no significant association with tobacco consumption was observed. These results could suggest that the association between tobacco consumption and OLD underdiagnosis is related to COPD underdiagnosis.

Despite having less severe airway obstruction and fewer comorbidities than those with a clinical diagnosis of asthma or COPD, people with undiagnosed OLD had a higher mortality risk than the general population [19]. Undiagnosed COPD patients often experience exacerbations, and compared to individuals without COPD, they have impaired health-related quality of life and increased healthcare use [7, 9, 31, 32]. In the absence of diagnosis, these patients cannot be properly managed for their disease, although effective treatments are available to stop smoking, prevent respiratory infections, relieve symptoms, decrease exacerbation risk, and limit quality-of-life impairment [12]. Some treatments were recently shown to decrease mortality in some subpopulations [33, 34]. Regarding asthma, evidence shows that early intervention, particularly with inhaled corticosteroids, has a substantial impact on quality of life and later morbidity [35].

No data on time trends in asthma prevalence among French adults are available, but repeated prevalence surveys among children show an increasing trend [36, 37]. Regarding COPD, increased hospital admissions for COPD exacerbation have been observed [38]. Due to the delay in the mass uptake of smoking in women in the twentieth century, between-gender discrepancies in the current trends for COPD burden are observed. Between 2002 and 2015, the rate of patients hospitalised for COPD exacerbation increased by 100% in women and 30% in men. COPD prevalence modelling in France predicted an increase in prevalence (for both diagnosed and undiagnosed COPD) between 2005 and 2015, especially in women [39]. If the underdiagnosis of OLD is not substantially reduced, the number of undiagnosed individuals will continue to increase in the coming years.

Conclusion

The underdiagnosis of OLD is very common among adults in France. Many remain undiagnosed despite the significant burden of respiratory symptoms. Underdiagnosis affects not only people with mild airflow limitation but also those with more severe disease. This study highlights the need to reduce the underdiagnosis of OLD in the French population. Efforts should be made to raise awareness about OLD and respiratory symptoms in the general population through national campaigns using various media. Promoting the use of spirometry among primary care professionals along with more systematic screening for symptoms using structured questionnaires should also improve OLD diagnosis.

Availability of data and materials

Access to sensitive and personal data, such as those of the CONSTANCES cohort, is restricted by French law. The CONSTANCES coordination team makes the data available, upon request, to qualified researchers who have obtained prior authorization from the French national data protection authority (Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés, CNIL). Information for applicants to CONSTANCES data is available on the website: https://www.constances.fr/CFP.pdf. CONSTANCES investigators may be contacted at the following address: contact@constances.fr.

Abbreviations

ATS:

American Thoracic Society

COPD:

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

ERS:

European Respiratory Society

HPC:

Health prevention centres

FEV1 :

Forced expiratory volume in 1 s

FVC:

Forced vital capacity

GLI:

Global Lung Function Initiative

GOLD:

Global Initiative on Obstructive Lung Disease

OLD:

Obstructive lung disease

References

  1. GBD Chronic Respiratory Disease Collaborators. Prevalence and attributable health burden of chronic respiratory diseases, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(6):585–96. 2020.

  2. Aaron SD, Boulet LP, Reddel HK, Gershon AS. Underdiagnosis and overdiagnosis of asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;198(8):1012–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lamprecht B, Soriano JB, Studnicka M, Kaiser B, Vanfleteren LE, Gnatiuc L, et al. Determinants of underdiagnosis of COPD in national and international surveys. Chest. 2015;148(4):971–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Delmas MC, Bénézet L, Ribet C, Iwatsubo Y, Provost D, Varraso R, Zins M, Leynaert B, Nadif R, Roche N. Prevalence of asthma among adults in France, data from the Constances cohort study. Rev Mal Respir. 2021;38(8):797–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Roche N, Dalmay F, Perez T, Kuntz C, Vergnenegre A, Neukirch F, et al. Impact of chronic airflow obstruction in a working population. Eur Respir J. 2008;31(6):1227–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Quach A, Giovannelli J, Cherot-Kornobis N, Ciuchete A, Clement G, Matran R, et al. Prevalence and underdiagnosis of airway obstruction among middle-aged adults in northern France: The ELISABET study 2011–2013. Respir Med. 2015;109(12):1553–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Akazawa M, Halpern R, Riedel AA, Stanford RH, Dalal A, Blanchette CM. Economic burden prior to COPD diagnosis: a matched case-control study in the United States. Respir Med. 2008;102(12):1744–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Siersted HC, Boldsen J, Hansen HS, Mostgaard G, Hyldebrandt N. Population based study of risk factors for underdiagnosis of asthma in adolescence: Odense schoolchild study. BMJ. 1998;316(7132):651–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Labonté LE, Tan WC, Li PZ, Mancino P, Aaron SD, Benedetti A, et al. Undiagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease contributes to the burden of health care use. Data from the CanCOLD Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;194(3):285–98.

