Skip to main content
Download PDF

The economic burden of pulmonary arterial hypertension in Spain

BMC Pulmonary Medicine volume 22, Article number: 105 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) is a rare, debilitating, and potentially fatal disease. This study aims to quantify the economic burden of PAH in Spain.

Methods

The study was conducted from a societal perspective, including direct and indirect costs associated with incident and prevalent patients. Average annual costs per patient were estimated by multiplying the number of resources consumed by their unit cost, differentiating the functional class (FC) of the patient. Total annual costs per FC were also calculated, taking the 2020 prevalence and incidence ranges into account. An expert committee validated the information on resource consumption and provided primary information on pharmacological consumption. Unit costs were estimated using official tariffs and salaries in Spain. A deterministic sensitivity analysis was conducted to test the uncertainty of the model.

Results

The average annual total cost was estimated at €98,839 per prevalent patient (FC I-II: €65,233; FC III: €103,736; FC IV: €208,821), being €42,110 for incident patients (FC I-II: €25,666; FC III: €44,667; FC IV: €95,188). The total annual cost of PAH in Spain, taking into account a prevalence between 16.0 and 25.9 cases per million adult inhabitants (FC I-II 31.8%; FC III 61.3%; FC IV 6.9%) and an incidence of 3.7, was estimated at €67,891,405 to €106,131,626, depending on the prevalence considered. Direct healthcare costs accounted for 64% of the total cost, followed by indirect costs (24%), and direct non-healthcare costs (12%). The total costs associated with patients in FC I-II ranged between €14,161,651 and €22,193,954, while for patients in FC III costs ranged between €43,763,019 and €68,391,651, and for patients in FC IV between €9,966,735 and €15,546,021. In global terms, patients with the worst functional status (FC IV) account for only 6.9% of the adults suffering from PAH in Spain, but are responsible for 14.7% of the total costs.

Conclusions

PAH places a considerable economic burden on patients and their families, the healthcare system, and society as a whole. Efforts must be made to improve the health and management of these patients since the early stages of the disease.

Peer Review reports

Background

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare, progressive, and life-threatening disease, defined by a chronic elevation of the pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance, which may lead to severe disability and even death if untreated [1, 2]. The symptoms of PAH include shortness of breath during activity, dizziness, fatigue, chest pain, fainting, palpitations, and peripheral oedema [3, 4]. Moreover, mental disorders like anxiety and depression are also reported to be frequent among patients with PAH [5,6,7]. The symptoms of the disease affect the patient’s physical mobility and emotional state, which adversely affect their health-related quality of life. In addition to the clinical impact, PAH imposes a substantial financial burden on both patients and their families, healthcare systems, and society as a whole [8].

The disease is significantly influenced by its functional class (FC). The FC scoring system categorises patients with pulmonary hypertension according to their perceived physical activity limitation, between FC I representing no limitations and FC IV constituting very high impediments, including the onset of symptoms at rest. Mortality rates after one year of diagnosis are 2.8% for FC I-II patients, 9.9% for FC III patients, and 21.2% for FC IV patients [9].

PAH belongs to group 1 of pulmonary hypertension, encompassing idiopathic PAH, hereditary PAH, drug induced PAH, and PAH associated with other diseases (e.g., connective tissue diseases, congenital cardiopathies, portal hypertension, HIV and Schistosomiasis, among others). These share similar clinical, physiological, and pathological aspects, and usually respond to the same treatments [10].

There is currently no cure for PAH. However, new therapeutic approaches to the disease have been developed within the last decade, aiming at relieving symptoms, improving quality of life, slowing disease progression, and prolonging life [11]. Pharmacological treatment for PAH targets three fundamental signalling pathways in the control of pulmonary vasomotor tone and vascular cell proliferation: the prostacyclin pathway (iloprost, treprostinil, epoprostenol, or selexipag), the endothelin pathway (ambrisentan, bosentan, or macitentan), and the nitric oxide pathway (sildenafil, tadalafil, or riociguat) [1, 12, 13].

Some of the patients go through hospitalization periods due to the disease or comorbidity-related issues. Moreover, lung and/or heart transplants should be considered as an option when other treatments fail and in those cases in which patients have not been able to progress to milder stages of the disease (FC I-II) [10]. In addition, the management of patients with PAH includes other measures, such as frequent medical visits, specific tests, rehabilitation, physical activities, psychological support, programs to support treatment adherence, and other types of therapy (e.g., diuretic treatments, anticoagulants, or the treatment for anaemia, among others) [10].

From a social point of view, PAH is a highly limiting disease, which requires a high amount of formal and informal care. Since the average age of PAH diagnosis is approximately 45 years old and in many cases the disease remains undiagnosed [12, 14], PAH may also have a high impact on the employment situation of patients, which could contribute to an increase of the total economic burden [15,16,17,18].

One of the tools used to inform health decision-making is disease burden studies, which allow understanding the consequences of the disease and estimating the necessary resources for its management. This can be especially relevant in the field of rare diseases, where there is less knowledge about the pathology and its potential associated costs, both for the patient and his/her family environment, as well as for the health system and society at large.

Previous studies have shown that PAH has a high psychological impact, requires formal and informal care, and represents a significant economic burden for health systems [8, 19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. However, to date, no study has estimated the indirect costs derived from the disease, nor studied its economic burden in Spain.

The objective of this study was to estimate the economic burden of PAH in Spain, from a social perspective. Specifically, we analysed the economic and social impact of the disease according to FC.

Methods

Design

A bottom-up prevalence approach was used to estimate the economic burden of PAH in Spain for the year 2020. Incident and prevalent patients with Group 1 PAH (all subtypes) were included, differentiated by their specific functional class (FC I-II, FC III, or FC IV).

The study was performed from a social perspective, including direct healthcare costs (DHC) for the National Health System (NHS) associated with the management of patients with PAH, as well as direct non-healthcare costs (DNHC), and indirect costs (IC) associated with the loss of labour productivity due to the disease of patients with PAH. This has been done according to previously published methodological [31, 32] and applied economic burden studies in Spain [33, 34] and elsewhere [35,36,37]. Specifically, we have included the following items under each cost category: (i) DHC: diagnosis, medical visits, tests, hospitalisations, transplant and drugs; (ii) DNHC: formal care, informal care, supportive therapies, medical devices; (iii) IC: early retirement, permanent leave, temporary leave, working hours reduction, working days missed, work time lost due to visits/tests and trips.

Data sources

Data on epidemiology and resource consumption of patients with PAH were obtained from a literature review, including national and international references. Databases consulted were Medline/Pubmed and grey literature, as well as official databases. Spanish studies, and those with data disaggregated by FC were prioritised.

A multidisciplinary group of nationally recognised experts validated the data. Moreover, experts analysed the suitability of adapting data from other countries to the Spanish context and confirmed the validity of specific values deriving from variables for which a high data heterogeneity resulted from the literature search. In addition, two experts provided anonymised primary data on PAH patient medication utilisation from their own centres.

The expert group consisted of a pneumologist from one of the main public hospitals in the province of Granada (south region of Spain), a cardiologist from a Reference Centre (a unit which meets specific quality criteria on the management of a specific disease, such as knowledge, volume of patients treated, history, staff, results, information systems, etc.) in the treatment of PAH (Valencia, west of Spain), a pharmacist from the Regional Healthcare Management Area of Galicia (northwest of Spain), and a nurse, specialist in PAH in a Reference Centre in the treatment of PAH (Catalonia, northeast of Spain). All experts have a broad experience in the clinical management of PAH, as well as in research related activities, having participated as authors or co-authors in national and international publications. The number and profile of experts included are in line with the methodologies used in previous economic burden studies undertaken in Spain [33, 38].

Most of the data on DNHC and IC of patients with PAH came from a recent survey which was carried out by Hipertensión Pulmonar España Organización de Pacientes (Spanish Pulmonary Hypertension Patient Organisation, HPE-ORG) [39]. The anonymised database that originated from this survey was shared with the authors of this study. For data that was not available in that survey, information published in similar studies was considered.

