Skip to main content

The performance of detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in lung biopsy tissue by metagenomic next-generation sequencing

Abstract

Background

Tuberculosis (TB) is a chronic infectious disease caused by the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC), which is the leading cause of death from infectious diseases. The rapid and accurate microbiological detection of the MTBC is crucial for the diagnosis and treatment of TB. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has been shown to be a promising and satisfying application of detection in infectious diseases. However, relevant research about the difference in MTBC detection by mNGS between bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and lung biopsy tissue specimens remains scarce.

Methods

We used mNGS to detect pathogens in BALF and lung biopsy tissue obtained by CT-guide percutaneous lung puncture (CPLP) or radial endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial lung biopsy (R-EBUS-TBLB) from 443 hospitalized patients in mainland China suspected of pulmonary infections between May 1, 2019 and October 31, 2021. Aim to evaluate the diagnostic performance of mNGS for detecting MTBC and explore differences in the microbial composition in the 2 specimen types.

Results

Among the 443 patients, 46 patients finally were diagnosed with TB, of which 36 patients were detected as MTBC positive by mNGS (8.93%). Striking differences were noticed in the higher detection efficiency of lung biopsy tissue compared with BALF (P = 0.004). There were no significant differences between the 2 specimen types in the relative abundance among the 27 pathogens detected by mNGS from the 36 patients.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that mNGS could offer an effective detection method of MTBC in BALF or lung tissue biopsy samples in patients suspected of TB infections. When it comes to the situations that BALF samples have limited value to catch pathogens for special lesion sites or the patients have contraindications to bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) procedures, lung biopsy tissue is an optional specimen for MTBC detection by mNGS. However, whether lung tissue-mNGS is superior to BALF-mNGS in patients with MTBC infection requires further prospective multicenter randomized controlled studies with more cases.

Peer Review reports

Background

Infectious diseases remain the leading cause of morbidity and mortality around the world [1].The lung infection, the most common infectious disease, has attracted wide concern, especially when it occurs in the form of explosive emerging infectious diseases such as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) [2, 3]. However, some specific pulmonary infectious diseases should not be ignored. Pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB), a chronic infectious disease caused by the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC), remains a major global public health problem that affects at least a quarter of the world’s population each year and causes high morbidity and mortality worldwide, particularly in developing countries, such as India, China and South Africa and so on [4, 5].

The MTBCs can invade multiple systems and organs, such as the lymph nodes, colon, liver, and spine, with lung infection being the most common form [6]. Active patients with PTB, the main source of infection, usually expel bacteria by talking, coughing, or sneezing, spreading the pathogen through airborne particles inhaled by others [7]. The accurate and early detection of MTBC is of great significance for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of PTB, and ultimately helps reduce the spread of PTB. The rapid development of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) recently has shown promising and satisfying applications in medical microbiology [8]. mNGS may be particularly useful for samples from a sterile site, such as those from BALF, cerebrospinal fluid, blood, or biopsy tissue. BALF is considered a sterile type of specimen that is suitable for detecting pathogens of respiratory infections. Meanwhile, lung biopsy tissue specimens, the gold standard of diagnosis of cancer, gradually being used to comprehensively detect pathogens of infectious diseases. However, for patients with peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) or who have contraindications of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) procedures, the role of BALF in MTBC diagnosis is limited. Lung biopsy specimens may be a good alternative to BALF for MTBC detection under the abovementioned circumstances. Up to now, relevant research about the difference in MTBC detection by mNGS between BALF and lung biopsy tissue specimens remains scarce.

This study comprised 2 parts. We first evaluated the diagnostic performance of mNGS for detecting MTBC between lung biopsy tissue and BALF. The lung biopsy tissue was obtained by radial endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial lung biopsy (R-EBUS-TBLB) or CT-guide percutaneous lung puncture (CPLP). And then we explore differences in the microbial composition in the 2 specimen types to analyze possible relationships between MTBC and other pathogens.

Methods

Study design and subjects

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 443 hospitalized patients who were clinically and radiologically suspected of having pulmonary infection at The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China (Anhui Provincial Hospital), a provincial tertiary first-class general hospital, in mainland China from May 1, 2019 and October 31, 2021. We excluded patients who met one of the following 4 criteria: (1) no mNGS results, (2) finally were diagnosed with non-infective diseases, (3) incomplete clinical data, (4) coinfection with HIV (Fig. 1). The standard of diagnosis refers to the WHO consolidated guidelines on tuberculosis 2021 version [9]. The patients detected as MTBC positive by mNGS were enrolled in the statistical analysis of the study. Demographic characteristics and clinical information were gathered by electronic medical records, including gender, age, smoking habit, family history, disease history, previous anti-TB/antibacterial therapy, computerized tomography (CT) diagnosis, Sputum Stain, GeneXpert MTB/RIF (Xpert).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study design

Standard of diagnosis of PTB

The diagnostic criteria for PTB were in accordance with the following several aspects including (1) Clinical diagnosed PTB referred to patients with typical chest radiograph findings and met any of the following: typical clinical presentation of PTB or positive purified protein derivative (PPD) test. Relevant symptoms and radiographic lesions were improved after anti-TB treatment, even if they had negative findings. (2) Definite PTB referred to patients with positive cultures or nucleic acid for MTBC detection in sputum or BALF; patients with at least 1 positive sputum smear; patients with positive pathologic results indicative of PTB; patients with positive Xpert assay results [9].

