Skip to main content
Download PDF

Impact of recipient and donor pretransplantation body mass index on early postosperative complications after lung transplantation

BMC Pulmonary Medicine volume 24, Article number: 161 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Prior studies have assessed the impact of the pretransplantation recipient body mass index (BMI) on patient outcomes after lung transplantation (LT), but they have not specifically addressed early postoperative complications. Moreover, the impact of donor BMI on these complications has not been evaluated. The first aim of this study was to assess complications during hospitalization in the ICU after LT according to donor and recipient pretransplantation BMI.

Methods

All the recipients who underwent LT at Bichat Claude Bernard Hospital, Paris, between January 2016 and August 2022 were included in this observational retrospective monocentric study. Postoperative complications were analyzed according to recipient and donor BMIs. Univariate and multivariate analyses were also performed. The 90-day and one-year survival rates were studied. P < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. The Paris-North Hospitals Institutional Review Board approved the study.

Results

A total of 304 recipients were analyzed. Being underweight was observed in 41 (13%) recipients, a normal weight in 130 (43%) recipients, and being overweight/obese in 133 (44%) recipients. ECMO support during surgery was significantly more common in the overweight/obese group (p = 0.021), as were respiratory complications (primary graft dysfunction (PGD) (p = 0.006), grade 3 PDG (p = 0.018), neuroblocking agent administration (p = 0.008), prone positioning (p = 0.007)), and KDIGO 3 acute kidney injury (p = 0.036). However, pretransplantation overweight/obese status was not an independent risk factor for 90-day mortality. An overweight or obese donor was associated with a decreased PaO2/FiO2 ratio before organ donation (p < 0.001), without affecting morbidity or mortality after LT.

Conclusion

Pretransplantation overweight/obesity in recipients is strongly associated with respiratory and renal complications during hospitalization in the ICU after LT.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Body mass index (BMI) is the reference tool that defines underweight, normal weight, overweight and obese individuals according to the World Health Organization [1]. In lung transplantation (LT), the 2021 report of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) described that an abnormal pretransplantation BMI was present in 55% of the LT recipients in the 2010–2018 period [2].

The impact of abnormal pretransplantation BMI on outcomes after LT has already been studied. Most of the prior studies described an increased mortality rate in recipients with an abnormal pretransplantation BMI. The last ISHLT report described a significant association between a pretransplantation BMI > 30 kg/m2 and one-year mortality [2], as did an analysis of the UNOS database [3]. These findings confirmed prior monocentric studies [4,5,6,7]. Another large cohort assessing 11,411 LT recipients showed increased 30-day mortality in recipients with an abnormal BMI (underweight or obesity) in comparison with recipients with a normal BMI [8].

However, the threshold above which an abnormal BMI affects mortality has been reported to vary among different studies. This can probably be explained by the limits of the BMI, which does not take into account body composition, sex, age or ethnicity, to diagnose underweight of overweight / obesity. Singer et al. observed a significant effect of increased pretransplantation BMI on mortality only in patients with class II (BMI > 35 kg/m2) or III (BMI > 40 kg/m2) obesity [9]. The underlying mechanisms of this overmortality are not clear, but early postoperative complications are suspected. In overweight or class I obesity patients, increased morbidity (increased duration of surgical procedure, duration of cold ischemia, postoperative atelectasis and impaired cachexia) was observed without a significantly increased mortality rate [9]. Some studies have even shown a reduced postoperative mortality rate in overweight patients [10, 11].

As a consequence, the ISHLT guidelines recommend considering class I obesity (BMI 30–34.9 kg/m2) as a relative contraindication to LT and class II and III obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2) as absolute contraindications [12].

Interestingly, little is known about the effect of donor BMI on early postoperative complications and mortality rates after LT. Ideal acceptability criteria for human lung donors do not include BMI criteria [13, 14], and to our knowledge, no prior study has specifically assessed the impact of a donor’s overweight status and obesity on early postoperative complications after LT.

The main objective of this study was to assess postoperative complications during hospitalization in the ICU after LT according to the donor’s and the recipient’s pretransplantation BMI. The secondary aim was to evaluate the 90-day and one-year mortality rates of LT recipients stratified by their pretransplantation BMI.