The unit costs of the different resources analysed were estimated through rates and salaries in Spain, that had been published in the different regional regulations or in official national sources [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65].

Resource consumption

Direct healthcare costs

DHC included diagnosis and healthcare management. We assessed the mean number of annual medical visits, emergency department visits, tests, hospitalisations, transplants, and PAH-related medication consumption during diagnosis and follow-up, per patient and by FC (Table 1).

Table 1 Non-pharmaceutical DHC resource consumption per patient (diagnosis and follow-up by FC) and unit costs
Full size table

Inpatient and outpatient visits to general and specialised practitioners were included, as well as nursing and emergency visits [10, 66,67,68]. For emergency visits, we assumed that 40% were to general emergency services, whilst 60% were unscheduled visits to the referral centre.

The tests required at diagnosis and follow-up were based on the guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension published by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS) [10]. These included electrocardiograms, echocardiograms, biochemistry tests, cardiopulmonary exercise tests, the Six-Minute Walk Test, blood gas analyses, catheterisation, angiograms, and chest X-rays, among others. The experts specified the mean annual consumption of four types of tests per incident and prevalent patient.

The mean number of hospitalisation days, by FC, was based on information obtained in the literature [67]. As data on FC I-II was aggregated in the original source, we assumed a distribution of 10% of patients in FC I and 90% in FC II, based on the experts’ opinions. Data on resource use related to transplants were obtained from the 2020 report on lung transplants from the Organización Nacional de Transplantes (National Transplant Organisation, ONT), which included transplants performed on patients with pulmonary hypertension [69]. Based on literature data [70], we assumed that 47% of transplants were performed in FC III and the remaining, in FC IV.

For the pharmacological treatment of PAH, primary data based on routine clinical practice were used (Table 2). Doses were calculated according to routine clinical practice and product labels of each drug [71]. Administration costs, if applicable, were also included. The resources necessary for the administration of intravenous and subcutaneous drugs (hospital stays and training by the nursing staff) were approximated through information collected in the literature [72].

Table 2 Drugs per patient consumption and unit costs, by FC. Sources: Botplus (2021) [80], AEMPS (2021) [71], Roman (2012) [72] and others [42, 43, 46, 47, 49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57, 60, 63, 105]
Full size table

Direct non-healthcare costs

DNHC included supportive therapies, medical devices, and formal and informal care. The consumption frequency of each of these items among patients with PAH was obtained from the HPE-ORG survey [39] (Table 3).

Table 3 DNHC resource consumption per patient during 1-year follow-up by FC, and unit costs
Full size table

Patients with PAH may require a comprehensive care approach with additional support from other healthcare professionals to improve activities of the daily living [73]. Accordingly, the mean annual consumption of supervised rehabilitation/physiotherapy, nutrition, psychotherapy, and social work sessions, as well as long-term oxygen therapy and non-invasive mechanical ventilation, were also included. This study assumed that patients used oxygen therapy on a daily basis (365 days per year) and that mechanical ventilation required 12 days of hospital stay [74]. In addition, the proportion of patients in need of a wheelchair, a walker, or an adjustable bed were also contemplated [39].

Regarding personal care, the percentage of patients within each FC who required formal, informal, or mixed care were extracted [39]. Personal care was divided equally into formal and informal care whenever the type of assistance was left unspecified. Moreover, based on assumptions of free time of each caregiver, the distribution of the caregivers’ time was defined [75].

Indirect costs

IC refer to the production lost to cessation or reduced productivity of the patient as a consequence of the morbidity and degree of disability. A human capital approach, which takes the patient perspective and counts any hour not worked as an hour lost [76, 77] was adopted to estimate productivity losses, including the reduction of working hours, working days lost to the disease, temporary and permanent leaves, and early retirement. Additionally, work time lost associated with the management of the disease was also considered (Table 4) (see Additional file 1 for more details).

Table 4 IC resource consumption during 1-year follow-up by FC, and unit costs
Full size table

Information on the loss of labour productivity by FC (early retirement, permanent disability, temporary leave or reduction of working hours) was extracted from the HPE-ORG survey [39], as the studies identified by our literature review were not undertaken in Spain, nor displayed results disaggregated by functional class, nor provided enough detail to allow for the estimation of productivity losses [16,17,18, 24]. Work days lost to disability were only applied to patients in FC I-II [18], since, according to the HPE-ORG survey, all patients in the latter FC under 65 years of age who were working when they were diagnosed, had to leave their job (details on the methodological aspects on labour productivity can be found at Additional file 1). Despite not having enough details by FC provided in the literature, the results found in the HPE-ORG survey (100% of patients in FC III-IV are either retired or have asked for a permanent leave) seems to be in line with the studies regarding productivity losses in PAH patients, as they indicate this disease has a high impact over their working condition[16,17,18, 24].

The time spent on medical visits and tests, including the corresponding traveling time, was also considered. An average duration of 30 to 60 min was assumed for each visit/test, with an average travelling time of 1 h (round trip). For hospitalisations and NIMV, the average duration considered was 8 h per day (equivalent to one working day).

Costs

Estimated costs were reported in 2020 Euros (€). Unit healthcare costs used were the median values of the latest published for each Autonomous Community in Spain. If specified on the respective Official Regional Bulletins, unit costs were updated to €2020 using the Consumer Price Index (CPI) [78]. The unit costs for non-pharmaceutical DHC are presented in Table 1.

The cost per hospitalisation day was calculated as the median cost of a medical or surgical hospitalisation day among the different Autonomous Communities [42, 43, 46, 47, 49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57, 60, 63]. The cost per transplant was the weighted average of that of a heart and lung transplant performed by the NHS [79].

Annual drug costs were calculated using mean dosages and list prices, including Royal Decree Law 8/2010 deduction rates, when necessary, a 4% of value-added tax (VAT) entitled for Spain [80], and administration costs, where applicable [81, 82] (Table 2).

The cost per supportive therapy service was calculated as the median cost per session among the different Autonomous Communities. Moreover, the median unit cost of a wheelchair and a walker was also collected from the regional official regulations, and the unit cost of the adjustable bed was approximated from the information contained in the public sector contracting platform (tenders), using the CPV code 33192100 (Table 3).

The unit cost of formal care was calculated as the average annual female salary of the health and social services subsector. For informal care, the average annual female salary of all sectors, was used. Average working hours were also obtained from INE [82].

Labour productivity losses were monetised based on annual wages and working hours for all occupations and both genders. The costs associated with these lost hours were calculated as the average annual salary per hour among all occupations in 2020, for both sexes [83] (details on the methodological aspects on labour productivity can be found at Additional file 1).

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were generated, reporting means and standard deviations for continuous variables, and counts and percentages for categorical variables. The average annual cost per patient was estimated, differentiating by FC, based on the annual consumption of each resource and its unit cost.

Separate estimations were performed for prevalent and incident patients. For prevalent patients, follow-up medical visits and tests were considered, and no drug administration cost was assumed [72]. For incident patients, according to current guidelines, diagnosis tests and first medical visits were assumed, regardless of the patient’s FC [10]. To this, the cost of care management and supportive therapies were added, assuming that incident patients consumed half the annual resources of prevalent ones, as the exact date of diagnosis couldn’t be specified (this was done in order to avoid applying an overestimated cost). Transplant costs were not included for incident patients, given the time it takes for patients to be included in the transplant program, which is followed by an extended time they spend on the waiting list [10]. Likewise, costs of early retirement, permanent disability, temporary leave, or reduction of working hours were not included, as applying for any of those procedures is highly bureaucratic, leading to long lead times until they are granted to patients [84]. The two types of work productivity loss considered for incident patients were work days lost and time spent on visits and transportation.

Finally, the total annual cost burden for the NHS and for society as a whole was calculated, multiplying the estimated average annual cost per patient by the number of prevalent and incident patients in 2020 in the country. A low and high prevalence range was applied (16.0 and 25.9, respectively [14, 85]) and an incidence of 3.7 [14] to the adult Spanish population of 39.1 million in 2020 [86]. Distinctions were also made by FC. All analyses were performed using Excel.