Ethics statement and specimen collection

All study methods were carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was achieved from the ethics committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China (Anhui Provincial Hospital), and written informed consent was obtained from each patient before performing bronchoscopy or lung biopsy. The samples of patients enrolled in our study included BALF and lung biopsy tissue. Bronchoscopy with BAL is often indicated for the definitive diagnosis of PTB, especially when empiric anti-TB treatments fail, and its safety and tolerability profiles have already been confirmed in previous clinical operations [10]. Lung biopsy tissue was obtained from CPLP or R-EBUS-TBLB. Our respiratory endoscopy and intervention center has developed standardized procedures for specimen collection (1) All patients were examined by electronic bronchoscopy in our hospital, and chest CT showed that the lesions were brushed, followed by BAL, (2) The brush specimen of bronchoscopy was routinely tested by acid fast bacillus (AFB) smear and cytopathology, (3) BALF and lung biopsy tissue was preserved in a specialized refrigerator at −80 °C before mNGS test and all specimens were sent for mNGS within 1 h.

Sample preparation and DNA extraction

The total volume rang 10 to 12 mL BALF sample from patients was collected according to a standard procedure, of which 1.5 ml precipitation was extracted by centrifugation after inactivation were directly collected in deoxyribonuclease (DNase)-free tubes for the identification of potential pathogens. Lung biopsy tissue required a special procedure before the nucleic acid extraction: the tissue sample was ground into homogenate before deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extraction. All samples were stored in a refrigerator at −80 °C before the test. Samples were prepared for wall-breaking reaction, and 200 ng DNA was extracted by the TIANamp Micro DNA Kit (DP316, Tiangen Biotech).

Construction of DNA libraries and sequencing

Our hospital cooperated with the Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI) to establish a localized mNGS laboratory in our hospital for rapid and high-quality etiological detection. The physicians in the department of clinical laboratory of our hospital used MGISEQ-2000 platform, providing by BGI, to conduct mNGS detection and interpretation of reports. The extracted DNA was sonicated and 200–300 bp DNA fragments were obtained. Then, DNA libraries were constructed through DNA-fragmentation, end-repair, adapter-ligation, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification. Qualified libraries were pooled, DNA Nanoball (DNB) was made using single-stranded DNA circles, and sequenced by MGISEQ-2000 platform.

Bioinformatic analysis

High-quality sequencing data were calculated by removing low-quality reads, followed by subtracting the human host sequence of the human reference genome (hg38) using Burrows-Wheeler alignment (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome). The remaining sequence data were aligned to the Microbial Genome Database. The database used for this study contains 2,328 bacteria, 199 fungi, 4,189 viruses, 135 parasites, 83 mycobacteria, and 41 mycoplasma/Chlamydia, which were associated with human diseases.

Criteria for a positive mNGS result

  1. 1.

    Bacteria (mycobacteria excluded), viruses and parasites: mNGS identified a microbe whose coverage rate scored tenfold higher than that of any other microbe [11].

  2. 2.

    Fungi: mNGS identified a microbe whose coverage rate scored fivefold higher than that of any other fungus because of its low biomass in DNA extraction [12, 13].

  3. 3.

    Mycobacteria: MTBC was considered positive when no less than 1 read was mapped to either the species or genus level because of the low yields of DNA extraction and rare specimen contamination [14, 15]. Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) were identified as positive when the mapping read number (genus or species level) was in the top 10 in the bacterial list due to the balance of hospital-to-laboratory environmental contamination [16] and low yield rate [17].

Statistical analysis

The sensitivity and specificity of different ways of obtaining samples were analyzed. 95% confidence intervals (CI) are displayed in the results figures. Comparative analysis was conducted by Pearson χ2 test, Fisher exact test, the Wilcoxon rank sum test or the McNemar test for discrete variables. Statistical analyses and figures were conducted using the SPSS statistical package 24.0 software and GraphPad Prism 9 software. A heatmap and Stacked Bar Chart was drawn using the R language. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Patient and sample characteristics

Among the 443 patients suspected of pulmonary infection between May 1, 2019 and October 31, 2021, according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 40 patients were excluded. From them, twenty-five patients without mNGS result and five patients without complete clinical data were excluded. Ten patients were not enrolled on account of the final diagnosis of noninfectious inflammatory disease. Four hundred and three patients underwent mNGS tests on direct clinical samples, including BALF or lung biopsy tissue. A total of 36 patients (36/403, 8.93%) were detected MTBC positive, ranging in age 16 to 84 years old, with an age median of 56 years, an average age of 53.3 years (95% CI, 46.2–60.4 years), and the male/female ratio of 13/23. The positive detections from two different sample detection modes were 21 cases in BALF sample, and 15 cases in lung biopsy tissues. Combine with the results of Xpert, treatment, and follow-up, the 36 patients were finally diagnosed with PTB. The clinical and demographic characteristics of the study patients are summarized in Table 1. Among 36 patients detected MTBC positive by mNGS, 26 patients underwent tuberculous testing with mNGS and Xpert simultaneously, and 10 patients carried on mNGS and Xpert, respectively, as part of the validation process. The remaining 367 patients had MTBC-negative results by mNGS detection, including 9 cases diagnosed with clinical PTB and 1 case that were diagnosed with definite PTB for positive Xpert results.