Materials and methods

Study population

This observational, monocentric study was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively implemented database. All the recipients who underwent LT at Bichat Claude Bernard Hospital, APHP, Paris, between January 2016 and August 2022 were included in the study. The study was reviewed and approved by the Paris-North-Hospitals Institutional Review Board (Paris Diderot University, AP-HP, IRB No. 00006477) who waived the need for an informed consent because of the observational nature of the study, according to French law.

Data collection

The following data were recorded: characteristics of the recipients (demographic data, indication for LT, comorbidities, pretransplantation BMI, use of ECMO as a bridge to LT), and donor information (age, sex, BMI, duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), PaO2/FiO2 ratio before organ donation, transfusion, and tobacco use). Patient data concerning the characteristics of the LT procedure (the nature of the surgical procedure and duration, peridural anesthesia, hemodynamic status and transfusion during surgery) were also collected. Postoperative complications during hospitalization in the ICU were recorded, including severity scores and lactateaemia at ICU admission; respiratory complications (primary graft dysfunction (PGD) and grade; duration of MV; neuroblocking agent (NBA) administration; prone positioning; tracheostomy for ventilation weaning; hemodynamic and renal complications (ECMO and catecholamine support after surgery and duration; AKI); infectious, surgical and airway complications; and acute rejection. The short-term outcomes of the recipients (duration of hospitalization in the ICU, death on Day 90 and at one year) were also recorded.

Definitions

Comparisons of postoperative complications were performed between 3 groups of recipients (underweight [BMI < 18.5 kg/m2], normal BMI [18.5–24.9] kg/m2] and overweight/obese [BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2]) [1] and 4 groups of donors (underweight [BMI < 18.5 kg/m2], normal weight [BMI [18.5–24.9] kg/m2], overweight [BMI [25–29.9] kg/m2]), and obese [BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2]). Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) was defined and graded according to the ISHLT definition [15]. AKI was defined according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO) definition [16]. Septic shock was defined according to the Sepsis-3 definition [17]. Acute rejection was defined according to the ISHLT nomenclature [18].

Perioperative care of the recipients

Inscription on the waiting list was provided by a multidisciplinary team (pulmonologist, thoracic surgeon, anesthesiologist, intensivist) in accordance with the ISHLT guidelines [12].

The perioperative management of the recipients, during and after surgery, was standardized according to our local protocol [19, 20]. ECMO support strategy is protocolized in our centre. Before surgery, ECMO is implemented as a bridge to LT if severe hypoxemia persists despite high-flow oxygen therapy. Veno-venous ECMO is favoured in the absence of severe arterial pulmonary hypertension (mean pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) > 50 mmHg). During the intraoperative period, if applicable, veno-venous ECMO as a bridge to LT is most often converted into a venoarterial device. Venoarterial ECMO support is also required in cases of severe pulmonary hypertension, preexisting or perioperative right-sided cardiac dysfunction, or when the patient does not tolerate single-lung ventilation (mean PAP > 50 mmHg, SaO2 < 85%, SvO2 < 60%, cardiac output < 1.5 L/min/m2, hypercapnia).

Statistical analysis

Qualitative variables are expressed as absolute numbers and percentages, and quantitative data are expressed as medians and interquartile ranges. To assess early postoperative complications, univariate analysis was performed using the chi-square or Mann–Whitney U test, as appropriate. The 90-day and one-year survival rates stratified by donor and recipient BMIs were studied using Kaplan‒Meier curves and log rank tests. To study the independent risk factors for 90-day mortality, a multivariate analysis was performed. Variables with a p value < 0.2 in univariate analysis were entered into a backward stepwise logistic regression model. When several related variables were associated with 90-day mortality according to univariate analysis, the most clinically relevant variables were included in the multivariate model. Analysis of postoperative complications in the subgroups of COPD and pulmonary fibrosis were also performed. A p < 0.05 was defined as significant. Statistical analysis was performed using R. (R Foundation for Statistical computing, Vienna, Austria, http://www.R-project.org/).

Results

General characteristics of the study population

Overall, 304 patients who underwent LT in Bichat Claude Bernard hospital between January 2016 and August 2022 were included in the analysis of postoperative complications depending on recipients pretransplantation BMI. However, 25 recipients were excluded of analysis of donor’s BMI, as this data was not available. Median BMI in the all cohort was 24[21-27] Kg/m2 for the recipients, and 24[21-27] Kg/m2 for donors. Median weight of recipients was 70[58–80] Kg. 41 (13%) recipients were underweighted, 130 (43%) recipients had a normal pretransplantation BMI, and 133 (44%) recipients were overweighted or obese (36 (12%) obese recipients, including 35 class I obesity (BMI 30–34.9 kg/m2)). The flow chart of the study is presented in Fig. 1A and B. The distribution of recipients pretransplantation BMI and their distribution depending on diagnosis leading to LT are presented in Fig. 2A and B.