Sensitivity analysis

A univariate deterministic sensitivity analysis was conducted to examine the uncertainty of the model. Twelve different scenarios were built and validated by the experts committee, based on the possible variations of key sensitive parameters and assumptions: (i) maximum prevalence (from 25.9 to 55 ppm) [87]; (ii) number of visits for diagnostic (± 40–50%); (iii) selected medical tests for diagnostic (± 60%); (iv) distribution of emergency visits (emergency services and unscheduled visits to referral from 0 to 100%); (v) distribution of number of hospitalization days by FC I-II (from 0 to 100%); (vi) discount on drugs (from 0 to 43.1%) [88]; (vii) unit costs for tests, visits, transplant, transport, hospitalisation and support therapies (minimum and maximum from the Autonomous Communities); (viii) number of hours dedicated by caregivers to patients, per week (± 28–33%); (ix) distribution of formal and informal care (formal: from 17 to 36%); (x) time spent on medical visits and tests (± 25–50%); (xi) wages and average working hours (± 5%); (xii) loss of productivity related to early retirement, permanent leave and temporary leave (± 10–20%) (see Additional file 2 for more details).

Results

Average cost per patient

The average total annual cost per prevalent patient with PAH was estimated at €98,839 (Table 5). DHC represented 62.5% (€61,739), followed by IC (25.7%; €25,369) and DNHC (11.9%; €11,731). Pharmacological treatment was the main cost item, responsible for 49.9% of the average total cost (ranging between 40.8% and 62.7% according to FC). Data showed that 32.1% of patients were on monotherapy, 45.5% on double therapy, and 22.4% on triple therapy. All patients in FC IV were on triple therapy, 11.1% among patients in FC I-II, and 63.0% among patients in FC III. Throughout one year, each patient consumed an average of 1.9 drugs, the two main drugs being tadalafil (29.6% of the total drugs used) and macitentan (23.7%), followed by ambrisentan (12.6%), bosentan (10.7%), sildenafil (9.1%), epoprostenol and selexipag (5.1% each), iloprost (1.6%), and riociguat and treprostinil (1.2% each). Following pharmacological treatment, loss of productivity due to permanent disability (18.6%; 11.5–19.9%), informal care (7.3%; 4.7–8.2%), and hospitalisations (6.8%; 6.3–8.5%) were also key cost items.

Table 5 Estimated annual average cost per patient with PAH in Spain by FC. Incident and prevalent patients
Full size table

The average annual cost per incident patient with PAH was estimated at €42,110. DHC represented 80.0% (€33,686). Drugs were also the main type of cost, being responsible for 62.5% of the average total cost (ranging between 53.9% and 73.4% according to FC), followed by the costs of informal care (8.6%; 5.2–9.6%) and hospitalisations (7.9%; 7.2–10.8%).

Higher FCs were associated with increased costs. The average cost per prevalent patient in FC IV (€208,821) was 2.0 and 3.2 times higher, than costs in FC III (€103,736) and FC I-II (€65,233), respectively. For incident patients, the average costs in FC IV (€95,188) was 1.7 and 3.7 times higher than the costs in FC III (€44,667) and FC I-II (€25,666).

The increase in costs by FC was observed in all cost categories. DHC for prevalent patients were €35,783 in FC I-II, €63,810 FC III and €162,967 in FC IV, whilst for incident patients, those costs were €20,401; €35,210 and €81,378, respectively. DNHC costs were €6,558 for prevalent patients in FC I-II, €13,742 in FC III and €16,314 for FC IV. For incident patients, those costs were €3,444 (FC I-II), €7,034 (FC III) and €8,338 (FC IV). IC costs were €22,892; €26,184 and €29,539 for prevalent patients in FC I-II, FC III and FC IV, respectively, and for incident patients, those costs were €1,821; €2,422 and €5,471.

Total costs

The distribution of cases by FC was extracted from the proportions observed in the REVEAL and Spanish national registries, that is 32% of patients in FC I-II, 61% in FC III, and 7% in FC IV [89, 90].

Based on epidemiological data and the estimations of average costs per patient, the economic burden of PAH in Spain was estimated to be between €67,891,405 and €106,131,626 in 2020 (Table 6). Prevalent patients represented 91–94% of these costs (between €61,802,379 and €100,042,600). DHC were estimated to be between €43,475,515 and €67,362,079 (64% of the total cost, for both low and high value estimates), whereas IC were estimated to be between €16,215,758 and €26,030,824 per year (24%) and DNHC ranged between €8,200,132 and €12,738,724 (12%).

Table 6 Estimated total costs of patients with PAH in Spain by FC. Lower-end and higher-end of the patient prevalence range
Full size table

More than 80% of the burden was attributed to four types of costs: drug treatment (€34,648,694–€53,731,814; 51% of the total), loss of labour productivity due to permanent disability (€11,504,419–€18,622,778; 17%), informal care (€5,028,076–€7,816,756; 7%), and hospitalisations (€4,668,739–€7,258,124; 7%).

The total costs associated with patients in FC I-II ranged between €14,161,651 and €22,193,954, while patients in FC III represented between €43,763,019 and €68,391,651, and patients in FC IV between €9,966,735 and €15,546,021.

Sensitivity analysis

The sensitivity analysis showed that the most sensitive parameter was prevalence, with an impact of 105% (+ €111 million versus base case) over total costs estimated. Changes in unit costs could derive in − 9% (€9 million) or + 44% (€46 million). A drug discount could reduce total costs up to 22% (€23 million). The other parameters varied at a median of between -0.7% and + 0.4% (ranging from -3% to + 3%) (Fig. 1) (see Additional file 2 for more details).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Tornado diagram, % of variation in total costs vs. base case

Full size image

Discussion

In most publicly funded systems, resource allocation is a pressing issue provided that there is an opportunity cost associated with every resource spent on a disease or a person. Achieving more efficient and equitable health systems requires a deeper knowledge of the global burden of each disease and of the economic and social consequences of changes in its management. Traditional methods to assess the economic and social impact of a disease and its management may be especially useful in the field of rare diseases, where there is a lower degree of knowledge and greater heterogeneity and uncertainty around the evidence found in the literature [91]. In fact, a growing number of patient associations are carrying out studies to measure and increase the awareness of the economic and social impact of these diseases [92, 93]. Furthermore new methodologies, such as the multi-criteria decision analysis, are being progressively used by decision-makers worldwide to widen the set of criteria considered in evaluation processes and to allow the assessment of drugs from an holistic perspective [94,95,96].

To our knowledge, this is the first study to quantify the annual economic burden of PAH in Spain. A thorough analysis of the different types of costs borne by both patients and their environment, as well as the public system and society as a whole has allowed the comprehensive quantification of the total costs associated with this rare disease in Spain, which ranged between €67.9 million and €106.1 million per year. More specifically, DHC accounted for €43 million to €67 million (64% of the total cost), while IC accounted for €16 million to €26 million (24%) and DNHC for €8 million to €13 million (12%). In terms of the average cost per patient, a newly diagnosed patient had a total average cost of €42,110 per year, while a prevalent one was associated with an average cost of €98,839 per year.

Our results are in line with other PAH published studies. According to a systematic review carried out in 2016, which included eight studies that evaluated the economic burden of PAH in Germany and the United States [97], the median DHC of these patients were estimated at $65,370 per year, similar to the €61,739 of DHC estimated in this study for prevalent patients. Six of these studies were conducted from the payer's perspective [19, 27,28,29,30, 98], while two of them further included the patient's perspective, with co-payments, medical devices, and home modifications [20, 24]. None of the studies assessing the economic burden of PAH included IC.

Moreover, these studies reported annual DHC ranging between $29,700 and $143,000 per patient [19, 20, 24, 27,28,29,30, 98]. The large variability was due to differences in study design (prospective versus retrospective approaches), sources of information, cost items considered, time horizon, focus, and perspective of the analysis, in addition to country-related differences such as health systems and unit prices (e.g., Germany versus USA) [97]. Moreover, substantial differences in patient characteristics in terms of age, comorbidities, and FC, were further observed.