Table 1 Clinical information of the enrolled patients with TB

In this study, the 36 mNGS MTBC-positive patients were enrolled and categorized into two groups. Demographic characteristics were collected and analyzed. The average age was 53.7 years (95% CI, 44.6–62.8 years) old among the BALF group. Among them, male patients accounted for 61.9%. The proportion of smoking in the BALF group was 19%. We found that no significant differences in age, male, family history, disease history, and abundance of Xpert and sputum stain were observed between the BALF group and lung biopsy tissue groups (Table 2). Besides, the pathogens were analyzed among all subjects. As shown in Table 2, we found that the patients only detected MTBC in the lung biopsy tissue group significantly more than that in the BALF group (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.006).

Table 2 Baseline characteristics and pathogens of the study population

Diagnostic performance of mNGS and Xpert tests for MTBC detection

Then, we focused on assessing the diagnostic performance for mNGS, Xpert, and traditional methods compared with the clinical final diagnosis. We noticed that two of the mNGS-positive cases presented a negative result Xpert. On account of high reads of MTBC (n = 1484 and 609) and typical clinical symptoms and imageology characteristics in this case, we gave diagnosis as PTB and observed effective anti-TB treatment in follow-up. Among these 10 patients finally diagnosed as PTB with negative mNGS results, 9 cases with clinically diagnosed PTB were negative for both Xpert and mNGS while 1 case was positive for Xpert. This Xpert-positive case was collected from a BALF sample (Fig. 1). The 10 patients were already put on anti-TB treatment with improved tuberculosis symptoms.

The sensitivity and specificity of MTBC detection by mNGS was 78.26% (36/46, 95% CI, 65.88%–90.65%) and 100% (36/36) respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of MTBC detection by mNGS was 100% (36/36) and 97.28% (357/367, 95% CI, 95.60–98.95%). The sensitivity and specificity of MTBC detection by Xpert was 76.09% (35/46, 95% CI, 63.28–88.89%) and 100% (35/35) respectively. The PPV and NPV of MTBC detection by Xpert was 100% (35/35) and 97.00% (356/366, 95% CI, 95.25–98.76%) (Fig. 2). Overall, mNGS and Xpert presented similar overall MTBC detection efficiency, which was also superior to AFB (2.17%) (Fisher's exact test, P < 0.05).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Diagnostic performance of mNGS and Xpert tests for MTBC detection

Comparison of diagnostic performance for MTBC between BALF and lung biopsy tissue

A comparison of the relative abundances of genera between the BALF and lung biopsy tissue groups allowed us to identify differences in the diagnostic performance for mNGS in detecting MTBC (Table 3). We counted the proportion of MTBC reads in total sequences of each patient, respectively, it indicated that mNGS possess a higher efficiency in lung biopsy tissue (non-parametric tests, P = 0.004) (Fig. 3).

Table 3 The detection ratio of MTBC sequence reads
Fig. 3
figure 3

BALF comparison in lung biopsy tissue samples by mNGS from MTBC-positive patients. The stacked histogram were plotted with the percentage of pathogen reads detected by mNGS in each patient's BALF or lung biopsy tissue samples. Differential abundance analysis indicated that the ratio of MTBC reads in the lung biopsy tissue group was significantly higher than that in the BALF group (non-parametric tests, P = 0.004). mNGS = metagenomic next-generation sequencing, BALF = bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

Characteristics of microbial composition detected in different types of specimens

An average of 69,472,264 reads per sample from patients was obtained. Before the analysis of relative abundance, we remove anthropogenic sequences and colonized bacterial sequence reads by comparing to microbial database. To describe the detailed composition features of the microbiota in detail, patients were sorted into two categories as BALF and biopsy groups. The grouped clustering heatmap of pathogen abundances across samples was presented after Z-score was executed to standardize the reads (Fig. 4). It displays the abundance of each category and the relationships between categories and specimens.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Analysis of the pathogens detected by mNGS. The clustering heatmap, presenting all pathogens, was drawn using the z-scores of reads detected by mNGS

In 36 cases detected MTBC positive by mNGS, 14 cases (14/36, 38.89%) were detected MTBC only, while mNGS were also positive for other pathogens in 22 cases (22/36, 61.11%). The species and relative abundance of pathogens detected in enrolled cases were listed in Table 4, respectively. The mNGS sequences detected reads of MTBC ranged from 1 to 61,407, and reads of the other pathogens ranged from 1 to 11,583. After analyzing the relative abundance, we focused on the genera with relative abundance equal to or greater than 0.1%. The genera from top to bottom were Candida (8.9871%), Aspergillus (7.5898%), Nakaseomyces (7.1741%), Human gammaherpesvirus 4 (7.0210%), Mycoplasma (5.0869%), Prevotella (4.0848%), Haemophilus (1.5316%), Human alphaherpesvirus 1 (1.1677%), Neisseria (0.9850%), Streptococcus (0.9831%), Veillonella (0.9726%), Mycolicibacter (0.1964%), Primate bocaparvovirus 1 (0.1689%), Capnocytophag (0.1244%), and Actinomyces (0.1100%) (Table 4). Although the rank of fungi were high on the list, there were no significant differences between the reads of fungi (23.75%) and non-fungi (22.59%) (non-parametric tests, P > 0.05). The distribution of pathogens was compared between the two groups. From the 27 pathogens discovered, six pathogens were evenly distributed in the two groups, including MTBC, Prevotella, Haemophilus, Capnocytophag, Streptococcus, Actinomyces.