  10. Zins M, Goldberg M, team C. The French CONSTANCES population-based cohort: design, inclusion and follow-up. Eur J Epidemiol. 2015;30(12):1317–28.

  11. Burney PG, Luczynska C, Chinn S, Jarvis D. The European Community Respiratory Health Survey. Eur Respir J. 1994;7(5):954–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: 2020 report. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). Available from: https://goldcopd.org.

  13. Ruiz F, Goldberg M, Lemonnier S, Ozguler A, Boos E, Brigand A, et al. High quality standards for a large-scale prospective population-based observational cohort: Constances. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, et al. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J. 2005;26(2):319–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Quanjer PH, Stanojevic S, Cole TJ, Baur X, Hall GL, Culver BH, et al. Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3–95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations. Eur Respir J. 2012;40(6):1324–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. International Standard Classification of Education: ISCED 2011. Available from: http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/international-standard-classification-of-education-isced-2011-en.pdf.

  17. Santin G, Geoffroy B, Benezet L, Delezire P, Chatelot J, Sitta R, et al. In an occupational health surveillance study, auxiliary data from administrative health and occupational databases effectively corrected for nonresponse. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(6):722–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kish L. Cumulating/combining population surveys. Surv Methodol. 1999;25(2):129–38.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Martinez CH, Mannino DM, Jaimes FA, Curtis JL, Han MK, Hansel NN, et al. Undiagnosed obstructive lung disease in the United States. Associated Factors and Long-term Mortality. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015;12(12):1788–95.

  20. van Schayck CP, van Der Heijden FM, van Den Boom G, Tirimanna PR, van Herwaarden CL. Underdiagnosis of asthma: Is the doctor or the patient to blame? The DIMCA project Thorax. 2000;55(7):562–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Delmas MC, Pasquereau A, Roche N, Andler R, Richard JB. Richard JB [Awareness of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in France: 2017 Health Barometer]. Bull Epidemiol Hebd. 2018;35–36:703–8.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Asai M, Tanaka T, Kozu R, Kitagawa C, Tabusadani M, Senjyu H. Effect of a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) intervention on COPD awareness in a regional city in Japan. Intern Med. 2015;54(2):163–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Soriano JB, Calle M, Montemayor T, Alvarez-Sala JL, Ruiz-Manzano J, Miravitlles M. The general public’s knowledge of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and its determinants: current situation and recent changes. Arch Bronconeumol. 2012;48(9):308–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Walker SL, Saltman DL, Colucci R, Martin L, Canadian Lung Association Advisory C. Awareness of risk factors among persons at risk for lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and sleep apnea: a Canadian population-based study. Can Respir J. 2010;17(6):287–94.

  25. Haute Autorité de santé. Guide du parcours de soins: Bronchopneumopathie chronique obstructive. Saint-Denis: HAS, 2014. 63 p. Available from: https://www.has-sante.fr/jcms/c_1242507/fr/guide-du-parcours-de-soins-bronchopneumopathie-chronique-obstructive-bpco.

  26. Johnson KM, Bryan S, Ghanbarian S, Sin DD, Sadatsafavi M. Characterizing undiagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Respir Res. 2018;19(1):26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zoia MC, Corsico AG, Beccaria M, Guarnone R, Cervio G, Testi R, et al. Exacerbations as a starting point of pro-active chronic obstructive pulmonary disease management. Respir Med. 2005;99(12):1568–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bastin AJ, Starling L, Ahmed R, Dinham A, Hill N, Stern M, et al. High prevalence of undiagnosed and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at first hospital admission with acute exacerbation. Chron Respir Dis. 2010;7(2):91–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Balcells E, Gimeno-Santos E, de Batlle J, Ramon MA, Rodriguez E, Benet M, et al. Characterisation and prognosis of undiagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients at their first hospitalisation. BMC Pulm Med. 2015;15:4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bhatta L, Leivseth L, Carslake D, Langhammer A, Mai XM, Chen Y, et al. Comparison of pre- and post-bronchodilator lung function as predictors of mortality: the HUNT Study. Respirology. 2020;25(4):401–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Miravitlles M, Soriano JB, Garcia-Rio F, Munoz L, Duran-Tauleria E, Sanchez G, et al. Prevalence of COPD in Spain: impact of undiagnosed COPD on quality of life and daily life activities. Thorax. 2009;64(10):863–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Çolak Y, Afzal S, Nordestgaard BG, Vestbo J, Lange P. Prognosis of asymptomatic and symptomatic, undiagnosed COPD in the general population in Denmark: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 2017;5(5):426–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lipson DA, Crim C, Criner GJ, Day NC, Dransfield MT, Halpin DMG, et al. Reduction in all-cause mortality with fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;201(12):1508–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rabe KF, Martinez FJ, Ferguson GT, Wang C, Singh D, Wedzicha JA, et al. Triple inhaled therapy at two glucocorticoid doses in moderate-to-very-severe COPD. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(1):35–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Global Intiative for Asthma. Global strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention, 2020. Available from: https://ginasthma.org/.