Furthermore, pharmacological costs were contemplated in all studies, though from different approaches and scopes. In Germany, Wilkens et al. (2010) analysed the costs associated with 118 patients, of which 64% received monotherapy, 19% double therapy, 5% triple therapy, and 2.5% intravenous treatment [24]. They concluded that drugs were the most important cost item, accounting for 96% of total direct costs on average. Other studies obtained similar results, especially regarding combination therapies [28, 98]. Nevertheless, some studies found that after applying a certain treatment, new drugs could have an economic benefit or an offset effect on other DHC, by reducing medical visits and hospitalisations [27, 29]. Other studies recalled that both an improved understanding of PAH pathogenesis and specific therapies have helped to decrease mortality over the past 20 years [11].

It should be noted that the published evidence further confirms that costs increase with the severity of the disease, and that closer monitoring of the patient can reduce costs [24, 98]. However, few studies have analysed the differences in costs per FC. One of these studies estimated a greater cost for patients in FC IV compared to those in FC II (+ 27%) [24]. In contrast, the present study estimated that the average DHC of a prevalent patient in FC IV is 4.6 times higher than that of a prevalent patient in FC I-II (or 3.5 times higher excluding pharmacological costs).

Finally, the evidence also highlights the high economic burden posed by PAH in terms of work impact, with 32% of patients having to retire from work due to the disease [24]. Furthermore, at the time of diagnosis, between 40 to 50% of patients with PAH were already not working and, after diagnosis, 74–84% of those employed had their working conditions affected somehow, through reduced working hours, missed days of work, need for retirement, long term absence leave or simply because those patients decided to give up work completely[16,17,18, 24]. Our study estimated that 90.7% of the patients had their working life affected, which is in line with the results from the literature.

One of the main strengths of this study is the broad perspective applied to the analysis. In fact, this is also the first study that has attempted to approximate the IC derived from this rare disease. DHC accounted for the largest part of the total cost, 64%, but the study has shown that IC (24%) and DNHC (12%) account for considerable amounts, ranging from €24.4 million to €38.8 million per year, depending on the prevalence considered. Performing this study from a social perspective allowed for a broader and more realistic quantification of what the disease really means in the country, not only for the health system but for all the agents involved. In addition, the high degree of detail of the cost items included in our analysis allows for a better visualisation of the problems that these patients face in their day-to-day life, with the disease having a considerable impact on the physical, emotional, and working domains. According to a scoping review of cost-of-illness studies conducted on rare diseases, costs due to productivity losses, non-medical costs, and informal care costs were quantified in 68%, 60%, and 43% of studies, respectively [91].

Moreover, stratifying the economic and social impact of PAH according to FC confirmed that increased disease severity was associated with an increase in all cost items, including IC. According to the present study, the average cost of a prevalent patient in FC IV is twice that of a patient in FC III (€208,821 versus €103,736) and more than three times that of a patient in FC I-II (€65,233). In global terms, patients with the worst functional status accounted for only 6.9% of the adults suffering from PAH in Spain, but they were responsible for 14.7% of total costs, while patients with FC I-II, which represent a third of the total were responsible for 20.9% of the costs. Another element of interest, since it is not usually included in studies of economic burden, is the distinction between incident and prevalent patients.

To contextualize the results, it would be convenient to analyze other economic burden studies carried out in Spain. There is a reduced number of recent published studies comparable to ours in terms of information collected. According to their estimations, the annual average cost per patient ranged between €1,100 (low back pain) and €478,000 (transthyretin amyloid polyneuropathy) [38, 99]. In terms of total burden, the total annual cost associated with PAH could be much lower than that of pathologies such as multiple sclerosis, depression or low back pain [34, 99, 100].

However, the present study is not exempt from certain limitations. The first refers to the uncertainty associated with the information used as the basis for the analysis. In this regard, data on resource consumption were not collected retrospectively, but from the literature. Accordingly, some assumptions in agreement with the expert committee were used. On the other hand, the primary data used to estimate the costs of pharmacological treatment, DNHC and IC may not be fully representative of the group of patients with PAH in Spain. Additionally, official drug prices do not include potential discounts applied after negotiations between suppliers and hospitals. Moreover, the costs derived from having a poorer quality of life or the intangible costs associated with the disease (e.g., pain, anxiety, etc.) were not included in the analysis. Accordingly, our estimations reflect only a part of the real social impact of the disease. Finally, the prevalence of PAH in Spain could be underestimated, as other more recent European sources stablish a higher prevalence. We tried to manage this challenge by also using an international reference to capture the potentially higher real prevalence. Considering that the maximum prevalence reported in Europe amounts to 55 cases per million habitants [87], if real prevalence in Spain was closer to this numbers, total annual cost would increase up to €217 million. This potential variability suggests that an integrated updated national PAH registry would be necessary.

Conclusions

Patients with PAH represent a substantial financial burden for the health system and society at large, derived not only from their clinical management, but also from the need of personal care and/or supportive therapy, and the labour impact caused by the disease. Non-pharmacological costs have a considerable weight in PAH total costs, with the social dimension accounting for up to one third of the total economic impact, so limiting the perspective of decisions to direct healthcare costs can lead to significant biases.

Our results reinforce that the therapeutic objective of preventing the disease from progressing and, whenever possible, following a multidisciplinary approach that allows a closer monitoring of patients and their maintenance in less severe FC levels, should be pursued, as it would translate into clinical, but also economic and social benefits. In order to better plan for resource allocation, it would also be convenient to consider the costs throughout the patient's lifetime, and not just in a given year, and to propose strategies that allow long-term savings.

Finally, investing on optimising databases is necessary to have up-to-date, reliable, and unified information sources that allow to determine more accurately the impact of the disease. A coordinated effort should be made to enhance the fulfilment and update of PAH registries on a national level and to investigate the real impact of the disease on the patient’s daily life. Future research could be conducted to broaden the scope of this analysis and help overcome the methodological difficulties of the present study.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to confidentiality issues and to safeguard accurate data interpretation, although they are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AACC:

Autonomous Communities

CPI:

Consumer Price Index

CPV:

Common Procurement Vocabulary

DHC:

Direct Healthcare Costs

DNHC:

Direct Non-Healthcare Costs

ESC:

European Society of Cardiology

ERS:

European Respiratory Society

FC:

Functional Class

HPE-ORG:

Patient Organisation for Pulmonary Hypertension in Spain

IC:

Indirect Costs

INE:

National Institute of Statistics

NHS:

National Health System

ONT:

National Transplant Organisation

NIMV:

Non-Invasive Mechanical ventilation

PAH:

Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

VAT:

Value-Added Tax

References

  1. Vazquez ZGS, Klinger JR. Guidelines for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Lung. 2020;198:581–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Humbert M, Sitbon O, Simonneau G. Treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1425–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barst RJ, Ertel SI, Beghetti M, Ivy DD. Pulmonary arterial hypertension: a comparison between children and adults. Eur Respir J. 2011;37:665–77.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. McDonough A, Matura LA, Carroll DL. Symptom experience of pulmonary arterial hypertension patients. Clin Nurs Res. 2011;20:120–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Aguirre-Camacho A, Moreno-Jiménez B. Depression and anxiety in patients with pulmonary hypertension: the role of life satisfaction and optimism. Psychosomatics. 2018;59:575–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McCollister DH, Beutz M, McLaughlin V, Rumsfeld J, Masoudi FA, Tripputi M, et al. Depressive symptoms in pulmonary arterial hypertension: prevalence and association with functional status. Psychosomatics. 2010;51:339-339.e8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vanhoof J, Delcroix M, Vandevelde E, Denhaerynck K, Wuyts W, Belge C, et al. Emotional symptoms and quality of life in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014;33:800–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Delcroix M, Howard L. Pulmonary arterial hypertension: the burden of disease and impact on quality of life. Eur Respir Rev. 2015;24:621–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoeper MM, Kramer T, Pan Z, Eichstaedt CA, Spiesshoefer J, Benjamin N, et al. Mortality in pulmonary arterial hypertension: prediction by the 2015 European pulmonary hypertension guidelines risk stratification model. Eur Respir J. 2017;50:1700740.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Galiè N, Humbert M, Vachiery J-L, Gibbs S, Lang I, Torbicki A, et al. ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: The Joint Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS): Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Eur Respir J. 2015;46:903–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Levine DJ. Pulmonary arterial hypertension: updates in epidemiology and evaluation of patients. Am J Manag Care. 2021;27(3 Suppl):S35–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lau EMT, Giannoulatou E, Celermajer DS, Humbert M. Epidemiology and treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017;14:603–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Klinger JR, Elliott CG, Levine DJ, Bossone E, Duvall L, Fagan K, et al. Therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension in adults: update of the CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest. 2019;155:565–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Escribano-Subias P, Blanco I, Lopez-Meseguer M, Jiménez C, Román A, Castillo-Palma M, et al. REHAP investigators. Survival in pulmonary hypertension in Spain: insights from the Spanish registry. Eur Respir J. 2012;40:596–603.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. National Alliance for Caregiving. Rare Disease Caregiving | The National Alliance for Caregiving. 2018. https://www.caregiving.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/NAC-RareDiseaseReport_February-2018_WEB.pdf. Accessed 3 Feb 2021.