Table 4 The distribution of microorganisms at the genera level that were found in the samples of PTB patients

Additionally, we found that only 11 of the 36 cases had results of the specific Mycobacterium strain. They, respectively, were Mycobacterium tuberculosis (10/36, 27.78%) and Mycobacterium microtus (1/36, 2.78%). The most frequent patterns of mixed microbial composition were bacteria and virus mixed (5/36, 13.89%), followed by bacteria and fungus mixed (3/36, 8.33%) and mixture of bacteria, fungi and viruses (3/36, 8.33%). No significant between-group differences were found (multiple comparisions, P > 0.05).

Potential usage in patients with viral identification

In order the sequencing reads of the 8 viruses from 9 patients were Human gammaherpesvirus 4 (EBV) (n = 3, reads = 10,727), followed by Human alphaherpesvirus 1 (n = 2, reads = 1784), Primate bocaparvovirus 1 (n = 1, reads = 258), Human betaherpesvirus 5 (CMV) (n = 3, reads = 79), Human betaherpesvirus 6B (n = 1, reads = 58), Torque teno virus (n = 2, reads = 15), Torque teno virus 16(n = 1, reads = 4) and Hepatitis B virus (n = 1, reads = 1) (Table 4). Combined with the results of T cell subpopulation test, nearly half of the patients (4/9, patient NO.14, 15, 21, 31) were considered immunodeficiency hosts and may have been diagnosed with a chronic viral infection or hospital-acquired infections. All of them did not receive antiviral medication before the mNGS test. Additionally, there was a quite high percentage of patients (8/9, 88.89%) wide-spectrum antibiotics, including levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and cefixime, while 7 of 9 patients were suspected of inappropriate antibiotic usage.

Discussion

This is a single-center retrospective study to assess the diagnostic performance of BALF and lung biopsy tissue for mNGS detecting MTBC. Previous studies have shown the value of mNGS on MTBC detection, most of which generally involved BALF and sputum samples. This is the first study to directly compare BALF with lung biopsy tissue on the use of mNGS in MTBC detection. Preceding studies have indicated that the efficacy of culture, Xpert, and mNGS was significantly affected by anti-TB treatment [18]. All enrolled patients in our research had not previously received anti-TB treatment that ensures the objectiveness and accuracy of the research results. Moreover, we implemented the R-EBUS probe lesions suspected of PTB location when TBLB to make certain of higher diagnostic rates of mNGS from lung biopsy tissues.

The keys to managing infectious diseases include the following vital aspects (1) control the source of infection, (2) cut off the route of transmission, and (3) protect the susceptible population [19]. Early bacteriological diagnosis of PTB case is crucial to limit the spread of infections [20]. Nevertheless, early detection of PTB from other lung infections is difficult by traditional methods, particularly for patients with mild symptoms or uncharacteristic appearances on imaging [21, 22]. In 2020, the incidence and mortality rates of PTB were 47.7644 per 100,000 and 0.1367 per 100,000 in China. The positive tuberculosis case detection rate (CDR) is less than 40% in China, which would place a heavy burden on health care services, and carry enormous consequences for societies and economies [23]. Therefore, it is critical in improving the diagnosis of patients with PTB. Recently, the popularity of mNGS has drawn extensive concerns, particularly with respect to shortening turnaround time and guaranteeing accurate pathogen detection for diagnosis [8]. Xpert is WHO-recommended rapid test that simultaneously detect tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in people with signs and symptoms of tuberculosis. This assay has been proven useful to diagnose PTB, with 89% sensitivity and 99% specificity [24]. Previous research has shown that Xpert performs similar detection efficiency to mNGS in MTBC detection [18]. In the Health Industry Standards of the People's Republic of China—Tuberculosis Diagnosis issued in 2017 [25], positive Xpert test of MTBC and lung imaging examination were included in the diagnostic standards of tuberculosis, which is highly recognized for the application value of the Xpert test in tuberculosis diagnosis. Removing false-positive results is a primary challenge for mNGS analysis. Therefore, for the patients detected MTBC positive by mNGS, we had implemented Xpert as part of the validation process. In our study, mNGS and Xpert displayed similar overall MTBC detection efficiency, which was also much superior to AFB (Pearson Chi-Square test, < 0.05), which demonstrates that mNGS is a reliable tool for MTBC detection, whether using BALF or lung biopsy specimens. However, during the process of clinical diagnosis and treatment, we noticed that major deficiencies of Xpert are as follows. Firstly, according to the WHO report, it has not improved global case detection rates and shows limited efficacy in extrapulmonary TB (ETB) [26]. Secondly, The Xpert and PCR laboratory tests are DNA tests of MTBC used to diagnose tuberculosis infection, but they cannot diagnose NTM infection [27]. Thirdly, the detection limit of Xpert is 131 CFU/ml; any unit lower than this value cannot be detected, resulting in negative results. Moreover, although Xpert shows both high sensitivity and specificity, and suggests its high value in PTB diagnosis; however, the application of pleural fluid is still limited, and should be improved [28]. Therefore, in some special cases, mNGS can be recognized as an important complement to Xpert in tuberculosis diagnosis. Both methods have their own pros and cons that seem to complement each other. For patients with complex disease, the combining mNGS and Xpert to diagnose PTB can improve the diagnostic rate [29].