Fig.1
figure 1

Flow chart of the study. A Analysis of recipient pretransplantation BMI. B Analysis of donor BMI

Full size image
Fig.2
figure 2

A Distribution of pretransplantation BMI in the recipient population. B Distribution of recipient pretransplantation BMI according to the diagnosis of diagnosis leading to LT

Full size image

General characteristics of the grafts depending on recipient’s pretransplantation BMI

The general characteristics of the grafts depending on recipient’s and donor’s BMI are presented in Table 1. The median PaO2/FiO2 ratio before organ donation was significantly lower in overweighted or obese donors (p < 0.001).

Table 1 Characteristics of the grafts depending on the recipient’s and donor’s BMI, univariate analysis
Full size table

Characteristics of the recipients before and during surgical procedure depending on their recipients and donors BMI

The characteristics of the recipients before and during the surgical procedure depending on recipient’s pretransplantation BMI and donor’s BMI are presented respectively in Tables 2 and 3. The recipient’s comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, high blood pressure, hypercholesterolemia, chronic ischemic heart disease) were more frequent in the overweighted/obese recipients.The need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support during surgery was significantly more frequent in overweighted/obese recipients (80% versus 66% in underweighted or normal weight recipients, p = 0.021).

Table 2 Characteristics of the recipients and intra-operative period depending on recipient’s pretransplantation BMI, univariate analysis
Full size table
Table 3 Characteristics of the recipients and intra-operative period depending on donors BMI, univariate analysis
Full size table

Early postoperative complications of the recipients depending on recipients and donors BMI

The postoperative complications of the recipients during hospitalization in ICU depending on recipient’s and donor’s BMI are presented respectively in Tables 4 and 5.

Table 4 Postoperative complications during hospitalization in the ICU and short-term outcomes of the recipients stratified by preoperative BMI; univariate analysis
Full size table
Table 5 Postoperative complications during hospitalization in the ICU and short-term outcomes of the recipients; donor BMI univariate analysis
Full size table

The occurrence of PGD and grade 3 PGD were significantly more frequent in overweighted/obese recipients (p = 0.006 and p = 0.018 respectively). As a consequence, NBA administration and its duration (p = 0.008 and 0.020 respectively), and prone positioning (p = 0.007) were significantly associated to overweight/obesity. KDIGO 3 AKI was significantly more frequent in overweighted/obese recipients (p = 0.036). No significant difference was observed between the three groups concerning severity scores at ICU admission, haemodynamic status, nor infectious, surgical, airway complications and acute rejection.

Although grafts from overweight/obese donors had significantly lower PaO2/FiO2 ratios before organ donation than grafts from other donors, no difference was observed in early postoperative complications or in the recipients mortality rate.

Short-term outcome according to the pretransplantation BMI of the recipients

The independent risks factors for 90-day mortality in multivariate analysis are presented in Table 6. Pretransplantation overweight/obesity of the recipient was not an independent risk factor for 90-day mortality (p = 0.33). The short-term outcome of LT recipients depending of their pretransplantation BMI is presented in Fig. 3. The probability of 90-day mortality depending of the pretransplantation BMI is presented in Fig. 4.

Table 6 Risk factors for death on Day 90 according to multivariate analysis
Full size table
Fig.3
figure 3

Short-term survival of LT recipients according to preoperative BMI. A 90-day survival B One-year survival

Full size image
Fig.4
figure 4

Probability of 90-day mortality depending on the recipient’s pretransplantation BMI

Full size image

Analysis of the pulmonary fibrosis / emphysema subpopulations

The characteristics of the pulmonary fibrosis and COPD subgroups and their postoperative complications during ICU stay are presented as supplemental data (Table S1, S2, S3, S4).