  16. Armstrong I, Billings C, Kiely DG, Yorke J, Harries C, Clayton S, et al. The patient experience of pulmonary hypertension: a large cross-sectional study of UK patients. BMC Pulm Med. 2019;19:67.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Helgeson SA, Menon D, Helmi H, Vadlamudi C, Moss JE, Zeiger TK, et al. Psychosocial and financial burden of therapy in USA patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Diseases. 2020;8:22.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Joish VN, Kreilick C, Germino R, Muccino D. Estimation of pulmonary arterial hypertension on productivity losses in the United States. Value Health. 2014;17:A118.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Johnson S, Delate T, Boka A, Shaw P, Zager C. Characterizing the financial burden of pulmonary arterial hypertension within an integrated healthcare delivery system. J Med Econ. 2013;16:1414–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sikirica M, Iorga SR, Bancroft T, Potash J. The economic burden of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in the US on payers and patients. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:676.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Burger CD, Ozbay AB, Lazarus HM, Riehle E, Montejano LB, Lenhart G, et al. Treatment patterns and associated health care costs before and after treatment initiation among pulmonary arterial hypertension patients in the United States. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018;24:834–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hwang B, Howie-Esquivel J, Fleischmann KE, Stotts NA, Dracup K. Family caregiving in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Heart Lung. 2012;41:26–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhai Z, Zhou X, Zhang S, Xie W, Wan J, Kuang T, et al. The impact and financial burden of pulmonary arterial hypertension on patients and caregivers: results from a national survey. Medicine. 2017;96: e6783.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Wilkens H, Grimminger F, Hoeper M, Stähler G, Ehlken B, Plesnila-Frank C, et al. Burden of pulmonary arterial hypertension in Germany. Respir Med. 2010;104:902–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Studer S, Hull M, Pruett J, Koep E, Tsang Y, Drake W. Treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and healthcare costs among patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension in a real-world US database. Pulm Circ. 2019;9:2045894018816294.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Exposto F, Petrică N, Davies E, Beaudet A. Identification of a pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patient cohort and study of its burden of illness in Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d’information (PMSI). Int J Cardiol. 2020;306:175–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kirson NY, Birnbaum HG, Ivanova JI, Waldman T, Joish V, Williamson T. Excess costs associated with patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension in a US privately insured population. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011;9:293–303.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Copher R, Cerulli A, Watkins A, Laura MM. Treatment patterns and healthcare system burden of managed care patients with suspected pulmonary arterial hypertension in the United States. J Med Econ. 2012;15:947–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Said Q, Martin BC, Joish VN, Kreilick C, Mathai SC. The cost to managed care of managing pulmonary hypertension. J Med Econ. 2012;15:500–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Berger A, Edelsberg J, Teal S, Mychaskiw MA, Oster G. Changes in healthcare utilization and costs associated with sildenafil therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pulm Med. 2012;12:75.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Jo C. Cost-of-illness studies: concepts, scopes, and methods. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2014;20:327–37.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Choi H-J, Lee E-W. Methodology of estimating socioeconomic burden of disease using National Health Insurance (NHI) Data. 2019.

  33. Delgado-Ortega L, González-Domínguez A, Borrás JM, Oliva-Moreno J, González-Haba E, Menjón S, et al. The economic burden of disease of epithelial ovarian cancer in Spain: the OvarCost study. Eur J Health Econ. 2019;20:135–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Fernández O, Calleja-Hernández MA, Meca-Lallana J, Oreja-Guevara C, Polanco A, Pérez-Alcántara F. Estimate of the cost of multiple sclerosis in Spain by literature review. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017;17:321–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Labisa P, Andreozzi V, Mota M, Monteiro S, Alves R, Almeida J, et al. Cost of illness in patients with duchenne muscular dystrophy in Portugal: the COIDUCH study. Pharmacoecon Open. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-021-00303-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Hao S, Östensson E, Eklund M, Grönberg H, Nordström T, Heintz E, et al. The economic burden of prostate cancer—a Swedish prevalence-based register study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20:448.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Brodszky V, Tamási B, Hajdu K, Péntek M, Szegedi A, Sárdy M, et al. Disease burden of patients with pemphigus from a societal perspective. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021;21:77–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Galan L, Gonzalez-Moreno J, Martínez-Sesmero JM, Muñoz-Beamud F, Santos-Rubio MD, Tran D, et al. Estimating the annual economic burden for the management of patients with transthyretin amyloid polyneuropathy in Spain. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021;21:967–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. La carga socioeconómica de la hipertensión pulmonar en España. Hipertensión Pulmonar. https://hipertension-pulmonar.com/la-asociacion/estudios/255-la-carga-socioeconomica-de-la-hipertension-pulmonar-en-espana. Accessed 28 Jun 2021.

  40. Boletín Oficial de Aragón - BOA, Núm. 156 (10/08/2012). Resolución de 30 de julio de 2012, de la Dirección Gerencia del Servicio Aragonés de Salud, sobre revisión de las tarifas a aplicar por la prestación de servicios sanitarios a terceros obligados al pago o a usuarios sin derecho a asistencia sanitaria en la Comunidad Autónoma de Aragón.

  41. Boletín Oficial del Principado de Asturias, Núm. 219 (13/11/2019). Decreto 194/2019, de 31 de octubre, de segunda modificación del Decreto 87/2009, de 29 de julio, por el que se establecen los precios públicos a aplicar por el Servicio de Salud del Principado de Asturias por la prestación de servicios sanitarios.

  42. Boletín Oficial de las Islas Baleares - BOIB, Núm. 128 (16/10/2018). Núm. 10517. Resolución del director general del Servicio de Salud de las Islas Baleares de corrección de errores de la Resolución del director general del Servicio de Salud de las Islas Baleares de 29 de diciembre de 2017 por la que se modifica la Orden de la consejera de Salud y Consumo de 22 de diciembre de 2006 por la que se establecen los precios públicos a aplicar por los centros sanitarios de la Red Pública de las Illes Balears por la prestación de servicios sanitarios, cuando existan terceros obligados al pago o usuarios sin derecho a asistencia sanitaria de la Seguridad Social.

  43. Boletín Oficial de Canarias - BOC, Núm. 67 (5/4/2017) - 1616 Servicio Canario de la Salud.- Resolución de 29 de marzo de 2017, del Director, por la que se modifica la cuantía de los precios públicos de servicios sanitarios previstos en el Decreto 81/2009, de 16 de junio, por el que se establecen los precios públicos de los servicios sanitarios prestados por el Servicio Canario de la Salud y se fijan sus cuantías. http://www.gobiernodecanarias.org/boc/2017/067/002.html. Accessed 20 Jun 2021.

  44. Boletín Oficial de la Junta de Andalucía - BOJA, Núm. 92 (15/5/2018) Orden de 8 de mayo de 2018, por la que se modifica la Orden de 14 de octubre de 2005, por la que se fijan los precios públicos de los servicios sanitarios prestados por centros dependientes del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía.