Sputum specimens are mostly used as respiratory samples due to advantages such as convenience and security. However, it inevitably exists potential pollution from the oral cavity microbiota and upper respiratory tract (URT). BAL is playing an increasingly important role in the diagnosis of respiratory diseases because it leads in the fields of accountability, practicality and safety for operation [30, 31]. When inflammation lesions are anatomically limited to the surrounding lung parenchyma, the most accessible site should be biopsied. TB, an intracellular bacterium, tends to release fewer extracellular nucleic acids due to its intracellular growth characteristics, which make it difficult to detect [32]. However, the sensitivity for detecting TB will be improved since biopsy may lead to the destruction of tissues and cells. In our research, we found that mNGS samples from BALF and lung biopsy tissue varied in detecting MTBC. Lung biopsy tissue mNGS was more sensitive than BALF to the MTBC detection. Lung biopsy is indeed more invasive in patients than in BALF. Therefore, we should weigh the pros and cons carefully when we can gain the same benefit from both options. For patients with PPLs or who have contraindications of BAL procedures, detection of MTBC using biopsy tissue by mNGS is a more appropriate diagnostic method. Additionally, the sampling method of alveolar lavage fluid is single, while lung biopsy tissue can be obtained by R-EBUS-TBLB, percutaneous lung puncture biopsy (PNLB) and thoracoscopic biopsy. According to clinical observation, most patients have poor tolerance for BAL, particularly for the elderly patients complicated with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases who are rejected for painless tracheoscopy when the risk of anesthesia is high. The pain and discomfort caused by ordinary bronchoscopy is so unbearable that those patients with a specific location of lung lesions prefer to choose PNLB. Besides, thoracoscopic examination for patients with suspected tuberculous pleurisy can accurately determine the lesion site and identify the lesion. If the examination results from thoracoscopic sampling specimens are positive, tuberculous pleurisy can be clearly diagnosed. However, the lung biopsy samples by R-EBUS-TBLB and PNLB are usually small and thus it is not enough to be used for MTBC culture after mNGS and pathological examination. Paraffin-embedded tissue (FFPE) can be used for acid-fast staining identification, but cannot be applied to culture. Tissue-mNGS detection has a unique application value in the abovementioned context. When it comes to the situations that BALF samples have limited value to catch pathogens for special lesion sites (such as PPLs) or the patients have contraindications to BAL procedures, lung biopsy tissue is an optional specimen for MTBC detection by mNGS. MTBC was considered positive when no less than 1 read was mapped to either the species or genus level because of the low yields of DNA extraction and rare specimen contamination. [14, 15]. NGS tends to detect all nucleotide sequences not only from the samples but also those acquired from the contamination, which remains a huge challenge on interpreting of mNGS results. One of the controversial subjects is that the cut-off values for low MTBC sequencing reads by mNGS may indicate a false-positive result. Our study spotted 6 cases with one read mapping while reads of the other 6 cases were less than ten, but these 12 cases were clinically confirmed by successfully responsive to anti-TB treatment. This research revealed that mNGS shows unique advantages and approaches a specificity of 100% in the diagnosis of PTB with a low MTBC burden.

Significantly, although mNGS possesses the ability to identify MTBC and NTM, because of the high internal homology and relatively insufficient coverage, the species within the MTBC was difficult to determine. A total of 11 cases had specific PTB strains among the 36 patients in our research. Based on accumulating evidence, making treatment options tends to depend on different strains. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the future potential of identifying the species MTB. Analogous limitations had also affected the analysis of other pathogens. Species-level are usually not sufficiently precise for characterization as the DNA chains for mNGS DNA sequencing are too short to offer enough information for identification. Therefore, according to the inhomogeneous data on sequencing reads of each pathogen in our study, the pathogens were discussed only at the genera-level while the further research is needed to reveal the inner layer details in species-level of pathogens.

Chronic viral infections can induce inflammatory reactions and suppress processes that drive immune defenses to enhance viral elimination, which increases the severity of MTBC coinfection [33]. MTBC coinfection has been linked to pulmonary Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) infections [34]. CMV, EBV and other viruses tend to be detected in the BALF of many patients who are affected by pulmonary infection after kidney transplantation [35]. We found 9 cases complicated with viral infection. Detection of viral DNA or RNA by RT-qPCR remains a gold standard for the identification of infected patients. Unfortunately, independent validation experiments were not carried out in this study owing to this being a retrospective study. Therefore, a diagnosis of co-infection cannot be confirmed. Whether it is necessary to provide antiviral therapy according to a few reads of viruses remains uncertain. However, dynamic variations in the sequencing of reads and relative abundance from mNGS detection before and after treatment could indirectly reflect therapeutic effectiveness and determine whether these viruses were detected as infection or colonization [36]. Hence, more research is needed to affirm the reasonable cut-off values, which are vital elements of therapeutic options.