  36. Delmas MC, Guignon N, Leynaert B, Com-Ruelle L, Annesi-Maesano I, Chardon O, et al. [Trends in asthma prevalence in children in France: data from the national health surveys among schoolchildren, 2003–2008]. Bull Epidemiol Hebd. 2014;20:360–5.

  37. Delmas MC, Guignon N, Leynaert B, Moisy M, Marguet C, Fuhrman C. Increase in asthma prevalence among young children in France. Rev Mal Respir. 2016;34(5):525–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Olie V, Pasquereau A, Assogba FAG, Arwidson P, Nguyen-Thanh V, Chatignoux E, et al. Changes in tobacco-related morbidity and mortality in French women: worrying trends. Eur J Public Health. 2020;30:380–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Burgel PR, Laurendeau C, Raherison C, Fuhrman C, Roche N. An attempt at modeling COPD epidemiological trends in France. Respir Res. 2018;19(1):130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the team of the “Population-based Epidemiologic Cohorts Unit” (Cohortes épidémiologiques en population) that designed and manages the Constances Cohort Study. They also thank the French National Health Insurance Fund (“Caisse nationale d’assurance maladie”, CNAM) and its Health Prevention Centres ("centres d’examens de santé“), which are collecting a large part of the data, the French Old-Age Insurance Fund (“Caisse nationale d’assurance vieillesse”) for its contribution to the constitution of the cohort, and ClinSearch, Aqualab and EuroCell, which are conducting the data quality control. The authors also acknowledge the Constances Respiratory Group: MC Delmas, O Dumas, V Giraud, Y Iwatsubo, B Leynaert, N Le Moual, R Nadif, T Perez, N Roche, R Varraso.

Funding

The Constances Cohort Study was supported and funded by the French National Health Insurance Fund (“Caisse nationale d’assurance maladie”, CNAM). The Constances Cohort Study is an “Infrastructure nationale en biologie et santé” and benefits from a grant from the French National Agency for Research (ANR-11-INBS-002). Constances is also partly funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), AstraZeneca, Lundbeck and L’Oréal. None of these funding sources had any role in the design of the study, collection and analysis of data or decision to publish.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Santé Publique France, French National Public Health Agency, 12 Rue du Val d’Osne, 94415, Saint-Maurice Cedex, France

    Marie-Christine Delmas, Laetitia Bénézet & Yuriko Iwatsubo

  2. Inserm UMS 011, Population-Based Epidemiological Cohorts, Villejuif, France

    Céline Ribet & Marie Zins

  3. Inserm, Équipe d’Épidémiologie Respiratoire Intégrative, CESP, Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Université Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France

    Rachel Nadif, Nicolas Roche & Bénédicte Leynaert

  4. APHP Centre, Hôpital et Institut Cochin, Service de Pneumologie, Université de Paris, Paris, France

    Nicolas Roche

Authors
  1. Marie-Christine Delmas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Laetitia Bénézet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Céline Ribet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yuriko Iwatsubo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Marie Zins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rachel Nadif
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Nicolas Roche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Bénédicte Leynaert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MCD was involved in the study design, data analysis and results interpretation, and was a major contributor to the manuscript writing. LB contributed to the data analysis, results interpretation and manuscript writing. CR and MZ were involved in the cohort creation. YI, RN, NR and BL were involved in the study design, results interpretation and manuscript writing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie-Christine Delmas.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the national and institutional committees on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration, as revised in 2008. All procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the French Institute of Health Research (INSERM). The CONSTANCES cohort was also approved by the French Data Protection Agency (CNIL). All participants provided written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

NR reports grants or contracts from Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis and Pfizer, consulting fees from GSK, AstraZeneca and Novartis, and Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, GSK, AstraZeneca, Chiesi, Sanofi and Zambon. All other authors have nothing to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Underdiagnosis of obstructive lung disease: findings from the French CONSTANCES cohort.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Delmas, MC., Bénézet, L., Ribet, C. et al. Underdiagnosis of obstructive lung disease: findings from the French CONSTANCES cohort. BMC Pulm Med 21, 319 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-021-01688-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-021-01688-z

Keywords

BMC Pulmonary Medicine

ISSN: 1471-2466

Contact us