  45. Boletín Oficial de Cantabria - BOC Núm. 248 (29/12/2017) - Orden SAN/35/2017, de 15 de diciembre, por la que se fi jan las cuantías de los Precios Públicos de los Servicios Sanitarios prestados por el Servicio Cántabro de Salud.

  46. Diario Oficial de Extremadura - DOE, Núm. 32 (17/2/2021) - RESOLUCIÓN de 10 de febrero de 2021, de la Vicepresidenta Primera y Consejera, por la que se publican las tarifas actualizadas de las tasas y precios públicos de la Comunidad Autónoma de Extremadura en virtud de lo dispuesto en la Ley de Presupuestos Generales de la Comunidad Autónoma de Extremadura para 2021.

  47. Normativa vigente. Tasas y precios de la Comunidad Autónoma - Diario Oficial de Galicia - DOG Núm. 240 (11/12/2003) - Ley 6/2003, de 9 de diciembre, de tasas, precios y exacciones Reguladoras de la comunidad autónoma de galicia. 2020.

  48. Boletín Oficial de la Comunidad de Madrid – BOCM, Núm. 198 (21/8/2017) - Orden 727/2017, de 7 de agosto, del Consejero de Sanidad, por la que se fijan los precios públicos por la prestación de los servicios y actividades de naturaleza sanitaria de la red de centros de la Comunidad de Madrid.

  49. Boletín Oficial de Castilla y León - BOCYL, Núm. 249 (30/12/2013) - Decreto 83/2013, de 26 de diciembre, por el que se actualizan los precios públicos de la Comunidad de Castilla y León y la tasa por actuaciones administrativas relativas a actividades agrícolas.

  50. Diario Oficial de Castilla-La Mancha - DOCM, Núm. 226 (21/11/2014) - Orden de 17/11/2014, de la Consejería de Sanidad y Asuntos Sociales, por la que se establecen los precios públicos de la asistencia sanitaria y de los servicios prestados en la red de centros sanitarios dependientes del Servicio de Salud de Castilla-La Mancha.

  51. Diari Oficial de la Generalitat de Catalunya - DOGC, Núm. 8153 - (12/6/2020) - Orden SLT/71/2020, de 2 de junio, por la que se regulan los supuestos y conceptos facturables y se aprueban los precios públicos correspondientes a los servicios que presta el Instituto Catalán de la Salud. https://infoboe-production.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/documents/fc27d9c2c6b9b9a029b20ebf5d6613d4-20200612.pdf. Accessed 20 Jun 2021.

  52. Boletín Oficial de la Región de Murcia - BORM, Núm. 133 (11/6/2020) - Orden de 29 de mayo de 2020 de la Consejería de Presidencia y Hacienda, por la que se publican las tarifas de las tasas y precios públicos aplicables en el año 2020.

  53. Boletín Oficial de Navarra - BON, Núm. 14 (22/1/2019) - Resolución 1564/2018, de 20 de diciembre, del Director Gerente del Servicio Navarro de Salud-Osasunbidea, por la que se establecen las tarifas por los servicios prestados por el Servicio Navarro de Salud-Osasunbidea. http://bon.navarra.es/es/anuncio/-/texto/2019/14/5/. Accessed 20 Jun 2021.

  54. Tarifas para facturación de servicios sanitarios y docentes de Osakidetza para el año 2020 (12/2019) - Acuerdo de 19 de diciembre de 2019, del consejo de administración del ente público Osakidetza, por el que se aprueban las tarifas por prestación de servicios sanitarios y docentes a terceros obligados al pago durante el ejercicio 2020.

  55. Boletín Oficial del Estado - BOE Ceuta y Melilla, Núm. 180 (29/7/2013) Sec. I. Pág. 55225 - Resolución de 19 de julio de 2013, del Instituto Nacional de Gestión Sanitaria, sobre revisión de precios a aplicar por los centros sanitarios del Instituto Nacional de Gestión Sanitaria en Ceuta y Melilla, por las asistencias prestadas en los supuestos cuyo importe ha de reclamarse a los terceros obligados al pago o a los usuarios sin derecho a la asistencia sanitaria de la Seguridad Social, así como por los servicios prestados por el Centro Nacional de Dosimetría y por la reproducción de documentos de la biblioteca de la entidad gestora.

  56. Boletín Oficial de la Junta de Andalucía - BOJA, Núm. 210 (27/10/2005) - Orden de 14 de octubre de 2005, por la que se fijan los precios públicos de los servicios sanitarios prestados por Centros dependientes del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía. Servicio Andaluz de Salud. https://www.sspa.juntadeandalucia.es/servicioandaluzdesalud/sites/default/files/sincfiles/wsas-media-sas_normativa_mediafile/2019/orden2005_precios_publicos.pdf. Accessed 20 Jun 2021.

  57. Diario Oficial de la Generalitat Valenciana - DOGV, Núm. 8202 (30/10/2017) - Ley 20/2017, de 28 de diciembre, de la Generalitat, de tasas. [2017/12159]. 2017. https://dogv.gva.es/portal/ficha_disposicion.jsp?L=1&sig=011728%2F2017. Accessed 20 Jun 2021.

  58. Diario Oficial de Extremadura - DOE, Núm. 28 (11/2/2020) - Resolución de 6 de febrero de 2020, de la Vicepresidenta Primera y Consejera, por la que se publican las tarifas actualizadas de las tasas y precios públicos de la Comunidad Autónoma de Extremadura en virtud de lo dispuesto en la Ley de Presupuestos Generales de la Comunidad Autónoma de Extremadura para 2020. (2020060240).

  59. Prestación de los servicios y actividades de naturaleza sanitaria de la Red de Centros de la Comunidad de Madrid. Anexo - Precios públicos por servicios y actividades.

  60. Boletín Oficial de La Rioja - BOR, Núm. 156 (19/12/2014) Pág. 24921 - Orden 12/2014, de 16 de noviembre de 2014, de la Consejería de Administración Pública y Hacienda por la que se establece y regula el precio público por los servicios sanitarios prestados a particulares en los centros del Servicio Riojano de Salud.

  61. Boletín Oficial de Aragón - BOA, Núm. 135 (12/07/2011) - Resolución de 1 de enero de 2011, de la Directora-Gerente del Consorcio de Salud, por la que se aprueban las tarifas a aplicar en el seno del Consorcio a los terceros obligados al pago o a los usuarios sin derecho a la asistencia sanitaria de la Seguridad Social, con excepción de aquellos supuestos cuyas tarifas vengan reguladas por convenios, contratos o conciertos específicos.

  62. Boletín Oficial de la Junta de Andalucía - BOJA, Núm. 210 (21/10/2015) Pág. 46 - Orden de 14 de octubre de 2005, por la que se fijan los precios públicos de los servicios sanitarios prestados por Centros dependientes del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía.

  63. Boletín Oficial de Aragón - BOA, Núm. 165 (29/08/2017) - Orden SAN/1221/2017, de 21 de julio, por la que se establecen los precios y tarifas máximas aplicables en la prestación de servicios sanitarios con medios ajenos al Sistema de Salud de Aragón. 2017. http://www.boa.aragon.es/cgi-bin/EBOA/BRSCGI?CMD=VEROBJ&MLKOB=977342223030. Accessed 20 Jun 2021.

  64. Boletín Oficial de las Islas Baleares - BOIB, Núm. 002 (4/1/2018) - Resolución del director general del Servicio de Salud de las Islas Baleares por la que se modifica la Orden de la consejera de Salud y Consumo de 22 de diciembre de 2006 por la que se establecen los precios públicos a aplicar por los centros sanitarios de la Red Pública de las Islas Baleares por la prestación de servicios sanitarios, cuando existan terceros obligados al pago o usuarios sin derecho a asistencia sanitaria de la Seguridad Social. http://www.caib.es/eboibfront/es/2018/10758/seccion-iii-otras-disposiciones-y-actos-administra/472. Accessed 21 Jun 2021.