In our study, the lung virome and mycobiota were analyzed to confirm if they were involved in the alveolar environment. Our study found that the sequence of the microbiota such as Human gammaherpesvirus 4, Human alphaherpesvirus 1, Human betaherpesvirus 5, Human betaherpesvirus 6B, Primate bocaparvovirus 1, Torque teno virus, Torque teno virus 16, Hepatitis B virus, Candida, Aspergillus, Nakaseomyces, and Pneumocystis was detected. We attempted to analyze the relationships and differences among the 27 pathogens detected by mNGS. However, statistical analysis revealed that there was no significant difference among them. Further research is needed to determine the cut-off value of specific pathogens when identifying co-infecting. The detection of some genera that might have a few pathogenic species does not mean that there is a co-infection. More than that, it should confirm the pathogens using complementary methods such as qPCR as mNGS has some challenges in classification and identification. However, mNGS has potential applications in viral identification.

MTBCs can invade the vulnerable groups via the respiratory tract, digestive tract, or broken skin. A study showed that patients with TB had a marked change in bacterial community, then a disappearance of highly homogenous bacterial flora. From our awareness of TB pathology, mycobacteria invasion by injuring the defense of mucosal barrier function in the lower respiratory tract (LRT) is a crucial factor, facilitating the bacterial colonization [37, 38]. However, previous studies merely demonstrated the interaction between MTBC infection and microbiota [39]. The LRT was initially thought to be sterile despite its constant exposure to the environment [40]. However, it has recently been shown to not be a sterile state in the normal LRT with further relevant research [41]. It has been a hotspot in research area to the impact of tuberculosis and anti-tuberculosis therapy on the composition and modification of human lung microbial communities. However, the relationship between MTBC pulmonary infection and the resident lung microbial composition remains unclear. One study found that the abundance of the Mycobacterium and Porphyromonas genera was increased in TB lesions, while the Cupriavidus genus was reported as dominant and specific in patients with TB [37]. A study showed the difference in bacterial quantity from the URT and LRT, but no difference in composition [41]. Evidence from the other study suggested a significant reduction in alveolar microbiota diversity in BALF samples from patients with TB and interstitial pneumonia, compared to healthy volunteers who took part in the study, which was characterized by a common reduction in Streptococcus and Acinetobacte genus abundances for the two diseases, respectively [42]. It makes sense to investigate the role and diversity of the microbiome and metagenome in mediating MTBC infection. Once the correlation between MTBC infection and microbiota could be established, it will achieve a significant breakthrough in TB research.

The relatively high expense of the mNGS routine (3600 China Yuan, approach 570 dollars) restricts its extensive application and secondary test. Moreover, patients diagnosed with PTB previously were reluctant to receive a second test, which makes it difficult to the supervision and management of drug-resistant MTBC. Few reports were described the alveolar microbiota in BAL samples from patients with TB after anti-TB treatment. More patients will benefit from mNGS when the technique procedure is optimized and the cost is reduced.

This study has several limitations as follows. Firstly, our study involved DNA-based mNGS only; thus, only DNA was sequenced in the study, which means that all RNA viruses were excluded including Influenza virus, Bunyavirus, Hantavirus and so on. Secondly, considering the medical expenses, the enrolled patients did not receive both mNGS analysis of BALF and lung biopsy tissue at the same time. Thirdly, there were some barriers to follow-up patients with PTB because they were required to undergo further treatment in a specialist hospital. Finally, this was a single-center retrospective study. A multicenter, prospective cohort study should be performed in the future.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this study evaluated the performance of BALF-based or lung biopsy tissue-based mNGS for microbiologic diagnosis of MTBC. Usually, qualified BALF is an ideal sample for mNGS detection of MTBC. When it comes to the situations that BALF samples have limited value to catch pathogens for special lesion sites or the patients have contraindications to BAL procedures, lung biopsy tissue is an optional specimen for MTBC detection by mNGS. However, whether lung tissue-mNGS is superior to BALF-mNGS in patients with MTBC infection requires further prospective multicenter randomized controlled studies with more cases.

Availability of data and materials

The mNGS sequence data presented in this study can be found online at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/study/?acc=PRJNA784757. The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

TB:

Tuberculosis

PTB:

Pulmonary tuberculosis

MTBC:

Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex

mNGS:

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing

BALF:

Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

TBLB:

Transbronchial lung biopsy

PNLB:

Percutaneous lung puncture biopsy

SARS:

Severe acute respiratory syndrome

COVID-19:

Coronavirus disease 2019

AFB:

Acid-fast bacillus

WHO:

World Health Organization

Xpert:

GeneXpert MTB/RIF

CT:

Computerized tomography

PPD:

Purified protein derivative

BAL:

Bronchoalveolar lavage

CPLP:

CT-guide percutaneous lung puncture

R-EBUS-TBLB:

Radial endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial lung biopsy

PPLs:

Peripheral pulmonary lesions

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic acid

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

DNB:

Deoxyribonucleic acid nanoball

NTM:

Nontuberculous mycobacteria

CI:

Confidence intervals

PPV:

Positive predictive value

NPV:

Negative predictive value

EBV:

Human gammaherpesvirus 4

CMV:

Human betaherpesvirus 5

CDR:

Tuberculosis case detection rate

ETB:

Extrapulmonary tuberculosis

KSHV:

Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus

URT:

Upper respiratory tract

LRT:

Lower respiratory tract

References

  1. Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2095–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61728-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Peng Z, Zhou J, Tian L. Pathogenic characteristics of sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples from patients with lower respiratory tract infection in a large teaching hospital in China: a retrospective study. BMC Pulm Med. 2020;20(1):233. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-020-01275-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Xian Y, Zhang J, Bian Z, Zhou H, Zhang Z, Lin Z, et al. Bioactive natural compounds against human coronaviruses: a review and perspective. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2020;10(7):1163–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2020.06.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu S, Liu N, Wang H, Zhang X, Yao Y, Zhang S, et al. CCR5 promoter polymorphisms associated with pulmonary tuberculosis in a Chinese Han population. Front Immunol. 2021;11: 544548. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.544548.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Harding E. WHO global progress report on tuberculosis elimination [published correction appears in Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Nov 15]. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(1):19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30418-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Andrianto A, Mertaniasih NM, Gandi P, Al-Farabi MJ, Azmi Y, Jonatan M, et al. Diagnostic test accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF for tuberculous pericarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. F1000Res. 2020;9:761. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.22770.1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Wu Y, Huang M, Wang X, Li Y, Jiang L, Yuan Y. The prevention and control of tuberculosis: an analysis based on a tuberculosis dynamic model derived from the cases of Americans. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1173. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09260-w.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Gu W, Miller S, Chiu CY. Clinical metagenomic next-generation sequencing for pathogen detection. Annu Rev Pathol. 2019;14:319–38. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-012418-012751.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. WHO consolidated guidelines on tuberculosis. Module 3: diagnosis – rapid diagnostics for tuberculosis detection. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Krimsky WS, Broussard JN, Sarkar SA, Harley DP. Bronchoscopic spray cryotherapy: assessment of safety and depth of airway injury. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139(3):781–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.03.051.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Langelier C, Zinter MS, Kalantar K, Yanik GA, Christenson S, O’Donovan B, et al. Metagenomic sequencing detects respiratory pathogens in hematopoietic cellular transplant patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;197(4):524–8. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201706-1097LE.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Schlaberg R, Chiu CY, Miller S, Weinstock G. Validation of metagenomic next-generation sequencing tests for universal pathogen detection. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017;141(6):776–86. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2016-0539-RA.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bittinger K, Charlson ES, Loy E, Shirley DJ, Haas AR, Laughlin A, et al. Improved characterization of medically relevant fungi in the human respiratory tract using next-generation sequencing. Genome Biol. 2014;15(10):487. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0487-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Doughty EL, Sergeant MJ, Adetifa I, Antonio M, Pallen MJ. Culture-independent detection and characterisation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and M. africanum in sputum samples using shotgun metagenomics on a benchtop sequencer. PeerJ. 2014;2:e585. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.585.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Simner PJ, Miller S, Carroll KC. Understanding the promises and hurdles of metagenomic next-generation sequencing as a diagnostic tool for infectious diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66(5):778–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix881.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. van Ingen J, Kohl TA, Kranzer K, Hasse B, Keller PM, Katarzyna Szafrańska A, et al. Global outbreak of severe Mycobacterium chimaera disease after cardiac surgery: a molecular epidemiological study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(10):1033–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30324-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Özçolpan OO, Sürücüoğlu S, Özkütük N, Çavuşoğlu C. Klinik örneklerden soyutlanan ve DNA dizi analizi ile tanımlanan tüberküloz dışı mikobakterilerin dağılımı [Distribution of nontuberculous mycobacteria isolated from clinical specimens and identified with DNA sequence analysis]. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2015;49(4):484–93. https://doi.org/10.5578/mb.9698.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhou X, Wu H, Ruan Q, Jiang N, Chen X, Shen Y, et al. Clinical evaluation of diagnosis efficacy of active Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex infection via metagenomic next-generation sequencing of direct clinical samples. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019;9:351. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2019.00351.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang P, Wang X. COVID-19: a new challenge for human beings. Cell Mol Immunol. 2020;17(5):555–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41423-020-0407-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Fu C, Wang S. Nosocomial infection control in healthcare settings: protection against emerging infectious diseases. Infect Dis Poverty. 2016;5:30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-016-0118-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Cudahy P, Shenoi SV. Diagnostics for pulmonary tuberculosis. Postgrad Med J. 2016;92(1086):187–93. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2015-133278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Grossman RF, Hsueh PR, Gillespie SH, Blasi F. Community-acquired pneumonia and tuberculosis: differential diagnosis and the use of fluoroquinolones. Int J Infect Dis. 2014;18:14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2013.09.013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. WHO: Global tuberculosis report 2019. 2019.

  24. Denkinger CM, Schumacher SG, Boehme CC, Dendukuri N, Pai M, Steingart KR. Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J. 2014;44(2):435–46. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00007814.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. WS288-2017, People's Republic of China Health Industry Standard—Diagnosis of Tuberculosis [S], 2017.