Discussion

The main objective of this study was to assess the impact of abnormal pretransplantation BMI of recipients and donors on recipient’s outcome after LT, focusing on the early postoperative complications during hospitalization in ICU. In this monocentric cohort of 304 LT recipients, the need for ECMO support during surgery (p = 0.021) and early postoperative respiratory and renal complications (PGD, NBA administration and duration, prone positioning, need for tracheostomy for ventilation weaning, KDIGO 3 AKI) were significantly increased in overweighted or obese recipients. No difference appeared in haemodynamic status, infectious complications, duration of MV or of ICU stay, or 90-days mortality rate (p = 0.65). The grafts from overweighted or obese donors had significantly lower PaO2/FiO2 ratios before organ donation, but no difference was observed in the early postoperative complications or in mortality rate of recipients after LT.

A majority of LT recipients (57%) in our cohort presented an abnormal preoperative BMI, overweight being the most common disorder (32% of the all patients). This result is consistent with prior studies; Singer et al.study described BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 in 50% of the cases [9]. In our cohort, recipient overweight/obesity was more frequent in recipients with pulmonary fibrosis, in agreement with prior literature [21].

The median BMI in our cohort was 24 [20–27] kg/m2, lower than the median BMI described by the last ISHLT report (26.5[19.6–34.6] Kg/m2) [22], whereas cystic fibrosis as indication for LT is poorly represented in our cohort (4(1%) patients), and these patients are frequently underweighted [21]. These findings probably reflect the strict adherence of the recipients to the ISHLT guidelines (class II and III obesity as an absolute contraindication) [12].

Our study showed that increased postoperative morbidity in overweight patients was exclusively linked to respiratory and renal complications. Indeed, no significant difference was observed in hemodynamic status or infectious, surgical or airway complications. Early postoperative complications associated with increased mortality in obese recipients have already been suspected. Two studies found no difference in survival when the analysis excluded recipients who died in the first year after LT, suggesting that overall mortality was linked to early complications [5, 8]. A recent study showed that recipients with a low BMI are at increased risk of death from infection, acute respiratory failure, and chronic lung allograft dysfunction, whereas recipients with a higher BMI are at increased risk of death from PGD, acute respiratory failure, and chronic lung allograft dysfunction [23].

The incidences of PGD and grade 3 PGD in our cohort were 53% and 38%, respectively. An increased risk of PGD in recipients with a preoperative BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 has already been reported in ISHLT reports and described in some prior studies [24]. Lederer et al. showed that obesity is associated with increased risk of PGD occurrence [25], the severity of which is linked to decreased survival [26]. Chronic inflammatory status, linked to excess adipose tissue, could be responsible for the early postoperative plasmatic overexpression of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines (MCP-1, IP-10) associated with PGD occurrence [27]. Several studies have described an association between high plasma leptine levels and PGD occurrence [9, 25], confirming the relationship between obesity and PGD.

In our study, pretransplantation overweight/obesity in the recipient was significantly associated with increased ECMO support during surgery. To our knowledge, this link has never been described in prior studies. This result is consistent with the increased occurrence of early respiratory complications after LT.

Despite the increase in respiratory complications in patients with preoperative overweight/obesity, 90-day and one-year mortality did not differ among the three groups. A prior retrospective study analyzed 5.978 patients and revealed that the mortality rate was 15% greater for underweight recipients, 15% greater for overweight recipients, and 22% greater for obese recipients than for patients with a normal pretransplantation BMI [3]. We can hypothesize that the relatively small size of our cohort can explain these results. Morevoer, a strict selection of recipients with abnormal BMI may also explain this result.

To our knowledge, no prior study has specifically assessed the impact of overweight and obesity in donors on early postoperative complications after LT. Our study showed that grafts from overweight or obese donors had a significantly lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio before organ donation, without any increase in morbidity or mortality after LT. A lower PaO2/FiO2 may be related to atelectasies under MV. Therefore, a lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio before organ donation may be tolerable in obese/overweighted donors without increasing the postoperative risk for the recipient.

In our cohort, the lowest probability of 90-day mortality was observed in patients whose pretransplantation BMI was between 26 and 27 kg/m2. This result must be considered carefully because of the relatively small size of our cohort. However, these findings are in accordance with those of the Fernandez et al. study, which assessed 17,000 patients between 2005 and 2016 and reported a significant reduction in 90-day and one-year mortality after LT in the subgroup of patients with pretransplantation BMIs of 25 kg/m2 and 26 kg/m2 [10] . Another monocentric study of 324 recipients revealed a significant decrease in the mortality rate in the overweight group compared with the normal weight group (p = 0.005), with a 50% reduction in mortality risk [11]. Singer et al. also showed that a lower probability of survival was observed in patients whose BMI was approximately 25 kg/m2 (p = 0.02) [9].