  65. Boletín Oficial del Principado de Asturias, Núm. 77 (4/4/2013) - Resolución de 25 de febrero de 2013, de la Consejería de Hacienda y Sector Público, por la que hace pública la relación de las cuantías exigibles por tasas y precios públicos en el ejercicio 2013. 2013. https://sede.asturias.es/bopa/2013/10/03/2013-18043.pdf. Accessed 20 Jun 2021.

  66. Tran K, Coyle K, Jabr MF, Coyle D, Boucher M, Mielniczuk L, et al. Drugs for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Comparative Efficacy, Safety, and Cost-Effectiveness. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2015.

  67. Dufour R, Pruett J, Hu N, Lickert C, Stemkowski S, Tsang Y, et al. Healthcare resource utilization and costs for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: real-world documentation of functional class. J Med Econ. 2017;20:1178–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Dranitsaris G, Mehta S. Oral therapies for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension: a population-based cost-minimization analysis. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2009;7:43–59.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Organización Nacional de Trasplantes - ONT, Memoria actividad donación y trasplante pulmonar. España 2020.

  70. López-Meseguer M, Román A, Monforte V, Bravo C, Solé J, Morell F. Trasplante bipulmonar en hipertensión pulmonary. Una serie de 15 pacientes. Arch Bronconeumol. 2009;45:366–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. AEMPS. Centro de información de medicamentos (CIMA). 2018. https://www.aemps.gob.es/cima/publico/home.html. Accessed 18 Oct 2018.

  72. Roman A, Barberà JA, Escribano P, Sala ML, Febrer L, Oyagüez I, et al. Cost effectiveness of prostacyclins in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2012;10:175–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Grünig E, Benjamin N, Krüger U, Kaemmerer H, Harutyunova S, Olsson KM, et al. General measures and supportive therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension: updated recommendations from the Cologne Consensus Conference 2018. Int J Cardiol. 2018;272S:30–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Hawn JM, Bauer SR, Wanek MR, Li M, Wang X, Duggal A, et al. Effectiveness, safety, and economic comparison of inhaled epoprostenol brands, flolan and veletri, in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ann Pharmacother. 2020;54:434–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. PHA Europe. The impact of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) on the lives of patients and carers: results from an international survey. European Pulmonary Hypertension Association. PHA Europe. 2012. https://www.phaeurope.org/wp-content/uploads/PAH_Survey_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 3 Feb 2021.

  76. Weisbrod B. The valuation of human capital. J Polit Econ. 1961;69:425–36.

    Google Scholar 

  77. van den Hout WB. The value of productivity: human-capital versus friction-cost method. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:i89-91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE). INEbase / Nivel y condiciones de vida (IPC) /Índices de precios de consumo y vivienda /Índice de precios de consumo 2020. INE. https://www.ine.es/dyngs/INEbase/es/operacion.htm?c=Estadistica_C&cid=1254736176802&menu=ultiDatos&idp=1254735976607. Accessed 19 Aug 2021.

  79. Ministerio de Sanidad, Consumo y Bienestar Social - Portal Estadístico del SNS - Registro de Altas de los Hospitales Generales del Sistema Nacional de Salud. CMBD. Norma Estatal. https://www.mscbs.gob.es/estadEstudios/estadisticas/cmbd.htm. Accessed 21 Jun 2021.

  80. Consejo General de Colegios Oficiales de Farmacéuticos. Base de datos de información sanitaria (BOT PLUS). 2021. https://botplusweb.portalfarma.com/.

  81. Instituto Nacional de Estadística - INE. Sexo y secciones de actividad (28185). INE. https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Tabla.htm?t=28185&L=0. Accessed 21 Jun 2021.

  82. Instituto Nacional de Estadística - INE. Número medio de horas efectivas semanales trabajadas por todos los ocupados (hayan o no trabajado en la semana) por situación profesional, sexo y rama de actividad (empleo principal) (4880). INE. https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Tabla.htm?t=4880&L=0. Accessed 21 Jun 2021.

  83. Instituto Nacional de Estadística - INE. Sexo y grupos principales de ocupación (28186). INE. https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Tabla.htm?t=28186&L=0. Accessed 21 Jun 2021.

  84. Ministerio de Inclusión, Seguridad Social y Migraciones. Seguridad Social: Trámites y Gestiones. https://www.seg-social.es/wps/portal/wss/internet/InformacionUtil/44539. Accessed 26 Jan 2022.

  85. Hoeper MM, Huscher D, Pittrow D. Incidence and prevalence of pulmonary arterial hypertension in Germany. Int J Cardiol. 2016;203:612–3.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Última Nota de prensa. Cifras de Población. Provisionales a 1 de julio de 2020. Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE). https://www.ine.es/dyngs/INEbase/es/operacion.htm?c=Estadistica_C&cid=1254736176951&menu=ultiDatos&idp=1254735572981.

  87. Leber L, Beaudet A, Muller A. Epidemiology of pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: identification of the most accurate estimates from a systematic literature review. Pulm Circ. 2021;11:2045894020977300.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. DiarioFarma. Precios notificados: cada año hay más y con mayor diferencia sobre el real. diariofarma. 2019. https://www.diariofarma.com/2019/02/12/precios-notificados-cada-ano-hay-mas-y-con-mayor-diferencia-sobre-el-real.

  89. Badesch DB, Raskob GE, Elliott CG, Krichman AM, Farber HW, Frost AE, et al. Pulmonary arterial hypertension: baseline characteristics from the REVEAL Registry. Chest. 2010;137:376–87.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Salvador ML, Loaiza CQ, Padial LR, Barberá JA, López-Meseguer M, López-Reyes R, et al. Portopulmonary hypertension: prognosis and management in the current treatment era. Results from the REHAP Registry. Intern Med J. 2021;51:355–65.

    Google Scholar 

  91. García-Pérez L, Linertová R, Valcárcel-Nazco C, Posada M, Gorostiza I, Serrano-Aguilar P. Cost-of-illness studies in rare diseases: a scoping review. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021;16:178.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. EveryLife Foundation, Lewin Group. The National Economic Burden of Rare Disease Study. 2021.

  93. Federación Española de Enfermedades Raras (FEDER). Publicaciones. https://obser.enfermedades-raras.org/. Accessed 19 Aug 2021.

  94. Drake JI, de Hart JCT, Monleón C, Toro W, Valentim J. Utilization of multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to support healthcare decision-making FIFARMA, 2016. J Mark Access Health Policy. 2017;5:1360545.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. ORPHAR-SEFH. Manual para el desarrollo de un informe de evaluación de medicamentos huérfanos usando metodología de Análisis de Decisión Multicriterio. 2020.

  96. Zozaya, N, Oliva Moreno, J, HIdalgo-Vega, A. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Healthcare. Its isefulness and limitations for decision making. Weber Foundation; 2018.

  97. Gu S, Hu H, Dong H. Systematic Review of the Economic Burden of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Pharmacoeconomics. 2016;34:533–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Angalakuditi M, Edgell E, Beardsworth A, Buysman E, Bancroft T. Treatment patterns and resource utilization and costs among patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension in the United States. J Med Econ. 2010;13:393–402.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Alonso-García M, Sarría-Santamera A. The economic and social burden of low back pain in Spain: a national assessment of the economic and social impact of low back pain in Spain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020;45:E1026–32.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Vieta E, Alonso J, Pérez-Sola V, Roca M, Hernando T, Sicras-Mainar A, et al. Epidemiology and costs of depressive disorder in Spain: the EPICO study. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2021;50:93–103.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Zozaya N, Abdalla F, Moreno IC, Diz CC, Ana MRG, Soriano JR, et al. POSA103 estimation of the economic and social burden of pulmonary arterial hypertension in Spain. Value in Health. 2022;25:S53.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Boletín Oficial de la Comunitat Valenciana, Núm. 38 (12/2/2018) - Ley 20/2017, de 28 de diciembre, de tasas. https://www.boe.es/buscar/doc.php?id=BOE-A-2018-1870. Accessed 20 Jun 2021.