  26. World Health Organization. Policy Update: Automated Real-Time Nucleic Acid Amplification Technology for Rapid and Simultaneous Detection of Tuberculosis and Rifampicin Resistance: Xpert MTB/RIF Assay for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary and Extrapulmonary TB in Adults and Children. 2013.

  27. Yan Q, Wang W, Zhao W, et al. Differentiating nontuberculous mycobacterium pulmonary disease from pulmonary tuberculosis through the analysis of the cavity features in CT images using radiomics. BMC Pulm Med. 2022;22(1):4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-021-01766-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Li S, Lin L, Zhang F, Zhao C, Meng H, Wang H. A retrospective study on Xpert MTB/RIF for detection of tuberculosis in a teaching hospital in China. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20(1):362. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05004-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Zheng Y, Qiu X, Wang T, Zhang J. The diagnostic value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in lower respiratory tract infection. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11: 694756. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.694756.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Elston WJ, Whittaker AJ, Khan LN, Flood-Page P, Ramsay C, Jeffery PK, et al. Safety of research bronchoscopy, biopsy and bronchoalveolar lavage in asthma. Eur Respir J. 2004;24(3):375–7. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.04.00063003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hertz MI, Woodward ME, Gross CR, Swart M, Marcy TW, Bitterman PB. Safety of bronchoalveolar lavage in the critically ill, mechanically ventilated patient. Crit Care Med. 1991;19(12):1526–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199112000-00015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Qian J, Chen R, Wang H, Zhang X. Role of the PE/PPE family in host-pathogen interactions and prospects for anti-tuberculosis vaccine and diagnostic tool design. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10: 594288. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2020.594288.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Xu W, Snell LM, Guo M, Boukhaled G, Macleod BL, Li M, et al. Early innate and adaptive immune perturbations determine long-term severity of chronic virus and Mycobacterium tuberculosis coinfection. Immunity. 2021;54(3):526-541.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2021.01.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Broussard G, Damania B. Regulation of KSHV latency and lytic reactivation. Viruses. 2020;12(9):1034. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12091034.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Zinter MS, Hume JR. Effects of hematopoietic cell transplantation on the pulmonary immune response to infection. Front Pediatr. 2021;9: 634566. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.634566.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Li Y, Sun B, Tang X, Liu YL, He HY, Li XY, et al. Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for bronchoalveolar lavage diagnostics in critically ill patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020;39(2):369–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03734-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhou Y, Lin F, Cui Z, Zhang X, Hu C, Shen T, et al. Correlation between either cupriavidus or porphyromonas and primary pulmonary tuberculosis found by analysing the microbiota in patients’ bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(5): e0124194. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124194.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Cruz Rde C, De Albuquerque Mde F, Campelo AR, Costa e Silva EJ, Mazza E, Menezes RC, et al. Pulmonary tuberculosis: association between extent of the residual pulmonary lesion and alteration in the lung function. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2008;54(5):406–10. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-42302008000500012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hong BY, Maulén NP, Adami AJ, Granados H, Balcells ME, Cervantes J. Microbiome changes during tuberculosis and antituberculous therapy. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2016;29(4):915–26. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00096-15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ntolios P, Tzilas V, Bouros E, Avdoula E, Karakasiliotis I, Bouros D, et al. The role of microbiome and virome in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Biomedicines. 2021;9(4):442. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9040442.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Charlson ES, Bittinger K, Haas AR, Fitzgerald AS, Frank I, Yadav A, et al. Topographical continuity of bacterial populations in the healthy human respiratory tract. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184:957–63. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201104-0655OC.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Vázquez-Pérez JA, Carrillo CO, Iñiguez-García MA, Romero-Espinoza I, Márquez-García JE, Falcón LI, et al. Alveolar microbiota profile in patients with human pulmonary tuberculosis and interstitial pneumonia. Microb Pathog. 2020;139: 103851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2019.103851.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all patients and their families involved in this research. We also thank all members of Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China (Anhui Provincial Hospital).

Funding

This work was supported by the Anhui Provincial Key Clinical Specialty Discipline Construction Program (2021szdzk05). The funding body had no role in the design of the study, and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MF, LC, DX, and JZ: the design of the study. LC, ZJ, NH, WX, and YF: R-EBUS-TBLB implementation. MF, ZJ, NH and ZL: PNLB proceeding. MF: data collection and statistical analysis. MF: drafting the article. LC, DX and JZ: critical revision of the article. All authors: reviewing the final manuscript. MF, DX and JZ: final approval of the version to be published. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jun-Qiang Zhang or Da-Qing Xia.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All study methods were carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC (Ethical Approval Number: 2020-RE-055). The need for informed consent was waived by the ethics committee/Institutional Review Board of the ethics committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, because this investigation used anonymous clinical data and had retrospective nature of the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fu, M., Cao, LJ., Xia, HL. et al. The performance of detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in lung biopsy tissue by metagenomic next-generation sequencing. BMC Pulm Med 22, 288 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-022-02079-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-022-02079-8

Keywords

  • Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex
  • Diagnosis
  • Pulmonary tuberculosis
  • Metagenomic next-generation sequencing
  • mNGS