Interestingly, our study did not show any effect of pretransplantation underweight of the recipients on early postoperative complications or short-term mortality. This result contradicts the findings of other studies. Singer et al. observed that underweight was associated with a 35% increased relative risk of death at one year [9]. In this study, which assessed 9073 patients, 900 (10%) were underweight, and 439 (48.8%) were cystic fibrosis patients. This underlying disease was poorly represented in our cohort (4 (1%) recipients).

Our study has several limitations. First, the monocentric design, the relatively small size of the cohort, and the retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort limit the generalizability of the results. The small representation of cystic fibrosis in our cohort resulted in a small representation of underweight patients (6.6%) and limited the ability to detect differences in 90-day mortality and the impact of underweight on postoperative morbidity.

Second, the median BMI in the overweight/obese group was close to normal, and only 36 patients (12% of the cohort) had a BMI > 30 kg/m2. Similarly, the median pretransplant BMI in the underweight group was 17 [16–18] kg/m2, which was relatively close to normal. Only 11 (3.6%) patients had a BMI ≤ 16 kg/m2. We can hypothesize that this could explain why no effect was observed on mortality or duration of MV in patients with an abnormal BMI.

Third, BMI is an imperfect tool for determining underweight or overweight status. Indeed, it does not take into account body composition, sex (adipose tissue being more common in women than in men for the same BMI), age, or ethnicity. BMI cutoff values commonly used to diagnose obesity have high specificity but low sensitivity for identifying adiposity, as they fail to identify half of the people with excess adiposity [28]. In 2020, the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) proposed integrating body composition data such as muscle loss or sarcopenia into the diagnostic process of underweight individuals [29]. Metabolic risk classifications such as the Adult Treatment Panel-III (ATP-III) [30] or the Karelis et al. criteria [31] are more sensitive for characterizing body composition or metabolic risk.

Conclusion

In our monocentric retrospective study assessing early postoperative complications in LT recipients stratified by recipient and donor BMI, pretransplantation overweight or obesity was strongly associated with early respiratory complications and KDIGO 3 AKI occurrence during hospitalization in the ICU, without any difference in 90-day or one-year mortality. Donor’s overweight or obesity was associated with decreased PaO2/FiO2 ratio before organ donation, without any effect on postoperative complications or short-term mortality of the recipients.

Availability of data and materials

Data are available on request to the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

AKI:

Acute kidney injury

BMI:

Body mass index

COPD:

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

ECMO:

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

ICU:

Intensive care unit

ISHLT:

International society for heart and lung transplantation

IPF:

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

KDIGO:

Kidney disease: improving global outcome

LT:

Lung transplantation

MOF:

Multiorgan failure

MV:

Mechanical ventilation

NBA:

Neuroblocking agent

OR:

Odds ratio

PGD:

Primary graft dysfunction

PRC:

Packed red cell

RRT:

Renal replacement therapy

SOFA:

Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment

References

  1. WHO Consultation on Obesity (1999: Geneva S, Organization WH. Obesity : preventing and managing the global epidemic : report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organization; 2000. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42330. Cited 17 Feb 2023.