  103. Diario Oficial de Extremadura - DOE, Núm. 19 (29/1/2019) - Resolución de 24 de enero de 2019, de la Vicepresidenta y Consejera, por la que se publican las tarifas actualizadas de las tasas y precios públicos de la Comunidad Autónoma de Extremadura en virtud de lo dispuesto en la Ley de presupuestos generales de la Comunidad Autónoma de Extremadura para el año 2019. (2019060221).

  104. Diari Oficial de la Generalitat de Catalunya - DOGC, Núm. 6323 (26/2/2013) - Orden SLT/30/2013, de 20 de febrero, por la que se aprueban los precios públicos del Servicio Catalán de la Salud.

  105. Instituto Nacional de Estadística -INE. Salarios medios por tipo de jornada, sexo y decil. (13927). INE. https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Tabla.htm?t=13927&L=0. Accessed 21 Jun 2021.

  106. Servicio Andaluz de Salud. Concejalía de Igualdad, Salud y Políticas Sociales. Catálogo de productos ortoprotésicos. Orden de 26 de junio de 2014 (BOJA 126, de 2 de julio). Nuevos importes desde el 1 de agosto de 2014.

  107. Boletín Ofcial de Aragón - BOA, Núm. 252 (30/12/2019) - Resolución de 20 de diciembre de 2019, de la Dirección General de Asistencia Sanitaria, por la que se señalan las condiciones de aplicación en la Comunidad Autónoma de Aragón de las Órdenes Ministeriales SCB/45/2019, de 22 de enero, y SCB/480/2019, de 26 de abril, relativas a la prestación ortoprotésica del Sistema Nacional de Salud. http://www.boa.aragon.es/cgi-bin/EBOA/BRSCGI?CMD=VERLST&DOCS=1-200&BASE=BOLE&SEC=FIRMA&SEPARADOR=&PUBL=20191230. Accessed 20 Jun 2021.

  108. Boletín Oficial del Estado - Núm. 22 Sec. I. Pág. 6371, (25/1/2019) - Orden SCB/45/2019, de 22 de enero, por la que se modifica el anexo VI del Real Decreto 1030/2006, de 15 de septiembre, por el que se establece la cartera de servicios comunes del Sistema Nacional de Salud y el procedimiento para su actualización, se regula el procedimiento de inclusión, alteración y exclusión de la oferta de productos ortoprotésicos y se determinan los coeficientes de corrección.

  109. Boletín Oficial de las Islas Baleares - BOIB, Núm. 070 Pág. 24786 a 24831 (25/5/2019) - Núm. 4924 Resolución de la consejera de Salud de 25 de abril de 2019 por la que se actualiza el contenido del catálogo de productos ortoprotésicos aprobado por el Decreto 41/2009, de 26 de junio.

  110. Boletín Oficial de Canarias - BOC, Núm. 5 (9/1/2020) - Orden de 30 de diciembre de 2019, por la que se aprueba el Catálogo de tipos de productos ortoprotésicos de la Comunidad Autónoma de Canarias, se regula la prestación ortoprotésica suplementaria de dispensación ambulatoria y se crea el Registro Público de Establecimientos Sanitarios de Canarias colaboradores en la gestión de la prestación ortoprotésica suplementaria de dispensación ambulatoria. http://www.gobiernodecanarias.org/boc/2020/005/001.html. Accessed 21 Jun 2021.

  111. Boletín Oficial de Cantabria - BOC, Núm. 6 (10/1/2020) - Resolución de 3 de enero de 2020, por la que se aprueba y se da publicidad al Catálogo General de Productos Ortoprotésicos de la Comunidad Autónoma de Cantabria.

  112. Junta de Castilla y León, Consejería de Sanidad. Catálogo de material ortoprotésico SACYL 2020.

  113. Diario Oficial de Castilla-La Mancha - DOCM, Núm. 236 (29/11/2019) - Resolución de 25/11/2019, de la Dirección-Gerencia, por la que se aprueba el Catálogo General de Prestaciones Ortoprotésicas. [2019/10781].

  114. Servei Català de la Salut, Generalitad de Catalunya. Catàleg de prestacions ortoprotètiques a càrrec del Servei Català de la Salut. Vàlid a partir del dia 16 de gener de 2020. Actualització del dia 14 de juny de 2021.

  115. Catálogo de material ortoprotésico Servicio Extremeño de Salud 2019.

  116. Diario Oficial de Galicia - DOG, Núm. 104, Pág. 19799 (3/6/2013) - Orden de 28 de mayo de 2013 por la que se regula la prestación ortoprotésica en la Comunidad Autónoma de Galicia.

  117. Catálogo de material ortoprotésico SNS. Extracto del Real Decreto 1030/2006, de 15 de septiembre, por el que se establece la cartera de servicios comunes del Sistema Nacional de Salud y el procedimiento para su actualización.

  118. Eusko Jaurlaritza , Gobierno Vasco. Correlación nuevo catálogo ortoprotésico.

  119. Gobierno de España. Ministerio de Hacienda. Plataforma de Contratación del Sector Público. https://contrataciondelestado.es/wps/portal/plataforma. Accessed 7 Sep 2018.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Patient Organisation for Pulmonary Hypertension in Spain (HPE-ORG, Hipertensión Pulmonar España Organización de Pacientes) for their valuable contribution to this project, by conducting a survey with patients with PAH in Spain, to investigate behaviours and resource consumption drivers, which served as one of the main sources for the estimation of DNHC and IC in the present study.

Funding

This project was funded by Janssen-Cilag, S.A.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health Economics, Weber, Calle Moreto, 17, 5º Dcha., 28014, Madrid, Spain

    Néboa Zozaya & Fernando Abdalla

  2. Department of Quantitative Methods in Economics and Management, University Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain

    Néboa Zozaya

  3. Pneumology Unit, University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain

    Ignacio Casado Moreno

  4. Pharmacy Department, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Pontevedra, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Galicia Sur (IISGS), Pontevedra, Spain

    Carlos Crespo-Diz

  5. Pulmonary Hypertension Unit, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain

    Ana M. Ramírez Gallardo

  6. Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, CIBERCV, Valencia, Spain

    Joaquín Rueda Soriano

  7. Market Access Department, Janssen, Madrid, Spain

    Macarena Alcalá Galán

  8. Weber Foundation, Madrid, Spain

    Álvaro Hidalgo-Vega

  9. Department of Economic Analysis and Finances, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain

    Álvaro Hidalgo-Vega

Authors
  1. Néboa Zozaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fernando Abdalla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ignacio Casado Moreno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Carlos Crespo-Diz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ana M. Ramírez Gallardo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Joaquín Rueda Soriano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Macarena Alcalá Galán
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Álvaro Hidalgo-Vega
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

NZ, AH and MA participated in the conception and design of the work. NZ, FA, AMRG and JRS have contributed to the acquisition of data. NZ and FA have analysed and interpreted the data. NZ has drafted the manuscript, and FA has substantively reviewed it. All authors have approved the manuscript and have agreed both to be personally accountable for the author´s contributions and to ensure that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work, even ones in which the author was not personally involved, are appropriately investigated, resolved, and the resolution documented in the literature. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Néboa Zozaya.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines. Furthermore, experimental protocols and informed consent are not applicable, as data generated by this study are based on literature, expert opinion and retrospective anonymised medical historical data. Based on the Spanish Law 14/2007 and Royal Decree 1090/2015, the current study does not require an approval from an Ethical Committee, as it does not involve research on human beings, animal experimentation or the use of biological agents or genetically modified organisms. Furthermore, according to the European Ethics and Data Protection Guideline from 2018, the current study does not raise ethical concerns arising from the use of personal data, as all data are anonymized and cannot relate to identifiable persons.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Published abstract

An Abstract of this work has been published at ISPOR Europe 2021 [101].

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Methodological aspects of labour productivity.

Additional file 2.

Sensitivity analysis.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zozaya, N., Abdalla, F., Casado Moreno, I. et al. The economic burden of pulmonary arterial hypertension in Spain. BMC Pulm Med 22, 105 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-022-01906-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-022-01906-2

Keywords

  • Economic impact
  • Burden
  • Social perspective
  • PAH
  • Pulmonary arterial hypertension

BMC Pulmonary Medicine

ISSN: 1471-2466

Contact us