  2. Chambers DC, Perch M, Zuckermann A, Cherikh WS, Harhay MO, Hayes D, et al. The international thoracic organ transplant registry of the international society for heart and lung transplantation: thirty-eighth adult lung transplantation report—2021; focus on recipient characteristics. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021;40(10):1060–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Lederer DJ, Wilt JS, D’Ovidio F, Bacchetta MD, Shah L, Ravichandran S, et al. Obesity and underweight are associated with an increased risk of death after lung transplantation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180(9):887–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Madill J, Gutierrez C, Grossman J, Allard J, Chan C, Hutcheon M, et al. Nutritional assessment of the lung transplant patient: body mass index as a predictor of 90–day mortality following transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2001;20(3):288–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Culver DA, Mazzone PJ, Khandwala F, Blazey HC, DeCamp MM, Chapman JT. Discordant utility of ideal body weight and body mass index as predictors of mortality in lung transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005;24(2):137–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kanasky WF, Anton SD, Rodrigue JR, Perri MG, Szwed T, Baz MA. Impact of body weight on long-term survival after lung transplantation. Chest. 2002;121(2):401–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. González-Castro A, Llorca J, Suberviola B, Díaz-Regañón G, Ordóñez J, Miñambres E. Influence of nutritional status in lung transplant recipients. Transplant Proc. 2006;38(8):2539–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Allen JG, Arnaoutakis GJ, Weiss ES, Merlo CA, Conte JV, Shah AS. The impact of recipient body mass index on survival after lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010;29(9):1026–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Singer JP, Peterson ER, Snyder ME, Katz PP, Golden JA, D’Ovidio F, et al. Body composition and mortality after adult lung transplantation in the United States. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190(9):1012–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Fernandez R, Safaeinili N, Kurihara C, Odell DD, Jain M, DeCamp MM, et al. Association of body mass index with lung transplantation survival in the United States following implementation of the lung allocation score. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;155(4):1871–1879.e3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chaikriangkrai K, Jhun H, Graviss E, Jyothula S. Overweight-mortality paradox and impact of six-minute walk distance in lung transplantation. Ann Thorac Med. 2015;10(3):169.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Weill D, Benden C, Corris PA, Dark JH, Davis RD, Keshavjee S, et al. A consensus document for the selection of lung transplant candidates: 2014–an update from the pulmonary transplantation council of the international society for heart and lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34(1):1–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Van Raemdonck D, Neyrinck A, Verleden GM, Dupont L, Coosemans W, Decaluwé H, et al. lung donor selection and management. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2009;6(1):28–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Orens JB, Boehler A, de Perrot M, Estenne M, Glanville AR, Keshavjee S, et al. A review of lung transplant donor acceptability criteria. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2003;22(11):1183–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Snell GI, Yusen RD, Weill D, Strueber M, Garrity E, Reed A, et al. Report of the ISHLT working group on primary lung graft dysfunction, part i: definition and grading—a 2016 consensus group statement of the international society for heart and lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017;36(10):1097–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Khwaja A. KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury. Nephron Clin Pract. 2012;120(4):c179–184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Stewart S, Fishbein MC, Snell GI, Berry GJ, Boehler A, Burke MM, et al. Revision of the 1996 working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the diagnosis of lung rejection. J heart lung transplant. 2007;26(12):1229–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Atchade E, Barour S, Tran-Dinh A, Jean-Baptiste S, Tanaka S, Tashk P, et al. Acute kidney injury after lung transplantation: perioperative risk factors and outcome. Transplant Proc. 2020;52(3):967–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Atchade E, Arsène A, Jean-Baptiste S, Tran Dinh A, Tanaka S, Stern J, et al. Donors brain-dead after successful resuscitation of cardiac arrest: Early outcome and postoperative complications of lung recipients. Resuscitation. 2023;184: 109720.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jomphe V, Lands LC, Mailhot G. Nutritional requirements of lung transplant recipients: challenges and considerations. Nutrients. 2018;10(6):790.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Chambers DC, Cherikh WS, Harhay MO, Hayes D, Hsich E, Khush KK, et al. The international thoracic organ transplant registry of the international society for heart and lung transplantation: thirty-sixth adult lung and heart-lung transplantation report-2019; focus theme: donor and recipient size match. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019;38(10):1042–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Anderson MR, Cantu E, Shashaty M, Benvenuto L, Kalman L, Palmer SM, et al. Body mass index and cause-specific mortality after lung transplantation in the United States. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2023;20(6):825–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shah RJ, Diamond JM, Cantu E, Flesch J, Lee JC, Lederer DJ, et al. Objective estimates improve risk stratification for primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2015;15(8):2188–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Lederer DJ, Kawut SM, Wickersham N, Winterbottom C, Bhorade S, Palmer SM, et al. Obesity and primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation: the lung transplant outcomes group obesity study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184(9):1055–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Whitson BA, Prekker ME, Herrington CS, Whelan TPM, Radosevich DM, Hertz MI, et al. Primary graft dysfunction and long-term pulmonary function after lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007;26(10):1004–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hoffman SA, Wang L, Shah CV, Ahya VN, Pochettino A, Olthoff K, et al. Plasma cytokines and chemokines in primary graft dysfunction post-lung transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2009;9(2):389–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Okorodudu DO, Jumean MF, Montori VM, Romero-Corral A, Somers VK, Erwin PJ, et al. Diagnostic performance of body mass index to identify obesity as defined by body adiposity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Obes. 2010;34(5):791–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Keller H, van der Schueren MAE, Consortium GLIM, Jensen GL, Barazzoni R, Compher C, et al. Global leadership initiative on malnutrition glim guidance on validation of the operational criteria for the diagnosis of protein‐energy malnutrition in adults. J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2020;44(6):992–1003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert panel on detection evaluation and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). Third Report of the national cholesterol education program (NCEP) Expert panel on detection Evaluation and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation. 2002;106(25):3143–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Karelis AD, Rabasa-Lhoret R. Inclusion of C-reactive protein in the identification of metabolically healthy but obese (MHO) individuals. Diabetes Metab. 2008;34(2):183–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. DMU PARABOL, APHP, CHU Bichat-Claude Bernard, Département d’anesthésie Reanimation, 46 Rue Henri Huchard, 75018, Paris, France

    E. Atchade, C. De Tymowski, E. Lepitre, N. Zappella, A. Snauwaert, S. Jean-Baptiste, A. Tran-Dinh, B. Lortat-Jacob, S. Tanaka & P. Montravers

  2. UMR 1149, INSERM, Immunorecepteur Et Immunopathologie Rénale, CHU Bichat-Claude Bernard, 46 Rue Henri Huchard, 75018, Paris, France

    C. De Tymowski

  3. INSERM U1148, LVTS, CHU Bichat-Claude Bernard, 46 Rue Henri Huchard, 75018, Paris, France

    A. Tran-Dinh

  4. UMR 1188, Université de La Réunion, INSERM, Diabète Athérothrombose Réunion Océan Indien (DéTROI), Saint-Denis de La Réunion, France

    S. Tanaka

  5. Service de Pneumologie B Et Transplantation Pulmonaire, APHP, CHU Bichat-Claude Bernard, 46 Rue Henri Huchard, 75018, Paris, France

    J. Messika & H. Mal

  6. Université de Paris Cité, UFR Diderot, Paris, France

    J. Messika, H. Mal, P. Mordant, Y. Castier & P. Montravers

  7. Service de Chirurgie Thoracique Et Vasculaire, APHP, CHU Bichat-Claude Bernard, 46 Rue Henri Huchard, 75018, Paris, France

    P. Mordant & Y. Castier

  8. UMR 1152ANR-10LABX17Physiopathologie Et Epidémiologie Des Maladies Respiratoires, INSERM, Paris, France

    P. Montravers

Authors
  1. E. Atchade
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. De Tymowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. E. Lepitre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. N. Zappella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. Snauwaert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. S. Jean-Baptiste
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. A. Tran-Dinh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. B. Lortat-Jacob
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. J. Messika
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. H. Mal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. P. Mordant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Y. Castier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. S. Tanaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. P. Montravers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

EL participated in the research design, in the data collection, and in the writing of the paper. NZ, AS, SJB, ATD, BLJ, JM, HM, PM, and YC participated in the data collection and rewieved the manuscript. HM and YC revised the manuscript. EA and CDT contributed equally to the writing of the manuscript and participated in the research design, data collection, and data analysis. PM participated in the research design, wrote the paper, and revised the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to E. Atchade or C. De Tymowski.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki. The Paris-North-Hospitals Institutional Review Board reviewed and approved the study (IRB00006477). According to French law, due to the observational design of this study, the ethics committee waived the need for an informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interest

EA received congress reimbursement fees from Isis Medical. PM received consultation fees, payments or honoraria for presentations or educational events from Viatris, Menarini, Pfizer, Univero, Mundipharma, and MSD. HM reports grants from sandoz, non-financial support from roche, non-financial support from boeringher, grants from pfizer, non-financial support from chiesi, non-financial support from pulmonx, non-financial support from pneum rx, outside the submitted work; CDT, EL, NZ, AS, SJB, ATD, BLJ, HM, PM, YC, and ST have no conflicts of interest to declare.JM received congress reimbursement fees from Biotest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Atchade, E., De Tymowski, C., Lepitre, E. et al. Impact of recipient and donor pretransplantation body mass index on early postosperative complications after lung transplantation. BMC Pulm Med 24, 161 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-024-02977-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-024-02977-z

Keywords

BMC Pulmonary Medicine

ISSN: 1471-2466

Contact us